Best Free Web Browser


This category is divided into three sections: 1) MEGA WEB BROWSERS includes the most popular, powerful and heavyweight browsers; 2) LIGHTWEIGHT WEB BROWSERS includes the browsers that provide the best performance with respect to memory and CPU consumption; and 3) OTHER BROWSERS includes browsers that haven't been discussed in the both categories above. For a full comparison of features of the various browsers, click here.

Reviewing web browsers is different than reviewing other types of software categories because the choice of which browser is best is truly subjective and the browser updates are released with tremendous frequency.  The major web browsers compared in this review are the most common used around the world. While some comparisons are necessary, each browser will really stand on its own merit and new features of the latest releases.  As such, each browser will be reviewed based on major updates.

The most popular of the major browsers are Google Chrome (Chrome), Internet Explorer (IE), Mozilla Firefox (Firefox), and Opera. Also entering contention this year is Maxthon. There is much debate regarding which one is the most popular at any given time. According to various surveys on the Internet Chrome and Firefox tend to lead the pack for the following reasons; 1) strong app support, 2) cross platform compatibility.

Regarding performance the statistical difference between them is so minor, most users won't see a difference. Startup and performance is another subjective theme as it depends on the hardware, software and browser configuration for each user. Deciding which browser(s) to use depends on the need. The average user may be satisfied with IE or Opera. Power users may prefer Firefox, cloud oriented users may prefer Chrome or Maxthon. Some users may prefer to use multiple browsers, taking advantage of the unique features each has to offer.

Due to modern advances and competitiveness, all of the major web browsers share similar, and what I would call, essential features. Examples of these features are; tabbed browsing, privacy browsing, password manager, download manager, searchable address bar, and cross application syncing. The individual browsers may use different names for their respective features but the functions are basically the same. The reviews will attempt to highlight the key elements of each browser to help you decide which browser may be best for you.

Wiki Comparison of Web Browsers compares web browsers in essentially 11 categories.  For a web browser to be classified as Mega, it must compare to IE, Chrome and Firefox in all 11 categories.



After Google hired several Mozilla Firefox developers, they released Chrome in 2008 to provide users a clean, fast and stable browsing experience.  Chrome is one of the most popular browsers today.  It has become more than a web browser however, Chrome is an integral part of Google's cloud syncing across multiple hardware platforms, Google applications and services.

Chrome is available for Win XP - Win 8, OS X, and Linux. For smart phones and tablets, Android and iOS versions are available using the Webkit engine.  At it's core Chrome's engine is Blink, developed as part of the Chromium project and V8 a JavaScript Engine. After installation Chrome opens with two tabs. The first tab provides a login screen in case you have a Google account. If you don't have a Google account, click "skip for now" to proceed. The window will show the New Tab which will provide links to other Google services like YouTube, Gmail and Google Docs. The second tab is called Getting Started. Getting Started is a good resource for learning more about Chrome's features. Simply click "learn more" on the Welcome to Chrome page.

Chrome has a large selection of extensions (like apps on a smart phone) to enhance the browsing experience.  Chrome also has WebApps, programs that run within the browser instead of installing on the computer.  Google has another feature called cloud print.  Essentially if you have a printer that supports cloud printing at home or work, add a cloud printer to Chrome's advanced settings and you can print to the printer from Chrome.  Have you heard of ChromeVox?  An excellant text to speech feature for the visually impaired.  ChromeVox is a Google extension that reads the text in any open tab in Chrome.  

Most web developers still use Internet Explorer compatibility as the standard for developing websites.  Long ago there was an issue with viewing some websites do to their coding with a browser other than Internet Explorer.  I'm happy to say I haven't seen any of these issues with Chrome and would consider it safe for all commercial websites.  Chrome is an excellant browser for those seeking a clean, fast, and stable internet browsing experience at the novice and advanced levels.  Now to get past Google's use of Chrome to promote all their other services.

Mozilla Firefox was released in 2004.  Designed to be part of a Web Suite of chat, mail and HTML editing software, the developers felt the browser would make the suite too big and released it separately.  Firefox is considered one of the top three major web browsers.  Unlike Internet Explorer and Chrome, Firefox is owned by a non-profit (Mozilla Foundation) and completely open source being developed by a team of volunteers worldwide.  Consider it sort of a grass roots web browser that has found particular favor among Linux Distro users.  Firefox uses the Gecko engine developed by the Mozilla Foundation.

In 2011 starting with version 5 Mozilla started a program called Rapid Build.  There goal was to release new versions of Firefox every 6 weeks.  Firefox is now at version 25.  The reasoning is to get new features to the users faster.  That is a pretty ambitious goal.  

Some of Firefox's defining features include being able to pin a tab using the Pinned Tab feature to permanently make a tab like e-mail, Facebook, Twitter or other sites you like to keep open on the tab bar.  Switch-to-Tab will attempt to let you know when you already have a website open on a tab.  As you type in the Omnibar (address bar) Firefox will check to see if you have that site open.  Accidentally close one or more tabs and want to reopen them?  With Firefox you can.  Matter of fact while I was writing this I had to use the restore tab feature being very glad it was there.

Update: Firefox 27 has been release without much fanfare.  Most of the updates are in the background and won't be noticed by the average user.  For security Firefox upgraded to TLS, the successor to SSL security. For what its worth, Google 30 and IE 11 already have this technology.  They also made some API updates which will enhance how social media sites can be viewed but its all in the back ground, so most users aren't likely to see the difference.  During my peek at version 27 I was very disappointed in the performance, especially when speed is so heavily touted by Mozilla, the developer.  Version 28 is in Beta right now with a focus on Windows 8.x compatibility.  Just in time as Windows 9 is waiting in the wings.  Is it just me or does Mozilla seem to be getting farther and farther behind in the PC Browser category since splitting into the Android market and now Firefox OS? 

Internet Explorer has ties to Bing, Google Chrome has ties to Google Search, what does Firefox have? A search bar that let's you choose your search engine on the fly!  How cool is that?  Not only can you choose from the big three search engines, you can also search Amazon, Twitter, eBay and Wikipedia.  Yay!  Being independent does have it's advantages, and eliminating the bias' of the corporate conglomerate is huge.  There is also a status bar at the bottom for quick connection to your downloads, bookmarks, history, and more.  Even with all the good there is a little bad.  The most common reported issue seems to be from web sites that use Flash Player.  See the Firefox support page for possible fixes.  Overall I really enjoy Firefox using it at least 50% of the time for web browsing.

Internet Explorer (IE) was first release in 1995 with Windows 95.  Because it's bundled with Windows, IE is the most widely distributed browser in the world, and arguably the most popular in North America.  Currently using the Trident engine first released in 1997 and Chakra released in IE 9.

With the release of Version 10, IE has gained some market share the past 12 months, while Chrome and Firefox are declining some.  This vague opinion was reflected on 2 notable websites tracking browser use worldwide.  One showed Chrome in the lead, the other showed IE in the lead, both showed Firefox in third, both showed IE gaining and the others declining.  Personal opinions are even farther apart, and for this reason I won't get into debates on which one performs better or is the most popular.  As mentioned in the introduction, its a subjective debate.

Many think the only reason IE is still competing in the browser wars is because its so widely distributed.  The latest version however has demonstrated IE can be what it should be, more stable, secure and faster then previous versions.  The interface is clean, Chrome like, with minimal menus, a clean simple appearance and inconspicuous icons for quick access to favorites, settings and the home page.  Press the ALT key to reveal the neatly hidden traditional menus.  If you're a traditionalist, use Alt to access the View menu, Toolbars, where you can turn on the hidden traditional toolbar appearance.  IE needs improvements with tab sandboxing, the ability to control crashes by isolating them to the tab instead of crashing the entire browser.  IE is lagging behind Chrome and Firefox in the add-on/extension realm but significant improvements have been made.  Using the tracking protection add-on will help prevent third parties from gleaning information about your browsing habits.

IE does offer some useful utilities, like the performance dialog for add-ons.  If the browser speed is being impacted by add-ons, a message pops up.  Open the the Choose Add-ons window to see what is slowing the browser and make changes.  Security is strong with Tracking Protection and Smartscreen Filter.  Overall the improvements in IE 10 make it a contender again, at least for now.  

Opera, was released in 1996 and is current the 2nd most popular mobile browser.  Opera has been credited with originating many features, like their Speed Dial, that other web browsers have adopted under a different name.   Opera started out using their own engine called Presto until version 15 when they began using Google's Blink to provide the browsers more power and options.

Watch out big three, Opera is edging in with version 18.  Adding Firefox's Pinned Tabs, and the multi-search engine select feature.  All the browsers allow searching from the address bar, however unlike Firefox which offers a separate search box to select different search engines, Opera incorporates this ability into the address bar.  Simply type a search term and the address bar expands by dropping down with suggestions.  At the lower right edge of the drop down list are the optional search engines Google, Yahoo, Bing, Amazon and Wiki.  Who's borrowing who's ideas now?  

Has Opera become an industry follower instead of leader?  Opera is following Firefox's features and using Google's Chromium/Blink 32 engine. Sounds like they are struggling to keep up.  Many Opera users are frustrated with how recent versions of Opera manages favorites/bookmarks compared to Opera 12.  The developers have incorporated a method to import bookmarks from versions prior to 15.  They also added a feature called the Quick Access Bar (favorites bar).  Turning on the Quick Access Bar requires several steps.  At first I didn't understand why, then I started thinking they want users to get used to using Speed Dial instead of the traditional favorites.  Opera does provide a lot of features and settings, however trying to learn or find them is challenging.  On a more positive note Opera Speed Dial is an innovative take on defining how favorites should be managed.  Given a fair chance I think Speed Dial adds a modern casual yet deceivingly powerful take on web browsing.

Update: Opera 19 has been released as stable.  Major changes include updating the Quick Access Bar to a Bookmarks bar (symantecs). Turning on the Bookarks Bar from the settings menu is much easier than the hoops I had to jump through to turn on the Quick Access Bar.   Another new feature is the ability to make any image a browser wallpaper.   A lot of work has been done with extensions with more than 700 now available.  For Advanced User's more flexability and features have been added to the Opera Cabinet. Besides the additional features, Opera has been working diligently to fix bugs and glitches as demonstrated by the change log for version 19.  This version should offer allot more stability.  I also noticed some performance enhancements in this version of Opera. Version 20 should be arriving soon and hopefully bringing with it enough changes to warrant a full review.

I feel Opera is a refreshing browser.  It's fast and efficient, providing tools to optimize a true web "browsing" experience.  Using the Speed Dial and Stash features provides a different yet unique prospective.  After the initial installation Opera opens with two tabs, Speed Dial and Welcome to Opera.  The welcome doesn't provide any guidance as such.  It's more of a road map to the essential icons and features of the browser.  For additional detail click the "help is here" hyperlink.  Overall Opera doesn't quite hold up to the big three in complexity or bells and whistles.  However it does contend with them overall in essential features making it a Mega Browser.

Maxthon was released in 2003, known previously as MyIE.   In 2010 Maxthon released a browser for Android.  Two years later they introduced a Mac, and iOS version.   Maxthon uses Trident and Webkit engines. This combination creates a dual display engine for more website compatibility.  

Why Maxthon?  This browser is light and fast with a lot of features that don't bloat the browser's performance.  Many features that are add-ons or extensions with the other browsers are developed as part of the browser, so they are better integrated.  Maxthon also has some distinctive features like the split screen view.  With this feature two tabs can be viewed side by side.  The interface has semi transparent skins that blends the edges of the interface so they aren't distracting making the web page being viewed the star of attention.

Maxthon's claim to fame is cloud syncing between devices.  Create a free account with Maxthon and take advantage of it's many features to share data between a computer and cell phone or tablet.  The tabs viewed on the PC can be viewed on a cell phone or tablet.  Files can be downloaded to the cloud to share between devices.  The Cloud Push feature will send a web page to another device.  Using the share with friends a web page can be pushed to others via e-mail.  

Other built in features include Resource Sniffer which downloads video, music and pictures from the web page.  Like downloading YouTube videos?  You don't need a third party utility with Maxthon, you can do it from the browser with Resource Sniffer.  Maxthon has many features, but one of my favorites is Night Mode.  The browser will change to colors that are more suitable for night viewing.  Choose the default or customize from a palate of colors.  Night Mode also has an automated feature that lets you set the time of day or night you want modes to automatically switch.

Whether you use the cloud to share information between devices or simply want a browser packed full of usable features that won't slow the browser performance, Maxthon is worth checking out.

Sleipnir 5 is truly the unique browser in the Mega class.  While Maxthon brought unique designs from China, Sleipnir (pronounced slay-p-near), offers unique ideas from Japan.  That's right, a browser developed in Japan using a name based on Norse mythology.  There is nothing mythical about this browser based on Google's Blink engine, Sleipnir seeks to provide a "luxury" browsing experience by reinventing the browser UI and quality of text.  Released in 2004, Sleipnir was stolen, so the developers had to start over with version 2.  The original English versions were launched in Europe around 2010. Sleipnir supports Windows/Mac PCs, iphone/ipad, Android and Windows phone.  Sleipnir 5 does pass the Acid 3 test and HTML5 test.

The tabs are the focal point of the toolbar displaying a thumbnail image.  Menus are minimal on the left corner while the former address bar now called a portal field is on the far right.  Sleipnir believes the long address bar is a thing of the past.  Most people browse the Internet using search terms or hyperlinks not typing web address.  The portal field serves the same function as most address bars being used for searching or entering web address, however it's not the focal point of the toolbar.  Doesn't the term "portal field" just make sense?  It somewhat grows on you when you think about it.  A web browser is a portal to the Internet.

Using mouse gestures to navigate between pages in Sleipnir is a different experience than other browsers.  Using mouse gestures in Maxthon or Opera will essentially navigate the history of an open tab, in Sleipnir mouse gestures navigates between the open tabs like changing views in a smart phone.  Speaking of smart phones, Sleipnir is another web browser on the trend of blending their PC browser to emulate smart phone and tablet browsing.  It also supports touch screen PC displays.  My biggest complain about Sleipnir is their lack of proper support.  Their website lacks a lot of information and it could be because translating the browser into an English version is their latest challenge.  Still if you're looking for something truly new in a web browsing experience I think Sleipnir is worth trying.

Related Products and Links

Quick Selection Guide

Google Chrome
Gizmo's Freeware award as the best product in its class!

Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Supports multiple operating systems, frequent & silent updates, built-in flash and pdf viewer, large selection of extensions, cloud printing,
Getting slower, newer version has some backward software compatibility, still runs 32 bit.
Online Installer: 576 KB (Offline Installer: 33.37 MB, download link below)
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Open source freeware
A portable version of this product is available but not from the developer.
Windows, Linux, Mac OS X
Mozilla Firefox
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Simplified interface, competitively fast, broad cross platform support, very secure, sync & panoramas, thousands of add-ons, excellent website compatibility, large developer community
Doesn't play well with Adobe Flash Player.
23 MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Open source freeware
A portable version of this product is available from the developer.
Windows, Mac, Linux
Internet Explorer
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Amazing speed, minimalistic interface, pinned sites, improved web standard compliance, download manager with malware protection, tracking protection, H/W acceleration, good OS integration
Tab handling not as good as others, limited extension support, not as cloud friendly, no cross platform syncing, for MS-Windows only.
827 KB Win32.exe installer
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 7 and 8
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Fast, feature rich, cross platform support, tab stacking, web standard compliant, built in mail & torrent client, extension & themes support, visual tabs & mouse gestures, Opera turbo, account syncing
Limited Extension gallery, key features layered in extensive menus
34 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
A portable version of this product is available from the developer.
Windows, Mac, Linux
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Small footprint, fast, true cloud sync across devices, split screen view, custom skins, cloud push, cloud download, resource sniffer.
Inadequate tab functions. The core is still lagging some technologies of bigger browsers.
1.74 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
A portable version of this product is available but not from the developer.
Windows 7, 8, OSX
Sleipnir 5
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Innovative, sleek, cross-platform, tab thumbnails, unique designs
poor support
43 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows or Mac OSx. See Additional Information Below.

version v 5.0.1 | Vista / 7 / 8, Version 4.3.2 | For OS X 10.6 or later
Available for Mac/Android/Windows mobile devices.


Thank you for reading this article. If you think, it could be improved or your favourite Web Browser is not present in the article please do post your feedback and suggestions in the comments section below. Also don't forget to rate this article yes

This software review is copy-edited by Victor Laurie. Please help edit and improve this article by clicking here.

You are welcome to join the discussion in our forum here

Back to the top of the article



Share this
Average: 4.3 (155 votes)
Your rating: None


by Anupam on 8. January 2014 - 15:17  (113480)

Yes, I do not use NoScript with Firefox, and haven't been using it for years now. There are two reasons for it. First, there was a news about NoScript on the internet, in which AdBlock developer found that NoScript was allowing some chosen scripts, etc, in order to benefit some companies. I don't remember exact details now, but it made me lose faith over NoScript. Although NoScript ddeveloper had apologized for it later, and corrected the mistake. Still, lost my trust.

Also, I found out that Firefox opened page much faster without NoScript.

Since then, I haven't been using NoScript. But again, I don't venture much into dark places of the internet. And I use common sense and safety practices, so I am fine without it.

by bo.elam on 8. January 2014 - 16:19  (113482)

If you like to know why there is no NoScript in Chrome, read this article. Its a little old but still applies, after reading it (and the comments) you ll know why Google does not permit anything as good as NoScript to be available in Chrome.



by joeguru on 8. January 2014 - 16:22  (113483)

To All: Regarding FF and NoScript I must ask that this conversation be moved to the Freeware Forum. The comment section for category reviews is not the appropriate forum. Thank you.

by bo.elam on 8. January 2014 - 16:31  (113484)

In my personal case, pages open "a lot faster" with NoScript. Why? it takes a lot less bandwidth to open webpages when you block flash contents, scripts, etc. That is the way its supposed to be. Perhaps when you tried NoScript you did not have a good internet connection at the time and blamed it on NoScript.

As you know, I am a big believer in NoScript. In my personal opinion, NoScript does more for users (security wise) than any antivirus. In my experience, ever since I being using NoScript (five years), I have never encountered any malware while browsing.

You know how much I believe in Sandboxie containing malware, I feel the same way about NoScript blocking potential malware. NoScript works real well and silently.


by bo.elam on 8. January 2014 - 16:38  (113485)

Hey George, ScriptSafe and ScriptBlock don't do the same thing as NoScript. Please read Giorgios article below (reply to crombierob).


by jacemace on 29. January 2014 - 5:00  (114050)

Tried firefox ultimate. It is terrible. Freezes (not responding) constantly.

by youngjoe on 4. February 2014 - 2:26  (114231)

Two killer problems (for me):

1) I download a lot of text files. Chrome won't let me do that -- it converts them all to chrome's proprietary html format. I've seen a forum discussion of this. Many people have complained. Google doesn't give a damn. The other browsers offer downloaders a choice of formats.

2) Current Firefox doesn't permit use of current Shockwave Flash. I'm a musician and I can't use a browser that won't let me view videos.

I used Firefox happily for years, but this problem kills it for me.

by Anupam on 4. February 2014 - 8:29  (114235)

You had written Firefox as Foxfire, which I corrected in your post. Please take care to write the proper name.

Firefox does allow use of Flash. But, you have to allow it manually, since in recent versions, Firefox has implemented click to play for Flash videos.

by youngjoe on 4. February 2014 - 15:07  (114245)

Thanks for the correction, Anupam. And thanks for the information! Please, would you tell me how to go about allowing it manually. When I go to the page that FF sends me to to manage add-ons, I am informed that Flash player is banned because of unspecified malware problems, and no work-around suggestion is offered.

We all use our browsers with personal ideas of what functionality is required, and I know that many, many people are happy with Chrome. I'm not one of them. I've tried a few other browsers over the last few days, and I realize that for my purposes Foxfire is very much what I need to use, so I am grateful for suggestions of how to cure the flash problem.

by joeguru on 4. February 2014 - 15:24  (114246)

Please post user questions in the Freeware Forum, you'll get more help. This section is for comments regarding reviews or suggested software. Thank you.

by youngjoe on 4. February 2014 - 18:33  (114249)

Gotcha joe!

by Anupam on 4. February 2014 - 19:30  (114252)

youngjoe, please post your queries here in the forum:

When you post the thread, in the content, please post the Windows version on your system, the Firefox version installed, and also the flash player version.

See you in the forum :).

by Mike86 on 14. February 2014 - 15:03  (114472)

Is it true that mozilla planing to serve ads in browser? If it is true that will be a big time crash for her, i would still chose chrome or opera any time...

by sicknero on 14. February 2014 - 15:22  (114473)

I don't think it'll be having much of an impact... the ads will be shown in the tiles of the New Tab page so anyone who is especially bothered by them can just replace that with one of the many alternatives or even just opt for a blank page instead.

I expect there will be some complaining for a while and then back to business as usual, that's what generally happens when a vendor introduces some less-than-popular change.

by crombierob on 15. February 2014 - 4:34  (114478)

I have been struggling with FF for over a month now.
It gets very slow to load or refresh a tab, and then causes my CPUs to overheat, which then slows things as well.
I have Googled, and I am not alone with this problem.
ADVs will probably add to the problem.

by tenprodoc on 20. February 2014 - 19:10  (114578)

Sleipnir does seem worth trying! however upon trying it I was prompted to install a media player and it recommended VLC. All sounds well and good until it installed the player and tried to get me to accept about 5 changes to my computer search and browsers and I don't know what all. I refused all and it still screwed up my browser and search. Guess the relationship going forward is a bit too pricey for me and great text will have to wait until the price isn't too high.
I lost a lot of work and it left a very bad taste in my mouth.

by George.J on 21. February 2014 - 7:08  (114580)

Personally I haven't tried Sleipnir for a long time, but Softpedia confirms the product as clean:

The problem that you had usually comes when you download softwares from sites other than the homesite or reputed software download sites like Softpedia. Next time be careful when you download.

by MidnightCowboy on 21. February 2014 - 8:08  (114582)

Certainly sounds like a wrapped installer. Cnet and Softonic for two would definitely have bundled unwanted components with the download. I just installed the program into Windows 7 from our download link and there was nothing else included. This is actually quite impressive. All my Chrome extensions and settings imported including the site WOT script. :) More information about how to avoid bundled software below: MC - Site Manager.

by Panzer on 4. June 2014 - 7:46  (116609)

Beta version of Otter Browser (project aiming to recreate classic Opera (12.x) UI using Qt5) is out:

by Panzer on 16. June 2014 - 7:49  (116784)

360 Browser:

What's new in the latest version?

1. Ad Filter: hide unwanted advertisements.
2. Dual Engine: powered by both Webkit and IE web engines.
3. Secure Browsing: filter phishing and malicious URLs.
4. Video Pop-out: place video in an always-on-top window.
5. Themes: personalize 360 Browser with beautifully designed themes.

by stephench on 8. July 2014 - 5:42  (117215)


It is Stephen Cheng From FlashPeak Inc. Can you list our Slimjet Web Browser from here? Slimjet is based on the Chromium project and adds a lot of convenient and smart features on top of it. It is the best browser we've made so far. While it shares a similar set of features with SlimBrowser/SlimBoat, it beats the other two in terms of performance, stability, web site compatibility and support of the latest web technologies. It is currently built on top of Chromium m35. We will keep it synchronized to the Chrome releases as closely as possible.


by sicknero on 22. July 2014 - 12:15  (117484)

Hi Victor, I just wanted to mention that Maxthon have been offering a portable version of their browser for quite a long time now.

v here -

by Zeaxan on 26. July 2014 - 22:19  (117597)

Has anyone heard any good reviews for 360 Browser from the makers of 360safe antivirus? I know the antivirus is one of the best free available with great detection rates, but I'm curious about their web browser. Its suppose to be similar to IE only safer.


In case anyone wants to check it out. Thanks!

by George.J on 27. July 2014 - 4:45  (117600)

It runs on Webkit and IE engines, but the interface looks like that of Opera to me :D

by crombierob on 27. July 2014 - 4:54  (117601)

I have a question, which perhaps should be on everyone's lips (everyone using XP)
Which browser is so much based on IE, that web pages designed to only run on IE, will run on that browser ?
The reason that question should be on many lips is, the cessation of XP security updates, means hackers are targeting IE.
For users out there that need the ability to open web pages designed for IE, which browser will allow that SAFELY ?


by crombierob on 27. July 2014 - 6:07  (117602)

I am trying your 360 browser.
I assume that Webkit means Chrome ?
It in nearly all respects looks to be Chrome based (even the irritating minimalistic approach that is spreading like a disease)
I decided to check it out in case it was the answer to the question I posted above (Safe IE based alternative)
I can only find one hint that IE mode is possible, in the Settings, where it says -
Browsing Engine - Pick the right engine for me

If I am correct, and hackers are now targeting IE, does that mean - that exploits they discover for IE, will also exploit 360 Secure Browser, when it is in IE mode ?


by dave316 on 30. July 2014 - 7:06  (117664)

Sleipnir has a portable version for download. It's with the .zip extension.

by crombierob on 30. July 2014 - 7:30  (117665)

I tried Maxthon
There are some people in the world that don't mind all their open tabs, being discarded (like used co.....s ) when the browser closes.
Personally I would vote them out of the gene pool, but I must learn to be tolerant.
Users have written to Maxthon complaining that they discard all open Tabs, and Maxthon has replied (many times) that the solution they provide is just as good.
Their solution is they give you a single Tab with a list of your previously open Tabs.
You then have to tell Maxthon to re-open them (like it should have done in the first place)
I tolerated that for a few sessions, and the last time I opened Maxthon and requested a re-opening of all Tabs (like it should have) it discarded all but a couple.
On reflection, perhaps I am meant to study that flippin list, and tick/untick some lines.
Instead - I will never use Maxthon again.

by MidnightCowboy on 30. July 2014 - 7:51  (117666)

I sympathize with your feelings. I encounter similar stuff frequently with Linux systems and apps. A bit of searching usually brings up a solution in one forum or another. My attitude though, is for the solution to exist there is obviously a problem, so why isn't the solution already built into the product? MC - Site Manager.

by Aninnymous on 20. August 2014 - 17:38  (118094)

It would be useful to inform us all about the cluster of each "mega" browser 'clones'. Perhaps each list could be included after the discussion of the particular browser with a brief description of the main advantage of the alternate.

FireFox has WaterFox, PaleMoon, Sea Monkey, etc.

Chrome has Comodo Dragon, SRWare Iron, RockMelt, Chromium, etc.

And so on.

It's hard to keep track of all the useful alternatives out there now.

Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting!

Gizmos Needs YouShare your knowledge of free software with millions of Gizmo's readers by joining our editing team.  Details here.