![]() |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: England
Posts: 657
|
I don't know much about SSD but I'd say it depends on what your needs are re; portable software.
My preference is to have as few installed programs as I can possibly get away with, so I have a directory on a separate partition to C:\ to run all my portables from. Aside from that I have a smaller collection of portable software that I keep on a flash drive ... stuff which is useful for trouble-shooting and problem solving, rescuing O/Ss and so on. Performance-wise, I can't say I've noticed much difference between running software from USB or from my HDD but I've never had SSD so I don't know how much difference that would make. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,028
|
Quote:
2. Performance-wise, I think the difference between external and internal media would be the amount of time it takes to start a program. I don't even think the difference will be that much noticeable unless you have extremely slow external media. I don't have an SSD either but I think what you are referring to really relates to extreme activity, e.g. defragging. IMHO, running portable apps from your SSD should be considered normal activity. For that matter, I don't see the amount of "wear and tear" being any different from running installed apps from the same SSD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Co-Author, Best Free Security List
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|