Best Free Music Player and Organizer
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
Introduction: Find a Free Music Player to Suit You; Play MP3 and Other Multimedia
|
|
Choosing the best free music player and organizer is no doubt greatly a matter of taste. But in this article I compare some of the most impressive music players that stand out of the crowd. In general they serve as excellent MP3 players and play most popular audio formats. They play your MP3, MIDI, MPEG audio, WMA, OGG, FLAC files, and many more music formats without any need to download additional components. Many of the mega all purpose media software packages out there still manage to lack key features for music lovers, prompting us to search for decent music player software. In my search through music players, I looked at the quality of the individual music player and how much you stand to lose in user-friendliness, adaptability, feature support, and overall quality, that is, if you were changing over from Winamp Full (Bento) or Windows Media Player. Music players and organizers that equal or surpass them ought to rank high for everyday use. I found many music players that balance play efficiency and feature support. I think the best music player and organizer ought to facilitate an appreciation for music and satisfy avid audiophiles, such as by inspiring us to rip or download music, organize our music libraries, and learn more about our favorite artists or music. Some music fans may want to use their music player for storing information and organizing extensive music libraries; others may just want to listen to music. All of the top picks have excellent music player and organizing features, with significant advantages over bulkier programs depending on your tastes. But at the end is my current best basic/lightweight music player pick for minimalists. |
|
Discussion: Best Free Music Players
|
|
Jaangle (formerly Teen Spirit) is my top pick for its combination of simplicity and ease of use for average users whilst also providing impressive features for music lovers. It downloads free information from the Internet that music fans will appreciate, including artist photos, album covers, song lyrics, music tablatures, album reviews, and artist biographies. For example, if you right-click on an artist in the library and then select "LastFM - load picture," it will download an additional free artist picture (if available) each time it is clicked, turning the relevant photo into a slide show. By the way to set up the Jaangle interface as shown in the photo (above to the right), you must go to Options from the toolbar and deselect all of the checks under "special info" except artist picture. Otherwise, it's a very competitive music player: it minimizes to a convenient and transparent mini player, integrates support for audio/video media, and tracks user history for auto play lists. It's very competitive on performance, especially for compressed audio files (or, generally, after they were played first, but the flip side is that it's medium-high on memory use if an uncompressed file is the first song to play). Some of its additional features include an interesting music quiz game that draws from your library. It also allows you to set minimums for item groupings, so that any item in the library with only one or two songs will not appear separately (they go under "various" instead). You can tweak crossfading with a slider bar to have smoother transitions. The new Jaangle version introduces interface improvements, such as a toolbar and the ability to quickly increase a panel to full screen. In the negative: it doesn't write some of its information to tags (lyrics and ratings will not carry over between music players), and sometimes the auto continue will repeat a couple songs when you play shorter play lists (for longer play lists it also doesn't seem random, but then again, you tend to hear songs you like more often!). It also doesn't rip music from your CDs/DVDs ("rip" means to encode music to an audio file of your choice). Therefore, it might be helpful to download ripping freeware and other related specialized freeware in the related products and links. For those looking for music, check out the article and comments on finding music online, the article on best free streaming media recorders, and the tutorial on finding legal (and free) torrents. Also, Free Music Zilla helps you record and download songs from members of online music-sharing communities (stick to non-copyrighted songs and license agreements, of course). These techniques could help you get a sample of your favorite albums, artists, and songs to start downloading and linking an assortment of other free related information.
Its library interface creates automatic play lists based on several categories, including star-ratings, times played, date last played, and new audio files. It allows you to play songs directly from these auto play lists. And you can even select all of the songs on the lists (or a few of them) and add them to regular play lists, effectively allowing you to save auto play lists. The main interface also docks in its library and still allows you to minimize it to a mini player. I found the mini player quite impressive. When you hover over the mini player, an optional second panel appears with rolling information and several options. At first, I was not a fan of the Quick File Info box that pops up when you click on the scrolling information or hover over the tray icon. But then I found that it just disappears a few seconds after you move your mouse away (I kept wanting to close it myself). In the negative: I never really did get comfortable with the main interface and it seems generally cluttered to me. It is obviously visually stunning, but I wish I could find what I wanted more quickly.
Foobar2000 is not the most visually attractive music player, but it succeeds with an intuitive and easy to use interface (without any loss of functionality). Its interface is also highly adjustable to suit the desires of the user; in fact, it is more adjustable and customizable than most other music players. Also, it has a transparency option for the whole player, it adjusts the location of toolbar features to fit the size of the interface, and it has visualizations that either fit in the toolbar or open in a separate window. In addition, Foobar2000 has a decent library for organizing music. The newest version now supports artist images. It substitutes auto play lists by allowing for filter expressions, but the filter and search features do not seem very user-friendly. But you could use the playback statistics plugin to improve this feature. If your sound card supports the ASIO plugin to improve sound quality, you can download it for use with Foobar or XMPlay below.
Some of its features take experimentation and discovery. It allows you to drag and drop individual files as well as massive folders into a queue and library. Another way is to select specific files by holding the Ctrl key or the Shift key and clicking on the files you want (alternatively, hold and drag your mouse over the files you want). The library window also sorts by various categories and can monitor selected folders to update them automatically. Since it loads multiple play list formats, XMPlay is a good possibility for a second music player. It could also be used as a primary music player for those who just want to listen to music. Most of the top picks share common features, so here is a sample of them (in no particular order, and non comprehensive):
Please help us by rating this review. |
|
Several other free music players were brought up in comments here or noted from other sources. As they are not rated in this review, I am listing some of them here with brief descriptions and links to their sites for ease of reference. Many of the music and media players I looked at were problematic for their general complexity or inefficiency in playing and organizing music, such as Media Monkey, Winamp Full, Songbird, and, of course, Windows Media Player. For those who want to save on system resources, these may not be the top choices for playing music and multitasking for long periods of time. In alphabetical order:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
This category is maintained by volunteer editor Rizar. Registered site visitors can contact Rizar by clicking here.
Tags for this page: best free music players, music players for windows.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Please rate this article


Subscribe to our 




VU Player is my favorite. It doesn't do libraries but I like it better than
any of the others I've tried.
http://www.vuplayer.com/
Please do not post direct links to exe/setup files.
Anupam
I used to use Jaangle, but now I just love Music Bee and find it is the perfect solution for my needs, especially when I need to play some music off my external hard drives
www.getmusicbee.com
I've tested several music players with my Realtek Azalia Soundcard and a low end Edifier C2 speaker on WinXP including: CoolPlayer, Winamp (also with MAD Plugin), iCoolPlayer, Spider Player, Winyl, QuxPlayer, Aimp2, XMPlay, Xion, BEOPlayer even Samsung PC Studio Multimedia Player and of course WMP.
What I am looking for is the best quality of sound produced by those players omitting the user interface and the top 3 among them are:
Winyl (not sure what the engine is)
coolPlayer (MAD Engine)
XMPlay (BASS Library)
iCoolPlayer (I think it's BASS too)
Winyl has the best sound quality on my system but lack of UI features (which is I do not care). Most players can not determine which one is treble, middle and bass (blurry in term of imaging) but this Winyl (IMO) can provide it with a solid bass kick, sharp character of each frequency group. So, if you have the same system as I have, maybe you should try Winyl.
[Edit: Winyl homepage http://vinylsoft.com/ ]
"I've tested several music players with my Realtek Azalia Soundcard"
If you want to criticized audio program, first stop using any soundcards from "Realtek". Any of products from that company can make some sort of noise but nothing more. I have never heard any of person proudly declared that he uses "Realtek" sounds card for testing program. This is simply worst comment/review ever I have seen at here.
What about Songbird... the open source music player based on Firefox. Even supports add-ons too. Its in active development.
www.getsongbird.com
Anupam
Uses HUGE resources... CPU and RAM.. it may not impact modern systems but there are better alternatives. Besides it feels clumsy, flicky and SLOOOOOW. And it crashes a lot.
I make a recommendation for J. River's Media Jukebox 12 (not their Media Center 14). Really quite a nice program.
This is a full featured player, ripper, tagger, takes coverart & tagging info from Internet, Podcasts, links to Amazon (is kind of a nag at start-up including J. Rivers Media Center but not bad), lots of tools, skinning, plug-ins, auto-import, sync tool to external players, playlists, smartlists etc.
Memory footprint while playing approx 25 MB, which is not too bad, Jaangle was approx. 13 MB, while aTunes was 60 MB.
Btw aTunes (www.atunes.org) is another one not listed here I think.
I agree, glad you mentioned JRMJ 12. I have been using it now for about a month and love it. Rips/burns with no false speed limitation, manages mp3 portables well.
New miniplayer of Jaangle will be great.
it already is ;) and getting better
Wow, I'm already SO happy with XMPlayer. You can download a ton of excellent skins from the website which make it so much more user friendly than the default skin shown in this article. Also there are tons of plug-ins available, including ASIO, so the sound quality is really great. Best of all, it starts up right away and plays without delay. I'm really stoked. Thanks for the tip. I'm not sure if I even need foobar and aimp. Well, maybe for conversion, ripping and burning, which I'm not sure XMPlayer can do.
XMplay was my favorite one.. but its limited library/playlist system can get annoying when the collection is very big. Of course saving [potentially endless] playlists permutations its not an option for me to consider (this caused me to stop using rhythmbox as well.. developer cant understand an issue like this, which simply limits the freedom inevitable linked to the unpredictable human nature.. uhh.. did i just write that??)
Thanks for the article. I have been using MediaMonkey by choice, and iTunes by neccesity (for my iPhone). I can't stand iTunes, but I've liked MediaMonkey for it's high quality features and GUI. However, I have finally grown tired of dealing with it's slowness to start and play, as well as problems skipping and freezing when I have many programs open and resources are low. Sometimes it freezes while skipping, repeating a half second of song while also causing my whole computer to freeze, so I can't turn the volume down nor turn on mute. This can be very annoying, and I either have to wait a minute or two for it to stop, or else hit the power button on my laptop to force a shutdown.
After reading your article I am going to try aimp, foobar and xmplayer. The last one for when I am running photoshop, and the other two to replace MediaMonkey since they seem nearly as full-featured but much lighter on resources.
Cheers
I just wondered why the XION player wasnt included. it's a nifty player with one little extra for those who want custom themes...it supports psd files as the theme file...and it's lite on the cpu cycles too.
I got tired of waiting between clicking and hearing something...
and then I found Coolplayer !
One exe file, no install, skinnable (not tried), mp3 starts almost immediately after clicking !
worth taking a look...
winamp the best tried and tested for years. only if u knwo how to tweak installation..
I discovered -docking main window to audio library in Aimp- feature-after 2 months :-).I still liked it till then,and i'm glad is a top contendant.The sound quality and managing your music collection are very good IMO.Also uses minimal resouces.
Impressive
I also tried the player at http://alpha2player.com and now use it exclusively. It got very smart features than cannot find anywhere else. My second choice is AIMP and third is vuplayer
My friends it is al about Moovida !!!
You have to check this out it is utterly fantastical + 10
lol na really it is bangin
http://www.moovida.com
What about:
http://www.mercuryaudio.net/
http://www.bestwebsharing.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&...
I gave AIMP2 a try after I wiped my computer. You have it as the second best and I like what you said about it. I've used your help on finding a lot of great software over the past year or two. Until recently I've been using Winamp for about 6 years now and figured it was time for a change. I got AIMP2 working with my lastfm and I was really liking it. Although when I decided to put my music into the Library I became thoroughly disappointed. The library lagged, it was slow finding music and the search wasn't as smooth as Winamps. Maybe it's because I'm so used to Winamp I don't know, but I had to go back to it. Thanks for all the great reviews of software even if this is the first one I've disagreed with.
I apologize if this is here already somewhere but I've not read all the comments. Foobar is never going to win contests for it's interface but I use it simply because (for me) if gives the best sound quality. I use it mainly for online radio and this addon enables me to minimize the GUI and control everything from the taskbar.
http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Foobar2000:Components_0.9/...
AIMP2 is unfortunately horrible at reading tags. I have 100s of files where it ways the tags are empty while all other players read them fine.
So is Jaangle. They are obviously not reading all versions of ID3. Definitely a dealbreaker.
MediaMonkey is still the king of music managing.
AIMP player is on of the best audio players, Jaangle is not bad, but I will give him second place... Good alternative for AIMP is KMPlayer, all in one multimedia players with lot of stuffs and much better then AIMP, but if you have many process runs at once, AIMP is first choise, saving memory...
Slobodan Rasic,
Zaječar, Serbia
I haven't downloaded this (yet) or checked it out but it sure as hell sounds like a cool program:
it's called Mufin Music Finder (ya laugh at the name I know ya want to)
http://www.magix.com/us/free-downloads/free-software/mufin-musicfinder-b...
WARNING
This has not been checked and is NOT recommended (yet). Looks a little too good to be true (is it really free?) and wants to install an executable. We'd love user feedback on this.
Listed as freeware on tucows with a published date of 2007. I guess it's not possible to see if any strings are attached until you start using the software. As Peter says - any feedback welcome.
it is free but there is a paid upgrade apparently... cause I'm gonna be buyin another product which gets me the paid upgrade for free... but the link I sent was of there free version which they seem to dub in the download link is a trial...
The only thing I'll tell ya is it has to scan your my music folder (in my documents) to make suggestions and well when your like me as that folder is currently: 8.38GB in size which has: 2,217 Files & 174 Folders...
It said it'd take about 45min to scan... I didn't let it finish cause I had other things I wanted to do... but I may go back and let things finish.
oh an thanks for lettin me know on the other post I did Peter about this reply
The 45 minutes is only to scan the folder's files.
The next step is to do a deeper scan so it can make suggestions of comparable music and that takes much longer.
I installed this and it scanned a 90GB music folder relatively quickly. Then it showed over 10 hours for the deeeper scan.
I also found some discrepancies in its scanning. The first scan showed 17,000+ files available to be scanned(which was correct). However, it ended up showing 20,000+ files scanned. The deeper scan showed over 10 hours, so I paused it for a bit. After I paused and restarted, it showed 90,000 files available to be scanned (which was wrong) and scanned over 100,000 files. Supposedly, it picks up from where it left off after a pause, but it re-did the first step scan and was re-scanning the files already scanned.
After that scan, it showed over 20 hours for the deeper scan and I just decided to uninstall it.
It also messed with the auto play options for my attached HDs, setting it back to ask when I had previously set all auto play to take no action.
Thanks Shane. Mine IS bigger than yours (ha ha) 380 GB, but I have the advantage? of many more years. G. also has a huge collection.
I'll cleanup these comments v. soon.
ok so mabe I'm nuts but does one of these work with an I-pod?
additionally, xmplay can't handle ipod. And according to their forum, developers have no intention to add support for the ipod in the future.
Aimp seems to have similar situation too. At least, default ipod plugin for Winamp can't work with latest version of this program.
Jaangle can handle ipod, but it seems to me unable to handle m4a(or aac)files saved in ipod. on the contrary, mp3 in ipod works fine with jaangle.
Interestingly, Jaagle can play m4a file saved "FROM" ipod. I mean, the m4a file which is backed up from ipod directly and saved in local hdd can be handled fine by Jaangle (and I should ask this problem to their forum one day...).
Jaangle is resource friendly on task manager, but I noticed its function downloading lot of information about music file causes larger folder size of this player among hdd (it saves all the artist related information such as cover art, inside of its own folder). I am not sure to call this program as "resource friendly" at this point.
Hi are there any that can randomly select and play songs ?
I've been a subscriber to Gizmo's advice for a while and have great respect for the reviews on Tech Support Alert. I downloaded Jaangle based on this review, and I'm impressed...BUT - is it reliable?
I've come across a problem, and I don't know whether it's a bug in the programme or something to do with the installation on my system. I'm not a tech expert, so I don't know whether the problem I have encountered is a bug, or an installation problem.
I have a Dell laptop running XP Pro. I installed Jaangle v0.96.910.00. As with any new software, I did so when logged on to my Administrator account. It installed successfully, and appears to be functioning properly within my Admin account.
Now here's the problem. When I shut down and then restarted, and logged in to my User account (which I use for all normal daily work), there was no sign of Jaangle. Normally when I install programmes as Administrator, they then show up on the program list, and with desktop shortcuts, in all user accounts.
While still in my User account, I went into C>Program Files via Windows Explorer, found Jaangle, and opened it. The program interface opened up on my User account screen. It showed and listed all the music files in my separate Admin account (which surprised me as normally I would not have access to such files when logged on as User). But when I hit "play" on any track, or tried to execute any other action within Jaangle, the program crashed (and up comes a crash report window saying the program encountered an error and had to close). Why is this happening and how can I solve it? It seems unusual that I should have to install Jaangle separately in each User account in addition to installing it when logged on as Administrator.
I've tried the Jaangle forum, but it seems to get little traffic. So I thought perhaps a reviewer/tester, or another user, on this site might be able to offer ideas...
I'm using Vista but perhaps there is some overlap.
It probably doesn't have access to those music files. They are only listed in the music library and are not found by the music player to be played. Click "Collections" > "Update Local Collections" to refresh the library.
I created a second user account to try it out. But I had to move my music files to a C:\ directory and not use the typical "My Computer" location. And then it played them for me. Though I personally can't stand multiple user accounts.
As far as playing it on the other account, I suggest creating a new shortcut for it and then adding it to the start menu. Too bad Microsoft never got around to providing an easy way to add new short cuts to the start menu. In XP I usually did it from Explorer as it is easier to find the location than in Vista. I usually send them to the desktop from the right-click menu and then drag them from the desktop to the start menu in Vista.
Hi Rizar,
How you doing?:) Really good review. I like the way you tested the performance of each player. Really useful for resource stingy folks like me.
This maybe a stupid question, but which of these gives the best sound quality, I hope you get what I mean? I am not too keen on media tagging, library organization and hunting for info and such. Dont have GBs of music, and most of the time, I like just one or two songs, depending on my moods and keep playing them till I am fed up. I use those sony headphones with the megabass and so far I have been a staunch fan of winamp, with a dfx plug in for better sound. Same old story, eats up RAM and CPU, worse with recent versions. Would be nice to have something light while using Photoshop and such. Any suggestions or insights? Thanks a lot. (Other readers could recommend too?)
p.s. bought Neverwinter nights recently and having a blast:)
Well, seeming as how XMPlay is the lowest RAM required when running, the lightest weight, that should be a quick solution. As for a high quality plug-in, XMPlay should be able to use Winamp's. Emphasis on the word 'should'. I haven't tested it myself, but XMPlay has that capability as I have read and tested for one plug-in already. Like, I installed the .spc support plug-in that Winamp uses and it works perfectly. Would anyone like to test this for me? This is the lightest weight player around; if you are dealing with photoshop, you will experience no lag whatsoever with XMPlay. I may be able to test this out myself, but my internet situation at home isn't exactly free.
The other players reviewed here should also give you a fix, but if you are looking for music playing without even noticing a player running because it is so light-weight, use XMPlay. And as far as I know, sound sounds slightly better with XMPlay anyway, but I haven't yet proved this.
So try the Winamp DSP plug-in on XMPlay. It should work....
Hi nes,
Thanks. This was my first review, so I was sort of testing the site. I originally jumped back and forth from WMP, AIMP, & Foobar. Now I use Jaangle as my main player.
Someone asked a similar question below about a Winamp DSP plugin. It may have been for Dfx.
It may work as a plugin for players that support winamp plugins. AIMP 2 for example. It's much lighter than Winamp. You'd have to move the Dfx files over to AIMP's folder for plugins and see if it will load.
For the plug-ins to work, the plugin DLL files need to be located in the AIMP folder named "Plugins." And then there will be an option in the Winamp DSP drop down and you will be able to select them.
You can use the plugin drop down menu to download more plugins: enter "Plugins," select "Winamp DSP" from the drop down menu, and click the "Download" button, which goes to the AIMP website. Select English if you need to and download the file you want, be sure to extract it to the plugins folder under AIMP.
You can also download Winamp DSP plugins here and install them in the correct folder:
http://www.winamp.com/plugins/browse/5
Foobar also has enhancer plugins but I haven't tried any to say if any of them are as good as Dfx.
There's a quick answer and some very very long answers. Most serious tests of audio equipment conclude that listening to music is such a subjective experience that objectivity is virtually impossible. So much is dependent on our notion of what a particular piece "should sound like" and in fact almost all of us have different hearing abilities. Our ability to hear high notes for example, almost always declines with age and some medical experts state that this process starts in our teens. For home PC users, quality of reproduction is more affected by your sound card characteristics than anything else, with raw processing power second. (Of course speakers & headphones are also critical.) All the leading software players produce more-or-less the same quality of reproduction, although some claim to handle lossy formats better than others. Filesize is another issue, of course.
The quick answer is Foobar! Just try it. If you don't like it, try something else ... it uninstalls perfectly.
Thanks peter :). I guess you are right, there is no way of finding out without testing for myself. I listen to mostly classical and instrumental music through headphones, (rarely industrial dance and alternative rock but use external speakers for them). With some of the not so complex and simple players, the sound begins to jar at higher volumes with headphones. Maybe headphone limitations of course, and of course the sound card. Winamp plus DFX was really useful in bringing down the "jarring" factor, but I was wondering if there was something that would do it out of the box.
I would use WMP but it seems to have an irritating number of functions and parts trying to connect to the internet even when sharing and updating is off. Absolutely annoying and unbearable.
No matter, testing is what we all do best when at Gizmo's, and if I am not happy, I'll go back to my faithful old combo. :) (Off to try foobar)
And to the poster below, NW1 I believe,the basic game with no expansions.
Well I have to confess that apart from being a computer nut I'm a full fledged audiophile. You know, valve amplifiers, huge speakers from the 1970s , the whole catastrophe.
I can honestly say I hear no difference in sound quality between any music players when playing back over my computer monitors.
Over my main hi-fi system it's a different story; the differences are immediately audible.
The best sounding players are those that bypass the Windows kmixer module. Kmixer is the Windows Kernel Audio Mixer driver. It intercepts audio streams to provide a variety of services including mixing, format conversion and channel mapping.
Judged by the highest standards, kmixer slightly degrades the sound quality. That's why you should use a player that bypasses kmixer if you want the absolute best results.
Basically that means any player that uses ASIO drivers or kernel streaming.
I use Foobar2000. It's free, has a huge set of plug-ins and the sound quality is second to none. However while the quality is high the user interface is basic.
But let me repeat. You will not hear any differences in sound quality between different music players through normal PC speakers. And if you are playing MP3 or other compressed music files you won't hear any difference through any set of speakers.
(You can of course hear if playback volume levelling is turned on or off in a player. You can also hear the effects of different equalization settings and other sound processing options. Different players have different default settings for these sound processing options and this is the main reason why some people say they can hear differences between players even over cheap speakers. But if you configure the processing settings to be the same value in both players it's unlikely you will hear any difference. Well I can't anyway)
Gizmo
Hello Ian, I am quite chuffed that the website head honcho replied to this:)
I am in the process of testing Foobar and I think it is awesome so far, although I wish the options were simpler. I don't care much about fancy interfaces, function is paramount of course, and a clear GUI is sufficient for me. Used to be nuts about customizing and all that, but have grown out of it.
I have very sensitive hearing, loud noises hurt my ears and I am very aware of small changes in sound quality and all that, can't explain it better. The search for a program that handles ambient music and rock equally well, while on the go, is a challenge.
I had a huge gang of friends when I was doing my bachelors degree, they were all in bands and few were learning acoustics in engineering, so they taught me how to set up a really effective and awesome home theatre system in my dorm room using a locally made amplifiers and car stereo speakers. I have a 5.1 system I assembled myself here attached to the desktop PC now. (Laptop is a different story though). So the difference between those assemblies and laptop headphones is incomparable. Winamp had an awesome studio sound plug in, along with DFX plugin, sound that way was good. But CPU and RAM would go through the roof, especially with larger music files.
Browsing through the foobar plug ins now, hopefully I'll get the sound that I like as a happy finale.
Cheers!
XMplay also has the ASIO plug-ins and is very resource efficient.
NW1 or 2?
London SW2? Reggae in Brixton
Post new comment