Best Free Antivirus Software

Read this article in Spanish

Read this article in Chinese

Introduction

To begin with let me say this: there is no best antivirus out there. Why do I say this? Any product that you take will behave differently against various virus samples since the AV engines and other components incorporated in them are of different technologies.

While one product might have higher detection ratio, another might have better malicious URL blocking or virtualization techniques, yet another might have lesser impact on system performance and so on.

Read more about Antivirus Engine and other related details at the end of this article.

Rated Products

Kaspersky Free Antivirus/ Kaspersky Security Cloud

The paid security giant forays into free category and outsmarts its rivals

Our Rating:

Gizmo's Freeware editor award for the best product in its class!

License: Free (Limited features)

Similar signatures & cloud features as its paid counterparts
Performance impact is decent on higher end systems
Strong behavioral blocker
Attractive GUI with no ads
Top-notch detection and always up-to-date
Thorough malware removal and disinfection process
Privacy policy (complies with GDPR)
Default settings cover most users
Bundles with Kaspersky VPN (can be uninstalled)
Fairly good web protection
Powerful exclusion settings (even for specific modules)
Extensive scan logs

Protection settings are locked with presets in Kaspersky Free Antivirus (KFA) [is available in Kaspersky Security Cloud]
Long but thorough system scans
Performance hit becomes worse on lower end systems
Slow update installation

Read full review...

Avast Free Antivirus

The only antivirus with a fully customizable installer and selection of user preference components.

Our Rating:

License: Free (Limited features)

Extremely light on the system with a modern and clean UI
The only antivirus with a fully customizable installer, selection of user preference components
Works best in hardened or lock-down mode, which blocks all unknown programs (medium-expert users only)
Top notch detection capability, many secondary components to offer variety to a wholesome software
Excellent malicious URL blocking, network protection, outdated software checking, integrated password manager, and comes with a rescue disk.
Deep screen technology that includes Sandbox and Safe machine components for protection

Bloated default setup, some ads and pop'ups
Account creation for further protection after a month
Lack of an anti-ransomware module, and Deepscreen disabled by default
Cloud reputation, Malware signatures and HIPS module needs improvement
Offers Google Chrome and various bloated secondary components during install [Choose custom install]

Read full review...

Comodo Internet Security Premium

Provides a multi-layered protection scheme with HIPS, sandbox, antivirus and firewall.

Our Rating:

License: Free (Limited features)

Feature-rich with lots of options for customization along with setting tolerance against prompts
Tweaked settings gives the best 0-day protection among the pack
Multi-layered protection scheme with HIPS, Sandbox, Antivirus and Firewall
Industry grade firewall with options for learning and behavioural blocker
Low on resources with various graphical skins available and a clean user interface

Painful for beginners to use it, not very newbie friendly
Av-module is a bit weak especially the signature based detection
Auto-sandboxing happens for various legitimate files, troubles with FPS games
Too many tweaks needed for better protection
Buggy software and updates are released slow.
Chromodo browser, Yahoo search engine, custom DNS and Geek Buddy offered during default install. [Click customize installation during install]

Read full review...

Qihoo 360 Total Security

This free antivirus is better than most commercial ones.

Our Rating:

License: Free

Totally free, light on resources, extremely fast scan times and pre-configuration protection modes
Smooth running installer with no adware, pleasing UI and comes with many themes
Fast updates/fixes and excellent customer service with immediate replies
Great signatures with multiple engines and in-house cloud protection
Web protection addon, browsing locking, webcam, sandbox and usb protection modules
Online shopping protection, malicious URL protection and network threat blocking
Includes Glasswire Firewall and Windows patch-up components
Great detection rates, with very high zero day protection

Speedup and clean-up tools might not be for everyone (not present in Essentials version)
Bitdefender or Avira engines not enabled by default
Might encounter few false positives
PUP [Potentially Unwanted Programs] detection needs to improve

Read full review...

Avira Free Antivirus

A free antivirus with high quality signatures, very fast updates and less false positives.

Our Rating:

License: Free (Private/Educational use)

Pretty light on the system and runs smooth without system slow-downs
Clean ad-free GUI, Ad-free installer, No pop-ups or ads
High quality signatures, very fast updates, excellent detection on non-zero day threats
Deep file scans with very less false positives
Avira Protection Cloud makes for an excellent cloud engine
Browser safety Add-ons available for major browsers

Zero day protection (heuristic & behavioural shield) is very weak.
Ineffective Browser launcher which is a memory hog (can be uninstalled)
Painful removal for detected files. Repeated scans from Luke Filewalker increases CPU & RAM usage.
Multiple file exceptions needs to be added (real-time and on-demand)
No firewall/sandboxing/web shield technologies

Read full review...

Panda Free Antivirus

Gives you antivirus protection with low memory and CPU usage, and collective intelligence cloud security.

Our Rating:

License: Free (Private/Educational use)

Low memory & CPU usage thanks to cloud protection
Tiled UI with customizable interface and nicely rendered Settings interface
Collective intelligence cloud security - Downloading virus definitions is history
Good detection rates and behavioural analysis program
Fairly good web protection and hardware resource handling

Dependant on internet connection leading to weaker offline protection
Slow scanning speed, no fingerprinting (successive re-testing same files) and at times issues with virus removal
Not really light, performance impact in web browsing, installation and copying
Certain false positives despite the information available at cloud
Watch out for Panda security toolbar during install

Read full review...

Honorable Mention

AVG Free Antivirus
Baidu Antivirus
Bitdefender Antivirus Free
Clearsight Antivirus
Fortinet FortiClient (Most Improved products of 2018)
Nano Antivirus
Roboscan Internet Security Free
Sophos Home Antivirus
Tencent PC Manager (Most Improved products of 2018)
Windows Defender on Windows 10 (Most Improved products of 2018)
ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus + Firewall

Antivirus Engine

It is used for Real Time malware protection of files and is the core component to scan data on your PC for detecting and removing malware from hard disk, memory, boot sectors, network drives, removable disks, or from external network traffic (internet).

How does an antivirus detect malware:

Firstly you got the signature-based detection which contains an offline database of known patterns of malware downloaded from the internet which can identify specific malware codes or family of malware. Then you have heuristic based detection that identifies pieces of code that are unlikely to be found in legitimate programs and hence is prone to false positives depending on the sensitivity of heuristics. Virtualization and sandboxing unpacks or executes unknown programs in an isolated secure environment so that their behaviour can be analysed and scanned using the antivirus engine. The latest one is cloud based detection that requires a reliable internet connection and sends the suspicious scanned file over the internet and the analysis is done by the vendors' machine running the cloud engine.

Scanning for viruses:

Most antiviruses include these basic scan types: On-demand scan/manual scan is initiated by the user from right click context menu or from within the software. On-access scan is initiated when the resource is being accessed like running an executable, copying files from external drives etc. Scheduled scan periodically ensures that the system is free from malware by setting the time and frequency for scanning. Startup scan/quick scan checks most important locations like running processes, startup items, system memory and services, boot sectors and so on.

To be Continued in the next update....... Firewall, Proactive protection, Web protection components and more.

Editor

This software category is maintained by volunteer editor George.J. Registered members can contact the editor with any comments or questions they might have by clicking here.

Back to the top of the article.

Please rate this article:

Comments

well the avast 2014 is not that powerful in my experienced than the avast 2013 in terms of detection rates specially on worms! i have recently installed newly and updated version of avast 2014 on 3 different pc's however, the 2014 edition does not detect worms and their behavior on the computer. So why would I trust this antivirus program? worms are sometimes a kind of destruction to your files specially in flash-drives for it has a auto delete and auto hide components. fortunately I have been using Microsoft Security essentials for detecting almost all kinds of worms.

Every AV will have good days and bad days in terms of detection. However, I can tell you that nearly every test will put Avast far above MSE in terms of both detection and protection. That said, it is possible that Avast's detection of certain types of malware is not as good as that for others. Please let me know how you tested it against worms. How many samples did you use, and what was your methodology? Thanks.

I have been testing a few antivirus above and having a slow laptop (C2D 2.0ghz, 4gb RAM), I really care about the performance. And here is my take on each antivirus.

Since Avira implemented the cloud service, I have noticed some slowness (boot time and overall response time) compared to previous experience. Uninstall, and reinstall with cloud service ticked off seems to make it more responsive however it is not as fast as before.

For Avast, there is not much performance degradation on the new program update, everything seems working fine.

For BitDefender, it is very slow, and I still wonder why would people rate the performance as "high". My boot time increase for about 20 seconds compared to no antivirus installed after switching to Bitdefender. Try to give it a whirl, but the responsiveness is worse than Avira (high i/o activity).

AVG as usual, still slow however the recent version seems quite improve than before. Much better than Bitdefender but slower compared to Avira.

Machine with Panda Cloud seems to have the fastest overall response, with boot time only increase for about 3 seconds compared to no antivirus installed. However, my laptop is not 24/7 connected to internet, thus I have trust issues during offline operation.

Currently, in terms of overall performance and boot time impact would be:
Panda > Avast > Avira > AVG > Bitdefender

I have not tested latest COMODO due to time restriction (the last time I evaluate COMODO antivirus is in 2012), can somebody shed some light?

How much is the RAM usage and the boot time increment compared to other AV listed above?

Each AV will run somewhat different on different computers. Thus, I would advise checking Comodo Antivirus yourself and seeing how it fares. However, in general, I was planning on trying to locate somewhat reliable performance statistics for the AV software listed in this review for one of the upcoming updates. Once I have done that I will be able to supply more detailed information. Thanks.

Just my 2p-worth of experience with Bitdefender Free AV. After I installed it I could no longer print to my networked printer. The documents just sat in the queue and never printed. Uninstalled BD and all was well. I even tried reinstalling the printer after BD, but it still didn't work.
Decided to put Avira on instead and have had no problems.
I did a quick web search for problems, which only threw up issues with the full Internet Security Suite and its Firewall - which, of course, isn't part of the free AV prog. I guess I could have dug around some more, but life's too short.

That is a strange issue. I suppose the best approach, assuming you would like to try Bitdefender again, would be to ask that question in their forums. However, if you're happy with Avira then I suppose there is likely no need. If you have any questions about any of the other AV's listed in this review let me know. Thanks.

After trying comodo antivirus for only two days, i had no choice to uninstall it before my PC had had a heart attack. While running a full scan Comodo Antivirus brought my machine to a halt, the Quad core CPU was 100% most of the time. There is no doubt the spec of the software is pretty impressive for a free product, but be aware it may take over your machine while it takes an eternity to scan your drives . I have reinstalled AVAST which i have been using for years combined with comodo firewall. The CPU hardly moves during a FULL Scan allowing you to go about your business.

From my experience this is likely due to some sort of interference, or a problem which somehow occurred during installation. Please try reinstalling it by following the advice I give in this post: http://forums.comodo.com/install-setup-configuration-help-cis/most-effec... and let me know if that solves this problem. If it doesn't let me know. Thank you.

I run Comodo CIS on two fairly low-end machines (single-core 2 and 2.3 CPUs) and I've not found this problem myself for several versions now. Running a scan typically fluctuates between 10 and 40% rising sometimes to about 90. Later versions have the option to run scans as a background task as well. I've not found it to be noticeably slow compared to other scanners.

A few months ago I tried Comodo on my XP machine, and found I had to turn off the internet connection before I could boot it. Otherwise Comodo took over the machine, and just sat there doing who knows what (my guess: a download of the whole malware signature database, followed by a full-scale scan) that monopolized my computer and did not respond to any interrupts for hours on end. Fortunately that computer has a mechanical wireless on/off switch on the front so I was able to break in and try and tweak the thing into proper behaviour, but the mitigation was slight; I eventually wiped it in disgust. My experience with avast was nearly equally bad, just enough less offensive that, faut de mieux, I elected to tolerate it for now given the oncoming demise of MSE for XP.

Obviously, I need the best fortifications available constructed around my XP facilities. Equally obviously in the past few months there have been major changes in all the anti-virus offerings and how they work. Maybe things have improved.

Clarification is needed, too. I got an "update" notification from Comodo offering added features. But a close reading suggested (the weasel=wording and misdirection is shameful) that they were trying to sell me an upgrade, likely at exorbitant subscription expense. I could be wrong - but why are they playing this game in the first place?

I just want an antivirus that works, and don't mind running a selection of separate anti-malware programs should these be necessary. I know the internet is a dangerous place and will defend as best I can. But programs that take over and run away with my computer, or try con games with me, are not things I'm eager to take on - even with your recommendation.

Which version was this? I know that for V6 and V7 it only requires an initial update and then a quick scan. V5 used to require a full scan. Also, if the initial download takes a long time you can always manually update the definitions (directions are here) https://forums.comodo.com/antivirus-faq-cis/where-can-i-download-the-lat... If you are having other problems, which it sounds like you were, I would advise reinstalling by following the advice I give in this topic: http://forums.comodo.com/install-setup-configuration-help-cis/most-effec... If you wish, you can try it again. If you run into any new problems, or have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I can assist you with this. Thank you.

The only pain with Comodo Antivirus is with manual updation of definition files. After downloading the bases.cav file, ther's no easy way to update the definitions. Although I tried moving the file to /Comodo/Scanners, the program failed to detect the definitions file, and upon checking for updates again, it started downloading the whole 170MB file. Previously using Avast, everything was quite easy. Anyway I'm still happy with Comodo IS. :D

Instructions on how to manually update Comodo Antivirus can be found here: https://forums.comodo.com/antivirus-faq-cis/where-can-i-download-the-lat... Let me know if it works correctly for you. Thanks.

Thanks a lot :D But who keeps import function inside "About" :{

Now that you mention it, that is a strange place. However, now that you found it is everything up and running correctly?

Hi Chiron,

I think there's a typo in your last sentence about the top pick:
... I do with they made the process simpler.
I suppose you mean: I do wish...

Thanks for pointing that out. If you see any more errors please be sure to let me know. Thanks again.

Now corrected. Thanks Geert for pointing it out. Demonstrates admirably one of the failings of built-in spell check. MC - Site Manager

@Chiron @MC
You're welcome.
Thanks for the work you put into this site.

Chiron,

Why do you say "the level of protection provided is not identical with the paid" in BD Free review?

Perhaps I am wrong. Did you see somewhere where it said that the protection was identical? If so please provide a link so I can check it out. Thanks.

From the BD Free Manual:

What is Bitdefender Antivirus Free Edition?
Bitdefender Antivirus Free Edition is an antivirus program designed to be fast and
to minimize user interaction, while sacrificing nothing of the malware detection and
removal capabilities that Bitdefender products are generally known for.

Also a BD staff confirmed in Wilders forum. His name is Iulika0069.
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=338408
He confirmed BD free provides same protection as paid. The thread is huge, its hard to find the post. There are many post by him & you will get all the info about BD free.

I'll try to search through that later. It really is a huge thread. However, here is an excertp from the main Bitdefender Antivirus Free Edition page here: They say that "Bitdefender Antivirus Free Edition shares some of the revolutionary technologies that allowed our main product line to outpass major competitors such as AVG, Avast or Avira." http://www.bitdefender.com/solutions/free.html I'm not sure exactly which technologies the Free version does not have, but seeing as they specifically state that technologies have been removed from the Free version, I assume that the Free version also would not protect the system quite as well as the paid version. However, when I have the time I will look through that thread and try to see if perhaps I am wrong. If you run across a relevant post before I do please direct me to it. Thanks.

The link you gave mentions all the features BD free has.
Realtime
Active Virus Control
Intrusion Detection System
B-Have
HTTP Scanning
Anti-Rootkit
Early Boot Scanning
Autoscan

The Wilders thread I mentioned, if you go through the thread, you will see BD staff confirmed on the above features too.

I think the missing stuffs in BD free compare to paid are the additional stuffs like, safepay, wallet, rescue disc, parental control, etc...

I will try to find few important info posted by BD staff on the wilders thread & let you know.

I did notice that. What I'm not sure about are the further details. These are things such as, are signatures available just as quick to both, is the site-blocking feature updated just as frequently, is the heuristics used just as effective, is the cloud backend just as effective, etc... Marketing often just lists that both have the same features. The issue often lies with how effective those features are for both. Does anyone know about my above worries? Thanks.

If you are not sure of the details then I think you shouldn't mention "protection level is not identical with paid".

Get the details & put it in the review. The wilders thread link I mentioned in one of my previous post, you will get all the info about BD free by BD staff i.e Iulika0069.

Protection level is not just about the percentage of samples that an antivirus can identify, other features are added to a paid antivirus solution to keep you safer. Although a home user doesn't need all those "extra's", except for large business where data security is of utmost concern.

Thanks for pointing out the confusing wording. I have now updated it to read that "the level of protection provided has not been shown identical with the paid version, which is why I did not use the results for the paid version in my analysis". If anyone can show that the level of protection is absolutely identical then I can use the results for the paid version. This can be done for Comodo Antivirus. However, until someone can show me that the free version of Bitdefender offers exactly the same level of protection, not just the same components, I cannot use those results. I hope that makes sense. Thanks.

What I am trying to say is........

For example - AVG free autoupdate is not often like paid. This too can affect the protection. No Webshield/Online shield in free like paid.

For example - VB RAP test - You can see there is difference in protection by Avira free & paid. Avira free doesn't provide Webshield like paid. Avira Browser Security in free is not like Webshield in paid, there is no HTTP scanning in free like paid. Avira too doesn't autoupdate often like paid.

I know there are tests available for these AVs & that can be put in the review. But the same thing can be said about these free AVs i.e protection not identical with paid. You didn't mention this for these AVs but you mention this for BD free, that kind of looks unfair to BD free.

About BD free - I am little busy, when I will be little free, I will try to scan Wilders links & provide you the facts/confirmation about BD features/protection by BD staff. If you have time, you too try to do so.

I have tested & compared BD free with paid & other free AVs too & I find it an excellent free AV especially for average users. I find it better than all the free AVs mentioned here in terms of protection & everything for average users, not including CIS as CIS is way better than all the AVs mentioned here & recommended for advanced-intermediate users. I know my tests doesn't count, just sharing my test experience.

The reason I did not mention that the protection offered was not the same for many of the other Free AV's is because the Free versions were tested by the testing organizations I used for this analysis. Thus, there was no need to compare the Free to the paid versions. I could just look at how the free versions compared. However, I cannot do this for BitDefender because the Free version has not been tested by those tests. The only reason I mentioned it is because if I didn't many users may mistakenly think I could use the results for the Paid version. Thus, this is just an explanation to prevent confusion about why this particular methodology was chosen. Also, I have no problems with Bitdefender Free. It does seem like a very good product. If I didn't think it was I would have removed it from the review altogether. It's just that I'm trying to keep this review more factual. Thus, as I have no definitive data on how it compares to the others (using the real-world tests I referenced) I cannot recommend it over them. I'm sorry if my wording suggested otherwise. Thank you.

Gizmo's Freeware

Main menu

Best Free Antivirus Software

Introduction

Rated Products