Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

Gizmos Needs YouWe are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager        Interested? Click here

 

Lightweight Browsers

Introduction

Modern day desktops have blazingly fast processors and gigabytes of RAM and oodles of applications can be run at a time. Speaking of applications, when it comes to web browsers the primary choice gets usually shortlisted into any one of these: Firefox, Opera, Chrome, Safari or Internet Explorer for most of them. But you may be baffled while running the above megabrowsers on your low end system’s and naturally is out of question if you want to have a well balanced computing environment. Sometimes you just wish to browse through various sites peacefully or you may want to run multiple applications while browsing or you don’t want your RAM to be overloaded or just want your CPU to be relieved a little bit of its chores (considering you don’t have a graphics card installed). These lightweight browsers could well be your redeemer here. Some may not fully support the standards of the WorldWideWeb consortium and complicated HTML, javascript, CSS elements but these browsers play a very useful and important role for faster, lighter and more casual browsing experience in our daily lives.

Discussion

The web browsers are listed according to the measure of impact caused to the system by them, lighter ones being mentioned at the top. 

  • K-Meleon Rating 9 of 10

K-Meleon is a browser powered by Gecko engine, that aims to be very fast, widely customizable and extremely lightweight. The software is free and open source as well as simple and straight forward. Don't be deceived by the simplicity, the browser has a powerhouse of options that makes it lean and mean. The preferences panel has daunting number of options (presumably the largest among any browser) to customize the browser that can even shy the biggest names in the market. 

K-Meleon also supports a decent number of extensions to increase the flexibility of the browser. K-Meleon implements mouse gestures that makes your browsing experience more comfortable. Managing and organising bookmarks is very easy and they can be imported and organized well in folders. The privacy options lets the user to be safe and clear any sensitive data that may be stored and K-Meleon lets you to manage cookies, login data, history, cache, referrers, user agent string and prefetching link addresses as well as implements encrypted transmission and storage. 

There is also an endless list of search engines by default in K-meleon and which can be added at will and also has a built-in RSS reader. You can filter the contents of webpages through CSS rules for ad-blocking.  K-Meleon utilizes its cache very well and was the fastest to load webpages for consecutive times. 

The browser has been a pleasure to use and is the best bet on old hardware because of it being extremely light. Though the abundance of options in K-Meleon would interest any advanced user to lean against it, the browser has been made to rot without any significant updates for quite some time.

  • QtWeb Rating 7 of 10

QtWeb Internet Browser is an open source project based on Nokia's Qt framework and Apple's WebKit rendering engine (the same as being used in Apple Safari and Google Chrome). It's the best portable browser in my tests and consists of just a single portable exe file.The browser has the fastest startup time among all I've tested.

The user interface is minimal which can be changed by using application styles icon. The browser is also customizable with options to show/hide buttons, toolbars, relocate navigation bar and bookmarks, even undock them to desktop. The browser supports FTP browsing and downloading as well as have a built-in torrent client. The browser also supports mouse gestures, keyboard and mouse shortcuts (can be studied from new tab page) and open/play audio, video content in external applications.

I love QTWeb, especially because of its privacy and security. The browser being highly portable is a single button click away for turning on private browsing. It even runs in a limited Windows environment or directly from USB. There are options to 1. reset the browser(clear history, back to defaults etc) and 2. full reset (back to clean state). There is also an inbuilt adblocker which can be customized to block those nasty ads.

There are also additional useful options like Auto-Fill support, web inspector to inspect html elements and reduce load times, virtual keyboard support etc. Though, there is an occasional rise in memory consumption and concerns regarding the stability, the browser is still extremely lightweight and is a small 6MB download. 

  • Midori Rating 7 of 10

Midori (Japanese for green) is a web browser that aims to be lightweight and fast. It uses the WebKit rendering engine and the GTK+ 2 interface. Midori is part of the Xfce desktop environment's Goodies component.It is the default browser in elementary OS and the BodhiLinux distribution as well as Trisquel Mini.

  • QupZilla Rating 8 of 10

QupZilla is a lightweight multiplatform web browser written in Qt Framework (same as QtWeb browser) and using its web rendering core QtWebKit. It features SpeedDial extension and integrated AdBlocker and uses native widgets style with a unified library for bookmarks, history, rss and the like.

  • SlimBoat Rating 9 of 10

SlimBoat is a versatile and cross-platform web browser that is fast, secure and loaded with powerful features. It feels similar to SlimBrowser from the same company, but runs on top of QtWebKit rendering engine. It includes most of the features that Slimbrowser has, but feels lighter. 
  • Arora Rating 6 of 10

Arora is a lightweight cross-platform web browser. It runs on Linux, embedded Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, Windows, Haiku, and any other platforms supported by the Qt toolkit.Arora uses the QtWebKit port of the fully standards-compliant WebKit layout engine. It features fast rendering, powerful JavaScript engine and supports Netscape plugins.

  • Avant Rating 9 of 10

Avant Browser is an ultra-fast web browser. Its user-friendly interface brings a new level of clarity and efficiency to your browsing experience, and frequent upgrades have steadily improved its reliability. Avant Browser is the lowest memory usage web browser on Windows platform (website claim). 

  • Slimbrowser Rating 8 of 10

SlimBrowser is a free web browser for Windows that is blazing fast, most secure and fully loaded with powerful features. It starts up quickly and opens web pages right in front of you with minimum delay. It is designed to let you browse the Internet safely by guarding your personal information and protecting your privacy.

  • Columbus Browser Rating 5 of 10

Columbus is a smart and powerful web-browser with many useful built-in features. It has the ability to search for a particular file you want to download, directly on all popular torrent sites and offers a quick, reliable access to Web content, ease-up your downloading habits or help you with your online work. 

  • GreenBrowser Rating 7 of 10

GreenBrowser is based upon the Trident rendering engine used in Internet Explorer. GreenBrowser is a full-featured powerful and flexible browser, highly-customizable but compact in size and low in memory requirements.GreenBrowser is similar to Maxthon and closely related to the MyIE browser.

  • TheWorld Browser Rating 6 of 10

TheWorld Browser is a tiny, fast, secure and powerful web browser created by Phoenix Studio. It a multi-tab and multi-window web browser. It is completely free and there is no function limitation. It has no bundled software, so it can be uninstalled totally.  

 

Share this
4.517855
Average: 4.5 (56 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by Panzer on 29. October 2012 - 10:15  (101547)

New version of K-Meleon (K-Meleon Twin+) from rodocop is out:
http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/forum/read.php?1,123763

" ... 1) It's double portable build (1.7 folder inside 1.6 folder) - it was conceived that 1.6 is the main browser and 1.7 is secondary one on demand (sometimes it renders sites more correctly, but 1.7 branch still has more crucial bugs)

2) It's based on 1.6beta2.5 from JamesD and db+ builds from dugbugoffice. No new binaries - we still need C++ coders and this is problem.

3) But KM Twin+ has all the modern compatibility thanks to incorporated GoogleChromeFrame. This part of pack was inspired by disrupted's work.

Now, you can install ChromeFrame by pressing just one button on toolbar (with blue Chromium icon) - simply press and answer 'Yes' and 'OK' to get it installed.
Next time you'll start KM the same button will open currently opened page in new tab inside KM with Chrome engine!
No more incompatible pages!

4) Other original stuff are:

1. the Icon Selector toolbar, which lets you to select 1 of 7 icons for you KM (you can assign 2 different icons to Twins in order to distinguish them easy in simultaneous work (when you open 1.7 from 1.6 - new window is created, so you can use two different KMs in parallel);
2. button to quickly switch opening diverted windows/tabs from fore- to background (corresponding bug is now fixed in kmprefs.jar)
3. Privoxy webfilter is here to replace AdBlock in KM-1.7 or even add more content filtering power for KM-1.6. The only one drawback of using Privoxy is that it prevents you from using Keyword Autosearch and thereby it blocks the possibility to open pages by simply typing some peculiar keyword in URLbar and hitting Enter (my favourite trick in KM!)
4. upgraded AppLauncher (by disrupted and Alex Tarantul) which has now button for every App (IE, Mark text editor and KM1.7). Feel free to add more other apps by changing kmm-file! But remember - you'll need bmp-icons!

More useful stuff are bookmarklets - 5 different online bookmarking services (highly recommended to add site to your cloud bookmarks by 2-3 clicks!) and about 20 different JavaScript-tools for some useful (or just funny) operations with pages and content ..."

by Catia (not verified) on 24. October 2012 - 22:57  (101309)

I have a 512ram and 1.6GHz laptop in which I-m running a live usb with xubuntu 10.04 for 32bit. I was told it was the best distro but i am not convinced. Anyways, I want to know what is the best perfortmance browser for it. Firefox crashes, and I believe that Midori has issues with Flash. So, I was wondering if any of you could help me. I inclined to try Slimbloat.

by davidj411 (not verified) on 18. October 2012 - 17:21  (101001)

i tried k-meleon and qupzilla.
both yahoo and gmail dislike both browsers, but both sites would still let me view email using older basic view.
google reader only worked on qupzilla.
both could play video from CNN.com.
ExtJs seems good for both also.

by Flick (not verified) on 30. September 2012 - 0:27  (99975)

Cheers for this comprehensive list of lightweight browsers! As I have a (now low-end) 5 year old laptop, the new versions of the classic browseres are becoming resource hogs. FF was my all time favourite until 3+ and then I switched to Chrome. Now even the latest version of Chrome just about hogs everything with several tabs open.

I have used K-Meleon before (1.1) and loved it for its light-weight. Now going to have a go at the latest version and QupZilla to see how they fair. Just wanted to say props to CASD7 for his/her review

by rudyg on 2. October 2012 - 9:11  (100101)

I was reading an article concerning web browsers usage of system resources. I think you will find this article useful.

http://www.raymond.cc/blog/battle-of-the-browsers-in-cpu-and-memory-usage/

by D.Smithee (not verified) on 21. October 2012 - 7:42  (101130)

Thanks for this, Rudy--I was getting sick of Chrome and Firefox using up 50% of my usable RAM with three tabs open. Kudos on doing the research for us.

by George.J on 3. October 2012 - 7:38  (100160)

Thanks that's an amazing resource. I wonder why the system config specs weren't mentioned in the article but from the looks of it, he have run the tests on a system having >1GB RAM. But the results may not be universal. Because memory usage of browsers varies for different computer specs but memory efficiency remains the same.

For example, if you run a similar test on a system with 256MB RAM you will get totally different result. Most of the *lighter* browsers weren't included in that test.

by CASD57 (not verified) on 16. September 2012 - 15:29  (99331)

I'm in the process of trying every "Light on resource" QTWebkit type browser that I can find for windows, So far Qupzilla is working the best for me..
Like the speed dial because that I don't open as many tabs on startup, normal I had 14 or more..but with the speed dial I only open 5-6..
Also I leave my browser on all day and most of the others would be processor up to 100% after a few hours..(or sooner)

Opera was my favorite but I got tired of hearing my computer working so hard

Chrome and all the other variations seem to be boggy/slow on opening pages

FireFox another resource hog..

QTWeb is ok but doesn't have speed dial and still uses more ram then Qupzilla

Avant loses my startup tabs

Dooble Browser a little to basic

Lunascape6 seems to be trying to do to much and it's slow at responding and freezes up alot

Apple Safari...wow not ready for prime time..

Comet Bird is ok compared to FF but still after awhile starts to use up alot of ram
Enigma browser.. is ok but I think Slim Browser is better

Slim Browser is Fine if you want a Trident browser..

Slim Boat..still alittle buggy

Maxthon3 ok but if you check the box that opens tabs at the end your startup tabs will open in reverse one time and the next time in the right order,,back and forth everytime you startup..to fix it you have to check the box to open new tabs next to current ..this bugs me..

Sea Monkey.. can't seem to find/import bookmarks

Pale Moon..use to like it but it got to it wouldn't work right on my computer ??

Sleipnier.. Still trying to work with it..seems like it's trying to hard to do everything..

My Computer:
AMD processor
4gig ram
120g harddrive with a 320g external hard drive

by George.J on 16. September 2012 - 18:36  (99340)

Wow, that's a lot of browsers you're testing. :) You missed K-Meleon though.

But I'm thinking if you've 4GB RAM why use "lightweight" browsers mentioned here against the mainstream ones?

by CASD57 (not verified) on 16. September 2012 - 19:05  (99342)

Sorry I used to use K-Meleon but got tired of it not always opening certain web pages..tried the beta 1.7? and it just crashes alot..

by George.J on 16. September 2012 - 19:34  (99344)

Version 1.7 is still in early alpha from the last I've heard of it, and it's not even usable for daily chores. Although 1.6 beta 2 seems to be great (Prerequisite: Microsot Visual C++ 2005 2.5MB). If pages aren't rendering properly try switching user agent strings which is available within the Tools menu, or you may tinker a few settings. Here's a list of user agent strings . I use ones for Chrome, Firefox and Opera alternatively.

by CASD57 (not verified) on 16. September 2012 - 19:53  (99347)

Yes 1.6 is more usable..
My small reviews is based on plug and play..What's fits my needs and is visual appealing without doing any code adjustments..
I do like K-Meleon and I wish it was still being updated, it is a fast browser

by CASD57 (not verified) on 16. September 2012 - 20:43  (99349)

Also

I'm trying out World Chrome from the makers of The World Browser..
It addresses somethings that bugs me about Google Chrome and one is the tabs on top...I hate that about chrome..
With World Chrome the tabs are like other browsers under the address bar..
also seems lighter then Chrome but still heavier the Qupzilla.. I'll use it for a couple of days and I'll know more

by Anupam on 16. September 2012 - 18:25  (99339)

Qupzilla is quite a good browser... one of the qtweb based browsers which is impressive. It has some quirks too, but it's still very good. We have discussed it in the forum here :

http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/internet-web-apps-and-net...

Qtweb was a browser with potential, but sadly, it does not seem to be in development anymore, or even if it's in development, it's too slow.

SlimBoat impressed quite a lot, and it has loads of features. Discussion on forum here :

http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/internet-web-apps-and-net...

It's an impressive browser, but Qupzilla is quicker to startup, and feels lighter.

SlimBoat and Qupzilla are by far the best of the lot, and ones to watch out for. Hope they develop them into great browsers.

by alexxx46 on 15. July 2012 - 21:19  (96217)

The good of QtBrowser: tiny, quick and portable.
The bad: Java, Unicode and Flash problems. Not sure it is secure enough.
Overall: deleting from my computer.

by Scorpiorajkumar (not verified) on 15. June 2012 - 6:02  (94902)

Anyone tried Internet Surfboard and Wipeout Browser?.How is it? How is the performance of these browsers on Old systems ?

by George.J on 15. June 2012 - 7:33  (94907)

Internet Surfboard Browser is yet another browser based on QtWebKit. It seems like more and more browsers are using QtWebKit module. The fact remains that it doesn't offer anything new than other QtWebKit based browsers, other than that it doesn't leave history. Infact both the browsers that you mentioned here, focusses on privacy. Wipeout destroys any traces on exit by clearing out History, Cookies, Temporary Internet Files, Index.dat and Flash cookies. Whereas Internet Surfboard Browser claims that it doesn't leave any history on the hard disk while browsing. There's not even a history menu to clear the history. I'm not sure how could they ever do it, and I'll need to test the validity of their statement.

by Tbriggs (not verified) on 15. June 2012 - 16:03  (94925)

OK so is there any advantage to these browsers over just usiing Private Browsing mode in FF or IE9?

by George.J on 24. June 2012 - 12:00  (95305)

Private Browsing mode is a great way to hide all traces of your browsing activites. Wipeout takes it to the next level, by providing Private Browsing every single time when you browse. So there's no question of forgetting to turn on Private Browsing mode or surfing in a non private tab by mistake.

Secondly, extensions can be another problem that's beyond the control of Private browsing mode, because certain extensions may save history of your activities and we don't know how they handle with the personal data. So you'll also have to make sure that extensions are turned off. Chrome and IE does a good job in disabling extensions by default whereas Firefox doesn't. Also IE partially writes contents to index.dat file which could be crucial. Wipeout doesnt face this problem.

Finally when you create bookmarks in private browsing mode they don't get deleted when you exit private browsing. You're safe when using Wipeout here.

by Scorpiorajkumar (not verified) on 16. June 2012 - 6:43  (94933)

I am not entirely sure of the benefits, but Firefox has recently been taking lot of resources and It is not the same Firefox as before. Maybe you should try the new Opera 12 or Chromium or Seamonkey(which is secure and faster than firefox)

by Anupam on 16. June 2012 - 6:51  (94936)

I disagree with the statement about Firefox. I haven't experienced any big memory hogging issues with Firefox. In fact, I am running the latest version without any problem on my old P-III machine with 512 MB RAM. On any newer machine, it should run without any problems at all.

by Luchsen (not verified) on 23. June 2012 - 14:14  (95267)

Just because you are a lucky guy, you can't just disagree. Firefox is always over 300MB RAM for me, and that's an absolute no-go on available 512MB RAM (I have that much, too). While my PC is lagging because of Firefox, I'm always sitting here remembering the times when I had double the sites open and half the RAM used...

Just yesterday I got the update to version 13 and the respective info site with a video that wanted to show me how I will be surfing faster now, and you know what? The video lagged totally...

by Scorpiorajkumar (not verified) on 23. June 2012 - 14:44  (95271)

Hi Luchsen

Does Pale Moon work in your system?

I am using Opera 12,Seamonkey 2.10.1,Chromium 21.0.1181.0 along with Chromium Auto-Updater 1.10 by Mulder

by Scorpiorajkumar (not verified) on 16. June 2012 - 6:45  (94934)

Tbriggs..I think you should try out Pale Moon Browser :)instead of Firefox :)

by scorpiorajkumar (not verified) on 15. June 2012 - 7:55  (94910)

which are the best QtWebKit based browsers available as of now ?

I know there is Qtweb, Qupzilla, Arora.Anything apart from these 3. Qupzilla is not working on my system.I checked that already.

In Qtweb, when you open a image, on the right hand side,I get to see the Google Image property page and I am not sure how to disable it

Can you please suggest me more names of other QtWebKit based browsers

Thanks

by George.J on 24. June 2012 - 12:17  (95307)

What you mean Qupzilla is not working on your system? Could you please explain if you had any error messages when installing or what else? Also there is a portable version available at their website http://www.qupzilla.com/download . Choose your O.S and select Portable Edition.

There's nothing such as best QtWebKit browser, it actually depends on your preference. Other than that you've mentioned, Slimboat is another QtWebKit based browser.

It's normal that you'll see image properties when you open an image from Google Images on any browser. The properties page disappears once you click on Full-size image.

by Scorpiorajkumar on 24. June 2012 - 13:50  (95309)

Hi George

I had downloaded the portable version and I got the "application failed to start error message" and I got in touch with the Qupzilla team. It seems I have to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributables in order for the portable version to work.

Otherwise, install normal QupZilla version

by George.J on 24. June 2012 - 14:25  (95311)

Oh, the package is just 2MB and I normally have it installed on all my systems. Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable Package

by Scorpiorajkumar on 24. June 2012 - 14:56  (95314)

I am having Windows XP SP3 and this link which you have provided is for Windows XP SP4.

I would like to know whether we can get this Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable Package for Windows XP SP3 as a zip file.

I also would like to know whether the Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable Package will create problems/errors for my system.What exactly is the use of these files?

by George.J on 24. June 2012 - 16:35  (95317)

WinXP SP3 is the last service pack for XP, there is no SP4!
These are the supported O.S
-Windows 2000 Service Pack 4, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows XP

The package is required to run any software that is developed using Visual C++.