Gizmo's Freeware Forum

Gizmo's Freeware Forum (https://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/)
-   Internet, Web Apps and Networking (https://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/internet-web-apps-and-networking/)
-   -   Is Firefox Qantum Faster (https://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/internet-web-apps-and-networking/17330-is-firefox-qantum-faster.html)

Melita-s 10. Oct 2018 02:26 PM

Is Firefox Qantum Faster
 
To my surprise, I found Firefox Quantum much slower to load than the Legacy version, on the same computer with Windows 7. Has anyone had the same experience?

Thank you

windyctyprog 10. Oct 2018 04:16 PM

Melita,

My experience has been just the opposite - very fast, much to my surprise, even in Sandboxie.

In fact, I tried Slimjet a few weeks ago to see how a Chrome-derivative browser stacks up, Quantum is still faster. I had never used anything Chrome related before, this was also a surprise.

However, I have had so many other issues with Quantum since V60...

I gave up on anything related to bookmarks, moved every bookmark out of Firefox into a nifty app called Bookmark OS, and into Word files, believe it or not.

The issues with connection are also problematic. It runs in cycles, I never know why. This morning has been a nightmare connecting to even major sites.

I have fewer extensions now. Some of the replacements I tried were badly coded and caused issues.

I find using Waterfox or Pale Moon the occasional times I do to be very slow and difficult; wouldn't consider going back.

I fear that they are going to deprecate functionality over time because the kids don't find things like bookmarks to be useful and the fact that everything seems to be developed for mobile first.

V60.xx - 61.xx were nightmares until i just gave up. I deleted any trace of Firefox and started over with a fresh install of 62, I mean I deleted everything, because I could never solve any of the issues I had.

I just ran Slimjet for about a month until 62 was released. So far, so good. :)

Anupam 10. Oct 2018 04:51 PM

Firefox Quantum is definitely faster for me.

Melita-s 10. Oct 2018 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anupam (Post 124483)
Firefox Quantum is definitely faster for me.

My problem must be something at this end then. I also had the connectivity problem even with major sites. For the moment at least, I will stay with Legacy ESR. Thank you for all the information :)

danielson 11. Oct 2018 03:21 AM

Faster at boot?
-bah.

Faster at page rendering?
-debatable.

Faster at losing users?
-oops!

ESR is probably best.
Do find Firefox to be generally faster on Linux.

danielson 11. Oct 2018 02:04 PM

Once upon a time, there used to be an extension to check add-on memory usage...

For whatever reason, Firefox is using over 1.5G of RAM
while Vivaldi barely .55
Albeit, don't have as many extensions on Vivaldi but, who or what can tell me which ones on Firefox are using up all the resources?

- - - - -

Windows Pro 64bit

Melita-s 11. Oct 2018 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danielson (Post 124489)
Once upon a time, there used to be an extension to check add-on memory usage...

For whatever reason, Firefox is using over 1.5G of RAM
while Vivaldi barely .55
Albeit, don't have as many extensions on Vivaldi but, who or what can tell me which ones on Firefox are using up all the resources?

Windows Pro 64bit

I would also like to know about this please :confused:

EldonW 12. Oct 2018 06:32 AM

You could manually check the RAM usage of add-ons (I know it's not ideal).
https://www.technorms.com/35188/disc...he-most-memory

This extension unfortunately doesn't support Firefox Quantum.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...dl-upandcoming

danielson 12. Oct 2018 02:17 PM

Since my previous post have...
1. tested Slimjet loaded with many extensions (still under .5G of RAM usage);
2. created new Firefox profile with no extensions, no bookmarks, with 5 tabs open and one with a Youtube playing and it floated from initial .450 or so to .580G in the span of two minutes.
So... the proof is there! Firefox with blessed Quantum does not make their "safer" extensions better than before as they promised.

Did however notice a faster Firefox to load and page render.

danielson 13. Oct 2018 06:21 PM

Disabling Adguard has cut RAM usage by about 1/2.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.