Recent Comments Posted

toggle-button

This is a list of the most recently posted comments on the site sorted so that the most recent comments appear first. 

You can however sort the list on Article title by clicking on the column heading. To see actual comments click the + sign.

 

Article titlesort ascending Time posted Poster Comment Link
Be Where You're Not. Fool The Web. 5 years 5 months ago howiem

No joke. https://www.hidemyass.com/ I've used it in the past. It worked OK as a Firefox add-on, but I prefer to use the TOR browser https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en (4.5.1 is latest). TOR is free and now built in to Firefox ESR. It is however kind of slow to load (at least on my notebook). TOR does come with a number of security features including NoScript, HTTPS Everywhere. There is more on TOR at http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-anonymous-surfing-service.htm

view
Be Where You're Not. Fool The Web. 5 years 5 months ago jmaloney

I needed this service just a few minutes after I read the article. I tried to use the service in the US to log onto a site from the UK, but as soon as I selected United Kingdom a link appeared that said "Back to free version" and it wouldn't let me use the service. - Jon

view
Be Where You're Not. Fool The Web. 5 years 5 months ago AJNorth

A while back, I gave a previous version of ChrisPC Free Anonymous Proxy a try and found it useful to be able to listen to geo-restricted BBC and CBC streams from the U.S. -- http://proxy.chris-pc.com/ (as it is ad-supported, be mindful during installation; current version: 6.0, released 2015.04.15).

view
Be Where You're Not. Fool The Web. 5 years 5 months ago greenmanharper

I tried to use the UK link and was promptly bounced back to the free version. Too bad, it looked promising, but I will have to find another service.

view
Be Where You're Not. Fool The Web. 5 years 5 months ago Quetzalcoatl

I am afraid, there is a technical detail, with the "WebRTC" leak, even with a VPN, it is possible to detect your real IP Address. Chrome and Opera are specially vulnerable to this issue and there is no patch or solution in sight, the current addons for Chrome do not work.
Try it here : http://ipleak.net/
Firefox can be fixed with an addon or by editing the internal settings

view
Be Where You're Not. Fool The Web. 5 years 5 months ago mchldpy

Proxies have been less than bulletproof for awhile. Now with the latest SSL3 exploit it has once again come to light that the NSA has been able to break 1024 for awhile (at least since before 2012) and the DH key exchange exploit made 66% of the VPN servers ripe for de-crypting, if not in real time using precompiled computations then at their leisure since they can/do certainly have more than enough capability to store it now and break it later. At least it appears that regular scumbags can break 512, 768 takes an academic skilled team and 1024 takes a Nation (backed) State of jerkwads to break and the NSA has been capable of this for a minimum of 3 to 5 years so who knows where they are at now you can't REALLY count on any connection being secure, especially when the lag time is 3-5 years or more from when they do something and we start hearing about it or by chance discover it. People feel confident about TOR and VPN's. You know 100% for a fact they are capturing every single packet you send, it can't be very long until they figure out how to break every encryption, after all, we're paying them lots of good tax dollars to do it.

view
Be More Efficient and Productive with All the Windows Keyboard Shortcuts You Ever Wanted to Know 5 years 1 month ago Sgluber

I am a big fan and user of keyboard shortcuts since... always!

This list is amazing, surely I will learn more than I already know... many tks, Vic! :-)

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago danielson

Is Brave browser just as good or better than Epic browser (which i had never heard of before reading a comment on Ghacks) at warding off the prying eyes of those who want to know where we surf and what we search for?
Perhaps they're on an equal on that level, but Epic may have the advantage of being more compatible with Chrome extensions.

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago Australia

Thanks for the recommendation - I had never heard of Brave before
The speed of webpage browsing is very good, and so the ad blocking feature seems to work very well
However...
I installed it in early April 2017, and with only 3 tabs open, the memory usage on my Windows 7 machine was at least 600MB
I then opened my portable Firefox browser, opened 3 tabs, and the memory usage for Firefox was 300MB

My major desire is a browser that protects my privacy.
Speed of loading is also important, as long as this doesnt mean a large memory footprint
Blocking ads is great, but again as long as this doesnt mean a large memory footprint

At this point I will give Brave a chance, but the moment I find the memory usage is compromising my other PC work, it will find another browser that respects my privacy
If Brave can have a smaller memory footprint, then I would switch for all the advantages described above

The author of the program apparently was the cofounder of the Mozilla project, and it looks like he wants to disrupt the current internet business model. The underlying premise of Brave, is "removing websites of most of their ads and all tracking, and replaces those ads with its own.
I see an inherent issue in the long term, just what ads will instead be displayed, and is it a matter of time before Brave advertisers want to track you as well. We will see.

Two quick questions:
Why does Brave, without many features or plugins, still have to use up so much memory ??
What other browsers do NOT track your details or browsing habits, and dont have a huge memory footprint - I am interested to know
(I will check TechSupportAlert reviews for the answer !)

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago MidnightCowboy

Take a look at Slimjet. "Fastest web browser that blocks all ads and protects your privacy". It's based on Chromium so Chrome add-ons work. It's also cross platform. I use it on Linux (MX-16 x 64) and the speed is the fastest of anything I've tried. Memory footprint is low too. MC - Site Manager.
http://i.imgur.com/oTfnHE7.jpg
https://www.slimjet.com/

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago Sid in Extremis

Seems like an "interesting" way to make money, block the ads that a site needs to make money and replace them with ads that provide income for the browser.

I have no idea about the legality of such practices but ethically it's at best dubious.

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago eikelein

I am asking myself and the community how this might relate to
https://www.howtogeek.com/108384/6-alternative-browsers-based-on-google-chrome/

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago budchekov

I'll second that, incredibly fast/snappy and memory use is so low, compared to other 'chromish' browsers I use, that initially I couldn't believe it !
There's also a Portable version available at their site..

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago classicggma65

Epic browser was recommended to me by a friend...thinking of downloading that one. Not too sure about Brave browser though. Will wait to see if others say it's really as good as it says. There's also CLIQZ Browser which I have downloaded, comes with Ghostery and an ad blocker. Doesn't allow add-ons, which they say, and I agree, is safer. Based in Germany...at least the techs I emailed are. They explained why no add-ons, but did say if there are any security add-ons we think we need, then email them and if they haven't already checked them out, they will at that point. Going to be checking it out for a few weeks.

view
Be Brave. Try This Great New Browser. 3 years 7 months ago snakyjake

I'm leaning towards Opera or Epic for the VPN. But I assume the VPN is tracking me for advertising purposes, but better than my non-anonymous ISP, with my identity, tracking me.

view
BCMShogi Anonymous (not verified) view
BCMShogi Anonymous (not verified) view
BB FlashBack Express Anonymous (not verified) view
Battery Doctor 1 year 1 month ago ldmpub

Hi,

I can not find this app on Google Play with my phone (either location or manufacturer restrictions which are Europe/France and Samsung Galaxy S7) ;-(.

Only "Clean master" app is available in the store for editor "Cheetah Mobile".

view
Battery Doctor 1 year 1 month ago cray4

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ijinshan.kbatterydoctor_en&hl=en

view
Battery Doctor 1 year 1 month ago Calidore

https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/26/18113415/android-apps-google-play-cheetah-mobile-kika-tech

And FWIW, I've seen more than one write-up claim battery savers in general, as well as RAM savers and etc, are useless on Android.

view
BastiUK's World Clock Anonymous (not verified) view
Barcode Scanner 1 year 7 months ago Bellingham

Barcode Scanner+ is an enhanced version of the popular, free Barcode Scanner application, which is a product of the ZXing open-source barcode scanning library from Google. Barcode Scanner+ is based on the same code, and has been developed by one of the two primary authors of the original Barcode Scanner, Sean Owen.

view
Barcode Scanner Anonymous (not verified) view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago George.J This one is useful especially when you are playing games, and also installing software's. Thanks :) view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago herbc

My question is what net frameworks should i have for a Win 7 64 bit SP1 laptop ? Is there a negative to having all of them , i am not a developer .

I never play games or anything like that . Which ones are required for basic computer internet surfing ?

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago greyman

This is a great utility. I am not missing any .NET Framework, but I am fairly certain that I have more versions, and I mean like 10 or more versions, that I do not need. Anyone know of a program like this, which works to tell us about un-needed .Net frameworks, and help us get them off our machines? That would be sweet.

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago Jorpho

You probably shouldn't install them if you don't need them. Security updates for the various versions are constantly being pushed through Windows Update, and in the past the installation of those updates has sometimes been problematic. (I haven't seen any problems with them in a long time, though, so maybe that era is over.)

If you're constantly installing new applications from all over the place, then you'll probably need them sooner or later, but for "basic computer internet surfing" the frameworks serve no purpose whatsoever. Even those who are playing games are probably using Steam, and Steam is generally pretty good about providing these things whenever they are required.

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago Jorpho

If I'm not mistaken, everything should be listed quite plainly in the "Programs and Features" control panel, so you can uninstall them just as easily as any other program. Keep in mind that they are not backwards-compatible – programs that need version 2 of the the .NET Framework will not work with version 4, and so on.

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago Bob F.

Windows secrets talked about using process explorer to see if net frame is in use and for which program , but this is not for novices as you would have to activate every important program you have one by one to see what needs what . As said before games need net frame and so does some office suites and many security tools and various maintenance apps . If you have this many versions you must be a heavy user games or not and shouldn't remove a version unless you know what you're doing.

Bob F. part time tech Montreal

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago herbc

I thought i needed some of them but i guess not .

Thank you very much Sir.

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago greyman

I agree with what BobF was saying. You never know when some program you wish to run will need .Net Framework #? My machine, and some of its predecessors from which I have upgraded, have been piling them uup for years, like a person who hordes newspapers. I used to build webs, with Microsoft programs and utilities, and .Net is the backbone of those programs, going way back. I am not sure whether MS occasionally removes one when implementing another for the same type of work. probably just as well to leave them. If it works...etc. I just love (mostly Free) utilities that clean unneeded junk off my machines. One of the reasons I originally became addicted to Gizmo's. Windows Secrets.. So much less cool than "BriansBuzz" lol. fairly good forum going there on Windows 10, now. Thanks for the input, everyone. Probably stopped me from doing something really OCD. (( - :

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago herbc

I would love to have a program that did that as well greyman .

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago herbc

Is Microsoft Visual C the same as net framework ? There seems to be a lot of those on my computer.

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 6 months ago greyman

But that it could be so! lol (( - :

view
Banish Those Missing .NET Framework Errors Forever 4 years 5 months ago Mighty

The C Runtime Libraries that you see many programs install perform a similar function to the .Net framework. They are a collection of functions that many C programs routinely use. They are distributed as .DLL files, so that, technically, they could be shared by several programs written in C by different developers.

But, the Microsoft developers didn't think ahead enough when they set this up. They did not change the name of the .DLL from one version to the next. So, when Developer A released their program, they assumed a particular version of the DLL was installed on the user's computer. That was fine. Until six months later, when the user installs Developer B's program, which installs a newer version of the DLL over top of the one being used by Developer A. Ideally, that shouldn't be a problem. But, in real life, it wasn't uncommon for the new version to break Developer A's program. And, maybe Developer B's program won't work with the older version of the DLL.

So, what the developers quickly learned they needed to do was install their own copy of the runtime libraries with their programs. That defeated the purpose of saving space by reusing those libraries. But, as hard drives have grown, that's really not a concern. Several copies of the libraries are trivial in size, by today's standards.

So, I assume the plethora of .Net versions grew out of the experience gained from dealing with the C Runtime Libraries.

In addition to the runtime libraries, C programs might also use one of the .Net frameworks to perform some functions. They are not mutually exclusive. The C Runtime Libraries tend to be lower-level calls, like how to read from a hard disk, get the date from the OS, etc. .Net has those, plus a boatload of more baroque functions.

For example, the C runtime libraries will help the developer read data from an image file. But, it's up to the developer to decode the format and build the image in memory. Whereas .Net has functions that read any of multiple different image file formats and build up the in-memory copy of the file in a single call. .Net can makes some things easier. But, there are special cases where a developer might want to get at the raw data himself. So, neither is "better."

Drake Christensen

view
Backupify: Online Account Backup "Free Forever For A Limited Time" Anonymous (not verified) view
Backup Maker (Personal Edition) Anonymous (not verified) view
Backup Maker 6 months 4 days ago AJNorth

BackUp Maker has been updated on 29 APR 2020 to version 7.5.0.1

view
Backup Maker 3 weeks 1 day ago Tomnov

"Free" for non-commercial usage, yet obtrusive nag popups obscure the screen and whatever you are doing every time a scheduled backup occurs, reminding you that business useage is prohibited and offering to stop the popups by paying their fee for business usage.
That, plus when saving versions of files, the only option is to archive them into an individually named timestamped zip file folder, with the hierarchy of the files saved, also in individualized zip folders, making it very tedious if you have to locate one of the prior file versions.
The wizard interface is also very non-intuitive.

view
Backup & Recovery 2014 Free Anonymous (not verified) view
Background Eraser 3 years 9 months ago papavonschoen

(Commercial content removed as per site rules) Both programs will let you remove backgrounds and use layers. It would be nice to have a desktop program, for Windows, to make this easier. Rarely do I edit my photos on my phone or camera. They get transferred to the computer, edited and placed back on my mobile device.

view
Back Up Your Google Tasks To Your PC With This Free Service 2 years 1 week ago Madisonwill

Some tools are available in the market, you can search through google or I will recommend softaken google app backup tool, this software will help you to convent emails from google apps to PST file format. Go ahead and download the software.

view
Back Up Huge Files In Seconds (But Not the First Time!) Anonymous (not verified) view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 1 year 2 months ago scribbler

Thanks for this..a very handy tool to have. One thing though..it says here up to 5 GB on the free plan, but on their site, it says you only get 3 GB..thought it worth mentioning.

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 1 year 2 months ago rhiannon

I'm glad you like it, I like to keep data locally on more than one media.

Thanks for the heads up, I got the 5 GB somewhere on their site and didn't see the different number right in front of my face. It's been one of those weeks.

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 1 year 2 months ago tarachos

Thanks for this, I've been looking for a tool that does this. And BTW I had no problem with 3 or 5 GB: I downloaded 10 GB of emails with no problems (except the time it took!).

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 1 year 2 months ago rhiannon

You're welcome, and thanks for the heads up on larger data download. :)

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 1 year 2 months ago zachw

Mailstore Home
https://www.mailstore.com/en/products/mailstore-home/

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 1 year 2 months ago rhiannon

Mailstore is a great program, it's been featured on the site - it's quite popular. :)

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 8 months 3 weeks ago docarbe

I've been using the Upsafe Gmail Backup Software on my home PC to backup my Gmail and this worked well until recently. I had problems with this software backing up my gmail account. So I logged off from the Upsafe software and reinstalled. When I restarted the app and selected, "Sign in with Google" and I enter my account details, I get the following message from Google via the Upsafe app - "This browser or app may not be secure. Learn more. Try using a different browser. If you’re already using a supported browser, you can refresh your screen and try again to sign in." Has anyone else experienced this problem and identified a solution? Thanks in advance. Steve

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 8 months 3 weeks ago tarachos

I received a notification from Google yesterday that they would no longer allow Upsafe to access my Gmail.

view
Back Up Gmail to Your PC for Free 8 months 3 weeks ago rhiannon

I would contact Upsafe, I can't find anything definitive right now about the issue. They have chat and a support page on their site.

I'm assuming you've enabled the allow less secure apps setting in your google account.

view
Back Issues of Support Alert Newsletter Anonymous (not verified) view
BabelMap Anonymous (not verified) view
BabelMap Anonymous (not verified) view
B1 Free Archiver Anonymous (not verified) view
B1 Free Archiver Anonymous (not verified) view
B1 Free Archiver Anonymous (not verified) view
B1 Free Archiver Anonymous (not verified) view
azzCardfile Anonymous (not verified) view
azzCardfile Anonymous (not verified) view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago David Roper

Alas, someone made a good program and crapped on it with OpenCandy.

Maybe one day authors will stop all this sneaky stuff and produce good stuff like PCFile and PC Write. If it's good, people will register...eventually.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago EldonW

I have just downloaded the free VSEncryptor from LOKIBIT. The file is 2.24 MB (2.7 MB for Windows 64-bit) and it's clean according to avast! AntiVirus and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware. It can encrypt text and files and supports 21(!) encryption algorithms. It's worth a try.
http://lokibit.com/products.htm#vsencryptor

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago drh2020

I am pretty sure you can do a custom install and omit open candy.

References:

"For those of you who want to remove OpenCandy: Extract the Axcrypt Installer with OpenCandy Offer using 7-Zip. Open the folder and delete $PLUGINSDIR. This should remove the OpenCandy junk from the installer."
- found on: http://sourceforge.net/projects/axcrypt/reviews

Also, check this out:
http://www.axantum.com/axcrypt/freeware.html

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Jojo Yee For those who're interested in getting a full setup with no OpenCandy, open the Windows Command Prompt from the folder containing the setup file and run it with a /nocandy switch, e.g. AxCrypt-1.7.3156.0-Setup.exe /nocandy It works like a charm for me. To open the Windows Command Prompt from the folder containing the setup file, see this tip. view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago WillSee

I followed the link from drh2020 (http://www.axantum.com/axcrypt/freeware.html). The author is very clear about what he is doing and why, he's not trying to sneak anything past the user.

He also provides a clear explanation of how to install the program without the additional "features" (by explaining a command line install, or for those who don't know what that means he explains what to do to decline them)

There's even the option to download an "uncontaminated" version, but that does require a free registration -- with a working email address

I'd say on balance this is acceptable. He is open and clear on how gets some income to make a free program I want to use, and allows me to opt out if I wish.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago SwanKnight (not verified)

You make it sound like OpenCandy is some sort of malware, it is not. It's adware, and last time I checked it's completely optional.

It's not unreasonable for developers to try earn some money by including something like OpenCandy which is as far as I can tell is completely harmless. If you don't like the included application(s), then choose not to install them, it's as simple as that.

I'm really getting tired of people whining about OpenCandy.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago David Roper

It would be interesting to see how successful a website would be if they offered only CANDYWARE programs. Just Sayin' YMMV

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Geert

>> For this reason alone, I can't recommend that you use the standard, installable version of AxCrypt.
Thanks for at least sharing this great working freeware with us!
I hope the fact that a freeware program includes OpenCandy will NEVER be a reason not to even mention it here!
For me, OpenCandy is no issue given it is dead simple to workaround/opt out.
Just use your brains and read the text of the different installation windows carefully when you install ANYTHING.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago crosseyedlemon

The staff at Gizmo's attempts to be thorough when providing product reviews so let's applaud the effort and not complain when they mention items such as Open Candy. I use a program called "Unchecky" http://unchecky.com/ which runs in the background to deal with this type of garbage.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago ChronicChaos

Rob, give this a try....place several files inside a single folder. Now encrypt that folder. All files in that folder should be encrypted. At least it works for me. I also installed the non-OpenCandy version simply by registering for free with a throw-away email address. You actually gave a great write up of AxCrypt compared to TrueCrypt a couple years ago here at Gizmos.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago SwanKnight (not verified)

I'm afraid I've noticed a certain degree of bias against OpenCandy on several occasions from some Gizmo's staff/users, so how can I not complain when they demonize "OpenCandy" and use terms such as "OpenCandy-infected".

Also, the author goes as far was stating that he cannot recommend the installable version just because it comes with OpenCandy? That's not fair in my opinion.

OpenCandy is not malware and I've never faced any problems with it, I always just unchecked it and installed the application normally.

There are far worse adwares out there, some cleverly hidden that the user could miss it and other don't even give you a choice.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Geert

I tend to agree with that...

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago drh2020

I second that.
Rather than call Open Candy "malware", it should be classified as a "PUP", or "Potentially Unwanted Program", as some anti-virus/anti-spyware programs typically will do.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Yankiwi

I have used AxCrypt for some time now and have nothing but good things to report about it. It is excellent software, is dead simple to use, and does what it says it will do. When I had a question about something, I emailed the developer and got a prompt and informative answer.

As to OpenCandy (OC), it is of course appropriate for Gizmo's to note in any review that OC will appear during the installation process and to inform potentially unaware readers as to what OC is and how to avoid installing something they may not want. However, the AxCrypt developer is very open and honest about why he includes OC and provides clear and easy instructions for installing AxCrypt without OC.

By way of comparison, look at how Adobe tries to trick the unaware into installing McAfee Security Scan Plus during Adobe Flash Player updates. Is the Adobe update process "McAfee-infected?"

Instead of calling any program "OpenCandy-infected," it might be better if Gizmo's were to have a standard advisory note which could be inserted into the review of any software which contains OC. That brief note could then refer those readers who are unfamiliar with OC to a Gizmo's reference page which explains OC in more detail and explains how to avoid installing OC software if you don't want it.

I really appreciate all the hard work that Rob and the other Gizmo's reviewers put into researching and presenting free software choices, and I highly value the reviews in Gizmo's, but I have to say that using the term "OpenCandy-infected" for AxCrypt is unfair and unjustly maligns an elegantly simple and useful program which is well-designed, safe to install, and works well. Based on my personal experience, I recommend AxCrypt highly.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Yankiwi

Just FYI, when I hover my mouse over the link for http://unchecky.com, I get a yellow WOT warning. Caveat emptor.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago BEBOP0389

Many of these comments leave me to believe that a lot of people think Open Candy is optional. In my experience it isn't.

I recently installed IMGBurn. I did not select any optional software during the install process, and yet Malwarebytes detected Open Candy on my fresh OS install.

This constitutes an unwanted intrusion IMO. I was lead to believe I was installing IMGBurn and nothing else, and yet that crap was installed too. The sooner the majority labels it as unacceptable, the sooner devs stop including it in their installers.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Geert

>> I did not select any optional software during the install process
Afaik, with OpenCandy, you should UNselect any optional software

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago Jojo Yee Welcome your kind comments Yankiwi. The Gizmo's Freeware Policy on OpenCandy is available from this page Controversial Advertising Program Now Being Embedded in More Software. view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago MidnightCowboy We have also tried to expand on this with some practical advice in this article. MC - Site Manager. http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/what-else-have-you-just-download... view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago sicknero

What happens with an installer that includes Open Candy is that when the installation runs, a dll file is executed, usually "OCSetupHlp.dll" in my experience and it is this that MBAM and some other anti-malwares will detect as a PUP. Also most third-party firewalls will pick it up if configured to make executables ask before connecting to the internet.

The dll file is extracted to, and run from, the system temp directory and connects to the internet to show you the various bundled offers. If you decline all the extras then the dll is deleted after the installer finishes and nothing is left on your system except the program you wanted.

You can read about this in more detail on the OpenCandy website and observe the process for yourself with basic system monitoring freeware and/or a sandbox/virtualised OS.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago crosseyedlemon

That's interesting because both WOT and my Avast Online Security plugin are green and indicate no risk for the Unchecky site. The program has worked well for me with no problems.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago leibnitz

I agree with most commenters here: calling Axcrypt "OpenCandy-infected" is unfair, just like calling Gizmo "Adwords-infected".

With the slight difference that opting out of OpenCandy in AxCrypt (or not installing from the beginning) is so easy that I'm surprised the author of this article was not able to do it, while opting out from Google Retargeting is a bit more complex. Furthermore, I've not seen any "Warning, you'll be tracked by BigG because we earn money on you via AW" when opening this page, so just to apply your line of reasoning you didn't give the option to opt-out, while AxCrypt does. :-)

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago godzonekid

"For me, OpenCandy is no issue given it is dead simple to workaround/opt out."

Yeah, but for how long... THAT is the question. I've had open candy sneak on my machine due to the opt out box being out of view... yeah, that is sneaky.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago mouse53

Any type of adware, Is malware. Developers need to stop including this kind of garbage in their software. It is not needed nor wanted. Gizmos provides a great service and is trying to protect us from the junk. You guys need to stop bashing the staff at Gizmos, they are only trying to help us and many people don't want to go through all the garbage to install something. It should be a straight forward install, not use the Command promp, not opening the file to pick out the adware exe, or anything of that sort. They, ( Devs ) shouldn't be so hungry they resort to adding crap in their programs just to make a buck.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago SkuterB

I'll second that mouse53, with 1 clarification, I do understand that freeware creators need, want or hope to make money on their software and I will help them when I can.

It always seemed simple to me, IF an adware or toolbar developer is truly proud of their software, all they have to do is add a little blurb during the freeware installation telling you it is available and what it does and then have an UNchecked box where I can opt-in if I am interested.
Having a hidden or difficult to find box that is already checked and I HAVE to opt-out to avoid is underhanded no matter how you look at it.
IMHO That includes Adobe w/McAfee.

I also appreciate Gizmos giving me a heads-up when a program is infected with un-necessary and probably unwanted add-ons.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 4 months ago David Roper

I thought Rob down under, and several of us a few months ago starting calling it Crapware. There's Shareware, Freeware, Public Domain, Commercial or Boxware, and Crapware.

There's nothing wrong with a developer offering it as Shareware with a time bomb in it after 90 days from Installing. Jim Button made a good living with PCFile.

Crapware will never succeed anywhere.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 3 months ago hasi64

There is another alternative to Truecrypt. Its called Veracrypt and is based on Truecrypt. Major advantage: It adds enhanced security to the algorithms used for system and partitions encryption making it immune to new developments in brute-force attacks. The container format is not compatible to truecrypt.
Website: http://veracrypt.sourceforge.net/

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 6 years 3 months ago verlando

I've had my own experiences with OC and I think much depends on where you download it from. I've downloaded AxCrypt from sourceforge.net and not had a problem with it wanting to install other crap. I've used it for quite a while and like it very much and my scanners haven't picked up any issues with it (one of which is Malwarebytes as mentioned). That said, I suspect if a person downloaded it from cnet, through yahoo, etc - they'd probably pick up the crap mentioned by others here during the install.

view
AxCrypt. It's Good And Bad News. 4 years 8 months ago flugenblar

WAIT! The solution to the OpenCandy issue is simple. Download the .exe. Open the file with 7-zip. Just extract the .msi file - none of the other files. MSI is Microsoft's built-in package installer technology. Right click on the .msi, chose Install, and you're fine. You will not be prompted for the optional installs like OpenCandy, because they are not in the .msi package. The are embedded in the setup.exe (archive) separately. Upload the .msi to VirusTotal and see for yourself. you do not need to run the setup.exe to install AxCrypt. Just use the .msi.

BTW, AxCrypt is awesome. And you can encrypt many files or even a folder all at once.

view
AxCrypt Anonymous (not verified) view
AxCrypt Anonymous (not verified) view
Awesome Images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s First Five Years Anonymous (not verified) view
Awasu Anonymous (not verified) view
AVS Firewall Anonymous (not verified) view
Avira Free Antivirus Anonymous (not verified) view
Avira Antivir Personal Edition Anonymous (not verified) view
Avira Antivir Personal Edition Anonymous (not verified) view
Avira AntiVir Personal Edition Anonymous (not verified) view

Pages