I recently installed both Paragon 9.0 Express and DriveImage XML. The major differences I observed between the two are:
1) Paragon appears to take a much shorter time to backup my 89GB image.
2) Paragon gives the option to do a 'verification' of image file after backing up.
3) DriveImage XML is able to 'browse' and extract individual files from the 89GB file....I like this feature.
My preference is for DriveImage...as long as I can the fix the problem I have where when I boot (with BartPE or UBCD4WIN) I can't see my external USB. If not I'll go with Paragon, since it sees my external drive when I boot with the Paragon boot CD.
sam
________________________________________
this thread moved here from the Drive Imaging review page
|