Best Free High Dynamic Range (HDR) Software
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
Introduction
|
| Imagine that you are inside a large Gothic cathedral, and the sunlight is streaming in from the windows. You pull out your digital camera and take a photograph of the beautiful artwork on the church wall near one of the windows.
You needn't have bothered. Your digital photograph will be a flop. Either the painting will be dark and barely visible, or the window will appear as a glaring and dominant white area that is hardly recognizable as a window. Or both. Digital photography is a wonderful technology, but it's not very good at handling scenes that are comprised of both very dark and very brightly-lit areas. The human eye is superb at this, but the sensors in digital cameras are not. But, there is way to overcome this problem; It's called HDR photography. HDR photography works by combining several photos of the same scene, taken at different exposure settings, into one photo. The details of dark areas (from a longer-duration exposure) are combined with the details of brightly lit areas (from a shorter-duration exposure). The result is a single photo that is correctly exposed in both the dark and light areas; it not only looks like it is correctly exposed, it also looks more dimensional. There is a related technique called tone mapping. I won't attempt to explain this, but you can read more about that here. I'm also aware that the newer concept is to tone map just a single image, and most of the available HDR software will allow you to do this. The unfortunate thing is that it has become fashionable to have high saturation on tone mapping and I think this spoils an image. To create HDR photographs you will need to do two things. First, it would be wise to use a tripod when you take your series of differently exposed photos, which will ensure that all of the photos are identically composed. Second, you need to combine the series of photos by using special HDR software. HDR is now part of the camera's features, like the new Pentax K-7. I haven't seen how this works personally, but I suspect it is using several ev settings, but the sensors are also getting more sophisticated and will allow you to acknowledge different variations in light and adjust accordingly. Taking the multiple shots may be easy, because most modern cameras have a "bracketing mode" that will allow you to automatically take a picture repeatedly at different exposures. However, if your camera doesn't have this "automatic" feature, you can do it manually. Check your camera's guidebook. There are several free HDR software packages, and I've had the opportunity to review most of them. Selecting the best was not easy. |
|
Discussion
|
|
Qtpfsgui came out slightly ahead. It has great tone-mapping and aligning facilities, allows 8,16 and 32 bit channels and two means of manually manipulating the image. Qtpfsgui creates a wonderful range of tone-mapped HDR images. When loaded, the images can be aligned either automatically and manually. Click next and a wizard walks you through recommended profiles or you can change this to get the best profile for your image. It gives you choices for ghosting and response curves, and if these are not to your liking you can tick the custom configuration. After the generated image has been achieved, you have at your disposal a good array of tone-mapped filters and the ability to adjust tone-mapping manually. Here's the big hint; if your computer is struggling create the image in the smallest size. After you adjust your levels and find that you are satisfied with the finished image, delete it (yes, that's right, delete it!) and create your large one. This is not just Windows software; it can be used on Linux and Mac operating systems with support for RAW format. Picturenaut provides (all automatically) image alignment, exposure correction, color balancing, noise level compensation, and derivation of the camera curve from the source images. Although it doesn't support bracketed RAW images, the many HDR formats it does support are: What is interesting is that this software provides a choice of "weighting" when you have loaded your images, offering options "Derivative", "+hat1", and "+hat2". Simply explained, weighting defines the values between dark pixels and light pixels. Dark pixels have noise in them and light pixels are usually over-exposed; instead of dropping these pixels, they are assigned a weight value. Depending on your image, the weight function may help you obtain a better result. The EV (Exposure Value) can be taken from the EXIF information attached to the image, or assigned a manual value (this is excellent for cheating HDR's). As a modular piece of software, its most important functions can all be accessed from a command line. The downside is that you cannot alter the alignment of the image, but I have done tests on auto alignments and Picturenaut came out the best. If you are looking for straight forward images without excessive tone mapping this has to be your top software. FDRTools Basic was close to being my first choice because you are able to use the RAW format, and alter the image alignment. The supported import image formats are: JPEG, TIFF, Radiance RGBE, OpenEXR, Integrated RAW converter plus DCRAW for direct import of virtually all digital camera RAW formats. The supported export image formats are : Radiance RGBE, OpenEXR, TIFF, PNG, PPM, BMP and JPEG. There are four windows that you can view: display of menu with images and adjustments, preview area, progress and navigator. When you choose to align the images, the application automatically compensates for any 'slight' camera wobble. Once the images are aligned, you may manually adjust to create a slight misalignment for image creativity (sometimes a slight misalignment can create a better HDR image by giving it more depth). It provides two tone-mapping options: 'Simplex' – adjusting histogram, gamma and saturation, and 'Receptor', which is identical, but with the added bonus of compression and brightness. Personally, I work on 'Receptor' because it gives the greater effect if needed. Please delve into the 'Preferences', rather than work with the applications defaults, as this will acquaint you with the settings, allow you to specify your own final-image format, and select a destination file for your finished images. An excellent program. Essential HDR Community Edition is a fantastic free HDR software that blows the others out of the water when it comes to tone mapping. Their goal is to better Photomatix, which has made itself the bench mark of HDR software. It has an easy interface that allows you to manipulate the image by tone mapping, histogram and color balance. The best way to get a good result really is by using a tripod, however, it does have the ability for alignment if you have hand held the photograph. Don't hold your breath here, I have found its not that brilliant. Yes it is FREE, but the limitations of this software allows a maximum image size of 1mb. To give you an example I took 3 images on different EV values 2592 x 1944 px (5 MP, 4:3). After combing the images the results were: Result image can be saved in the following formats * Jpeg: 8-bit per channel RGB Source image can be in the following formats * Jpeg: 8-bit per channel RGB
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Picturenaut
|
||
| http://www.hdrlabs.com/picturenaut/index.html | ||
| http://www.hdrlabs.com/picturenaut/index.html | ||
| 2MB |
||
FDRTools Basic
|
||
| http://fdrtools.com/fdrtools_basic_e.php | ||
| http://fdrtools.com/fdrtools_basic_e.php | ||
| Windows 8MB – OS X 13MB |
||
| at least 512 MB memory – Processor: at least Pentium 4, PowerPC G4 | ||
ESSENTIAL HDR COMMUNITY EDITION
|
||
| Excellent tone mapping | ||
| Only A5 size images and aligning images from hand held photographs not brilliant. A company watermark is put onto your image | ||
| http://www.imagingluminary.com/Default.aspx | ||
| http://www.imagingluminary.com/Download.aspx | ||
| 3.5MB |
||
| Essential HDR can run on 64-bit Windows XP or Vista. However, current support effort focuses on 32-bit Operating Systems. System requirements: 1GB main memory minimal, 2GB preferred - 1.6 GHz CPU minimal, Dual-Core CPU preferred - Screen resolution: 1024x768 minimal, 1280x1024 preferred | ||
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Tony Bennett.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Please rate this article


Subscribe to our 
I put the pic into Photoshop, added a big white bit at the bottom and changed increased the canvas height. Then when Dynamic Photo HDR tried to add the watermark at the bottom, it could do so freely. Once the pic was saved, put the pic back into photoshop and cut the bottom off, complete with watermark!
i guess you get what you pay for. :)
Qtpfsgui:
I downloaded and installed in english,
but when I run the program everything is not in english, so I can't read the menus or anything.
I uninstalled, redownloaded and reinstalled in english,
but same problem.
I uninstalled that piece of crap.
End of story.
Your own command of English seems limited, so perhaps you should hold others to no higher standard than yours -- if you have one.
Please ladies can we not insult other people, especially on the basis of their language abilities, and try to be constructive instead? Foxmail also installs into a non-English GUI (Chinese) but there's a known workaround to change it. Maybe this is the same? I don't have a clue because HDR software on it's own to me is an alien species. If anyone can help though please post.
I did see this and thought it was a wrong download, there is obviously something amiss here. I have just re-loaded and downloaded the software and I have NO problems. I suggest you delete the whole program with something like Revo-Unistaller and not just use the programs Un-installer, that way we can make sure the program has not left anything behind. Then go back to the site and download the software and re-load. You should find that there is no problem. Just ensure you click the right box's. Keep me informed
I have had problems with QTPFSGUI suddenly shutting down in the middle of image processing. It has happened everytime I have used the software and am a bit dissapointed with that. I am curious to see a final image, but I am beginning to tink this program just will not function properly.
Get more memory.
I have had the same problem with qtpfsgui shutting down when doing really highresolution images, but I have 4GB of memory, and at the time 1.3GB of that was free, and the harddrive has severeal hundred gigabytes of free space. My operatingsystem is windows 7 64-bit, so it might be related to that though...
Something is a miss here and I am sorry you had problems. I havelooked and downloaded again and had no problems. Possibly try again
http://qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net/download.php.
Let me know how you get on
Tony
I wanted to like Qtpfsqui but after several installs could never get the filters to work. They were grayed out and yes I put them in the right folder. Several times.
I went to their forum to see if anyone else had this problem and apparently not. So I just uninstalled it.
Ummm, yeah... tried EHDR... I wouldn't mind playing with it somemore... but I HAVE A HUGE ISSUE WITH SOFTWARE PRESENTED AS FREE AND THEN PLASTERING YOUR FREAKING WATERMARK ALL ALONG THE BOTTOM. IF IT'S A FREAKING DEMO ****SAY IT'S A FREAKING DEMO****.
When I saw that watermark along the bottom, the first thing I did was uninstall. I might even have considered buying it, if it was any good... and the download was clearly specified as a demo for the commercial product. But after that? Nope, moving on... won't even consider buy it... not now, nor never in the future.
CRINTX
This page is a great resource (and opportunity); thanks!
I tried out EssentialHDR and found it quite usable for getting small-image output. The Detail-Revealer (the 2nd option) doesn't work, but the EHDR people replied to my email immediately and said they were about to update the free version. I was impressed with EHDR's ease of use, the quite good speed, and the possible adjustments. I'm tempted to buy the full version, but I want to try some of the others first. If I don't get the full version, I'll keep the free one on my computer because it's a very quick way to get an acceptable image from raw files shot in high-contrast light (i.e., an "auto-raw-converter" for problem pictures that are not quite worth the trouble of using layer masks on).
I tried out Qtpfsqui and was considerably less impressed. Once it was installed (XPpro, suitable computer), it did something to Windows so that "last best configuration" when I next restarted my computer didn't get things working; a couple of more retries were necessary and needless to say, once Windows was running again, I uninstalled the program and did a system restore. While I was using it, I couldn't get to the help file (a window opened, but it was empty, and its various buttons didn't work), and without it I really couldn't make sense of the adjustments this program was doing-- I couldn't get a not-blown-out, not-posterized image from photos that EHDR handled fine by default.
Sorry you had problems with Qtpfsqui. I have used this so many times now with Linux, Vista and XP I had no problems at all. But there is always the element of it clashing with another piece of software on your system. The best HDR software is Photomatix, not the free but the full version, its the Adobe of the HDR world, you could try this one as trial version
http://www.hdrdarkroom.com/forum/index.php?topic=6.0
Tony
Hi Tony,
I have Photoshop CS4 and have yet to try out HDR Darkroom 1.2 Windows Beta.
Here is the latest download link:
http://www.hdrdarkroom.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=e89a0f9b19a178bc878...
For more info check out: http://www.hdrdarkroom.com/index.htm
Many thanks for the reviews of the HDR software.
with a little searching I had thought photomatix was the only serious HDR program out there, thanks a ton, I downloaded the top 3 and am excited to do more HDR!
Just remember, HDR is a toy, not photo editing software.
photographyfromdanny101.blogspot.com - check it out theres some awesome HDR pictures
You people are rude and mean. You can give constructive criticism without being jerks. Seriously, if you need an ego boost, find a healthy way of getting it.
Many people find communicating is a difficult thing without insulting each other. Maybe the human race will learn one day, or maybe not. But that means it would have to grow up and its got a long way to go yet. Its very sad
HDR yes, awesome no. They are awful. lower your saturation, and get a better lens.
got ot agree with the others. try to refrain from using acid while tone mapping would be my only suggestion...
Your HDR photos suck. You should learn some basic photography first, like composition, and when to know that saturation will destroy details.
Dude, are you the one who did it and you are the one asking us to check out those pics....You seriously need to lean how to do photography and HDR. Honestly those photo's sucks...Sorry, no hard feelings.
no there isn't...
there are 4 images or so, and they are hit with a saturation bat.
Users of commercial packages should double-check to make sure that HDR isn't now included in the most recent updates of them. I notice, for example, that my most recent upgrade to version 12.5 of PaintShop Pro Photo X2 now includes HDR capabilities. Earlier versions did not.
As HDR becomes more and more common, I expect more and more software packages out there -- both free and commercial -- to start including it.
Just FYI.
__________________________
Gregg L. DesElms
gregg [at] greggdeselms.com
Napa, California
I have noticed this as well, but the problem is these are addons and the tonemapping is very limited from what I have seen.
I agree with most comments made. I have tested seven HDR programs using a variety of lighting conditions and cameras, including an 8 megapixel phone. In many tests Essential HDR Community Edition did very well and for web work, unless you are posting large images, it is the best choice as it is free.
There was very little to choose between the top two commercial contenders, Photoshop CS4 (way ahead of CS3) and Photoacute which outperformed Photomatix in most tests and has many more features.
First of all: Thanks for this brilliant overview! I tried out Essential HDR Community Edition myself, but don't like it. Here's why:
I installed it, startet it and came the first bad news. It only supports 1 Megapixel outputs. So it's not a real free software, but more a teaser for a commercial product. However, I added three pictures and... waited... and waited... and waited. It took this software about 10 MINUTES to align 3 pictures (10MP). Then I saw the result. It looked not so good. The picture was way too flat. I did not spend more time wis Essential HDR CE and uninstalled it at this point. Sorry to say, but this software is miles away from Photomatix!!!
Sorry I haven't replied but I have been in hospital for three weeks and am now catching up on all correspondence. Photomatix is the BEST there is in the HDR world. I took this a few weeks a go
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tony_photoplus/3677214969/sizes/o/
I have stated in my write up that Essential is limited, I have found away round the problem to a small extent and that is to export it as a PSD and then into Photoshop. Its a small consolation but its free and the tonemapping is the best out of the three freebies. Which is why it is there and it is 'last'. For internet work I find it fits in with loading images in forums and gives me the effects I am loking for sometimes, but Photomatix is the best on the market.
Glad you're back, hope it was nothing serious. Swine flu maybe? :D
You got some excellent photos on your stream.
Glad to hear they've released you back into the community! Followed the link to your flickr collection; it's just breathtaking, and as I spent some time in Aber. I'm not completely unfamiliar with the countryside.
Is Algernon for real!?
My question: I sometimes blunder across high-res images from places like eg. Nasa. They are typically in excess of 10 mb. How come yours are so small, but equally exquisite?
Peter I just reduce down my size to say 800pix at 100 res and a little sharpening is required when compressing down an image. Thats all its not rocket science ;)
Algernon needs another keeper. Interested?
Tony,
Thanks for doing the review. Picturenaut has just released a beta version which is pretty stable. It has an updated UI and a few new features. Check it out here http://www.hdrlabs.com/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1234336450
Also if you enjoy using Picturenaut, consider donating to keep it free.
I also just got done processing an image using Picturnaut and I thought I would share it with everyone for reference http://captainkimo.com/content/picturenaut-image-cape-elizabeth-maine
Enjoy,
Kimo
That is excellent HDR work. Thanks and thanks for you link, wonderful. Enough to inspire anyone to have a go
Tony
I have trouble downloading the top pick. Does that work with Vista?
Yes, it does.. Great site by the way, tony!! Good work!!
Thanks, glad you found it handy. Also glad that you sorted out the download. Never had a prob before with this site its always constant.
Tony
Thank you for this review, very informative. And thanks to the developer of Essential HDR from posting a comment :)
I am under the impression that you need to shoot RAW for working in HDR. Is it true. Thanks
Sorry I have gotten back sooner, no thats not true. All my HDR is shot in JPG. So have a go
Tony
Have you seen EasyHDR Basic? http://www.easyhdr.com/download.php#free I haven't tried it yet, but found it when looking into HDR. There is a Pro version with more tools, but the basic is free.
Also look here http://luxal.dachary.org/webhdr/software.shtml
And this is a good source of comparative info:
http://wiki.panotools.org/HDR_Software_overview
Thanks for these lists I came across them whilst searching all the HDR freeware and they are very useful. But the above is the best of the bunch.
I found this list while searching for an alternative to Qtpfsgui. Thank you for your great job! :-)
Thanks for this - I'm not sure I am any less confused, but I think I'm wiser
BTW - digital camera's are not the best thing since sliced bread, unsliced bread is miles better than any camera, and it wont break your teeth, nor your bank.
What does bread have to do with it? You can do the HDR rendering with any digital camera even a nondigital SLR, just convert images to a CD or DVD and off you go. The expense can really be quite low to start, I know because it has cost me zilch.
Thanks for sharing
Hi Tony,
This is from the developer of Essential HDR. Thanks very much for the nice overview. I hope more people find the free Community Edition useful.
I want to clarify two things. First we are not trying to replace Photomatix. Essential HDR produces natural results that can be considered as a compliment technique to PM's surreal effects. I see no reason the two can not co-exist.
Secondly, we are still in version 1.0 and in the upcoming version 1.1 we will introduce a much improved alignment method.
For anyone interested in joining our v1.1 beta test, you can follow the product announcement we will make on the support forum http://imagingluminary.org/support/index.php
Hi
Thank you for the excellent software. Are you guys planning to add RAW support in near future ?
Post new comment