![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Foundation Editor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,391
|
I downloaded the release candidate, a couple of weeks ago, and ran it as a live usb. It was still a little rough around the edges. So I waited and just installed new release today. I played around the new gnome shell environment with the custom extensions, but do not like having the gnome shell panel at the top and the "mint menu"/bottom panel at the bottom. I simply don't like two panels. It is possible to make the gnome shell panel at the top hide using an extension, but then you don't have the system tray etc. on the bottom.
I think the gnome shell is well executed, and the default extensions made it more to my liking. The mint menu extension is not really much like the mint menu many know and love, and with the gnome shell menu, I don't really see the point. So I logged out and tried MATE (Gnome 2 Fork) next. I was back in familiar territory, but ran across a few bugs. The worst one was when I tried to make the panel transparent. My system immediately became unresponsive. I had to drop to the command line and force a log out. When I went back in I was able remove the transparency, and now all is well. I think I will be sticking with MATE, although I am warming to Gnome Shell.
__________________
The smallest good deed is better than the greatest intention. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Foundation Editor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,391
|
I found that the problem with transparency also occurred with other themes but it has received a fix already which I had not yet downloaded.
__________________
The smallest good deed is better than the greatest intention. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Maestro di Search
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
|
Good for sharing your experience Ritho. I'll downloading it and will give it a try after setting it up. Looks like the Tips and Tricks for Mint page needs an overall update on a separate page for this new release.
__________________
Keep It Short and Sweet |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Site Manager
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
|
Maybe you more knowledgeable folk will have a ready answer for this, but considering with 10 Julia you have so many more options for "looks" such as Emerald and Screenlets, what are the compelling reasons to dump this and move up to 12? I appreciate looks aren't everything but certainly the majority of converts I've made here have gone down this route after seeing one distro or another on my screen.
IMO sticking with Julia seems an attractive option at the moment, or maybe Zorin 5.
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The north Coast
Posts: 1,117
|
From LinuxMintBlog
Quote:
As the above quote from the LinuxMintBlog states Mate is a desktop in itself designed to be identical to Gnome 2. Its interesting how we have to digress in order to progress. I'm sticking with Mint Julia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Maestro di Search
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
|
Downloaded Mint 12 ISO image and used Unetbootin to make a live USB, booted into Mint 12 from USB smoothly.
Now installing it in the harddisk after shrinking Mint 11 partition and creating a logical partition for Mint 12 using GParted. Will see how this new release work...
__________________
Keep It Short and Sweet |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Maestro di Search
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
|
Installed and tried to boot into Mint 12 from the harddisk.
The boot menu didn't show up instead of showing 'Input Not Supported' on the screen. No panic, just waited for it to time out after a few seconds and it booted into Mint 12. This was exactly the same problem as the one I experienced six months ago. Following the same fix posted here and the boot menu turned up after rebooting the PC. ![]() I can now choose to boot into Mint 11, Mint 12, Ubuntu or Win7 from the boot menu.
__________________
Keep It Short and Sweet |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Maestro di Search
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
|
Mint 12 basically provides me with three login sessions:
After logging into the MATE session, I noticed that the system response seemed to be quite slow. A click at Software Manager took around 15 seconds to fully load . While in the Gnome session, it took only 4 seconds to do the same for me.I think it still has a lot to improve for MATE, also as disclosed by Linux Mint that "MATE is brand new, not completely stable yet, and it's missing a few parts".
__________________
Keep It Short and Sweet |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Site Manager
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
|
Sounds ideally compatible with me
![]() I have to say though this is one test I will not be making time for. All this grief doesn't seem worth it just to have something "new".
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|