![]() |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India
Posts: 9,484
|
Yes, money might be a problem required for funding of the project. Other than that, what they are trying to achieve is quite a difficult task, because Windows is not open source, and whatever they have for working on, is from some of the documentation, or other parts, that are available to public.
I won't say that they are trying to revive a dead system, and they are not trying to build an XP clone, but their idea is to build an open source, and free Windows system. They still have a long way to go.
__________________
Anupam |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Site Manager
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
|
My take on this is that they've had to reverse engineer a lot of the stuff with little documentary assistance which is some commitment and quite an achievement.
As with everything, stability will be the key, but I hope they succeed.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India
Posts: 9,484
|
Yes, that is indeed quite an achievement. I would also say courageous, because with all these factors, it seems quite an ambitious project, and I too hope that they succeed.
Apart from stability, another factor would be usability. It would be interesting to see how would MS react once ReactOS becomes usable, because if a usable ReactOS is available, who would go for Windows?
__________________
Anupam |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Yep, its amazing how 7 is regarded as a fine operating system because most things work properly, i'm stumped when people say, "why should i upgrade?" Well if eye candy is not your thing, (which for me it isn't) err,, then il be fooked if i know.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|