Gizmos Needs You

Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

 We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following areas:
 -  Mobile Platform App Reviews for Android and iOS
 -  Windows, Mac and Linux software reviews       Interested? Click here

                  

 

Best Free Windows 64-bit Software

 
Page Index:
 
Windows-Desktop-64bit-82-58.png 6. Best Free Windows 64-bit Desktop and System
 

 

 

Best Free Windows 64-bit Icon Tool

Iconoid

SillySol's Iconoid allows you to change the colour of text associated with your desktop icons. You can also save and restore the position of desktop icons and, optionally, hide and restore icons by clicking on the desktop.

In order to use Iconoid to change the colour of text you must first turn off drop shadows for icon text.  This must be done via Control Panel, System, Advanced System Settings, and then click on the Settings button under Performance.  Right clicking on Computer, and then choosing Properties, will only change settings until you logoff or the PC is rebooted.

IcoFX

IcoFX has become a commercial product but the free version remains available although it is unsupported.

IcoFX "has a wealth of tools and is equipped with more than 40 image effects. … The program allows you to create icons for your programs, setup files, or favicons for your website or blog. It also allows you to convert your favorite images to icons, or icons to images. Conversion between Macintosh and Windows icons are supported. Other features include supporting Vista icons with PNG compression, true color, transparency (alpha channel) and batch processing capability. IcoFX allows you to create icon libraries, extract and patch icons inside the executable files. However, on some executable files which I tried, the former seems work better than the latter." (Best Free Icon Editor and Replacer)

 

Back to Page Index

Share this
3.685215
Average: 3.7 (575 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by Anonymous on 6. February 2010 - 17:12  (42982)

I only posted that fragbook because it explains various problems with discs and fragmentation very well in terms that more or less anybody can understand. Specific manuals tend to use too much specific terminology that hardly anybody not involved with them understands! :)

Since I started using SSD's, file and disc fragmentation on those machines have dropped off my list altogether, although they were once a fairly high priority for me at least. I just try to do the best I can with what I have, just a hobby now, I don't even need most of it anyway! :)

Thanks for the interesting input!

by rikmayell (not verified) on 6. February 2010 - 17:21  (42983)

Obviously 'one size fits all' cannot be applied to PC use. To an extent this is more complex than the 'Travelling Salesmen' problem as it is intangible. NP Hard / NP Complete problems at least have boundaries that we can state. Not computable in non-polynomial time being the most obvious. As computer scientists we work to address these issues and take our thinking forward. It isn't helped by people coming into the field that don't even know the fastest way to perform a sort, sigh...

Offers on the best way...Ordinary quick sort doesn't get you any points.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 6. February 2010 - 18:05  (42989)

Well, I'm not a computer scientist as such, just a fairly experienced engineer, and the last sorting algorithm I had anything much to do with was library sort ( it's an insertion sort, fairly new, and invented in 2005 I believe). New ways to sort are still being invented. I really don't know enough about the alternatives or applications thereof to make any sensible comment, I am most certainly not on the cutting edge of forward thinking here, and I don't know the fastest way to sort per se either, so it looks like I am not going to get any points this time! :)

by rikmayell (not verified) on 6. February 2010 - 18:13  (42990)

The MTBF may have improved but it doesn't change the fact that the drive will die. I can live with a two minute boot time safe in the knowledge that the machine will boot. If I really want a fast boot I go into Ubuntu :)

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 6. February 2010 - 18:41  (42994)

So we have turned full circle (once again).
You seem to be saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".

by rikmayell (not verified) on 7. February 2010 - 6:23  (43033)

Well I wouldn't quite say full circle :)

Defragmenting the hard drive(s) will have an impact on performance, especially after a hefty dose of maintenance, such as installing a Service Pack. Improving file layout can also make a big difference, this requires knowledge of the files you use most and where best to move them to. This isn't rocket science you just have to put in a bit of hard work ;)

Although not highly regarded, the Microsoft disk defragmentation tool deals with the Boot Plan generated by ReadyBoot (sic.) MyDefrag is the only freeware tool that does that. So, if you don't use MyDefrag, don't disable the Windows tool.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by rikmayell (not verified) on 7. February 2010 - 6:33  (43036)

We don't really give points here, but if we did you would get quite a few. You've been kind enough to stop by and read and further you've taken time to join in by posting. Finally what you don't say in your post says more than what you do. A rare gift in life indeed...

Thanks for your post.

Finally, if anyone does want the low down on the fastest sorting algorithm, contact me and I'll send it to you :)

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 8. February 2010 - 1:24  (43084)

Double Commander, native 64 BIT Explorer alternative. Still in Beta, but looking good.

http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/

by rikmayell (not verified) on 9. February 2010 - 4:23  (43139)

All of the installation files for the latest beta, 0.4.5, are Linux related deb, rpm or tar files. No mention of Windows anywhere.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 9. February 2010 - 8:49  (43147)

Thanx.
My personal decision is to use the MS one about once a month except in the circumstances you note.

by Anonymous on 9. February 2010 - 16:29  (43171)
by rikmayell (not verified) on 9. February 2010 - 17:24  (43174)

All deb, rpm, etc. I can't see any Windows installation files.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 9. February 2010 - 18:03  (43182)

PS. I have it running on several systems, Linux ( several distros), XP, and 7. Works great, no problems at all as yet. I am of course hoping that because it is in very active development that it gets even better, and am going to contribute if I can.

Would be a good idea for anybody else who wants a really good explorer alternative on 7 to contribute as well if they can.

I have no other connection with the project, I just think it's very good.

by rikmayell (not verified) on 10. February 2010 - 9:01  (43243)

I still have no download for a 64 bit Windows binary.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 10. February 2010 - 9:17  (43247)

That is very odd indeed. I know you don't normally allow direct download links, but I can't think of anything else in this case, remove TEST to use the link.

TESThttp://sourceforge.net/projects/doublecmd/files/DC%20for%20Windows%2064%20bit/Double%20Commander%200.4.5%20beta/doublecmd-0.4.5.x86_64-win64.exe/download

I have had no trouble with any of these downloads.

You can also reach the download page at Sourceforge by clicking on the "Download" link in the header of the first link page I posted.

Sourceforge can be rather difficult to navigate in some cases, but I don't understand what is happening here.

The only other thing I can think of is to search "Double Commander" on Google etc. this will also bring up various links. like this one: http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/File-Management/Double-Commander.shtml ( I have not tried this download myself ).

Most sites carrying it and linking to it are in German.

by rikmayell (not verified) on 10. February 2010 - 14:23  (43274)

Okay, thanks to all of those that have pointed me in the right direction, I got the download in the end.

I haven't had chance to try "Double Commander" out fully but one immediate 'no, no', is that the folder names appear in bold when it is launched. No doubt someone will post a tip telling me how to change this. That though rather misses the point. When first started the application should use the system defaults, Sergio UI for Vista and later. If I decide to use a different font, make it bold, purple, or whatever then that is my choice. Well respected guidelines for User Interface elements in Windows have been around for years. Why are people still not following them?

When these fundamental issues have been addressed and a final stable release produced I will take another look.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 12. February 2010 - 13:28  (43435)

rikmayell your WRONG about superantispy (SAS) it does so work with windows x64 = 64 bit ,Im running windows 7 ultimate x64 right now, and it works great.Maybe next time you should EXACTLY test a program before misleading people!


Moderator's Comment: While you are etitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to throw wild accusations at others on this site. Be nice or begone.

by Anupam on 12. February 2010 - 13:34  (43437)

Please be respectful for the person, who has taken pains to prepare the wonderful article, so that people get help. There is nothing written in the article which is misleading.

It clearly says "The 64 bit version of SAS is currently undergoing beta testing. It is unclear if there will be a free version."

I don't know how do you take it as misleading. If you have to say a thing, you can say it in a nice way, even if you differ from his point of view.

by MidnightCowboy on 12. February 2010 - 13:52  (43438)

Rik is correct. It is still a pre-release as of version 4.90 dated 10th February, not yet fully functional and not recommended for use on machines except for testing and feedback purposes.

by rikmayell (not verified) on 12. February 2010 - 17:27  (43443)

Just read the article? It clearly states that 32 SAS works under Windows 7 / Vista 64, indeed it is top pick.

The 64 bit version of SAS has been under development for many months without a sign yet of a release date for the finished product. As, when, and if, a free 64 bit version of SAS is released it will be reviewed here.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by Anonymous on 13. February 2010 - 3:29  (43475)

Since Windows 7 64-bit does not seem to be quite ready for prime time, I wonder if it would not be helpful for many of us to be informed when new information is added to this page.

For instance something such as this appearing at the bottom:

"Better still, get XXX's latest Win.7 64-bit free software information delivered daily via your RSS feeder or alternatively, have the RSS feed sent as email direct to your in-box."

Any other thoughts?

Robert D. Jewell

by rikmayell (not verified) on 13. February 2010 - 8:18  (43486)

We are currently reviewing the way the site works and making a large number of changes behind the scenes. The sort of 'notification' system you suggest is being actively considered. Personally, I concur with you, this has to be the way to go.

All I can say at present is watch this space.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by syntax_error on 14. February 2010 - 1:36  (43563)

I'm using FF 3.5.7 on W7, when I select print preview I get 21 pages. Whilst I haven't tried printing them, if I scroll through the preview they are all there.

by Anonymous on 15. February 2010 - 15:40  (43674)

You put together many of the recommended applications i too find as excellent tools to help maintain the windows environment. There are several i would like to add.
Winpatrol
IOBit360
Advanced Systems Care
Spybot Search and Destroy.

Nice stuff, thanks.

randy

Moderator's Comment : Email address removed. Please do not post email address in comments, its not safe.

by Anonymous on 24. February 2010 - 11:40  (44358)

Nobody seems to have mentioned the limitation in using Avira on 64 bit. See

h**p://www.avira.com/en/support/kbdetails.php?id=231

which says:

* protection of AntiVir services is not activated;
* detection of active rootkits is not activated.

(due to lack of API from Microsoft)

The lack of rootkit protection seems a big limitation so I wonder if MS Security Essentials should not be the top choice. I may be biased but the only virus problem I've ever seen was a rootkit (due to AVG free not having rootkit protection).

by Anonymous on 26. February 2010 - 11:39  (44534)

I am using IrfanView and Adobe Digital Negativ (.dng) aand i just noticed that dng is not supported within Windows 7 x64. Or on the other hand, Adobe Dng does not support x64, which is a shame actually.

Now there seem to be free 64bit codecs for dng available from 3rd party providers (http://www.fastpictureviewer.com/codecs/). Has anyone tried one of those yet and is able to give a recommendation?

Great Thanx, mike

by Anonymous on 26. February 2010 - 13:01  (44536)

edit:
IrfanView does support .dng within Win7 x64. (it was just a bit tricky for me to find that)
Still there is a codec from Adobe(currently in beta/rc status) that adds windows explorer / gallery preview for .dng, which is currently not available for x64-systems. (That's the shame.) As i mentioned above there are alternatives.

So if someone tried any of these, please share your experience here.

A nice one to all, mike

Moderator's Comment : Commercial software link removed. Please do not mention commercial software on the site. We are about freeware only.

by Anonymous on 3. March 2010 - 22:48  (44948)

First- I apologize if this has been covered- I didn't really want to read through numerous pages about this excellent article to see if it has been touched upon.

My comment is for 2 reasons- 1 is that it may prevent newbies from pulling their hair out, and the other is to show that MS does NOT THINK when they put out a SW app.

The file I am writing in regards to is 'SyncToy'. On their page- they have two download options. 1 that has an 'x64' ending, and one that has an 'x86' ending. WTF? I understand the naming convention- but wouldn't that confuse the hell out of some people that did not know what the numbers denoted??

Just had to mention the silliness.

by rikmayell (not verified) on 3. March 2010 - 23:17  (44951)

Yes I can understand how that might confuse some people and will add something near the start of the article highlighting the difference. Thanks for bringing up a valuable point.

Rik Mayell - Category Editor

by houcklaw on 4. March 2010 - 3:11  (44966)

Agreed. Does it mean 64 bit Windows or does it mean x64 as in AMD 64 bit processor or Itanimum (Intel) 64 bit processor?