Gizmos Freeware Reviews  

Go Back   Gizmo's Freeware Forum > Freeware Forum > Software Suggestions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06. Jul 2011, 09:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Foundation Editor/Forum Manager Intern
 
kendall.a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,814
Default Very Promising Desktop Search Tool

I am currently reviewing a new desktop search tool. It's called Miner Mole and can be found at http://www.miner-mole.com. So far, I've been very impressed.

You can see my initial thoughts here: http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...#comment-74821

It is incredibly fast with lots of options. Keep in mind that it doesn't appear to be able to search within files, but it is as quick or quicker than Locate 32. It also apparently can search Outlook emails, though I haven't got that to work yet on my work computer.

I'd be interested in other people's thoughts.....
__________________
<-------Is looking for his brain....
kendall.a is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08. Jul 2011, 02:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
Foundation Editor/Forum Manager Intern
 
kendall.a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,814
Default

As a follow up, I've been working with the developer to get the Outlook email indexing to work with Microsoft Exchange Server and with pst files stored on network drives.

Well, we got it working today! Miner Mole does do an index of your folders within Outlook and allows you to search these folders very quickly.

As I indicated earlier, this is a very fast search program and can index large amounts of files and folders very quickly. Search results are almost instantaneous. Very impressive.

(I know and realize that my mention of Outlook is referencing a commercial program. However, for anyone who ever needed or wanted a way of quickly searching through a large amount of email, this might be one of the only or best freeware solutions available. Thus, my mention of the software.)
__________________
<-------Is looking for his brain....
kendall.a is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08. Jul 2011, 02:50 AM   #3 (permalink)
Editor
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendall View Post
I know and realize that my mention of Outlook is referencing a commercial program.
Kendall, I don't see any issue with this. In our freeware reviews we often reference paid commercial products. As in this case, we recommend freeware that enhances commercial software.

There is no issue here as you are not promoting, recommending, or reviewing Outlook. Given your comment I can safely assume that you aren't getting any financial benefit from mentioning Outlook.
__________________
Better to light a candle ... than to curse the darkness.
Remah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08. Jul 2011, 03:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
J_L
Co-Author, Best Free Security List
 
J_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,475
Default

Yet mine was censored while fitting those criteria. Ironic isn't it?

Anyhow, the program itself is another addition in my bloated list.
J_L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08. Jul 2011, 08:12 AM   #5 (permalink)
Site Manager
 
MidnightCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
Default

Site policy is to adopt a less stringent attitude to the "mention" of commercial software wherever possible.

Unfortunately, there are certain trigger words/phrases which are used by spammers and will likely be picked up on by same if included in posts here.

Only us guys on the front line for this stuff are aware of the true extent of how it affects the site and naturally we're not about to reveal this, or our strategy for dealing with it, in public.

Suffice to say we spend enough of our time dealing with it, and if it looks attractive for the wrong reasons it will be edited or removed.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less
MidnightCowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08. Jul 2011, 10:15 AM   #6 (permalink)
Editor
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 505
Default

MC, thanks for the info as I won't be offended if it happens to me.

My big concern has been about the impact of mentioning "p*rn" in parental filtering category.
__________________
Better to light a candle ... than to curse the darkness.
Remah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08. Jul 2011, 06:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Site Manager
 
MidnightCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Remah View Post
MC, thanks for the info as I won't be offended if it happens to me.

My big concern has been about the impact of mentioning "p*rn" in parental filtering category.
I think most parents would want their kids shielded from this, even if they are into it themselves
Like you`ve done here though we try to obscure the word to fool the bots, same with cr*ck.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less
MidnightCowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2