![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 226
|
I have noticed that MSE2.0 gives you the option to throttle back the CPU when you run a scan. The recommended setting it 50% (MSE gets to use 50% of your CPU cycles for the scan and you get the other 50% to do other work). I suppose if you had an older PC with limited RAM and a slow processor, this would be a good thing. How low can you go, 10%, 20% ?
I was wondering if there was any real reason for MS to do this other than the above. Maybe it is to control spikes. This can be a nuisance on older systems. Newer PCs with a minimum config. should be able to deliver good response times even if a full scan was consuming 50% of the CPU cycles. Gaming or a movie running at the same might be an exception, but you can preset your PC for these events. I assume other AVs throttle back too (written into the code), so we may not know it is happening. I have run other AV quick, flash or full scans and some run quite quickly and I pretty much do not notice them running. My cloud based AV scans on my W7 system runs the fastest and I do see rather high CPU spikes at times, but there is little to no impact to other work I am doing. My XP/SP3 laptop is a slow bunny at times, but MSE 1.0 scans run OK there (quick scans run pretty much unnoticed). I am not sure that MSE 2.0 will do the same. I may have to do some throttling when it arrives. Has anybody been down this road already? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can also use a little app called Prio -Process Priority Saver. It's free for personal use.
http://www.prnwatch.com/prio.html |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 226
|
Tnx guys. Good to know.
I am still waiting for MSE2 to arrive in WU. I will definitely try it out on W7. If my XP laptop grinds with it, I'll try their solution first (50%, then 40,30,20,10). Guess a full scan will take hours at 10%, but worth a try to see just what effect it has. If it is unbearable, I can always run it when I have no other work to do on the system. Or .... go back to Avast. I have been reading posts on the MS answers forum and the XP community is not too happy with MSE2. However, some are happy (maybe they found the best %). |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: இந்தியா, सिन्धु, India
Posts: 324
|
Hi,
I'm back to XP after a disastrous gaming experience with Windows 7 ![]() ![]() MSE's new version does seem to have improved a lot... One thing: I noticed the CPU throttling option when I had Windows 7 yesterday. However, I do not notice such an option now? I think that this is an option only in Vista and Windows 7 and not for XP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 422
|
FWIW, on XP, you can throttle back CPU use on scheduled scans only. I've hung in there with MSE 2.0 on my xp machine now for a few days and I'm not seeing the cpu spikes anymore. But it was a rough start to begin with when MSE 2.0 was first installed, so I can understand the complaints from XP users, especially those with limited memory of 512 megs or less. I have 1 Gig of ram on my machine and that may be the difference.
__________________
T |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northeast US
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
![]() Maybe you can serve as an interpreter for us, or maybe it's just me.
__________________
T |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|