Best Internet Safety Freeware
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Internet safety software helps you avoid Internet scams, identity theft, phishing (read about it at PhishTank), spam, and malware (including viruses, Trojans, adware, and spyware). There are many freeware options that provide Internet security, including site advisers, site and link scanners, browser protectors, etc. Many of the freeware products reviewed here also provide child safety (with site filter or site blocker features). Regular use of these types of software generally helps to improve your Internet safety and privacy. You can learn more about Internet threats from OnGaurd Online, and read about related computer security tips from Web of Trust and Gizmo's Guide to Securing Your PC. The site adviser or safety check software in this article are important Internet security solutions for all users. The best security setups in the world will not completely prevent you, say, from entering your credit card information on an online form and sending it to scam artists. Prevention and user involvement are an essential line of defense. Additionally, many sites conceal their deceitfulness. For example, let's say you simply want a relaxing fish tank screensaver and you decide to search for one at Google. The search item doesn't sound malicious and Google is a known safe site. Right? Here are my real life results for some likely search terms you might use. I searched Google for "screensavers" and found 7 out of 10 links rated with dangerous warnings from WOT (counting only page 1 rated links). So you have a 70% chance of surfing to a malicious site for that sensible search item. For the search item, "fish tank screensaver," WOT gave 5 of the 12 links on page 1 red warnings (plus 4 yellow alerts), which gives you a 42% chance of surfing to a red marked dangerous site or 75% if you include yellow warnings. And "free screensaver" gave me an 8/10 or 80% chance of surfing a dangerous site. Searching for "porn" is 40% safer than searching for "fish screensavers." Maybe fish aren't that important after all. Here are my results for a few random searches based on Google popularity mostly (only page 1 results):
Overall the numbers aren't that bad for most search results, but you would never know whether your particular search item is deadly unless you used safety advisers. It's obviously very high for certain types of websites, such as those for screensavers, free credit reports, game/software piracy, music downloading, porn, and free money. However, McAfee SiteAdvisor found that "many popular Web categories (examples: screensavers, free games, contests) have a much higher percentage of red and yellow sites" (FAQ). In addition to "screensavers" (which was #1 in risk in their testing), McAfee found that lyrics keywords and keywords containing "free" were highest in risk (ZDnet). It was difficult for me to replicate their results for lyrics and normal games from just page 1 results, but my random search words above contained similar types of dangerous sites, such as those offering free money or music or game piracy. Advisory software like SiteAdvisor or WOT is not zero-day protection since a "good" website could decide to go over to the dark side, and users may make mistakes or disregard advice. LinkExtend, in fact, is a new option that combines several advisory sources to try to minimize the chance of any one service missing a risky site. Internet safety check software includes many different types of security methods:
Here are good combinations:
|
|
Discussion
|
|
I. Best Free Internet Safety Advisers
1. Best of all: it uses a fantastic warning screen to empower users to avoid interacting with potentially bad websites. This is my favorite sort of approach since it leaves the final decision to the user. If you combine this with your own good sense in avoiding untrustworthy sites and suspicious email links, then you have a nice preventative web shield. If you happen to load a risky website (or a child inappropriate site optionally), WOT covers the screen with a warning and waits for you to decide:
But if you want to block risky websites completely (or child inappropriate sites even), you can customize it to do so in "Settings..." > "Warnings." But I still had problems with the blocking feature (it didn't allow me to click "Back" to return to my previous page when it blocks a site, and it uses a "loading screen" message if a site loses its connection and then it reloads the site -- even if I was editing an article or otherwise writing online, which means I would lose any unsaved work). Though it allows you to ignore warning or blocking messages for a specific site if you manually enter (or "whitelist") it in "Settings..." > "Advanced" (not recommended).
2. LinkExtend: Firefox users with fast Internet connections may want to try it. It incorporates advisory ratings from many different free sources, and it has the potential to be the most secure. It's sort of like a poll of polls since it combines multiple sources into its overall rating, such as WOT and SiteAdvisor and many others (that each individually draw from multiple sources). But you may want to have it load the ratings at 10 seconds (it can be set in "Options" > "Main") so the ratings do not suddenly change, say, from green to yellow or red. Here are some screenshots. It's very helpful for site managers or anyone wanting to multi-source the safety of a link, and I have found a few links where it gave a red rating while WOT/SiteAdvisor gave a green rating (or vice versa). Despite these considerable strengths, it did give me some problems in my testing on a dialup connection. The ratings may change dramatically as it continues to load them from various sources, and after disabling it my Internet connection seemed to speed up. Therefore, it doesn't just slow down your Internet (especially while surfing with search engines), it may mislead you with an early "safe" rating before it changes to unsafe. Plus it doesn't play well with other site advisers, slowing my WOT Firefox addon considerably. Overall it may be overkill for many users, but if you're interested, it provides perspective on the different site adviser/site scanning services -- they don't always agree with each other, they don't all do their testing at the same time, and they use slightly different techniques to rate. Read more about it over at Gizmo's article: New Firefox Extension Makes Browsing Safer.
3. McAfee SiteAdvisor massively analyzes websites and evaluates them for the public. It has reviewed over 8 million sites, and tested over 5 million downloads and tracked for over 7 million possible sources of spam. It also allows registered users to add comments to its reviews. The analysis is based on automatic roving tests of websites (downloading files, entering information in sign-up forms, clicking on links), employee analysis, user comments, and site owner comments (read how it works). It provides color coded ratings based on its analysis, such as a secure grade (highest), green check, and yellow and red for cautions. Here is a sample report posted by McAfee. However, there are some questions over the infrequency of its ratings. For example, it was less sensitive than WOT for some of my test search terms, such as "screensavers", and gave green checks to some sites that seemed very negative in tone (based on user comments). Recently I re-tested it and was very impressed with its improvements. It leaves most install nags unchecked (letting users decide whether make Yahoo! the default search engine). It's easy to disable for short periods of time and it has many settings to allow users to customize it. Additionally, in its "reviewer central" it has posted several websites where it is considering a change of rating based on user votes. So it is starting to integrate WOT style ratings but not as often or as quickly as WOT. Finally, it has the largest download size by far at over 6 times the size of WOT or LinkExtend.
II. Additional Site Adviser/Scanner Options
1. Website Scanners: The following scanning options are complements to WOT, LinkExtend, or SiteAdvisor, but note that some web browsers also detect malware and phishing and other threats. These kind of scanners are not as sensitive to as many forms of scams and malicious content on sites as WOT type advisers, but they scan the active content of sites (placing check marks or warnings in your search results, emails, and even specific web pages on a site). But, of course, scanners sometimes cannot scan a link if it has moved and sometimes they have errors and fail to rate as well.
2. Find Web Site Security Reports, Scans, and Secure Searches (Without Downloading Software): If you can't use LinkExtend, these will help you compare site reports from multiple services. They may also help if your browser doesn't support your favorite site adviser.
3. If you need extra security to do your online business transactions, enter passwords, or verify suspicious sites, then you may want additional tools or a good second opinion.
4. Child Safety Freeware: Many options help you control unwanted content and filter or block child inappropriate sites. Briefly here are some of the options.
5. Not Reviewed: These are additional site safety raters that I decided not to include in the review, but I list them here for ease of reference.
III. Malware Protection
1. Browser Protection: If you are willing to put up with the slight learning curve of Sandboxie or GeSWall, then I highly recommend one of those products. They use different techniques to prevent or remove malware without depending on antivirus and antimalware scanners (that do not detect everything). Another option is to use a limited user account combined with TweakUAC. 2. Basic Computer Security Tips: We have excellent articles on the best free antivirus software and the best free adware/spyware/scumware removers to use. I also like to have a free software firewall, but the best ones require a little patience setting up and dealing with warnings, so at least be sure to turn on windows firewall (if so, see our HIPS article). Antivirus and antispyware scanners often allow you to scan your downloads with a right-click to the file or folder > and a click on something like "Scan with AntiVir/Malwarebytes/etc.". Or use online multi-scanners such as Virustotal or Jotti. 3. OpenDNS or Comodo DNS: Recently I've seen many recommendations for free DNS providers. They are extremely easy to setup, require no software (for the most part), and filter some malicious content before it gets a chance to harm your PC. These providers work by translating site addresses into IP addresses understood by computers (DNS primer) and by using servers often more secure than your regular ISP. Follow the directions provided by OpneDNS or Comodo DNS to make the easy switch; you will use these server names: OpenDNS:
Comodo DNS:
4. Secunia PSI: It's a good idea to run it at least once (and every once in awhile) to check for security holes in your software; it provides you with helpful links to update or uninstall software. But it automatically adds itself to the task scheduler without asking and it's generally slow. So for regular updating, see the article on Software Update Monitors. 5. SpywareBlaster is a very simple security program that helps block malicious content. For Firefox and many other browsers it mainly just blocks bad cookies from a list of specific sites. For Internet Explorer (IE) and browsers that use the IE engine it uses a list of restricted sites to block bad cookies, prevent the installation of activeX spyware, and prevent downloads/scripts/browser exploits. It doesn't seem to support Opera/Chrome/Safari. Spybot Search & Destroy has similar blocking features as SpywareBlaster. 6. Almost all popular web browsers now provide some general malware protection. I confirmed that Firefox, Opera, Google Chrome, Safari, & Internet Explorer all have anti-phishing, anti-malware, popup blocking, encryption support with SSL & TLS, and deletion of private data built-in. They also produce warning screens to help you to avoid malicious sites, but they are less sensitive than WOT type advisers. In addition, Firefox, IE, Google Chrome, and SRWare also have private browsing modes to clear your tracks away. Here's a sample:
Of course, it also helps to use your own good judgment in avoiding suspicious sites or emails and checking downloads. |
|
Have Your Say
|
| You are invited to share and discuss your views in our freeware forum. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate. Alternatively, anyone can leave a comment at the bottom of this page. You can also help us by rating this review at the end of the article. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editor
|
| This article is maintained by volunteer editor Rizar. Registered site users are allowed to edit and improve this article wiki-style. |
|
Tags
|
| best Internet safety freeware, Internet security software, Internet safety check, safe website check, site adviser, site ratings, Internet safety for kids, mywot/WOT - Web of Trust, LinkExtend, McAfee SiteAdvisor |
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Please rate this article


Subscribe to our 

Installed and used WOT for a few days, then made an interesting discovery:
Most of its 'ratings' have NOTHING to do with Internet scams, identity theft, phishing, spam, and malware (including viruses, Trojans, adware, and spyware)!
Here is the rating system of WOT, used on a certain web site:
Good site 7
Useful, informative 7
Entertaining 1
Adult content 1
Hateful, violent or illegal content 14
Ethical issues 1
Useless 1
Other 1
At least 99.9% of the comments for this site express approval / disapproval of the VIEWS and OPINIONS on this site. I don't need software to censor the Internet for me. There are a lot of web sites that promote things I don't approve of, but that is called FREE SPEECH.
By the way, the site I was looking at was a Christian web site, but not a web site that promotes militias, blowing up abortion clinics, or anything like that. They are just very dogmatic in their beliefs about Jesus, salvation, what is or is not sin, etc.
If you are looking for people to tell you what you should or should not read or look at, WOT is for you.
If you are looking for software to protect you from Internet scams, identity theft, phishing, spam, and malware (including viruses, Trojans, adware, and spyware), then WOT is NOT what you are looking for.
Mike
It doesn't explicitly censor anything unless you set it to "block".
It minimizes votes from some people if they are unreliable or too biased (http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/anonymity-vs-democracy).
And its algorithm includes the trustworthiness of its different sources (see API: http://www.mywot.com/wiki/API), so if a site is listed on PhishTank for phishing, then it may receive a red rating instantly despite numerous user ratings (http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/responding-to-threats).
For example, the scorecard for IOBit (http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/iobit.com) has 97 ethics complaints, but it's light green on some ratings and yellow on others. If it had that many phishing complaints from highly trusted sources it would be red, I suppose (see: http://www.mywot.com/wiki/Trusted_Sources).
You can read more about it here:
http://www.mywot.com/en/support/wot_works
http://www.mywot.com/en/support/faq
http://www.mywot.com/wiki/Main_Page
so is calling ID worth installing from a user's pt of view?
I think so with the reservations MC and I wrote about below. It has really positive reviews at CNET (older version), average ones at MajorGeeks, and a good rating from Softpedia. So I will add it at #4 with Comodo's verifier in the review since it seems to serve a similar purpose.
But not as a general security measure for everyone. WOT should help you avoid malicious sites in the first place, so it may be overkill.
It looks best for users with concerns for, say, business transactions and as a reassuring second opinion for special situations or regular transactions.
wot will not work with ie8...finjan does as does everything else I use...but not wot...tired of googling this problem looking for a fix. Consigning wot to the wood pile.
Hasn't anyone ever heard of Calling I.D.? A great freebie that actually saved my ass more than once. And not a word about it!
Yes, it does look very good. I not sure why its WOT rating is light green, but it seems to work fast and it can check sites before you submit information. One of the reasons I wrote this review was to prevent this very thing, which is a hole in all defensive arming: scams!
It even has options to warn me about typing text into this comment box for the first time. I'm not sure why it identifies TSA as a "Low Risk" though. If they want in our review they should fix that!
Strange software. None of the links on their support page are active and all of the other data relates to 2007 except for one press extract from this year. There is an email contact that appears live in another location but I think TSA would need to know much more about the status and projected future of this software before taking it any further.
I've sent a contact request via their page and will wait for a response. I'll report the result here and in the forum.
Thanks for highlighting this for us.
I think it deserves a second look. Just now I saw CallingID available for download on MajorGeeks. Seems like they have a new version out. I followed the link, and turns out that the software has got some excellent ratings on sites like FreewareFiles, and CNet, and others.
Further, apart from browsers, the software supports email clients, messengers, and MS office too.
Worth a look in my opinion.
Anupam Shriwatri
Regarding Finjan, as far as I can tell, it hasn't been updated since June of last year - a bit longer than I've been using it. Recently it has begun inserting junk text into Gmail:
http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?locale=fi&comments...
As a result, I have uninstalled it. That process, however, failed to remove the 300+ kb of its stuff in Firefox's prefs.js file which I ended up doing manually.
I have sent several emails to Finjan inquiring on both the Gmail issue and as to the addon's viability considering the lack of upgrades. The silence is deafening. Their Web site lists absolutely no version histories and except for copyright blurbs not one calendar date.
As far as I'm concerned, Finjan is dead and adrift in the water.
Darn, I'm good. Version 1.316 just showed up at their Web site, tho it's still 1.314 at addons dot mozilla dot org. However the updated 1.316 still injects junk into Gmail and uninstall still leaves a ton of stuff in prefs.js. Some update...
Which one of these slows down your browser the least?
WOT is the fastest for me, but sometimes it takes awhile for it to load ratings for obscure sites (sometimes I just click on "load scorecard" so I don't have to wait). I even find it a bit faster than SiteAdvisor for search results and websites with both running at the same time, but not by all that much.
LinkExtend slows my Internet to a crawl and its ratings load very slowly on my dialup connection. So it probably slows faster connections more so than WOT.
I don't think any of these tools should slow down browsing, but some (such as LinkExtend) may take a bit longer to load the ratings.
Browser Defender is free and also offered as part of PC Tools package: http://www.browserdefender.com/
My impression, however, was that it slowed down browsing.
I use WOT and SpywareBlaster (in combination with antirvirus & antimalware software), would strongly recommend their use for all.
Avoid "McAfee SiteAdvisor". Why? "Some sites not rated (it claims to have rated 95% of the world wide web, though), some ratings may be outdated, many nags on install if you go for its secure search engine" and much more.
AVG LinkScanner is out!
http://linkscanner.avg.com/
Hi
AVG free also include this feaure, how does it compawe againt the others?
AVG uses Linkscanner. I think it's using the Pro version.
I updated the review for the new version of WOT, which now allows you to block websites without registering and simplified its warning screen.
I added a couple child safety mentions, esp. for Glubble, in the middle of the article. Glubble seems like a top-notch service, though for dialup users it loads way too slowly with all the graphics! I had to turn them off. And also it is too easy to get around since kids could just use a different browser. But I found myself endlessly clicking around many of the suggested sites! It's actually good for adults too!
And I added links for the safety ratings services that allow you to search their reports online from a search box. There is great variance in thoroughness with them, but LinkExtend also provides helpful links to those reports and a few others that don't have online search engines.
thak you very nice what are you talking about no i kid vary well done thanks
WWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWW thats a long read but you have good points and such
Great article!
Thanks, very appreciated!
Woohoo! Now we can brag that we got two awards from Gizmo's - "Best Free Website Advisory or Blocker Software" AND "Best Internet Safety Check Freeware"!
Safe surfing,
Deborah
Web of Trust
totally
i agree we can
It's just the one! But WOT is also mentioned over at:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/how-to-secure-your-pc.php
WOT has also received some good press in the Windows Secrets newsletter:
Plus it is very fast for us who remain in the dark ages with dialup connections!
Comodo also has a Verification Engine, though, I believe it constantly runs in the tray.
http://www.vengine.com//
But it is another way to verify a site isn't scamming you.
Here is another security application by Comodo:
http://www.secure-email.comodo.com/index.html
It helps secure emails and ensure privacy.
Recently switched from SiteAdvisor to WOT myself on all three of my computers and really love the speed of the product as well as its detailed rating scales. From what I've read/heard elsewhere, WOT updates its site ratings and advisories more often and more quickly than SiteAdvisor has been doing, and it's already alerted me to a handful of sites that SiteAdvisor okayed just last week. Awesome product. Thank you Web of Trust.
We are honored and appreciative that you choose Web of Trust to receive the “Top Pick" award in the "Best Free Website Advisory or Blocker Software" category. Thank you for helping us to spread the word about WOT and to gather together an active community of people dedicated to making the Internet a safer place.
We also acknowledge the others on this list. They are all fine programs, and ultimately we are all working for the same goal. Congratulations to everyone and keep up the good work!
Safe surfing,
Deborah
Web of Trust
Thanks to you as well for a great product. As you see, I'm in the process of changing the title and location of the article.
Rizar
Post new comment