![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: இந்தியா, सिन्धु, India
Posts: 324
|
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01..._flash_bypass/
Guess safe browsing habits along with noscript-normal users browser with sandboxie+non-admin account-risk prone users are the best options always. Last edited by Concerned User; 07. Jan 2011 at 06:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Site Manager
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
|
I think this is the key to this one:
"An attacker would first need to gain access to the user's system to place a malicious SWF file in a directory on the local machine before being able to trick the user into launching an application that can run the SWF file natively". Although I always appreciate it when exploits are made public I think some media go OTT with the sensationalism. Yes it's true and yes it can happen (although not easily as far as most of us are concerned). IMO this is typical tabloid journalism
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
one would be in a constant state of paranoia. Guess that's what security software vendors want. But one cannot react in this manner because one would do much more damage to a machine just changing out security software than any malware or potential exploit ever could. If it ever gets that bad, well there's an easy resolution button that I have on my machine that I know will work to resolve any exploit. It's called the off button.
__________________
T |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|