![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 440
|
Hi guys,
I posted this question in the "Best Free Rootkit Scanner/Remover" some time ago - I noticed it doesn't have a dedicated editor only aftewards. So, here it is: Quote:
__________________
26Dolphins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,224
|
Hi 26Dolphins, my reply might not answer your question, but at one point
in the past I asked myself the same. The only thing that I could figure is that dedicated anti rootkits don't use or need to update often because they don't use definitions like a regular antivirus. The applications you mentioned are scaners which as you know, detect infections after you been infected so I decided to go a different way and use something that prevents rootkit infections, that's how I got to SBIE. I don't know if you are using SBIE but using the sandbox is a sure way to stop rootkits when you are browsing/running programs under the supervision of Sandboxie. Sandboxie does not allow drivers to be installed. Bo |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Co-Author, Best Free Security List
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,475
|
If they use specific signatures, then they won't be effective anymore without updating (unless uploading to cloud like HMP). If they use heuristics and behaviour analysis, then they can still be effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 440
|
Thanks to both for replying.
I don't have an infection, thankfully. The question came up after noticing that the version updates of SuperAntiSpyware include improvements to its rootkit detection engine, while the dedicated rootkit scanners/ removers don't update often, yet are considered effective. I'm quite new to SBIE, but can already appreciate its advantages. Thanks again.
__________________
26Dolphins |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|