![]() |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mostly planet Earth
Posts: 323
|
![]()
Hi.
I was just testing my system security here http://www.pcflank.com and got this notification Attention! Your browser is not private. Privacy is 50% While visiting web sites your browser sends information about previous sites you have visited. Recommendation: Install a personal firewall program. If you already have a firewall, adjust it to block this information. I've just reinstalled comodo, but i have no idea how to adjust it as advised. My browser is firefox and had cookies blocked when i tested it. Any help appreciated. grf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,174
|
![]()
I believe this may be related to HTTP referrer headers (sic)
For example, Firefox manual settings to control it are explained here There are also various Firefox addons (e.g RefControl ; No-Referer amongst others) that help manage referers if you feel it's necessary but personally I'm not familiar with their use. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mostly planet Earth
Posts: 323
|
![]()
Thanks Sope, that's exactly what it was. I went here http://cafe.elharo.com/privacy/priva...rs-in-firefox/ and followed the instructions: job done.
You wouldn't happen to know how i stop my firewall leaking would you? Win7, Zone Alarm and Comodo firewalls all test positive for leakage. Unfortunately i seem to have picked the wrong time to change my OS to x64, so am limited in which firewall i can use. MC suggested one that doesn't leak but it does not support x64 OS. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Site Manager
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 15,367
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Buy a Hoover and prove technology sucks. Last edited by MidnightCowboy; 11. Mar 2010 at 12:42 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,174
|
![]()
I've also had some confusing and conflicting results in the past with pcflank and grc. Detailed in this thread. Your situation may be similar to mine?
That was with my XP machine running Comodo. I get similar results with my new Win7 x64 system using the built-in firewall. Last edited by Sope; 11. Mar 2010 at 01:00 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mostly planet Earth
Posts: 323
|
![]() Quote:
![]() thanks Sope, MC. ![]() Last edited by grf; 11. Mar 2010 at 03:22 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Not Vegas
Posts: 111
|
![]()
What is intriguing is the concern over the http referrer info leakage from the browser. I am not naive about the "dangers" posed by tipping your hand about your environment to a potential hacking site, but how much time do you think you save by hiding your info? seconds maybe...not much more than that. Let's face it, you can announce your browser and OS stats and a bad site will infect your computer in a second or two, or you can mask the info and it will take an extra second or two. Your reactions times are slower than the probe times.
Some of my ambivalence to browser tracking does stem from the fact that I manage the analytics on dozens of websites for customers. I use the data to enhance the user experience on those sites. For example, I know that over 80% of our visitors use screen resolutions larger than 1024x768, so I design wider pages. I know that two years ago over 90% of my visitors were using IE and now only 62% of my visitors are using IE. I now code to standards that work best for Firefox. I have even stopped using CSS hacks to force IE6 to work. Why? Because only 2.1% (and dropping) of my visitors are using IE6, so why spend the time making it work. On the other hand, 3.3% (and rising) are visiting my sites with iPhones, so time to mobify some of those sites. I can go on and on with examples of how this information is used in a POSITIVE way. I just felt that I had to point out the other side of the http referrer argument so that it does not become an all out slug fest to shut down a portion of your browsers operating behavior. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mostly planet Earth
Posts: 323
|
![]()
On the pc flank home page you can select which test to run from the "Test your system" menu: Pc flank leaktest (new) is the one. I tested four firewalls all with the same result and have decided the best thing to do is to stop using services that fuel my paranoia. I don't know enough about this stuff to know what kind of risk this "leakage" poses, if any at all. Since i can't do anything about it, i'm just going to not worry about it anymore.
Thanks all. grf ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,174
|
![]()
I agree with you. It's very easy to get paranoid and obsessed aiming to completely lock down your PC and loading it with the numerous security measures that are available. In the process you forget to actually enjoy your PC and use it for the purposes you originally intended
![]() In reality, for the majority of us, it's more than enough to use a limited number of reliable security products (carefully chosen) and apply a dose of common sense when it comes to surfing and what we download. ......and always keep an up-to-date backup image in a safe place ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|