![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,224
|
Sandboxies protection does not have to stop when we recover files to the
hard drive. The protection will continue if we open those files sandboxed, this is more so if we get to those files by using a sandboxed Windows Explorer and to make it easier to do this we can create a sandboxed Windows Explorer desktop shortcut. Click Sandboxie control Click Configure Click Windows Shell Integation Click Add shortcut Icon Select Sandbox, (You can create one for this purpose) Sent to.....Desktop Most of my downloads are recovered to one particular folder that I created for this purpose, that way I don't have files that have not been inspected properly all over the place. On this sandbox, nothing is allowed to connect to the Internet and I allow everything to run. Drop my rights is on also. Bo |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: இந்தியா, सिन्धु, India
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
One question: Why do you have to recover files to a particular folder? I was browsing sandboxed and downloaded a few .jpgs and sandboxie immediately gave a popup to recover the contents to any folder or the same folder (unsandboxed). Doesn't this work fine enough, bo? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,224
|
Quote:
download. Creating this shortcut is a nice and comfortable idea for the user to open downloaded files sandboxed. When you were browsing sandboxed and SBIE gave you the pop up to recover, that is the default setting of immediate recovery. Personally I don't like to recover files that way, I never liked immediate recovery. You can change that setting, I use the Quick recovery function which allows you to recover files at any time during browsing or at the end when you delete the sandbox. Change the setting, concerned user, the quick recovery setting works better in my opinion. Bo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 422
|
You know Bo, I'm finding it quite ironic that AV\AM programs are starting to incorporate various forms of virtualization into their products. It's not a new concept. It's just that I've become aware of this fact recently when reading about the upcoming Avast 6.0
Thoughts?
__________________
T |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,224
|
Quote:
Behaviour shield actually work instead of adding new features like Sboxing. Avast adding some kind of sandboxing creates the possibility that Avast and Sandboxie will conflict and that is no good in my opinion, this will make it harder to be able to use both programs together. Bo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,224
|
Forced folders is for the registered/paid version, the idea of using a sandboxed
Windows explorer IS for users of the free version. The idea is not mine and I thought it was perfect to mention it at this forum, a forum specialized in freeware. If you using the registered version, like I do, then you can force the folder that you use for downloads, restrict it and you are done. Using the shortcut for the sandboxed Windows Explorer will be like having a "forced Windows Explorer" in the free version. Great idea and it works. Bo |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|