Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform App Reviews for Android and iOS
- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- PDF Writer
Interested? Click here
Best Free Intrusion Prevention and Detection Utility for Home Use (HIPS)
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Gone are the days when a virus was a virus and everything else was - well – different! Now known collectively as “Malware” these threats are constantly evolving and pose a serious challenge to security software. Signature based scanners give the most reliable detection results but these are limited by the frequency of their database updates. To compliment signature recognition software HIPS programs were developed which look for behavior on your PC which is “characteristic of malware activity”. The user is then presented with an alert to either allow or block the event. Some programs automate this process which can occasionally lead to problems. See my article “HIPS Explained” which deals with this and other issues in more detail. Evaluating the performance of HIPS programs is far from easy and any so called “test results” should be viewed with a degree of caution. It is straightforward enough to feed malware files to a selection of signature scanners and then count what they find to arrive at a score. AV Comparatives provides an admirable service here and the results are always consistent and reliable. There is no such definition line possible for testing HIPS software and my feeling is that some of the vendors may possibly use this to their own advantage (“hype”). Review Criteria |
|
Discussion
|
|
Malware Defender was formerly a commercial program, but this excellent HIPS changed ownership a while back and a new version was released as freeware. The sequence of events relating to this event is set out quite nicely here if anyone is interested. Just follow the thread through.
In addition to the usual file, registry and application modules, Malware Defender also provides network protection should you choose to enable it, including a connections monitor. This makes it the ideal companion for anyone using Windows own firewall, but wanting more detailed control. It also scores very highly in the Matousec tests for those inclined to value the results. It was difficult to know exactly where to place Malware Defender in terms of a review rating. For what it does it's an excellent performer but the complexities of using it make it unsuitable for average users. Mistakes can be rectified by changing rule permissions from the log entries, although if you've already denied a vital system function, your screen might now be empty!
WinPatrol has many advocates and has recently been upgraded to achieve greater compatibility for Vista and Windows 7 users. It's main objective is to warn you about alterations to your system which may be malware generated. It does this by taking a snapshot of your system settings and alerting you to any changes. WinPatrol operates using a heuristic approach which makes it more likely to find new malware than traditional signature based scanners which are heavily reliant on updates. WinPatrol will alert you to new program activations as well and is effective across a whole range of malware including worms, trojans, cookies, adware and spyware. Even stuff designed to replicate itself on your system is with WinPatrol's reach. You can also use WinPatrol to filter unwanted cookies and IE add-ons. An added bonus is that WinPatrol will also deal with the problems it finds so you won't need another program to do this for you. As of V19.0, WinPatrol becomes a "Cloud Edition". Mostly the extra features will only benefit users of the paid Plus version. One part of the WinPatrol Cloud though is a poll where the WinPatrol community of users can provide personal feedback on files that are detected. The poll data will be available to both FREE and PLUS users. The author, Bill Pytlovany, provides support and has an interesting comments and resource blog here: http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/
The program now also includes: Process Launch Monitoring, Folder and File Hooking, EMailing of Alerts and Quarantining of Files and Directories. There is an active thread for this software at Wilders forum here: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=54666 The author, Mark Jacobs, also maintains a range of other free software on his website and will respond to emails for support if requested. |
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version





Comments
Thanks for the reply :).
You are welcome. Your idea of mentioning some extra possibilities is good.
MC, I think you could mention here something about Defence+ plus at least. (Eg. repeat above the comment you gave here.)
Thanks for the suggestion. The only issue I have with this at the moment is that in order to utilize D+ fully then the AV component from CIS also has to be installed even if the firewall is not. If on the other hand we view this as a firewall/HIPS combination then it's already covered in Rizar's excellent article. Spyware Terminator is the same in that the anti-spyware component (such as it is) comes bundled with the HIPS whether you want it or not. That said, this one is designed to work with other programs whereas CIS is not. In this vane, to install D+ and the Comodo AV without also including the firewall doesn't seem to make much sense, well not to me anyway :)
Those more familiar with HIPS might wonder why some programs are not included. Couldn't you explain this (eg. about Defence+, SSM) in the end of this article?
Yes, this is certainly an idea for enabling a more complete picture. Although the article has been updated recently it is still maybe due a re-write and this is one of the areas I'll add in to it next time.
What about the HIPS that is part of the Free Comodo Firewall (i.e. Defense Plus)?
D+ is excellent, some would say even the best as part of the CIS firewall. This review though concentrates on applications which can be used as separate programs alongside other software to form a layered defense. Unfortunately, in order to use D+ in this way (without the firewall) the AV component also needs installing and so rules it out.
There are other excellent alternatives which are no longer in development such as EQSecure (3.41), System Safety Monitor and Realtime Defender. These however are not simple programs to manage and understand, are only good up to XPSP2 and have no support so unsuitable for inclusion here.
Not true.
Comodo can be installed without the AV. The download is located here:
http://www.comodo.com/home/internet-security/free-internet-security.php
After installing merely right click on the icon and change the Firewall and Sandbox to disabled.
Defense+ works very well with other security programs and thus should be included in this review.
Is Threatfire to be recommended above WinPatrol? What criteria can I use if no one wants to answer this directly?! Thank You
Threatfire is a more comprehensive solution but potentially capable of giving you more system problems than WinPatrol. The only real way to judge the benefits of either for your own use is to digest the relevant home page feature lists and then make a decision from there. The support forums are also a necessary source of reference. Although there are less issues now with Threatfire than there were with previous versions it's still worth looking to see what is happening to other users. If anything you see there is something you would not wish to cope with yourself then maybe WinPatrol would be the best option.
I tried Threatfire again yesterday on XP SP-3 and the latest version had very little noticeable drag unlike earlier versions, so this time I kept it on all day. This morning when I started my PC, I got a popup that Windows turned off Services and Controller App and next another popup stating Internet Explorer Has Encountered a Problem and Has to Close. I knew the problem had to be with Threatfire, so I uninstalled it in safe mode and no more problems.
I have tried various versions of Threatfire (including the original Cyberhawk) and found it to be problematic in ALL its various guises. I think people should be very wary of installing HIPS-type programs since they almost always create more problems than the threats they supposedly protect against. My advice: practice safe computing thereby reducing the necessity for such programs.
This is very good advice and matches my own sentiments exactly.
Unfortunately it is not up to us to tell people what they should install so rather we try to advise responsibly on what is likely to happen. Undoubtedly Threatfire is better than it was but still the one most likely to cause system problems, and for some users this will involve seeking outside help to fix.
This is why I used to like DSA so much when it was still supported as a standalone program, and not just a part of Privatefirewall. Having just "allow" or "Block" is great when mistakes get made because it's a relatively easy process to return things to normal.
The above article places threatfire as top pick!
i believe the version of Threatfire is 4.7.0.11, not 4.9.11.23
I believe this to be incorrect as both Softpedia and MajorGeeks report 4.9.11.23 as of 4th December. To be certain I've mailed PC Tools support.
I will agree with LordRahl here. I have seen this increasing trend of discrepancy of the download available on the download sites, and on the home page of the software. I have seen download sites hold a newer version of a software, but the version available at the main site of the software would still be an older version. In such cases I trust the site of the software, and not the download sites.
There could indeed be a number of reason for this but the only true answer is going to come from the vendor. To date I'm still waiting for their reply which considering it's Christmas week is not unusual.
My grateful thanks to those who spotted the different Threatfire file version numbers. PC Tools have now replied to my query and indeed there was an error with the file numbers sent to Softpedia, MajorGeeks and some others. The correct version as of 23.12.09 is 4.7.0.11 which has now been amended above.
Thanks for the feedback MC. I too had seen the version on MajorGeeks, but I had checked on the PC Tools site, and there it was the older version. I had been regularly checking the site for an updated version, but never happened.
As said before, I have been watching this trend of wrong information grow since some months, and with lots of software.
at the bottom of the page
http://www.threatfire.com/download/
this is probably the most reliable source
I’ve just updated the review to the format you now see above.
I’ve hesitated for some time about which direction to go in but eventually decided to remove DriveSentry.
My thoughts are echoed in other places too as illustrated by this thread from our friends at Wilders.
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?s=d8a377715f9f5f48cc9780ab...
Ultimately I was also helped by recent developments with Threatfire which is much improved from previous versions. I never doubted it’s detection capabilities but it’s tendency to also munch some of your system drivers for breakfast was nothing I would recommend for average folk to endure.
Thankfully, these issues are now behind us and Threatfire can regain it’s top spot with pride.
I tried the new Threatfire version from Major Geeks and the noticeable drag on my older XP is reduced to the point that I can now keep it installed. Thanks for the heads up MC. Is there any problem with keeping the Community Monitoring on for auto-updates or is it security-wise to turn this function off and manual update?
I notice a drag with Threatfire on an older XP. What ever happened with DSA? I assumed a lot of users liked it.
Unfortunately DSA is no longer being developed or supported as a standalone program. It remains an integral part of the now freeware Privatefirewall however and is being improved further as we speak to achieve full x64 bit compatibility. I was a great fan of DSA myself but unfortunately all of the freestanding HIPS applications are now dying out as vendors seek to incorporate everything into either a firewall or complete suite. This is hardly surprising when you consider the amount of alerts generated and work necessary to manage this type of program. EQSecure, System Safety Monitor and Realtime Defender are other examples of excellent products which have also ceased although all will continue to work very happily on XP up to SP2.
Older versions of Threatfire had several issues which I wasn't happy with which is why it ended up being downgraded in my review here. The "drag" I can identify with myself from my own XP days, so much so that I used to use an old version of Cyberhawk instead. Threatfire has improved a lot lately though and I notice no system performance drop on x64 Windows 7 at all. As I say in my review this has maybe been influenced by Symantec's involvement and the use of Threatfire components within the PC Tools Internet Security suite. Whatever the reasons though, Threatfire is now a solid choice for zero day protection although users will still need to be mindful of possible conflicts if their main solution also contains similar technology. Duplicating behavior based software on the same system is not always a good idea.
What are your thoughts on users who use a good firewall with strong os/hips protection such as those on the top of matousecs tree? Is a seperate hips such as threatfire for eg still needed?
This is a difficult question to answer for everybody because it’s largely dependent on your surfing habits. If you visit porn, social networking and file sharing sites then you need all the help you can get. In this respect complimentary software such as Threatfire with behavioral recognition technology is almost a necessity. Otherwise I would say it isn't with the type of firewall you describe. Resource use is reasonable though at less than 10mb and on my Windows 7 x64 I notice none of the system slowdowns associated with previous versions.
Anyone not wanting to install too many programs anyway could always choose a firewall like Privatefirewall which has good similar technology included. Be aware though that the process monitor is not yet x64 compatible although the other functions are. Full x64 compatibility is still being developed and won’t be in service until around the first quarter of next year. Not only does Privatefirewall notify you about what things are doing, it will also warn you if they are doing it differently to the last time they ran in terms of CPU cycles, memory use etc. This type of annomoly detection is a good resource to have, and with Privatefirewall this extends to emails too. You do need to read their PDF guide first though before installing it to understand fully how to set up a suitable training period otherwise it will end up annoying you with superfluous alerts and/or not work to it’s best potential.
MC, would your previous comments about protection still be needed/valid if using a program such as Returnil or Sandboxie? Would that not eliminate the need for such "extra" protection or as you stated "all the help you can get?"
Also would you still recommend PrivateFirewall if browsing is done almost exclusively with Returnil or Sandboxie or would that be overkill?
Ultimately, it's what works best for you and what you feel most happy to manage. You say browsing would be done "almost" exclusively with these other programs so that to me still implies a risk for which the use of Private firewall could prove beneficial. I for one have never been able to get on with Sandboxie so I'm not in the best position to comment but I do know that it requires discipline to use effectively.
I installed the free version of Drive Sentry and liked it enough to pay the $15 for the full version. My problems started at that point. First of all I had to use a round about way to even purchase Drive Sentry. The pop up link you get after creating an account sent me to a local address on my computer.
I tried registering on their support forums and apparently a Board Admin is required to approve you even after the activation email. It's been 4 days and nothing.
I'm now getting run time errors and Drive Sentry shut downs. I can not find any support information besides the forum which I can not get to. The contact numbers are always closed.
I've waisted $15 before, it's not the end of the world. I would really second think installing Drive Sentry or even purchasing a product that has limited support.