Best Free Web Browser
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Back in the early 1990s when the World Wide Web was young, there was only one web browser worth using: Netscape, which evolved from Mosaic. Then Microsoft gave us Internet Explorer and subsequently started including it with their OS. Thus began the browser wars, and IE eventually emerged as the clear winner. Today Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) is Microsoft's latest browser. A major update from version 7, it has been playing catch up with other major browsers on the market... especially when in the area of security and features. It is a competent browser with enough features to meet the needs of most users. Version 8 is by far the most secure version I have seen yet from Microsoft, but IE8 is still difficult to recommend due to on-going security concerns. In the past IE has been a focus for security attacks, and there is little to suggest that this will change with this new version. Additionally, Microsoft has a poor track record for speedily fixing IE defects. This has left users open to drive-by attacks and other forms of zero-day exploits. A big plus for IE8 is that it now supports an Add-on architecture, allowing the program to be enhanced, but the downside is that even though there are a growing number of IE8 add on programs available, very few are worth using (though that may change in the future). The end result is that even with IE8's security enhancements and new features, there is still a huge need for alternative browsers that are feature rich, very secure, and super fast. When it comes to web browsers, everyone has an opinion. Every web browser will have a specific feature set that appeals to some while not appealing to others. The criteria used for selecting browsers in this review are the following:
When it comes right down to it, the best web browser is one that allows you to view the Web the way that YOU want. The browsers listed below are, in this editor's opinion, some of the best at doing this by offering ease of use, flexibility, expandability, security, and great feature sets, while simultaneously doing their prime function of displaying HTML pages. |
|
Discussion
|
|
Mozilla Firefox 3.6 is my first choice. It's safer than IE, so safe in fact that many users have reported no spyware infections since they started using the product. It also browses a tad faster than IE, is very stable and is more standards compliant. When Firefox hit version 3.0 it fixed a whole slew of issues that its predecessor suffered. Version 3.5 makes Firefox even faster and more feature rich with such features as Private browsing (Similar to "Incognito Mode" in Chrome), the ability to create new windows from existing tabs, and better session control. With tabbed browsing and over 2000 free extensions (add-ons) that allow you to customize your experience, it provides the most flexibility, expandability, and features of any browser to date. Firefox continues to be my everyday browser, though I still leave IE8 on my PC for the occasional web site that's designed around IE's non-standard features. If you need any further convincing then check out Gizmo's IE to Firefox migration guide. An equal first choice is Opera. This safe, full featured, standards compliant, browser, is a speed demon. Now at version 10, there are several enhancements. The biggest is "Opera Turbo". When enabled, it will use Opera's servers to compress web pages, thus making pages load faster. This means if you are on any kind of a slow connection (shared public Wi-Fi, mobile phone, dial-up), you can greatly improve your page load times. Just as Firefox is extensible through add-ons, Opera can be enhanced using Widgets, though there are not nearly as many of these available as there are Firefox extensions. Then again, it doesn't need as many extensions because a lot of the features added by Firefox add-ons are already built into the standard Opera browser. In addition to being a top rate web browser, it also has a great email client, RSS reader, newsgroup reader, and IRC Chat client. It also now scores a perfect 100 on the Acid 3 test. There's just so much to like about Opera 10 that you could easily create a case that it's better than Firefox. Indeed, Opera used to be my first choice, and if I could get an Opera replacement for some of my key Firefox add-ons, I'd probably switch back. Apple's Safari Browser has been getting better and better and sets the bar pretty high. It is safe to say that this is Apple's fastest browser yet. Page load times rank right up there with Google Chrome and Opera. It is also standards compliant, scoring a perfect 100 on the Acid 3 test. Apple has definitely been doing its homework. In addition to being faster and more standards compliant, the Safari user interface is more streamlined with new features that have added a "Zen of Apple" type of user experience. The biggest is the Cover Flow navigation feature, which allows users to scroll through bookmarks and Web sites like they are browsing an iTunes collection. Very impressive! Also, they have adapted the popular "Top Sites" page found on Google Chrome and made it look 3-D. There is some criticism over these and other features though. One is that the interface looks too much like Google Chrome. In fact, it could be easy to confuse the two if it weren't for the other enhancements. Another is that tabs change size every time a new tab is added. Probably the biggest criticism I have of Safari is that it requires a lot of system resources. On Windows XP or Vista it requires a 500MHz Pentium class processor or better and 256 MB of RAM. To access the Cover Flow functionality and Top Sites, you will need a a Direct X 9.0 video card with 64 MB of video RAM. Slower PC's should probably avoid this one, but if you have a newer PC, you will have no problems. Google Chrome is making a lot of waves in the browser world, and for good reason. The folks at Google did their homework when they created this browser. It is amazingly fast at loading pages due to it being based on the Safari rendering engine. Although the interface is minimalist, it won't take long to get used to and is very easy to use. If you have been a Firefox user for awhile, you will be happy to know that now Chrome is now capable of being enhanced through the use of add-ons. There are two features that really impressed me with Chrome. The first is a feature called, "Create Application Shortcut". This will place an icon on your desktop that, when activated, will open any web page you specify automatically into Google Chrome, but without the navigation and search bar. This makes that page look as if it were a program installed on your PC. The second is "Incognito Mode". Setting the browser to this mode will prevent it from leaving any trace of your web history on your computer. Though these are amazing features, there are still some drawbacks. Presently, Chrome requires an internet connection to install on your PC and the interface is not customizable, but overall, Google Chrome is an awesome product, worthy of consideration on this list. For all of its positive reviews, Chrome does have its critics. Their major complaint is that Chrome creates a unique ID through which a user can be theoretically identified. If this is your concern, then SRWare Iron may very well be an option for you. SRWare Iron looks and acts almost exactly like Google Chrome, but without sending any information back to Google's servers. This means that there is no possibility of any browsing history or personal information being sent back to Google, yet you still get all the benefits of a lean and powerful browser. Users who don't want to drift too far from the Microsoft stable can get some of the feature advantages of Firefox and Opera by using one of the many customized shells for Internet Explorer, such as Maxthon and Avant. The main selling point for these products used to be tabbed browsing, but now that this has been available since version 7 of Inernet Explorer 7 it's hard to create a case for their general recommendation. Still, if you need a specialized feature they are worth considering. On the downside, these shells share most of the same security problems as IE because they utilize the IE engine. Last but not least is K-Meleon, a slimmed down cousin of Firefox that's optimized for Windows. Of the four browsers reviewed here, K-Meleon is the quickest loading and, along with Opera, the fastest for surfing. There are only a limited number of add-ons and plug-ins available, so you are pretty well limited to the features available in the standard product. If you're the type of person who prefers performance to bells and whistles, then you should definitely try K-Meleon. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Joe Bennett. Registered site visitors can contact Joe by clicking here.
You are welcome to join the discussion here:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/internet-webware-and-netw...
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Please rate this article


Subscribe to our 
Firefox does seem very very bloated nowadays. K-meleon seems to be for geeks. Not very user friendly. Google Chrome runs fast out of the box. Also new extensions are coming up fast.
I'm always on the lookout for my 'perfect' browser, but choice for site work is limited by the functions I really need to operate here effectively. I share you own thoughts about Firefox but recently began using CometBird. I don't need a huge amount of extensions but what I did use with Firefox all work fine with CometBird. Might just be worth a look for anyone else who feels the same. Mine definitely starts much faster than Firefox.
http://www.cometbird.com/
There's a pretty decent review for it here, but it's not for the latest version.
http://welloiledpc.com/cometbird.htm
'It’s best if end users know that they can be exploited on any browser and on any operating system. In general, exploitation on Windows got harder but it’s not impossible. All the browser engines are getting better at security. It’s much harder to find a vulnerability these days but there are all kinds of other problems with add-ons and third-party dependencies. People need to know that bad things can happen while you surf the Internet, regardless of what you use.' From a 'hacker'.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2951
Some interesting reads re 'bug bounties' re browsers
http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/security/cybercrime/news/index...
http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/security/3262-malware-fou...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/05/malicious_firefox_extensions/
Note fake firefox download site.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/03/fake_firefox_download/
IE vulnerability.
http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/security/3261-another-int...
MS 'advisory'.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/980088.mspx
Some Browser Stats...
http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/02/ie8-chrome-have-most-momen...
"By exploiting weaknesses in Adobe Systems' Flash Player, researchers have devised two separate attacks that bypass mitigations Microsoft put into IE 7 and 8" http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/03/microsoft_windows_protection_byp...
Comodo has its own browser now base on chromium check it out people http://www.comodo.com/home/internet-security/browser.php
Moderator's comment : Edited link to point to the product page, instead of the download page.
Currently, the newest STABLE google chrome has extensions support. And there are quite a few extensions it has now that the stable version has extensions. I've found all the ones that I need, except for one for downloading video (like off youtube) from video... streaming... things... don't know what they're called. Whatever, I can do without it. The point is, lots of firefox extensions can now be found on google chrome, and I've actually got less google chrome extensions than firefox extensions, because a lot of my firefox add-ons were to customize the look of it. I'm happy with google chrome's look, so I don't have any of those. Admitedly, there isn't a full Adblock Plus on Google Chrome, but there is Adblock (the normal one) for it, and it works almost as well (none of that Adthwart business thank you!). The only real problem I have with Google Chrome is that it takes up far more memory than Firefox (which is fairly trimmed down now. For a browser), because they house every single tab in its own process, and EACH EXTENSION in its process AS WELL! This is to stop crashes, and it makes Google Chrome a LOT stabler, but, seriously, can I say overkill?
The final thing is that Google is the fastest of all the browsers for me. I don't know, it just feels a lot less sluggish to me than the others.
"Browsers can leave a unique trail on the Web, privacy group says"
You can read the article, here:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9150002/Browsers_can_leave_a_uniq...
Excerpt:
"Users are mistaken if they think that disabling cookies--small text files stored in browsers that allow Web sites to recognize repeat visitors among other functions--will protect their privacy."
Wolfram
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/30/firefox_interprotocol_attack/
IE and FF are the most used Browsers.
As a result, IE and FF become the target of Hackers
more often than the rest browsers.
This is the case; not that the rest browsers are Safer than IE and FF.
If people had used more Opera and Google Chrome or Safari,
hackers would have attacked on these.
I tried Opera, Google Chrome, Iron, Safari etc.
All of them gave me problems.
I stay with FF, because:
-KeyScrabler FREE.
-No problems with sites' contents (videos etc.)
-Shows the Logos of ALL sites (Both in from of the Address and in Bookmarks.
-Best Ad-blocker: ABP is better than the two ones of Chrome.
-Sbybot and SpywareBlaster offer FF protection.
If another Browser offers me the same or even more, I can switch to it.
For the time being, no one can!
"IE and FF are the most used Browsers.
As a result, IE and FF become the target of Hackers
more often than the rest browsers."
you're quite right, and they are both equally exploitable. once, or if, ff becomes the most used browser it will no doubt suffer the same 'attention' that ie has. and it would prob be easier to exploit as it is 'open source'.
I'm interested to know how you judge open source software to be more easily exploitable?
Just like to say that on my system I had a serious possibly driver related incompatibility with the beta of SRWare Iron which wiped my monitor and needed a hard reboot to fix. This happened on several occasions when I was scrolling pages which hadn't completely loaded. I've now been using the stable version for a day doing the same stuff and so far it's fine. Maybe this is one of the things they've now fixed with this upgrade. I just like the speed and un-cluttered nature of the whole browser. It's not ideal for what I do, I would still like to see the WOT ratings in search results, but at least I can use the bookmark method for individual sites, and the adblock works really well.
Hi, Guys:
How about QtWeb? It's portable and loads faster than any browser I know of. Besides, it has a function to import Firefox, Opera, IE Favorites that does this perfectly (including the process of importing bookmark "aliases" or URL abbreviations, whatever you prefer to name these). It's available here:
http://qtweb.net/
Brazil.
Thanks for the tip, I like it! I wish it could search and auto load pages in the the navigator field like Firefox. Maybe it can?
Why isn't Flock listed here? It's the same as Firefox only the address bar and search bar are integrated into one bar in Flock, which is what makes Flock better than Firefox, which is strange cuz they're both Mozilla products.
Flock is huge memory hog. Avoid at all cost. It is even worse that FF.
The reason I don't list Flock on this list is because it is targeted at people who do social networking at places such as FaceBook, MySpace, and Twitter. Since the purpose of Flock is geared toward a specific user-base with the intent of being a social network browser, in my mind it falls just outside of the scope of this article, which is to review web browsers.
Try chromePlus http://www.chromeplus.org/download.php Version 4.0.295.0 It stays ahead of srware iron with more features.
New SRWare Iron-Version: 4.0.280 Stable for Windows is out!
http://www.srware.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1080
The download page shows 4.0.280 as the latest version. When I downloaded the file, it shows version as 4.0.275. Whats happening? O.o
Edit : Hovering the mouse over the setup shows version as 4.0.275.0. But, at the time of installation, the version shown is 4.0.280.0. So, OK, its the correct version :D.
The latest Google Chrome version is 4.0.249.78 and it supports extensions.
Bye Firefox :)
Why is this article so old?
It shows the version as 3.0.195.33.
Please update it soon.
Google Chrome v4 is not ready to replace Firefox.
Following I present Three (3) issues that made me to go back to Firefox:
1) Initially, Google Chrome could download videos
and open them with the Widows Media Player.
After I visited a site with an -Embedded- Media Player Video,
Chrome requested the Installation of a Media Player Plug-in.
I installed the Media Player Plug-in and saw that video.
From that moment, -All- videos,
even the ones that are -Not Embedded-,
open as -Embedded- ones (i.e. within Chrome).
As a result, I can Not save any of them.
-How can I stop Chrome from opening all Videos as if they are Embedded ones?
Removing the Windows Media Player Plug-in will cure the problem
(i.e. allow me to download Videos and watch them WMP 12.)
-BUT-
-What about the sites having Embedded Videos and demanding Windows Media Player Plug-in?
-When the Windows Media Player Plug-in is installed -Again-
(in order to watch Embedded Videos),
then,-ALL- videos (Embedded and Not Embedded)
open within the Browser (i.e. as if they are ALL Embedded).
No answer from their Forum yet...
2) The AdBlock Plus of Google Chrome is -Not- the SAME with
the AdBlock Plus of Firefox where the 'Fanboy's List', 'Malware Domains'
and other helpful elements can be introduced!
Adding AdThwart (another Ad-Blocking Tool)slightly improves the situation.
To test the Ad-Blocking element of Chrome and FF,
I used several Chinese, Russian etc. sites
which are famous for their Nasty pop-ups!
There have been cases where the Filters of AdThwart stopped pages from
opening properly, delaying their opening etc.
Overall, The Ad-Blocking protection of Google Chrome
(offered by AdBlock Plus-Google Chrome (+) AdThwart)
is less Effective than the AdBlock Plus of Firefox.
3)When I Bookmarked some pages,
Google Chrome could Not properly show their Bookmark Logo (i.e. icon),
whereas, Firefox could. (Opera has the same issue, too.)
Google Chrome is Faster than FF.
-BUT-
FF remains the most Configurable Browser due to thousands of Add-ons
and offers me No-Troubles After-Installation (Set & Forget).
Both Firefox and IE
support KeyScrambler Personal:
A Freeware which offers some protection against Keyloggers.
However, both Google Chrome and Opera do -NOT-
support KeyScrambler Personal (Free).
-What Opera and Google Chrome offer against Keyloggers?
Nothing!
Some people want the speed of Opera and Safari. Some like the simplicity of Chrome. Some prefer the expandability of Firefox. Like I say in the article: "...the best web browser is one that allows you to view the Web the way that YOU want. "
Opera - Safari:
-No W.O.T. installation (IE, FF, GC offer)
-Terrible Ad-Blocker (compared with AdBlock Plus of FF and GC).
-No KeyScrabler Free installation (IE and FF offer)
-Problematic with Embedded WMP videos.
-CanNot display properly some sites' Logo
(before the Address Bar & Bookmarks).
-CanNot display properly some sites' content.
Firefox is the Less-Problematic 3rd-Party Browser.
It may not be the fastest, but it does drive you crazy
with things missing, not working etc.
I need to update SRWare Iron browser. Can the new version be installed over the previous or must the old be uninstalled first? Thank you
Here is a discussion thread at SRWare Iron that talks about this very issue:
http://www.srware.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=183
Hello all, I don't go in much for Beta versions, so I held off testing Firefox 3.6 till yesterday's final release. Now, using the Peace Keeper benchmark on several systems, I think it can be safely said, "move over Chrome, I'm going back to my FireFox". For example, on a lowly AMD-2200, Chrome clocked-in all tests at 1222 and Firefox at 1306.
I look at it this way: When you can have a combination of speed, great behavior, security, web standards, AND add-ons like Ad-Block, No-Script, FEBE browser backup, Download Status Bar, Download Helper, etc.. and now Personas... Apart from narrow-minded fan-boy's, Who wouldn't switch?
Check results between browsers - Post them here - I think you find the same:
http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper
Note: You must have a recent Java installed and this test takes about 3-5 minutes per browser. At the end of each test, it gives you a link to test another browser, so at the end, you'll have cumulative results of all browsers tested on a bar graph. (click on each browser in the graph to get more score detail on Rendering, Social Networking, Complex Graphics, Data, Document Object Model operations, and Text Parsing)
PS: Joe, we see you posted at 2:52am this morning, we know you must love this stuff and you're bang-on again, we have do have a new winner here.. - CM
I don't know where you are, CM, but I posted last night at 6:53 PM from Michigan, USA. :)
Thanks for your kind comments.
That should have been, "we do have a new winner here"
and for folks who know Firefox addons, read:
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=402
- CM
With Opera 10.10 Unite is already a part of a stable release. You need to mention in the Opera review about it such as the ability to easily share files via your computer, sharing tens of Gbs of photos which is not possible with flickr, facebook etc.
You should also incorporate the Flock browser into review.
Well we have Firefox 3.6. Unfortunately it breaks some popular stuff like the Roboform toolbar. Mozilla does a Big Blue / Microsoft... sigh
Rik Mayell - Category Editor, Best Free Windows 7 / Vista 64 bit Software
SRWare Iron now supports plugin extensions. http://www.srware.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=567&sid=79e08e0d22ccd21...
German Government posts warning against using IE as full extent of vulnerability to latest exploit becomes known.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8463516.stm
For those 'bashing' IE, eg in the tsa forums, this would happen to any browser that was a means to an end and therfore the subject of such a focused targeting imo. it was the organisations that were targeted, and since the exploit is now common knowledge, and 'wild', IE is vulnerable, to a certain extent. please do some proper research, and employ some objectivity.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/15/ie_zero_day_exploit_goes_wild/
Most normal people would find that contributing to a debate is preferential to just rubbishing the attempts of others doing so, but of course here it is not possible to post in the forum unless you become a registered member.
So, posting it here when you have nothing "objective" to offer yourself does not help anyone to understand why they may or may not wish to continue using IE.
The French government has now issued a similar warning, but I guess that for the sake of Microsoft and IE we should ignore this one too?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8465038.stm
Here is an 'informative' link to MS view/assessment of the exploit. 'make of it what you will'!
http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2010/01/15/assessing-risk-of-ie-0da...
Yes, I read that. Are you implying that I'm not 'normal'. Typical 'fanboy' reply. How does that accord with your tsa rules etc? It's ok then to criticise a post that doesn't accord! Your site allows posting comments, and the post WAS 'objective'. didn't you read it? and the linked article, which does contribute, for eg? it said that IE is vulnerable!!! but.., but imo the same would happen to any browser that was a means to an end. yes, let the whole world, including the US govt and the White house use firefox etc. would that prevent the targeting of google etc? No. because any os, browser, software is hackable to those in the know with a concentrated agenda. so, don't patronise.
How does MC posting the news headline...
...amount to bashing IE as you say in your first reply "anonymous". It is pretty ironic that you are charging MC with a "fanboy" reply, when your first post could be taken that way too! MC never mentions what browser he uses or prefers, how is that being a fan?
Objective means to look at a subject from neutral position. (i.e. without personal bias or emotional attachment) MC's first post was from a neutral position, purely informational. Your post was not from a neutral position as it indirectly defends IE.
MC never claims here that FF or any other browser it not vulnerable, but IE has a record of being such from its inception. If there were groups of people standing behind severall supposedly bullet proof shields, but people were constantly getting shot behind one of them because the bullets were getting through, where would you stand?
It was never said that mc's post was a 'bashing'.
The 'personal' approach is a typical fanboy reply. as is the usual furore when something slightly 'objectionable' is posted.
I know what objective means, thanks. perhaps 'others' need to be advised of its meaning though. The linked article discusses the IE exploit/vulnerability, and then discusses mitigation. ie both sides! with plenty of related links to read up on, either way! this 'informational' link was posted a couple of days ago! ie no subjectivity, except for the factual opinion that any browser is exploitable/hackable to those in the know.
Yes, IE has been around for a v. long time!
No software is 'bulletproof', so your analogy is pointless.
Anyway, "..the fact that Windows 7 and IE 8 were able to withstand the "highly sophisticated" attacks that felled Google is testament that Microsoft is making significant progress." (from the linked article!)
There you go.
Just for information, messed around with email clients like an itch I can't scratch until finally settling on the one integrated into Seamonkey. This works well for the site admin and now has the same extension availability that I used to have with Firefox. I could never settle with Firefox but this is just a personal thing and not criticism of the browser. I did use Opera the same way for a while but kept encountering HTML issues I couldn't resolve when trying to post stuff to the site. This was maybe me not understanding something correctly but anyway I'm very happy with Seamonkey. When I'm just surfing for information and other stuff I now use SRWareIron.
MC, which version of Iron do you use, the stable or the beta? Also, what is your feeling regarding the portable versions available? At present, I am using the portable version of the beta.
I'm using the beta but as I like an integrated mail client I use Seamonkey most of the time so Iron is not out of it's box that often. I also can't comment on the portable version because I've never tried it. With my main beta version I have encountered an issue on several occasions which my tech says is driver related and results in my losing my monitor completely. This happens when scrolling pages with Iron which haven't completely loaded. I've tried to reproduce the same circumstances using Seamonkey and I don't have the problem so my logic says that Iron is responsible. I do like this version of Iron a lot though and once it goes final I may look again at my browser.mail client setup.
This article fails to mention that Opera has built-in encryption. I think the only other browser that has this is Firefox via the Keyscrambler plugin. Encryption needs to be addressed here. I'll also add that Opera magnifies text on webpages, making everything bigger and easier to read.
I'd like to learn more about this feature in Opera. Would you be able to explain in detail how to enable it? I'm not finding it in Opera's preferences, nor am I finding any mention of it in Opera's documentation.
here's the text from Wikipedia's article on Opera:
"Its security features include built-in phishing and malware protection, strong encryption when browsing secure Web sites, and the ability to easily delete private data such as HTTP cookies."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera_(web_browser)
This feature is not anything close to Keyscrambler. It is just about supporting the highest bit encryption when browsing https: sites.
Post new comment