Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager Interested? Click here
Best Free HTML Editor
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
HTML text editors are fine for programmers or those who are comfortable coding (X)HTML, PHP and CSS, but many users have no interest in this. They just want an editor that allows them to produce web pages quickly in a WYSIWYG environment. |
|
Discussion
|
|
Whether code-based or WYSIWYG, the ideal HTML editor should be able to validate that the HTML is standards-compliant, preview the page in different browsers, support meta-tags and provide basic image editing, while still being free. An included FTP client is a bonus. |
HTML WYSIWYG Editors |
|
KompoZer's last stable release was in 2007, and the last Beta (development version) was released in February 2010. Worth watching is BlueGriffon, which is a fork of KompoZer, currently under active development and looking very promising. |
|
Amaya lets users both browse and author web pages, which enables easy copying and pasting of information from other web pages and easy creation of links to other websites. You can seamlessly upload your web pages onto a server from within Amaya as well. |
HTML Text Editors |
|
My top choice for experienced users goes to Netbeans. It started life as a Java Editor but with recent releases has developed into a powerful text editor for web scripting. It is Vista and Windows 7 compatible. At first glance, Netbeans is a little intimidating. Most of the menu items can be ignored by ordinary mortals. Using it as an HTML/PHP editor is akin to using a steam hammer to crack a peanut. Nevertheless the code completion, code colouring and the professional look and feel make it an excellent choice. Netbeans supports:
My second choice is HTML-Kit which began as a specialized html editor but now has so many plugins that it is a highly customizable and extensible development environment. The latest freeware release is build 292, and plug-ins continue to be developed and extended, keeping this software very up to date. HTML-Kit is compatible with Vista and is also portable. HTML-Kit offers support for HTML, XHTML, XML, CSS, XSL, JavaScript, VBScript, ASP, PHP, JSP, Perl, Python, Ruby, Java, VB, C/C++, .NET C#, Delphi / Pascal, Lisp, SQL, and more. Over the years, both Netbeans and HTML-Kit have attracted large communities, so the support forums are very good. Their websites are full of video tutorials and resources. Both Netbeans and HTML-Kit are excellent choices for serious coders, offering support for many file types including HTML, XHTML, XML, CSS, XSL, JavaScript, VBScript, ASP, PHP, JSP, Perl, Python, Ruby, Java, VB, C/C++, .NET C#, Delphi / Pascal, Lisp, SQL, and more. |
|
It features optimizations for Javascript, HTML, Ajax, Ruby on Rails, PHP, CSS and many others. Aptana Studio plugins enable source control and over 1,000 other third-party extensions. There is a pro version (which includes a few other features), but the free version is more then enough for any web developer (from beginner to advance). I personally love Aptana studio, and recommend it to any developer wanting a full featured IDE for building websites, web applications, desktop applications (with the adobe air plugin), etc... |
|
This small tool has simple controls and handles plain text, yet is extremely capable. Saying you use PSPad for your coding scores you immediate points for technical machismo. |
|
Related Products and Links
|
|
You might want to check out these articles too: |
Download the 31MB PHP version unless you need modules for non-web programming. The Java SE Development Kit, JDK 6.0 Update 26 or later, is required. A link is given for this during Netbeans installation if it's not already installed on your system.
Great community support
|
Editor
|
| This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Ritho. Registered members can contact the editor with any comments of suggestions they might have by clicking here. |
|
Tags
|
| edit html, edit html files, edit html text, edit text wysiwyg mode, best free html text editor, top html editor, top free html editor, edit html what you see is what you get, freeware. |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version







Comments
The integrated mail client in Seamonkey is also worth checking out if you like your browser to be so equipped. I much prefer it to Opera.
Came across this.
PageBreeze : www.pagebreeze.com
Okay, sorry to give this article a low rating but in the past I have found that one of the great strengths of Gizmo's site is that it caters to the complete beginner as well as the sophisticated techie.
I am afraid the software reviewed here is all very user unfriendly and the author's bias toward the techie but difficult to use is very clearly stated in the introduction:
"Most professional designers and web developers use an advanced WYSIWYG editor, such as DreamWeaver, but quite a few just use a simple text editor and take a certain pride in doing so."
Great, take pride in your fantastic skill, but please, please suggest a bit of software for us amateurs. Yes I am incompetent. Yes, I am a fool. But this site used to cater to me and my oafish kind just as much as you programmers born under a red sun who only have kryptonite to fear.
I agree with many things you say here. Most all of the HTML editors here are not very good for rank amateurs, and that would include me. But I still appreciate the efforts of the freeware programmers and this website which is EXCELLENT for all of us.
Much of the site is excellent and I would give five stars to it.
This particular article is excellent, as long as you are an advanced user.
I'm just calling it as it is - this is not any good for the beginner. Credit where credit is due, though, the author doesn't pretend otherwise.
The fact remains, however, that there is little here for the beginner.
But I'm not expecting magic. I can successfully use various applications to get documents that I want with text, graphics and so on that print out on paper, but when it comes to the web... thrrrrrrrrp! It all looks great until right near the end when the font sizes and colours change all by themselves for seemingly no reason at all, or the file uploads (and why not link to the article on ftp?) seemingly okay but is invisible to one browser, perfectly okay in another and visible but mangled in another. Or, and this has happened to me in Komposer, the file disappears altogether. I don't want fancy graphics, just a sort of word processor for HTML.
To be honest Microsoft Word is easier to use than Komposer.
Perhaps I could write an article for people that want a simple web site that they can control and add to without expense, fuss, or tipping into clinical hypertension?
I encourage you to go ahead and write that article and submit it here for publication. We are always looking for good, well-written, and informative articles; especially if they advocate freeware programs.
Agreed with Kendall below. Please register and then contact me directly via our PM system if you would like more details about what is involved and how to proceed.
WYSIWYG HTML editors is one of those categories where there is no winning and no right answer. The problem is NOT that editors don't exist for beginners, but that web standards are so varied and browser capabilities are all over the map. No single editor package can possibly cover all bases. Even expensive programs like Dreamweaver fall short on being a true all-in-one editor for website development. Until all browsers and sites adhere to a single standard, the beginner is doomed to confusion and knowledge of HTML code as well as some CSS and Javascript code will be necessary in order to create good web sites.
One of the comments suggested that Word is far easier to use than any of the recommendations. I urge people to take that comment lightly. Two H-U-G-E problems with Word. As an HTML editor, the code it produces is HORRIBLE and so far from standards compliant it should be shunned. Also, most of the editors mentioned in the review have other features such as built-in FTP, design and code views, and some sense of web standards they follow in their code output. Word does not of that. If you need your website to show up and rank in Google, you are best avoiding Word as your editor.
If you are really looking for ease of use for site development, your best bet is to find a webhost that installs either Wordpress or any of the full-featured CMS (content management systems) and building your site off one of those platforms. Getting custom designed themes/skins/looks can still be a challenge for most people with a CMS, but at least the amount of coding you need to do or know will be minimal.
My own personal journey down this road had me starting with basic free editors and lots of frustrating moments. I then sprang for Dreamweaver thinking it would be the "magic elixir" to all my web design problems. It did help some, but not really. Today, I still use DW, but do 90% of my website coding in their "code view". Once you learn a bit of HTML, it is just much quicker.
Hopefully this explains some of the perceived attitude that my fellow editor takes with the review. We have obviously been down similar paths and I find the advice to be spot on. To allude to a beginner that there is an easy path is a disservice. We are best telling the complete beginner to roll up their sleeves and dive under the hood. All we can do is point out the path of least resistance.
so did i but it took a long time due to the low internet speed... so i know ur feeling on the internet speed...
I have found NVU to be the easiest to use for me. It isn't over complicated and seems more user friendly than most. Great job Gizmo. Keep up the good work
An HTML editor is never going to be easy for a beginner. None of the available programs, free or commercial, are "easy" in the way you describe.
To be able to create anything beyond the most basic website you need a knowledge of HTML and (preferably) CSS. You don't need to be an expert, but you need to put some effort into learning the basics.
The nearest thing to a complete no-brainer web design program was Microsoft's FrontPage - now discontinued because it's no longer standards compliant. It produced very clunky HTML code and required the host to provide FrontPage Extensions.
It was useful in that a newbie could get up and running without any web scripting knowledge and then polish their pages' scripting after learning some HTML and CSS.
The nearest free program to FrontPage is probably KomPoZer.
I'm not an IT pro, but I've been tinkering with web design for a while and I've found that, unless you pay big money for Dreamweaver or Microsoft Expression, the best programs are not WYSIWYG. You're better off using an editor like Bluefish or Komodo Edit and viewing your pages in a browser.
You're right about some purists having the attitude that if you can't build a website with Notepad you're not a real web designer. That's just silly. The better editors use tools like code hinting and syntax highlighting which are a great help. To scoff at such aids makes no sense to most people.
There's no easy answer for a complete beginner.
you've forgot to mention NETBEANS which is best tool for web development including HTML and CSS. NetBeans can help you build robust Web applications. Like most IDEs it has a steep learning curve because they don't often work in the same way that Web editors do. But once you get used to it you'll be hooked. One nice feature is the version control included in the IDE which is really useful for people working in large development environments. If you write Java and Web pages this is a great tool.
I agree Anon, thanks for your input. I've just taken over this category and will be updating it within days. I'll be adding Netbeans, Bluefish, and maybe a couple of others.
Nvu development stopped long ago - 2006 I think. The development was taken over with improvements and bug fixes and published as KompoZer. If you like Nvu, you'll love KompoZer.
I would suggest ActiveState Komodo Edit (note that "Komodo IDE" application is commercial), as I found it really powerful with HTML/XHTML/CSS
http://community.activestate.com/products/Komodo
I also appreciated a lot of it being a multi-platform application: I've been able to edit the same project and move it easily back and forth between Windows/Linux, and I'm sure the same is valid for MacOSX hosts.
~Lou
I agree Lou. Komodo Edit is an excellent editor and for HTML/CSS it stacks up well against Active State's paid version. It's in the review queue.
I've just been trying to find a good free wysiwyg and tried both Kompozer and Amaya: both were unstable to the point of being useless on my win7 machine once i started thrashing them a bit. A shame 'cause both looked good and up to the moment they fell down i was more than happy with them. Wish i knew why they were so unstable on my machine.
Next i tried Serif Webplus and am liking it a great deal. This really is an excellent app and so easy to use, not to mention fun to play with. For the average user the limitations on the free version are not a hindrance (it's not crippleware by any means)but your more serious hobbyist might want to buy a license as i will be doing, if only to access the HTML pane. The paid version also has a very neat image editor but nothing much you can't do with Photofiltre or such like. I've never used pro web design software so i have no idea how Serif would compare, but it seems to have all the functionality i need. I have looked at the code it produces in my browser and i would have to say "not pretty but functional" more or less describes it.
...For the average user the limitations on the free version are not a hindrance (it's not crippleware by any means)...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The WebPlus free version is crippled - a maximum of 10 HTML pages among other things - so, however good it may be, I can't consider it under the site's rules for Freeware.
i cannot find where to go down load html editor i just dont see a place to go theres a lot of places to click on things BUT WHERE IS YOUR DOWN LOAD FOR HTML AT your page is tooo full
Each program's entry above has a link to take you to the download site. Marked by a downward pointing blue arrow icon.
Love the comments.
I use Dreamweaver CS4 and i needed a html editor that a newbie could use, so another staff member could update a newletter we send out.
I agree one of the best free editors is KompoZer, for newbies.
He was clicking away in no time, editing and without any problems.
Thankyou for helping me find Kompozer.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=baa3ad86-bfc1-4bd4-9812-d9e710d44f42&displaylang=en
Office SharePoint Designer 2007 is free, and is the "next" Frontpage
For those who really do not want to worry about HTML coding but need to write web pages, I would suggest any modern word processor (Microsoft Word, OpenOffice Writer, Corel Wordperfect...), do all the formatting needed, and save as HTML. That's it!
Uploading the pages (and connected files, such as images) is another matter.
I agree about Microsoft Word. OpenOffice Writer is probably the best in this category.
I use and suggest Codelobster PHP Edition.
It is very powerful and free HTML, PHP, CSS, JavaScript editor with many useful and cure features.
MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT DESIGNER 2007 IS NOW FREE!
why not use the best Wysiwyg! not as combersome as 2010 express.
I really like it.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=baa3ad86-bfc1-4bd4-9812-d9e710d44f42&displaylang=en
"Most professional designers and web developers use an advanced WYSIWYG editor" if you say so...
I wonder if the Blue Griffon is worthy of the WYSIWYG editor category.
http://www.bluegriffon.org/
From the author of NVU that later evolved into Kompozer.
Thanks for that James, I've had a good look at Bluegriffon and you can wonder no more. It is most certainly worthy of inclusion. I need a day or two to test it but I suspect that it will soon knock KompoZer off its pedestal. It's very impressive.
Actually, I didn't say so. That was my illustrious predecessor. Although it wouldn't surprise me. Certainly in a large sector of the professional web design market Dreamweaver dominates. I've modified the wording to reflect my vacillation. :)