Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager Interested? Click here
Best Free Intrusion Prevention and Detection Utility for Home Use (HIPS)
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Gone are the days when a virus was a virus and everything else was - well – different! Now known collectively as “Malware” these threats are constantly evolving and pose a serious challenge to security software. Signature based scanners give the most reliable detection results but these are limited by the frequency of their database updates. To compliment signature recognition software HIPS programs were developed which look for behavior on your PC which is “characteristic of malware activity”. The user is then presented with an alert to either allow or block the event. Some programs automate this process which can occasionally lead to problems. See my article “HIPS Explained” which deals with this and other issues in more detail. Evaluating the performance of HIPS programs is far from easy and any so called “test results” should be viewed with a degree of caution. It is straightforward enough to feed malware files to a selection of signature scanners and then count what they find to arrive at a score. AV Comparatives provides an admirable service here and the results are always consistent and reliable. There is no such definition line possible for testing HIPS software and my feeling is that some of the vendors may possibly use this to their own advantage (“hype”). Review Criteria |
|
Discussion
|
|
Malware Defender was formerly a commercial program, but this excellent HIPS changed ownership a while back and a new version was released as freeware. The sequence of events relating to this event is set out quite nicely here if anyone is interested. Just follow the thread through.
In addition to the usual file, registry and application modules, Malware Defender also provides network protection should you choose to enable it, including a connections monitor. This makes it the ideal companion for anyone using Windows own firewall, but wanting more detailed control. It also scores very highly in the Matousec tests for those inclined to value the results. It was difficult to know exactly where to place Malware Defender in terms of a review rating. For what it does it's an excellent performer but the complexities of using it make it unsuitable for average users. Mistakes can be rectified by changing rule permissions from the log entries, although if you've already denied a vital system function, your screen might now be empty!
WinPatrol has many advocates and has recently been upgraded to achieve greater compatibility for Vista and Windows 7 users. It's main objective is to warn you about alterations to your system which may be malware generated. It does this by taking a snapshot of your system settings and alerting you to any changes. WinPatrol operates using a heuristic approach which makes it more likely to find new malware than traditional signature based scanners which are heavily reliant on updates. WinPatrol will alert you to new program activations as well and is effective across a whole range of malware including worms, trojans, cookies, adware and spyware. Even stuff designed to replicate itself on your system is with WinPatrol's reach. You can also use WinPatrol to filter unwanted cookies and IE add-ons. An added bonus is that WinPatrol will also deal with the problems it finds so you won't need another program to do this for you. As of V19.0, WinPatrol becomes a "Cloud Edition". Mostly the extra features will only benefit users of the paid Plus version. One part of the WinPatrol Cloud though is a poll where the WinPatrol community of users can provide personal feedback on files that are detected. The poll data will be available to both FREE and PLUS users. The author, Bill Pytlovany, provides support and has an interesting comments and resource blog here: http://billpstudios.blogspot.com/
The program now also includes: Process Launch Monitoring, Folder and File Hooking, EMailing of Alerts and Quarantining of Files and Directories. There is an active thread for this software at Wilders forum here: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=54666 The author, Mark Jacobs, also maintains a range of other free software on his website and will respond to emails for support if requested. |
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version





Comments
i checked out SWare Iron and it reads like it is from CHINA. the english reads like it is written by chinese. ie, "SRWare Iron is a real alternative. The browser is based on the Chromium-source and offers the same features as Chrome - but without the critical points that the privacy concern." So i am not going to use it. I like "palemoon" it is based on firefox.
SRWare Iron browser is from Germany. TheWorld Chrome is from China and is based on Chromuim.
I too prefer Pale Moon as an alternative to Firefox. I've also switched to Comodo Dragon as my preferred Chrome based browser.
MC I just looked at QTWeb and it appears to be a nice browser. However I am wondering what type security add-ons it will take. Which ones if any did you use with this browser?
I could be wrong because I've never looked into this but as far as I'm aware it has some built-in aids such as an adblock and that's it. There are a couple of questions about security/add-ons in their forum but neither has received a reply.
Thank you very much again. Your info is so helpful. I used all of the mentioned browsers and IE9 is the fastest in my comp. I'd also like to ask if you use any browser add-ons. If so, which ones.
I'm not a great fan of loading browsers up with extensions because they're the main cause of slowdowns and instability. That said, there are some I regard as indispensable (on Windows) like NoScript. Depending on the browser I also use WOT, AdBlock Plus, Dr. Web link scanner, the Virus Total extension and Google (English). I should also state that I'm no power user nor am I into social networking, and I appreciate those that are will want more than my meager collection of add-ons :)
Depending on which commercial suite you have there is a chance a HIPS program could conflict with it. Normally it's best to check with the user forum or help desk of the program you are using to see what other users have tried. There are fewer stand alone HIPS programs these days as compared to a few years back. And most suites have some sort of behavior monitor built in anyway, although most are not that great. About the only really good stand alone HIPS programs are Malware Defender and Comodo D+. The rest have significant protection issues, have lots of conflicts, run heavy or are no longer continually developed.
My experience with threatfire: I got a fast PC, but i dont notice any loss in ressources, but when driving up windows it takes a bit longer(maybe 3-4secs), but bearable. Therefore very low system ressources are used, it doesnt slow anything else I do down.
Defense: well its my first HIPS i ever installed. For the defense level i experienced the last days: I think its good, there surely are better HIPS out there, but threatfire definitely does its job, at least on maximum defense level, i would not recommend lower levels, since those didnt seem to provide a good enough intrusion protection.
What was very positive was the very easy GUI, for a person advanced in computer use but new to HIPS its easy stuff i would highly recommend for beginners using HIPS.
Compatibility: I use windows 7 64bit version. I noticed no problems so far, except 1, only a small one but still annoying: For some reason threatfire seems to mess with my SPTD and/or kerneldebugging, thanks to this daemontools doesnt run anymore. Well i had this problem before thanks to a firewall, there are other cost free mount tools I could get, but still its annoying, and daemontools is simply faster and easier. Will have to either look in to the problem further, or change to a different cost free mount tool. Unless that I had no problems(lucky me^^). But still for compatibility in my own review: I definitely have to give threatfire a minus point for this.
My fazit: Easy and above average strong in defense, but lacks compatibilty, here PCtools definitely should work on it for future versions. But overall im happy with it.
And last a general advice on HIPS: HIPS are no easy tools, and even things like threatfire are unfortunately not suitable for beginners, its more suited for advanced users or better. A HIPS is not as simple and easy as a firewall or antivirus, this is a total different dimension and system, here you are administrating also sensible windows and system processes, also other even deeper processes. You must never forget that a HIPS means a drastic measure in administrating your processes. Thats why: of course installing a HIPS is likely to cause problems, even the easy ones like threatfire, so dont wonder if there are problems in the beggining. Also again this is no firewall, nor a taskmanager, you can seriously mess with your system, thats why my general advice is: only change options if you really know what your doing. However because of this, thats why HIPS are such a big and valuable aid in generall, overall defense, and definitely worth the trouble your going through with it.
Btw: At the moment of course im busy dealing with threatfire^^ But in time i will as always seek more. Thats why Malware Defender hit my eye. I will read the comments but: Can anyone else give me a personal review on Malware Defender? Would be much appreciated, thanks in forward for any reviews on Malware Defender.
Thanks for sharing your experiences with Threatfire :) Your conclusion pretty much sums up HIPS in general. My own tech always says HIPS is only useful for those who plan to get infected and you certainly need well above knowledge of Windows to configure and manage one effectively.
Threatfire, as with all HIPS, is very system specific in how it behaves, and your hardware/software mix will determine how much or how little trouble you are likely to encounter.
Malware Defender is a lot less automated than Threatfire. This means for most users it will be more stable in use but you will also need to answer a deluge of popups during the early stages, especially with the network module enabled. Please let us know how you get on with it.
SpyShelter free version did not make the list?
No. Too many compatibility issues.
What were the compatibility problems?
Also, did you see the ThreatFire review made by EP_X0FF over at kernelmode? Here is the link-
http://www.kernelmode.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=586
His words "I'm not recommending to anyone use this ThreatTrash. Save your time and health of your OS." I'm sure since you are the HIPS expert here you are well aware of the credentials of EP_X0FF. Your response to his review of ThreatFire?
Sorry, but I have no interest in commenting on other reviews all of which vary greatly for every product available. Nor do I wish to comment further on a product not chosen to be included. The compatibility issues with SpyShelter are well documented around the net but as with anything else, user experience will vary. For me is was BSOD and inoperable keyboard, both reason enough. If SpyShelter is a program you like to use and it works for you, fine.
A broken keyboard was the reason I stopped using Threatfire. Actually it was a Threatfire incompatibility with Vista. That problem was listed on the PC Tools forum as well as WildersSecurity. I'm not sure what steps (if any) were ever done to correct the issue though. I suspect PC Tools just waited it out until Windows 7 came along. Some of the final free versions of CyberHawk can still be found around the net and I would much rather use that ob XP than Threatfire. CH and TF are not much different, although CH runs lighter and has fewer compatibility problems. But note the keyboard issue remains with CH and Vista.
Thnx, it is very useful pieces of advice. I'm grateful, i was trying to build up defence of my pc and your advices are boon for me.
I'm pleased you found it useful :)
Another very useful HIPS is not listed here because it forms part of a suite and to do so would make things even more confusing than they already are. If however anyone is into suites (single program - complete solution) then do check out Outpost Internet Security Free. On paper the test results for the AV component are not in the top group but don't be fooled by these. Nothing on the planet will protect high-risk surfers and for the rest of us Outpost Free is more than adequate. I even have a bunch of ex.customers still running FortiClient which I recommended for different reasons. This (supposedly) is even worse but in almost a year none has been infected.
You do need to ensure that your system is clean though before installing any type of security program which contains an auto-learn mode (like Outpost). Scanning first with Malwarebytes and HitmanPro is what I recommend.
Also, using good DNS service like Norton and the site rating agent WOT reduces your exposure to some malware groups by at least half before even considering what your resident AV might do.
mc is Outpost Internet Security Free your talking about good i like (single program - complete solution right now i use avast free, wot, xp firewall,norton dns ,Malwarebytes free,Superantispyware free is my setup better than the Outpost Internet Security Free your talking about? out of all the single program - complete what is your best? and if my setup i have now better would i gain anything using zonealarm free instead of xp firewall?
The detection rate of Outpost Internet Security Suite Free is not as good as Avast! The HIPS component in the firewall is first rate but requires some degree of Windows system knowledge in order to use it effectively. With any third party firewall like Zone Alarm you will gain the ability to monitor outbound connections, but with the setup you already have this should not be necessary to the point of changing anything. It's always tempting when you see something "new" or "improved", but in reality you can do more damage by changing security programs than keeping a stable system with those you already have. Certainly if you have not been infected during the past few months, the combination you have now must be working.
starting to get confused:
just got rid of: AVG, Spyware Terminator and ZoneAlarm
replaced it with: Avast and Comodo FireWall as per the Security Wizard.
So do I also need to add HIPs as well??
- maybe ThreatFire or WinPatrol
Both Avast and Comodo have behavior monitoring - is theirs not enough by themselves?
thank you for any help.
According to some tests, Comodo might offer better proactive detection, assuming you have the Defense+ module active, but you will need to learn how to use it. This is no easy task, but you might find this tutorial useful:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/how-install-comodo-firewall.htm
With Comodo correctly configured you will not need ThreatFire and/or WinPatrol as well because there will be a considerable amount of redundancy between the programs, and chances of conflicts will be high.
Thank you for the reply - makes things a little clearer.
I have just configured Comodo as per the article.
Great, I hope it works out for you because it is worth the effort.
Chiron is one of our resident Comodo experts so if you have any specific queries, please post them in the comments under his tutorial, or better still in the forum.
Just found out recently that Threatfire is messing up my Skype during start-up. The symptoms is when I start Skype, it will open in a first few seconds then crashed and say "Program Stops Working blah blah..." The only way I can use skype is to keep on trying opening it until the error doesn't come out.
I accidentally saw in the event viewer the faulting error about Skype and found out the threatfire together with it. So I immediately go to the custom rule and declared "Skype.exe" to be excluded in the process when Threatfire scans application that about to start. After that, no more skype crashing. :)
Thank you for sharing your experience. This is actually quite common for all programs which contain a form of HIPS or behavior blocker. This includes many of the leading firewalls and security suites too.
As a former user of ThreatFire, I can say that while it was effective, it only picked up a couple items. However, it massively slowed down system response. When I heard that MS Security Essentials now had the same heuristic capability as ThreatFire, I went ahead and uninstalled it. Bam! system speed massive increase. My CCleaner time is cut in half, and my registry cleaner now finishes in half the time.
I am as well a fan of MSSE. It picks up where TF left off. I'll now use SuperAntispyware as an on-demand malware backup program.
Cheers, Frank
I remember mention being made on this site regarding a way to obtain Prevx Safeonline through Facebook...How is this to be done? Also is it the full version? Thanks for this great site!
If you search here in the Search box for "Prevx", you will see a list of articles or comments mentioning "Prevx". One such link is:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/probably-best-free-security-list...
On that page, is a link to the Prevx SafeOnline Facebook page.
Hi MC, I have a question with online armor and threatfire as can I use these programs together, would u think if malware did appear from the net would there be any conflicts in picking the malware up.
Because at the moment I have these two programs install together on my pc, there is only a conflict when threatfire is turn up to level 4 or higher then it will pick up some of the online armor processes as a threat. But when threatfire has it's default level it has no conflict.
So in this situation would u say threatfire is redundant when I have online armor installed, would both programs do the same thing, or would u think it will increase my protection.
I currently have online armor, avira and threatfire on in real time. Would u say that is a good setup.
Thanks for u help MC.
Other comments from other users can help me to reply to this question as well.
Hi JamesD,
There is always a certain amount of redundancy between programs which operate in a similar way, but not always identically. I see the same thing sometimes with Privatefirewall and WinPatrol. Usually there's no real conflict as the programs compete for system access to check things and the result is mostly just a double alert. As you've found though, increasing the settings is definitely going to make this worse.
I think the setup you describe is excellent and with Threatfire at default settings I would keep it as it is. The only other thing to bear in mind is that most malware just doesn't "appear from the net" on its own. In fact nearly all of it requires at least some help from you :)
You may already have these programs/extensions but if not I would look at a DNS filter such as ClearCloud or Comodo, Trend Micro's Browser Guard service (if you use IE) and a website ratings guide such as WOT. These on their own will prevent you from visiting a lot of potentially bad places by accident so long as you follow the advice they give.
Site ratings agencies are the most open for debate because they all have their weaknesses. WOT relies on user opinion so sites with a low traffic volume can have their rating manipulated unfairly and others like McAfee don't update often enough. Overall we've found WOT to be the most reliable on balance which is why it is used by us to rate every link published here.