Gizmos Freeware Reviews  

Go Back   Gizmo's Freeware Forum > Debating Chamber > Security

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06. Nov 2009, 06:10 AM   #41 (permalink)
Foundation Editor/Forum Manager Intern
 
kendall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,769
Default

Observations continued:

1. A full scan of 2 hard drives (137 GB, 37 GB) took 2 hours and 7 minutes. Not a real speed demon....

2. Even though I've never downloaded it before and even though I got it during the correct period of time, my status still shows it as 60 day trial period.

3. I still like the interface. It's easy to navigate and very straight-forward.
__________________
<-------Is looking for his brain....
kendall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 06:37 AM   #42 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3
Default remote desktop non-op

Quote:
Originally Posted by renzo54 View Post
installed BD have run through the teaching process but run into a snag.

I run Remote desktop over Cisco VPN on XP, gave allow to BG for both apps but remote desktop hangs and can't connect.

Had no problems with the apps while running Avira AntiVir Personal

any ideas?
the long and the short of the answer is to start Cisco VPN, stop BG's firewall then run remote desktop
renzo54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 08:58 AM   #43 (permalink)
WES
Full Member
 
WES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Viribus Unitis
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendall View Post
Observations continued:

1. A full scan of 2 hard drives (137 GB, 37 GB) took 2 hours and 7 minutes. Not a real speed demon....

2. Even though I've never downloaded it before and even though I got it during the correct period of time, my status still shows it as 60 day trial period.

3. I still like the interface. It's easy to navigate and very straight-forward.
I personally find Vipre an excellent security solution, I am unimpressed with BullGuard and the way they are handling their relations with their potential customers. Very superficial and untrustworthy from the start.
WES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 10:48 AM   #44 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WES View Post
I personally find Vipre an excellent security solution
Personally, I don't see why you would pay for an unknown AV when there are plenty of others which have proven to be good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WES View Post
I am unimpressed with BullGuard and the way they are handling their relations with their potential customers. Very superficial and untrustworthy from the start.
Could you explain further?
Thanks
JonathanT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 11:14 AM   #45 (permalink)
WES
Full Member
 
WES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Viribus Unitis
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanT View Post
Personally, I don't see why you would pay for an unknown AV when there are plenty of others which have proven to be good.


Could you explain further?
Thanks
In short, a golden ***. That's what they are.
Unknown you say? Because I have tested it, has small memory footprint, does not give headaches to the user and it stops most nowadays malwares.
For safe surfing more than enough. For those of us not always practicing safe surfing adding the free sandboxie makes sense, and I feel a lot safer than anyone of U running BullGuard.

Moderators comment:
Please understand that whilst we welcome your input and opinion there are certain language standards which must be followed. This is why the word you used above has been removed. TSA is a family site and we would ask that all of our members present their posts in a manner they would find acceptable for their own children.

Last edited by MidnightCowboy; 06. Nov 2009 at 11:36 AM.
WES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 12:14 PM   #46 (permalink)
Site Manager
 
MidnightCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 8,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendall View Post
Observations continued:

2. Even though I've never downloaded it before and even though I got it during the correct period of time, my status still shows it as 60 day trial period.
Thanks for your observations Kendall. Please contact Bullguard using the support link provided in the program interface and they will then adjust your account to show 365 days instead of 60.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less
MidnightCowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 12:59 PM   #47 (permalink)
Site Manager
 
MidnightCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 8,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WES View Post
I personally find Vipre an excellent security solution, I am unimpressed with BullGuard and the way they are handling their relations with their potential customers. Very superficial and untrustworthy from the start.
Not sure how these from our comments section fit in with your analysis of Bullguard's support?

"Had the same license problem as many others, contacted Bullguard in a civilized manner via live chat, a minute later it was fixed by reentering user name and password! Great support, great software works like a dream!"

"Greetings from downunder, have installed the software as per above instructions on two PC's using the same downloaded file.
Father-in-laws shows 365 days lic,
Mine 60 days.
Used online chat contained within BullGuard and Tech - updated my lic and sent my copy a updated ticket, I then selected "check status" - i now have 365 days.
Brilliant support, dare I say best I've received for software support - took 3 minutes all up
NB Before installation I removed all other malware and virus protections programs and rebooted."




Vipre has always suffered from a range of issues including including poor rootkit detection. This extract from AV_Comparatives forum.

"We were testing an up-to-date Vipre with a clean system scanning an infected drive. It did not detect or block the W32.Downadup!autorun or the Downadup/Conficker worm. No detection and no results on a scan. It let the virus migrated to a flash drive as well.

We had to use Avira to clean it up. In the case of the autorun, we fixed manually. "

Recently though the product has improved and finally their CEO is reacting to pressure for verifiable testing and (so we are told) soon Vipre is to be featured by AV_Comparatives. Their previous response to this pressure was to invite Remove-Malware.com to run a test which later backfired when McAfee SiteAdvisor published reports about browser exploits on the Remove-Malware webpage and abusive spamming by mods from their forum.

As it stands at the moment Vipre is no better or worse than several alternatives but in my opinion Prevx would be a better option for anyone unwilling to use a freeware alternative.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less

Last edited by MidnightCowboy; 06. Nov 2009 at 01:03 PM.
MidnightCowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 01:37 PM   #48 (permalink)
WES
Full Member
 
WES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Viribus Unitis
Posts: 99
Default

Vipre is really light on system resources. As for the civilized manners thing this is an insult like many recently. Because it means we are all *****s and we are not. And as for the rootkit detection thing, no security solution is good at detecting or removing rootkits, don't be naive. There are only three logical alernatives that can make sense 1.) Virtualizing your windows environment with sandboxie, returnil, shadow defender and using a good scanner along the way, like Dr.Web or Malwarebytes'. 2.) Using an antimalware solution that will not give you headaches and is still reasonably good at stopping malwares and light on system resources.
3.) Running something else other than Windows.
WES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 02:04 PM   #49 (permalink)
WES
Full Member
 
WES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Viribus Unitis
Posts: 99
Default

By the way, I was curious because some people started to complain. I was very civilized and it did not help. I personally don't care if they have changed now their attitude, nor the people contacting me about the whole issue before I have had the time to investigate myself.
WES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06. Nov 2009, 02:51 PM   #50 (permalink)
WES
Full Member
 
WES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Viribus Unitis
Posts: 99
Default

Talking of rootkits, take a look at the results of bitdefender vs bullguard.

Yes that was back in 2008, but they were using bitdefender back then as well.
Although it is lighter than bitdefender, that's for sure, despite outpost (not sure about HIPS though)

Moderators comment:
I'm sorry but direct file links are not allowed. Please can you post a link to the page containing this report so that members can then decide for themselves if they wish to download it.

Last edited by MidnightCowboy; 06. Nov 2009 at 02:59 PM. Reason: Removed direct file link
WES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0