Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

Gizmos Needs YouWe are currently looking for people with skills and/or interest in the following areas:

- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Web Browser for Android

If this sounds like you then click here for more details

 

defrag

Updated 26. January 2009 - 20:05 by subrosavered

Why is it better to use one of the defrag programs recommended here rather than the one that comes with Windows XP?

by Anonymous on 6. February 2009 - 20:23  (15504)

Simply this, there are several alternatives that provide a faster and superior defrag experience.

and there are similarly efficient programs, such as Iobit or Defraggler which can be downloaded at MajorGeeks, Filehippo and Download.com.

Good luck.
by hyphen on 27. January 2009 - 12:46  (14788)

I prefer to use Diskeeper over the built in defragmenter for various reasons, its faster, completely automatic, works smoothly in the automatic mode even as I use the PC, has low free space defrag, defrags system files and is very thorough, defrags without skipping fragmented files.
by Rizar on 27. January 2009 - 4:24  (14761)

Here are the reasons JKDefrag gives: much faster, optimized for daily use, several disk optimization strategies, directories are moved to the beginning of the disk, reclaims MFT reserved space after disk-full, maintains free spaces for temporary files, can defragment very full harddisks, can defragment very large files, can defragment individual directories and files, can be used as a screen saver, can be run from cdrom or memory stick, sources available & can be customized.

Some reasons will be different for other defraggers.

Sources:
http://www.kessels.com/JkDefrag/

Post new comment