![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 57
|
By these guys called VUPEN.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/g...d-exploit/8626 I hope it had nothing to do with this pair https://chrome.google.com/webstore/d...kajceokkdgipbm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Site Manager
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South American Banana Republic, third bunch from the left
Posts: 9,250
|
I'm not saying this isn't the case because unless and until Vupen decide to share details we've not likely to know. We have however seen this before from Vupen who's main intent seems to promote themselves for financial gain.
This maybe helps to balance it out a bit. http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...browser_s_code
__________________
Knows nothing and cares even less |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Planet X
Posts: 487
|
hm, i don't really buy the it's a flash thing and not a chrome pwn... The entire reason is that chrome choose to include flash in it's browser. Unlike firefox/etc which doesn't come bundled with flash, chrome does and as such the flash exploit is a chrome exploit to me.
It's like saying windows has no exploits, it only has internet explorer exploits... and when it by passes IE, then say it's a UAC exploit, then so and and so furth. Because the exploits didn't "happen" to the windows base code, saying it wasn't a windows exploit is misdirection/plain out lying. Though I do feel chrome is safe though, because we all know nothing can be 100% safe 100% of the time, look at sony right now, they did what everyone else in the industry did for security but they got pwned. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 57
|
[QUOTE=MidnightCowboy;52226]I'm not saying this isn't the case because unless and until Vupen decide to share details we've not likely to know. We have however seen this before from Vupen who's main intent seems to promote themselves for financial gain.
Hi MC. It sure does seem a mixed up muddle of a security world at present. Google offer financial reward, to have Chrome hacked. http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner...hacks-rew.html VUPEN seem to have stepped up, and achieved what Google baited others to do. Then, the antsy bickering starts. This probably could not of come at a worse time for Google, with the much publicised lauch of $20 rented laptops. http://money.msn.com/top-stocks/post...7-6823f92a4968 As eyeB comments, Sony are in problems also. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20060661-83.html The words stable door, horse, and bolted, come to mind here. Perhaps, Sony would have been better off employing VUPEN to exploit their security, and save a lot of people from id theft, rather than financial reward after the damage is done. What a mess.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|