Best Free Windows 64-bit Software

 
Page Index:
 
Windows-Desktop-64bit-82-58.png 6. Best Free Windows 64-bit Desktop and System
 

 

 

Best Free Windows 64-bit Icon Tool

Iconoid

SillySol's Iconoid allows you to change the colour of text associated with your desktop icons. You can also save and restore the position of desktop icons and, optionally, hide and restore icons by clicking on the desktop.

In order to use Iconoid to change the colour of text you must first turn off drop shadows for icon text.  This must be done via Control Panel, System, Advanced System Settings, and then click on the Settings button under Performance.  Right clicking on Computer, and then choosing Properties, will only change settings until you logoff or the PC is rebooted.

IcoFX

IcoFX has become a commercial product but the free version remains available although it is unsupported.

IcoFX "has a wealth of tools and is equipped with more than 40 image effects. … The program allows you to create icons for your programs, setup files, or favicons for your website or blog. It also allows you to convert your favorite images to icons, or icons to images. Conversion between Macintosh and Windows icons are supported. Other features include supporting Vista icons with PNG compression, true color, transparency (alpha channel) and batch processing capability. IcoFX allows you to create icon libraries, extract and patch icons inside the executable files. However, on some executable files which I tried, the former seems work better than the latter." (Best Free Icon Editor and Replacer)

 

Back to Page Index

Share this
3.68804
Average: 3.7 (577 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by Hoff (not verified) on 31. March 2011 - 13:17  (68991)

Hey, just for the record since you wrote this post, ccleaner has come out with a 64-bit application, or at least 64-bit support, I would screenshot my version, but I am at work =(

by rik on 6. April 2011 - 11:47  (69567)

Thanks for the information, I'll take a look.

Rik

by Onslow2.0 (not verified) on 21. March 2011 - 17:33  (68269)

Hi,
Is is neccessary for me to install Windows 7 SP1 in order to make Windows secure and run more efficiently? The reason I'm asking is becuase Microsoft said IE9 would require SP1, but I'm running IE9 fine on 32 bit version of Windows 7. I'm just wondering if is an absolute must have. If it is, and I do decide to download it, do you know of a service pack clean up tool I could run. I'm running Panda Cloud on as well.

by rik on 21. March 2011 - 20:47  (68279)

Updates to Windows are released for good reason. They make the product more secure and reduce the 'attack surface' for exploits. My advice is therefore to apply SP1.

As to clean up, unless you are really short of disk space let Windows do it for you. If this is a real issue then post in the forum where many others will be able to help you.

Regards,

Rik

by Onslow2.0 (not verified) on 21. March 2011 - 21:01  (68281)

Thank you. I will digest your answer and use it as brain food!

by Fz (not verified) on 14. March 2011 - 13:45  (67905)

I never had so many freezes and blue screens as I did with Comodo. System restore would freeze as well. The customer service was not at all helpful so after really doing my best with it, I uninstalled it and all the problems went away.

If Foxit doesn't work for you, try Sumatra - just as fast/faster and very small.

by Modou lamin (not verified) on 25. February 2011 - 14:50  (67078)

thanks for the help

by Jeff S (not verified) on 29. January 2011 - 23:47  (65478)

Is there a toolbar available for 64 bit internet explorer/Windows 7?, or if not is there a way to run 2 sessions of the toolbar that comes with I.E. 64 bit?

by rik on 3. February 2011 - 5:59  (65743)

I'm afraid I don't know. This query would be better answered in the site forum.

Rik

by Thom (not verified) on 15. January 2011 - 19:50  (64622)

Why would an old program that runs perfectly well on native Windows XP in Wndows 95 compatibility mode not run (at all) in Windows 7 in Windows 95 compatibility mode?

Do I have to go to Windows 7 Professional and install the WINDOWS XP and Virtual Machine components or is there another solution?

by eikelein on 11. March 2011 - 12:15  (67782)

Most likely your legacy application contains some 16-bit code.
IMHO no way at all to run that in Vista/7 anymore.
Update to a current version that is written in fully 32-bit.

by rik on 17. March 2011 - 19:12  (68113)

Just to clear up a small technical point, 16 bit code will run under 32 bit Windows. Should you wish to run it under 64 bit Windows you need to employ virtual machine technology. This is covered elsewhere on the site and must be clear as I managed to follow it!

Rik

by rik on 27. January 2011 - 5:03  (65281)

Personally I think a VM is a far better solution although configuration can be 'interesting' :)

Rik

by rik on 26. January 2011 - 19:28  (65246)

I would like to apologize to everyone for not responding to comments; I have just returned home after three months in hospital.

Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible :)

Rik

by MidnightCowboy on 26. January 2011 - 20:36  (65252)

Please can we have the "bits". It's soup day tomorrow :D

Welcome back mate. Sadly and sorely missed. Just don't pile in too quickly and undo all the good work.

Remember, MC is watching! :D

by rik on 26. January 2011 - 21:13  (65256)

Message received and understood :)

Great to be back.

Rik

by Nickname on 30. January 2011 - 19:14  (65535)

Not knowing any of the background "area", I think I may be able to read in-between the lines - ouch painful. All the best for a swift & soothing recovery ;)

by chesscanoe (not verified) on 13. January 2011 - 16:27  (64456)

On Win7x64 system I like to use Chrome browser 9.0.597 beta to read a PDF either on the fly from a web page or a PDF on my hard drive. (Chrome embeds Adobe Flash as well at a higher level than publicly from Adobe.) However I do keep a current Adobe Reader X 10.0.0 installed in case I need to use its features, which is very rare.

by rik on 27. January 2011 - 4:49  (65274)

Thanks for the information.

Rik

by gggirlgeek (not verified) on 7. January 2011 - 11:29  (64062)

Sorry for the double post below... stupid browser addons... :( Feel free to delete one.

I must agree with others, and raise an eyebrow at the recommendation of a registry cleaner. The best way to clean my registry is also God's gift to the curious: drive imaging. Windows pissing you off? Just re-image for a brand new system.

Personally, I still use DriveImage XML because it is pre-installed on most recovery disks so I'm not left stranded. It has never let me down. And it does come in a 64-bit flavor.

Between you and me, and the world, though, I do use the registry tool in CCleaner occasionally, just out of curiosity.... This is usually followed by a re-image. :-}

by rik on 28. January 2011 - 3:50  (65346)

Could you enlighten me as to how imaging your system has any impact on the layout or size of your Registry? This is a new one on me and I fail to see how it works.

Rik

by mchldpy on 22. February 2011 - 22:29  (66947)

hey rik,
did you ever find out how imaging your system could or would clean and reset your registry... or whatever she was talking about? i don't think the first 63 sectors (0 - 62) of the ole hard drive had the mbr-
mental boot record intact any longer.

by rik on 2. March 2011 - 11:12  (67303)

I can't see how it would work following a standard image and then restore. Perhaps I'm missing something?

Rik

by gggirlgeek (not verified) on 7. January 2011 - 10:40  (64060)

IMHO, defragmenting everyday with Defraggler is not a good idea if you use MyDefrag or JKdefrag. Nor is using any other defragmenter. It completely ruins the optimization that JKdefrag peforms by rearranging the files and filling in the much needed gaps that were set up. This actually causes more fragmentation, slower disk performance for Windows, and a lot more wear and tare on the hard drive. The author of JKdefrag says that defragmenting once a week is plenty.

With that said, I am having doubts about whether Mydefrag actually optimizes the way JKdefrag used to. Whenever it is finished I see a completely filled in hard drive with no gaps and many "space hogs" at the front of the disk. Looks like old-school Windows defrag to me! I haven't had a chance to visit their forums about this yet but I'm thinking of just using the old JKdefragGUI in XP mode, or trying to adapt it's scripts to MyDefrag format.

I have to say it's worth it. Discovering Jkdefrag might have been the single biggest boost in performance my system has ever seen. I really have no need for constant system upgrades anymore with tools like these.

by rik on 27. January 2011 - 4:51  (65275)

The app you use is a matter of personal taste although MyDefrag is, I believe, a better choice. As you point out, using two such tools is NOT a good idea.

Thanks for your valuable input.

Rik

by Anonymous Surffer (not verified) on 17. December 2010 - 1:21  (62764)

I am running Minefield Firefox beta with 64 bit Flash plugin, available at Adobe as: flashplayer10_2_p3_64bit_plugin_111710. This is experiential but works fine.

by rik on 27. January 2011 - 4:51  (65276)

I would agree.

Rik

by Malwarebytes fan (not verified) on 14. December 2010 - 3:05  (62423)

My 2 cents: I believe that Malwarebytes should rank a little higher. That software has bailed me out couple times and especially when a trojan took away my admin rights. It was the only one that was able to eliminate the threat and restored my pc rights.

by Wikitikki (not verified) on 17. April 2011 - 1:13  (70340)

Glad it worked out for you unfortunately that is not how antivirus software is tested and would be a very blind way to go about it. Look for sites that test all kinds of AV software, look at their data and results and compare them with all the listed AV programs. The major thing to look out for is failed results, that is the key detail that determines a good AV vs a bad one.

Me personally I use Microsoft Security Essentials why?

Because:

1. It's light on system resources and free for life.
2. Actually 64bit unlike most claims made by top antivirus software.
3. Fast scanning.
4. Virus definitions updated daily.
5. 99% detection rate well at least I have yet to see it fail.

Things I don't like about it:

1. Constant beta state.
2. Updater doesn't work as it should you have better luck with schedules.
3. Anti-spyware kind of sucks, kills your resources if you have it on auto and are doing multiple things.
4. Its not designed with all the kinks and eye candy in mind, so it lacks allot of major security additions but being lightweight and free makes it worth the price point. If all you need is a solid AV then MSE should fit the budget.

by rik on 27. January 2011 - 5:08  (65282)

Remember that the review is based on side by side evaluation. Frankly, this is no substitute for personal experience.

Thanks for the valuable feedback.

Rik

Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting!

Gizmos Needs YouShare your knowledge of free software with millions of Gizmo's readers by joining our editing team.  Details here.