Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager Interested? Click here
Best Free Intrusion Prevention and Detection Utility for Home Use (HIPS)
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Gone are the days when a virus was a virus and everything else was - well – different! Now known collectively as “Malware” these threats are constantly evolving and pose a serious challenge to security software. Signature based scanners give the most reliable detection results but these are limited by the frequency of their database updates. To compliment signature recognition software HIPS programs were developed which look for behavior on your PC which is “characteristic of malware activity”. The user is then presented with an alert to either allow or block the event. Some programs automate this process which can occasionally lead to problems. See my article “HIPS Explained” which deals with this and other issues in more detail. Evaluating the performance of HIPS programs is far from easy and any so called “test results” should be viewed with a degree of caution. It is straightforward enough to feed malware files to a selection of signature scanners and then count what they find to arrive at a score. AV Comparatives provides an admirable service here and the results are always consistent and reliable. There is no such definition line possible for testing HIPS software and my feeling is that some of the vendors may possibly use this to their own advantage (“hype”). Review Criteria |
|
Discussion
|
|
Malware Defender was formerly a commercial program, but this excellent HIPS changed ownership a while back and a new version was released as freeware. The sequence of events relating to this event is set out quite nicely here if anyone is interested. Just follow the thread through.
In addition to the usual file, registry and application modules, Malware Defender also provides network protection should you choose to enable it, including a connections monitor. This makes it the ideal companion for anyone using Windows own firewall, but wanting more detailed control. It also scores very highly in the Matousec tests for those inclined to value the results. It was difficult to know exactly where to place Malware Defender in terms of a review rating. For what it does it's an excellent performer but the complexities of using it make it unsuitable for average users. Mistakes can be rectified by changing rule permissions from the log entries, although if you've already denied a vital system function, your screen might now be empty!
WinPatrol has many advocates and has recently been upgraded to achieve greater compatibility for Vista and Windows 7 users. It's main objective is to warn you about alterations to your system which may be malware generated. It does this by taking a snapshot of your system settings and alerting you to any changes. WinPatrol operates using a heuristic approach which makes it more likely to find new malware than traditional signature based scanners which are heavily reliant on updates. WinPatrol will alert you to new program activations as well and is effective across a whole range of malware including worms, trojans, cookies, adware and spyware. Even stuff designed to replicate itself on your system is with WinPatrol's reach. You can also use WinPatrol to filter unwanted cookies and IE add-ons. An added bonus is that WinPatrol will also deal with the problems it finds so you won't need another program to do this for you. As of V19.0, WinPatrol becomes a "Cloud Edition". Mostly the extra features will only benefit users of the paid Plus version. One part of the WinPatrol Cloud though is a poll where the WinPatrol community of users can provide personal feedback on files that are detected. The poll data will be available to both FREE and PLUS users. The author, Bill Pytlovany, provides support and has an interesting comments and resource blog here: http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/
The program now also includes: Process Launch Monitoring, Folder and File Hooking, EMailing of Alerts and Quarantining of Files and Directories. There is an active thread for this software at Wilders forum here: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=54666 The author, Mark Jacobs, also maintains a range of other free software on his website and will respond to emails for support if requested. |
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version





Comments
MC, maybe you should consider having a look at Spyshelter free. It is not only an anti-logger, but seems to be a full HIPS application. In their latest releases they added a "restricted mode" similar to DropMyRights and OA's "run safer"
Thanks for the suggestion.
Hi, Mid:
I thought that, while you're about seeking and reviewing new software options of this kind, you might get an interest in taking a look also at the free version of Xyvos (http://www.xyvos.com/).
Greetings from Brazil.
Thanks for the information about this new product but I would want to see a lot more detail first, including independent test results, before considering something like this with no site rating and no active forum (despite having a link).There is also no published privacy policy despite there being a link for this too.
IMO I would stay well away for the time being at least.
The PC security industry is highly competitive and highly profitable which is why so many try to climb on board the gravy wagon. The truth is that no new product is likely to outperform the top existing solutions unless those behind it's inception have a bottomless wallet and access to top industry techs.
I'm a blind user and I've found PcTools Threatfire very friendly. I highly recommend this to anyone. I have never had any issues with it and it appears to play nice with Microsoft Security Essentials. WinPatrol I believe does not offer real time protection in the free version. I found this out when I got infected and then WinPatrol alert me of something new and at this point was to late to remove. So personally I would throw out WinPatrol right out of this list. Threatfire at least offers real time protection. When, I did use WinPatrol I didn't like the lag before it would pop up either. Threatfire was found to be very simple to use for me to use.
Ultimately it depends on what you expect a program to do for you and how much interaction you want with it. This is the full list of WnPatrol capabilities and a comparison between the two options.
http://www.winpatrol.com/compare.html
That is a very good run down of what WinPatrol can do. Very impressive. However, I did notice that the default lag for WinPatrol is 2 minutes. You can change this to 1 minute. You have to purchase the product for real-time. The real question to ask now is will either product help you stop a new threat in its track just enough you can do a scan to remove a new virus of some sort? Suppose a new threat pops up. I kill the process with threatfire and it looks like WinPatrol does the same at this point should I be able to find it and remove it with HijaackThis or something?
There are always dangers when using software with crossover features. At best you have some redundancy between their various functions, at worst you can introduce conflicts as the software competes for system resources and file access. This introduces the possibility that your overall protection could be worse with two competing products, rather than better. As Threatfire is more aggressive than WinPatrol I would decide at what level you surf at and then choose just one program. With general safe surfing habits then WinPatrol is going to be adequate. If on the other hand you are prone to surfing risky areas then I'd use Threatfire instead. Either way, a comprehensive scanner such as HitmanPro or Malwarebytes should still enable you to find and delete malicious files which have otherwise not been dealt with.
Thanks so much Midnight Cowboy. You answered my question. I agree that WinPatrol has a leg up on what it offers but Threatfire I think offers a better real-time protection where WinPatrol lacks and can potentially leave you helpless as it did to me as where Threatfire was able to halt the threat cold in its tracks. I just feel Threatfire is a better choice because things will get past your Firewall and AntiVirus at times. This is a third layer protection I feel will suffice for a blind user. Luck with you all and keep up the good work. Love the site. Now if only I could get Comodo make it more blind friendly then I wouldn't need Threatfire! ;)
Pleased this has helped you out.
Why don't you try posting your comments about Comodo in their forum?
Despite the occasional ego trip I do know that Melih is very approachable about such things and maybe can offer some suggestions.
Hi MC - Great intro and reviews (as usual).
Just on the Threatfire/Comodo conflicts (as reported by "Munkie"). Is it not inadvisable to install more than one HIPS based application (or which includes a HIPS based component)? Is that not inviting the likelihood of incompatibilities, in much the same way as installing more than one AV with real time protection running?
I have used Threatfire for years, through XP, Vista and Windows 7. Never had a problem, never experienced any issues. I've also recommended it to many of my clients and associates, never had one call back because of anything caused by Threatfire....go figure!!
I agree 100% with your assessment. I recommend Threatfire largely because it requires virtually zero configuration (works well right out of the box) and minimal user input (decision making). Suits my clientele/associates who range primarily from 'wouldn't have a clue' to 'novice'. LOL
Sheesh, I can't believe how many respondents (not only here but all across the forum spectrum) are employing soooo many security products......at times, the list seems to go on forever!
Guys!! Security is very important but you CAN overdo it!! LOL
Cheers....Jimbo
Hi grimbles,
The difficult part is defining where a conflict might lie. On some
systems Threatfire coexists with other HIPS components and on others not. The only definite thing is that aggressive HIPS like CIS and that contained in Privatefirewall are more likely to cause issues.
When I was using Windows I never had a lot of luck personally with Threatfire so with XP I reverted to the last free version of Cyberhawk (before PCTools called it Threatfire) which was error free.
"feint hearted" should be
"faint hearted"
The typo is fixed now. Thanks for pointing out.
Thanks to both :) I was amazed at how much confusion there still is about this when I Googled it, and unfortunately a spell checker isn't much use :D
test post - mc
tried threatfire unfortunately had to uninstall immediately
I'm running windows 7 and threatfire seemed to conflict with comodo firewall on its initial install scan after threatfire wouldn't open comodo did not pop up anything, but there was something about it in the defense events (terminated process)
after a forced reboot comodo and avira would not load on restart but threatfire would and the program would open
now it might be my setup but they programs didn't seem to be compatible together or a possible setting somewhere needs adjusting
program seems worth a try but need antivirus and firewall more
Thanks for the notice Munkie. Unfortunately this has always been the problem with Threatfire although the later releases have been much better regarding compatibility. The strange thing I've seen is that this can happen (or not) on very similar setups so it's almost impossible to pin down the cause. Most would say that with Comodo installed you wouldn't need Threatfire anyway because there would be too much redundancy between the two. Supposedly Comodo is at last to be featured in the next round of AV Comparatives tests and depending on how well it does you might not need Avira either :)
How can I temporarily disable WinPatrol to try and determine if it is slowing FireFox? Thanks
Simply use your task manager (right click on the bottom tool bar) and turn off WinPatrol (End Task,End Process or End Process Tree).I use FireFox and WinPatrol.If you know what you're doing you can use WinPatrol to speed up your system by disabling unnecessary start ups,etc.
Good tip. In concentrating on WinPatrol's malware blocking abilities I tend to forget about it's excellent start-up control feature.
Can't think of how WinPatrol could be slowing up Firefox. This is more likely to be your AV's web scanner (if you have one) or the number/type of Firefox extensions you have installed. You might also like to try opening the same few pages with an alternative browser such as SRWareIron and see how the timing compares. To close WinPatrol just right-click the tray icon and select "Exit Program". You can restart it again from the start menu.
Thanks MC-You were correct as the problem was actually with my AT&T connection.Did not consider this initially but Vista(or was it AT&T?) diagnosed and repaired it automatically. Yes Vista does have some good points!
Pleased you got it sorted. Here I refer to my ISP as Indescribable Service Provider but out of a choice of two they are still the better option :D
Thanks, very good review of Malware Defender. It's very light on resources too. Just used MD to replace PC Tools, alongside windows firewall, Avast, GeSWall.
Windows Task Manager is another way to view network activity holistically since MD only shows the port connections.
I'm pleased you like Malware Defender. It's a bit labour intensive to start with if you have the network option enabled but once you get your rules set it's a great program.
Malware Defender has been a mixed bag of excessive popups initially (even for silly things like showing picture previews in a Explorer folder), and extra helpful control -- it's a rare HIPS that actually stops programs from launching IE!
If it ever trains up to silence, then it may be a keeper.
Same poster as above.
Hi GreenArrow.
Unfortunately this is very true. There is no half way house between the protection offered by a true HIPS like this and not having alerts. There are just too many possible variables for the vendors to code a silent HIPS which means that the questions will get asked and you, the user, will need to supply the answers to set the rules. Two other fine examples which I used during my XP days (RealtimeDefender and EQSecure) were the same. Certainly the benefits of sticking with it are that you can achieve a usable lock-down status for your machine. Equally, a lot of folks will say that a HIPS is only of any value if you plan to get infected otherwise why would you need to answer questions about what you've just installed? In reality, the proper use of say ClearCloud, WOT and a Chrome based browser will remove 95% of the reasons for having a HIPS in the first place and therefore a simpler and much more user friendly example such as WinPatrol is then all you need :)
MC, I am using WinPatrol and am pleased with it except there does seem to be a little delay in notifying me with its popups when detecting a new program or new "activity." Is this normal for WP?
Also are WP and Threatfire similar enough in what they do that one could substitute for the other? In other words would Threatfire provide any more protection than WinPatrol or just a somewhat different type of protection? I am currently using Avast5 Free, Superantispyware in real time,Vista firewall and Malwarebytes,SafeReturner and Hitman Pro as scanners. Thank You
Yes, the delay with WinPatrol is normal. Threatfire is a more complete antimalware solution and as with all of these programs there is bound to be a certain amount of redundancy when using two together. That said, there is enough of a difference to make keeping both acceptable if you really feel the need. Resist the temptation to increase the protection level of Threatfire above it's default setting though as on some systems this can cause problems. If you are using Sandboxie then both of these become redundant, it just depends on personal preference. It's also worth looking at WOT (Web Of Trust) and ClearCloud (DNS). If you don't visit bad places to start with then you need far less protection against them. WOT isn't infallible but orange and red rated sites have still got that way for a reason :)