Gizmos Freeware Reviews  

Go Back   Gizmo's Freeware Forum > Debating Chamber > Internet, Web Apps and Networking

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03. Aug 2017, 12:25 AM   #11 (permalink)
J_L
Co-Author, Best Free Security List
 
J_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,003
Default

I remember being a Firefox addon junkie... Now on Chrome, and only extension I'd probably be missing if I switch to Firefox 57 is Selection Search.

Firefox equivalent would be Context Search (which I had those many years ago), but there doesn't seem to be any alternative compatible with FF57 (like Babylon).

I know Firefox is trying to modernize its browser, but at what cost (can it afford)?
__________________
http://www.t7j7l.blogspot.com/
J_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03. Aug 2017, 05:26 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bo.elam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,714
Default

I had not really put any attention to this switch by Firefox of going to the WebExtensions model until now. As far as I was concerned, all I cared was knowing NoScript would work in the new Firefox. This thread opened my eyes. I been reading about this thing today and is bad. In my last post I said, we could switch to Palemoon and forget about it.

But that's not a solution either. Switching to a browser like Palemoon wont work because most likely addons are not going to be developed for a browser with an small amount of users. So, addons like NoScript, UBO, ABP, Video downloader, are going to develop for the new Firefox only, and eventually the old versions of the addons that work now will stop working with Palemoon, etc, browsers that don't follow Firefox.

I think I ll try to go along with the new Firefox, and perhaps something becomes available to make bookmarks open as a sidebar with one click. Probably there wont be nothing available for that but thats my wish and hope.

Danielson, I tested Palemoon, your favorite theme don't work with Palemoon.

Bo
bo.elam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03. Aug 2017, 03:08 PM   #13 (permalink)
Editor (Android)
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 223
Default

It's as if they wanted us to stay on older versions of browsers.... *smh*
trainman261 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04. Aug 2017, 02:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
danielson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,039
Default

ImTranslator
is the closest i've found so far as substitute for Babylon.

@bo.elam - Palemoon is good, but like K-Meleon and SeaMonkey, it'll never make the grade.
Too many extensions like the complete theme i enjoy will never come back.
Besides, i look at these browsers a bit like the beta vs vhs episode of our history.

As i've always said before, extensions, their devs and users are what made Firefox better and different than the others.

Vivaldi is interesting at present time as it seems to listen to users and compatibility with Chrome extensions is getting better. But, it still is a Google product.
danielson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04. Aug 2017, 11:46 PM   #15 (permalink)
J_L
Co-Author, Best Free Security List
 
J_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielson View Post
ImTranslator
is the closest i've found so far as substitute for Babylon.

@bo.elam - Palemoon is good, but like K-Meleon and SeaMonkey, it'll never make the grade.
Too many extensions like the complete theme i enjoy will never come back.
Besides, i look at these browsers a bit like the beta vs vhs episode of our history.

As i've always said before, extensions, their devs and users are what made Firefox better and different than the others.

Vivaldi is interesting at present time as it seems to listen to users and compatibility with Chrome extensions is getting better. But, it still is a Google product.
I don't see 57 support for ImTranslator?: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir.../imtranslator/
You mean Translation Comparison?: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...on-comparison/

Although Vivaldi is based on Chromium, it's developed by another company lead by an Opera cofounder. I wouldn't call it a Google product.
__________________
http://www.t7j7l.blogspot.com/
J_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05. Aug 2017, 09:51 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
danielson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,039
Default

ImTranslator is not a legacy and is compatible with multi-process.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir.../imtranslator/
That's why i kind of think it will be in for the long haul.

Vivaldi is built on top of Chromium (Google).
But that's okay.
At least they have a solid base to rely on.
danielson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05. Aug 2017, 10:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
danielson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,039
Default

Although not an extension...
If there's one thing that i've always appreciated in Firefox, a unique feature that distinguishes it from all other browsers (except maybe Palemoon to whom i had highly recommended to keep at the time of their inception) is the option to: "Search for text when you start typing".
Couldn't do without!

Fortunately, "Fire Gestures" extension still works...
Opera 12 beat it here.

Heck, even the modern Edge doesn't have a default "mouse gestures"!
danielson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14. Aug 2017, 09:18 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
danielson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,039
Default

Mozilla should just clear out all the legacy extensions (or set them on an archived page) and leave those that will be compatible with electro so that we don't spend hours looking for a legacy substitute.
danielson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15. Aug 2017, 07:11 AM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
EldonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Port Elizabeth, South Africa
Posts: 261
Default

I recently started using Google Translator for Firefox to translate a webpage from Brazilian to English and was very impressed. Hopefully it will survive.
http://translatorforfirefox.blogspot.co.za/
EldonW is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15. Aug 2017, 06:47 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bo.elam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielson View Post
Mozilla should just clear out all the legacy extensions (or set them on an archived page) and leave those that will be compatible with electro so that we don't spend hours looking for a legacy substitute.
Here is a list of extensions that are compatible with Firefox 57, as of now it has over 3600.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...&tag=firefox57

Bo
bo.elam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.