![]() |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Mexico US
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
2. I've never downloaded any software from them. I've always plugged in the DNS numbers in the proper boxes. 3. I don't use OpenDNS myself - for whatever reason it considerably slows down the connection speed and has for some years. Same result whether I configure the router or use network settings. I started using the Comodo DNS, previous to that I was using DNS Advantage. They are both owned by the same company, and having tried both, there doesn't seem to be a difference in speed. I use a DNS service because my ISP is usually slower and sometimes downright sluggish on the satellite internet we use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 45
|
Those with routers using better firmware like Tomato might want to cache dns names. Default in Tomato is only 150, Ive set mine to 4000. I transmit from Europe where they only have 2 servers, but never suffered from speed problems. I know some who have. Lookups can be 3-4 times slower than to ISP, but thanks to cache that is a minor issue.
Another advantage of Tomato is DNS server can be forced. If set up right there is no way ISP will be used no matter set up in OS. If Opendns is used as parental control this matters. Firefox and Chrome also cache dns names, now also pre-cache them. Enter a page and they will look-ahead. Why did they bother? as someone said about speed it "adds up" ![]() You only need ip-software if you use account at Opendns, they need to know where you are. May be possible to do in router. They have a DNS-O-Matic https://www.dnsomatic.com/service for this btw. Neat if you use more services requiring ip. Click documentation to see software/hardware support. Why? Had to try it and like control panel. If I had kids or uncontrollable grown ups using my computer I would probably take more advantage of blocking. And I do not agree with my ISP about blocking Piratebay.org Problem with Opendns is they might be good with blocking porn but they are useless when it comes to malware. Hardly anything is done. Has been talked about for a long long time. Browsers are doing it, some Anti-whatever are trying and WOT is superb, but Opendns can be made systemwide protection with router magic - big difference. Seems like a wasted opportunity to me. They should just dump the not working social angle, get some dedicated domain hunters aboard. Soon 1000s of sites would be blocked - such sites are not up for debate. Must be blocked so no risk of complaints. Instead they try to find "reputable" sources and safe way for community to test. Test what? Will never happen and there must be other reasons - still, very cool service. Last edited by js960; 06. Sep 2009 at 10:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Foundation Editor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 535
|
I have an odd question--
Does anyone know if OpenDNS would impact or forbid me from downloading a large 2 GB game file? I have tried with 3 different browsers on multiple websites to download a new demo game file/program. None of the browsers or websites worked. Can this have something to do with OpenDNS? I have OpenDNS setup only on my PC, not via my DSL router. My son was able to download the file just fine.
__________________
Rocky Mountain High |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Chief Editor
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brazil since 2006
Posts: 2,305
|
It's possible, but difficult to estimate without knowing how you have your OpenDNS filters set up via dashboard. You could try disabling the OpenDNS service temporarily or switching to Comodo 156.154.70.22, 156.154.71.22 to see if this works.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The north Coast
Posts: 267
|
I might have missed this question. But has anyone had trouble port forwarding utorrent with open dns. I cant seem to make it happen.
using a 2 wire dsl modem and a cisco linksys router along with online armor firewall. I tried to port forward with my modem and my router. and added my static ip to online armor. No Joy any suggestions? Cheers Wdhpr |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 127
|
What I do is ping all the different dns servers and use the ones with the best ping. For me this is Open DNS. Also to take into consideration is your location. Some dns will be better for some areas than others.
__________________
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...r-scrubber.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
These are all level 3 dns, they have been around for a long time and use anycast which makes for a very resilient dns which is distributed evenly across the network. 4.2.2.1 4.2.2.2 4.2.2.3 4.2.2.4 4.2.2.5 4.2.2.6 If you use mobile broadband this is the way to go. Open DNS which is much safer than other dns and also faster for some people. The only thing with this is that even thought it does use anycast servers are not located near some areas so you would not benifit on using open dns for speed if you stay far from there server. 208.67.220.220 208.67.222.222 Secure DNS (Comodo) basiclly the same as Open DNS. I get a slightly better ping with this so this is what I use. 156.154.70.22 156.154.71.22 My ISP DNS which gets around a 60ms ping average so not as good as Open DNS or secure DNS 62.24.128.191 62.24.128.190 These are dns servers in different areas. OpenNIC AU 58.6.115.42 AU 58.6.115.43 AU 119.31.230.42 BR 200.252.98.162 DE 217.79.186.148 FR 82.229.244.191 US 216.87.84.211 Here are some other DNS servers 66.93.87.2 216.231.41.2 216.254.95.2 64.81.45.2 64.81.111.2 64.81.127.2 64.81.79.2 64.81.159.2 66.92.64.2 66.92.224.2 66.92.159.2 64.81.79.2 64.81.159.2 64.81.127.2 64.81.45.2 216.27.175.2 66.92.159.2 66.93.87.2 Sprintlink General DNS 204.117.214.10 199.2.252.10 204.97.212.10 Cisco 128.107.241.185 192.135.250.69 There are loads online to chose from. What I do is I ping them using the comand promt like this C:\Documents and Settings\PC>ping 208.67.220.220 Pinging 208.67.220.220 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 208.67.220.220: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=53 Reply from 208.67.220.220: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=53 Reply from 208.67.220.220: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=53 Reply from 208.67.220.220: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 208.67.220.220: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 32ms And you get your average ping. I do the ping test 2 times so that the server address is in my cache. there are a few programs out there that claim to do this for you but beware some are malware. Do a google search for public dns servers list and you will find loads more. I only recommend Open DNS and Secure DNS for safety and have heard that Secure DNS is the best but it all depends how close you are to the serer for quicker responses. This is my take on the whole dns situation anyway. If you really want super fast dns then you may want to look into running your own caching server which has benefits but like all thins it has downsides as well. Anything else you want to know I would be happy to share. Thanks.
__________________
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...r-scrubber.htm Last edited by Brendan Bryson; Yesterday at 04:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|