Best Free Hard Drive Eraser

 
In a Hurry?
  Go straight to the Quick Selection Guide
Introduction

 

Data Recovery Risk

We've all heard the horror stories about someone buying a used hard drive at a flea market or garage sale and then finding tons of personal data left on the drive by the previous owner.

Or even worse, people getting their credit trashed by ID thieves that make their living by taking that information and using it to wipe you out financially.

"That would never happen to me," you say. "I'll delete all the files first" or "I'll re-format the drive before I trade it in or sell it." Not so fast there Scooter! That data you think you erased is still stored on the drive.

When you delete a file it isn't really removed from the disk. The file content remains on the disk until another file is written over it. Basically the same thing happens when you re-format a hard drive. Most of the data remains; the space on the drive is just made available to be written over.
 

Recommendations: Dealing with the Risk

To be as safe as possible, you must overwrite/erase/wipe both the slack space and free space. Also, the Windows swap file (a.k.a page file) could contain private data that you wouldn't want to have fall into the wrong hands.

  • For wiping the free space on large hard drives, a single pass of random data should be more than sufficient (NIST Guidelines, CMRR, Wright -- all cited for easy reference at Wikipedia).

    The best policy is to wipe the free space regularly. I find almost nothing after a full free space wipe on a sizable drive. With just a single pass of random data, PC Inspector File Recovery only finds 0 byte nonsense files, or many nonsense files full of useless random data in my testing.

    But on smaller drives eraser programs tend to leave behind more files of random data, and the data may be recoverable to varying degrees depending on the quality of the erasing pattern.

  • Since free space wiping takes so long, you may want to use file shredding in the meantime. For individual files and folders, note that the files can't "hide" as easily with an entire drive of erased random data, and some devices use wear leveling that may interfere with the effectiveness of wiping.

  • Erasing the Page File isn't a normal feature of eraser programs. You can easily set Windows to delete it at shutdown with a registry setting (remember to backup the registry before making changes to it). These programs set the registry for you to automatically delete it at shutdown: Ultimate Windows Tweaker, XP-AntiSpy, or Microsoft Fix It. But you can also encrypt the paging file. You can encrypt it with Ultimate Windows Tweaker, with registry or Local Group Policy changes (see Seven Forums), or from a Command Prompt:

    Encrypt the Page File:
    1. Start a Command Prompt, elevating it in Vista or later
    2. Key in "fsutil behavior set EncryptPagingFile 1" (without quotes)
    3. Restart your computer

  • If you need to erase a drive before getting rid of it, then Darik's Boot and Nuke (DBAN) is designed for wiping an entire drive, but be ready to spend time installing and updating windows from scratch afterward.

Discussion
 

EraserEraser allows you to easily add tasks to securely erase selected files and folders, unused disk space (aka free space), cluster tips (aka slack space), and the recycling bin. Eraser can overwrite the data area with your choice of a variety of random data patterns (14 default patterns and a custom pattern creator). It comes with a very detailed built-in help file. And the forum seems quite responsive to questions and problems. It works with any drive (including IDE, SCSI, and RAID), and with FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS partitions.

It was very effective in my testing on a medium size hard drive (with 120+ GB partitions). After it erased the free space with a single pass of random data wiping ("simple pseudorandom data"), PC Inspector File Recovery only found 0 bit nonsense file names (none of which were recoverable). And it produced informative reports for files it could not erase, such as those in use.

If you consult its FAQ Forum section (here), you can also set it to wipe data in the Internet cache, temporary files, Internet cookies, and other custom locations, but CCleaner is easier to use for such cleaning (see below).

In the negative, it was fairly heavy in memory use. It also became heavier over time as I used the windows explorer extension to erase particular files/folders. If it starts to get too heavy, then I suggest deleting the "Task List.ersx" file (it will delete all your existing tasks, though). My task list file got around 200 MBs before I thought to delete it; it's located in your user folder under "AppData" > "Local", but you can just use the search box to find the file. I suggest exporting your existing tasks at an early stage to be able to import them later (in case the program starts to bulge). The new interface received a bit of criticism, but the underlying erasing engine surpasses the competition.

 

CCleanerCCleaner is a unique and useful file shredder because it cleans a number of places where data can secretly lurk. It will help you scrub data left behind by web browsers and other applications (windows explorer, system temporary files, and excess files created by applications/utilities/windows). These are difficult to find and erase on your own, so CCleaner has advantages over other file shredders. Before it can erase the junk files that it finds, you must set it to erase what it deletes (Options > Settings > "Secure File Deletion").

It wipes the free space of a drive in "Tools" with a "Drive Wiper" (preset with four erasing methods). It also allows you to automatically wipe the free space during its normal cleaning: select "Wipe Free Space" (scroll down in the Windows tab to Advanced) and "Run Cleaner", but you still have to manually check/uncheck the "Wipe Free Space" option (to avoid waiting a lengthy time every time it runs).

Finally, it shreds custom files/folders, but you have to jump through a few hoops by manually selecting the file or folder (Options > Include), setting it to clean "Custom Files and Folders", and clicking Run Cleaner. Alternatively, you could delete files normally to the recycling bin and then have CCleaner erase it later. Other file shredders are much easier to use for erasing custom files/folders.

 

FileShredderFile Shredder - Despite its name, it has both free space wiping and file shredding capabilities. File Shredder has a small download size, simple interface, and it's very easy to use. It's a lot lighter than Eraser on active memory resources, but higher in CPU usage on my system. It lacks scheduling or a built-in help, and has very limited online help.

It uses a DoD (5220-22.M 3 pass) erase pattern by default, but it has four other patterns to choose from (versus the 14 patterns of Eraser). The default may be way too slow for free space wiping, so you may want to change it to one or two passes. The free space wipe works a little differently than Eraser, leaving behind more temp files of nonsense information (whereas Eraser doesn't usually allow recovery programs to read any bytes as recoverable). But I wasn't able to view anything of use from File Shredder's full wipe leftovers.

Eraser and File Shredder have explorer and context menu extensions, so you can right click on a file and send it to the erasing/shredding programs.

 

SDeleteSDelete: A command line utility that securely erases using a default DOD 5220.22-M pattern at a specified number of passes. It can erase files/folders, or the free space of a drive. Like other erasers, it doesn't erase file names (instead it renames them 26 times). To quibble, I found it a bit less effective on a 1 pass wipe of free space than others above (some data was recognizable in PC Inspector's hex view, but not much of importance).

Since it has no interface, you have to use old school DOS commands, but you can easily copy and paste over the commands (you may have to use the context menu to paste). After you download it, open a command window (click Start > Run > type "CMD"), and then, for example, enter "sdelete -p 2 -z c:" (without quotes) to wipe the free space of C drive with two passes. See its download site and Bright Hub for guides.

 

Related Products for Erasing

Recuva: A recovery program that can erase individual files it finds (editor review).

EraserDrop: From Erik Pilsits at PortableApps.com and the team behind Eraser, this flexible portable app sits on the desktop to allow for quick drag and drop erasing. It also performs free space wiping. Supports Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7.

UltraShredder: It's small, easy to use, and will work from a USB flash drive. Supports Windows XP/2000/98/98SE.
 

Darik's Boot and NukeA somewhat different alternative is Darik's Boot and Nuke (DBAN). It's used to construct a floppy disk or CD that will automatically wipe the hard drives of any PC that's booted from the disk. It's great for bulk disk cleaning of PCs, and is also useful as an emergency tool for quickly removing sensitive information. However, the power of this app makes it a dangerous tool in the hands of beginners.

Related Topics and Information
 

Introduction Continued

When you delete a file it isn't really removed from the disk. The operating system (OS) only removes the reference to the file from the file allocation table. This is like going into a book or magazine and removing a chapter reference from the table of contents. The actual chapter is still in the book. The only thing removed was the page number reference in the table of contents. With the file location reference removed the OS now sees that disk space as being available for use.

The DOS and Windows file systems use groups of disk sectors, known as clusters, to store data. These clusters are of a fixed size which is normally determined by the size and number of partitions of the disk volume itself and the file system being used. If the data you're storing requires less space than a full cluster, the entire cluster is still reserved.

For example, you've saved a file that required 15.5 clusters of drive space. Because the OS can't reserve a half cluster, the allocation table had to reserve 16 whole clusters for the file. That remaining half cluster that was not used may still contain data from a previous file. That unused half cluster is known as "slack space".

Data recovery programs can read slack space and retrieve the data stored there. Even worse, let's say the file system places your 15.5 cluster file over the "unused" area of a deleted file that originally took up 35 clusters. More than half of the previous file would still be retrievable! You could have thousands of clusters on your hard drive (a.k.a free space) that contain data you thought was deleted! Scary thought, huh?

To test this idea, use a data recovery utility (such as Recuva or PC Inspector File Recovery) and see if it recovers any files.

You can also use recovery programs to check whether an erasing program successfully overwrites your data. Some data gets nicely erased down to 0 bytes, some mixes with other random data to create files of nonsense information, some fails to get erased (whether because it's in use or it's in a protected area), and some are more difficult and require free space wiping. Very little of consequence is leftover after free space wiping on modern drives.

 

Do You Need to Use 35 Passes?

The quick answer is "no." In the epilogue to Peter Gutmann's secure deletion paper, he notes the importance of huge hard drive sizes and the use of perpendicular recording on modern computers. He compares the thinking behind the wide use of his Gutmann 35 pass erase method to the belief in voodoo:

In the time since this paper was published, some people have treated the 35-pass overwrite technique described in it more as a kind of voodoo incantation to banish evil spirits than the result of a technical analysis of drive encoding techniques... It will have no more effect than a simple scrubbing with random data. In fact performing the full 35-pass overwrite is pointless for any drive... If you're using a drive which uses encoding technology X, you only need to perform the passes specific to X, and you never need to perform all 35 passes. For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do. As the paper says, "A good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected". This was true in 1996, and is still true now.

Looking at this from the other point of view, with the ever-increasing data density on disk platters..., it's unlikely that anything can be recovered from any recent drive except perhaps a single level via basic error-canceling techniques. In particular the drives in use at the time that this paper was originally written have mostly fallen out of use, so the methods that applied specifically to the older, lower-density technology don't apply any more. Conversely, with modern high-density drives, even if you've got 10KB of sensitive data on a drive and can't erase it with 100% certainty, the chances of an adversary being able to find the erased traces of that 10KB in 80GB of other erased traces are close to zero.

 

Why Would Anyone Want to Erase?

  • Identity theft is not pure paranoia. Someone could recover personal information from a computer you just sold or from a stolen computer, or perhaps even from malware. It would be very weird to shred all your paperwork and then treat your computer as a secret lock box. It's probably more likely for someone to recover your data electronically than to come to your house and look through your trash!

If I delete something, I may actually want it deleted. Isn't it silly to throw something in the trash and then not take it out? Sometimes a file you delete will get overwritten, but it's not guaranteed and it may still be partially recoverable. Many file/drive cleaners now include secure erasing features, such as CCleaner, Revo, and most All-in-One cleaners. For these programs, erasing is just a natural extension of deleting files.

I've found erasing very useful in partitioning since the built-in windows tools won't partition unless it detects enough extra free space. After erasing, I was suddenly able to partition my drive the way I wanted.

I've seen some types of software regenerate. I've tried to delete files before and found them risen from the dead right after a restart. But not after erasing! Erasing might even prevent malware from using the same technique, but I'm not sure any exists that could.

Many people like the idea of protecting their privacy. In the US, for example, liberty can only be removed after a due process of law (personal privacy isn't explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, but it's inferred from the two due process clauses in the 5th/14th Amendments -- that all people have a right to life, liberty, property -- and the 4th Amendment search and seizure protections).

Some organizations are required by law or policy to erase data; however, some of them use more extreme measures!
 

General Sources and Information

Related Products and Links

Have Your Say
You are invited to share and discuss your views in our freeware forum. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate. Alternatively, anyone can leave a comment at the bottom of this page. You can also help us by rating this review at the end of the article.
Quick Selection Guide

Eraser
5
 
Gizmo's Freeware award as the best product in its class!

Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Works with any drive, including IDE, SCSI and RAID, and CD-RWs. Excellent for scheduling, rich features, and has good help and forum support. Gives informative reports, noting any unerased files/cluster tips.
Heavy on system resources, starts slower than FileShredder, the scheduler is of minimal usefulness for resource conscious users, and some forum posters have criticisms of its new interface.
http://eraser.heidi.ie/
6.0.10.2620
8.68 MB
Unrestricted freeware
A portable version of this product is available from the developer.
Windows XP/Vista/Server 2003 & 2008/Windows 7

The portable version is available here.

CCleaner
5
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Quickly finds private and unneeded data lurking in secret places, portable version available
Installs Yahoo toolbar by default
http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner
4.11.4619
4.54 MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Feature limited freeware
A portable version of this product is available from the developer.
Windows 2000 to 7 and 8 Beta

The portable version and a slim version with no toolbar are available here.

Darik's Boot and Nuke
4
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Great for bulk disk cleaning and emergencies
Dangerous tool in the hands of beginners
http://www.dban.org/
2.2.8
15.5 MB
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
All Windows/Linux/Mac version
File Shredder
3
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Small, easy to use, free space wiping and enough features to increase effectiveness.
Not as comprehensive, no scheduling, very little help.
http://www.fileshredder.org/
2.50
2.33 MB
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
WIndows NT, 2000, XP, 2003 Server, Vista
SDelete
3
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Light on resources. Created by Mark Russinovich.
No interface. Its erase pattern has not improved since 2006 and its not quite as good as the other products.
1.61
84 KB
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Supports XP and higher, or Server 2003 and higher

Editor

This software category is in need of an editor. If you would like to give something back to the freeware community by taking it over, check out this page for more details. You can then contact us from that page or by clicking here

Tags

eraser, secure erase utility, data erase, erase/wipe hard drive, erase sensitive data, secure delete, erase deleted files, securely erase data, eraser review, eraser 6, Darik's Boot and Nuke, File Shredder, CCleaner, SDelete

Share this
4.3578
Average: 4.4 (109 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by snakyjake on 30. December 2013 - 23:57  (113284)

Is there a simple program that uses just the Recycle Bin's context menu?

by MidnightCowboy on 31. December 2013 - 4:35  (113287)

This category currently has no editor. Please ask your question here in our forum. MC - Site Manager.
http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/i-want-freeware-program-t...

by Paxmilitaris on 23. September 2013 - 7:14  (110938)

I came here hoping to find a low-level format freeware that can be used in windows XP.
I know linux has such a tool, as explained by Demoidemo, but i'm not really comfortable enough yet in linux to start low-level formating an old ide drive that i want to give.

From what i saw in diagonal reading here, it's secure file deletion freeware, not zeroing the drive, just writing random stuff. I'm guessing the partitions and mbr stay untouched.

I'd prefer to give a drive with all zeros and all bad sectors found.

by Misty27 on 14. May 2013 - 17:50  (107752)

What are others' experiences in using various secure erasing tools (reviewed here, or others), then using various data recovery tools?

If individual files or folders are erased (say, on small partitions, where they'd be easier to ID, if anything is recovered), is any data at all readable by some recovery tools? Even if file names are replaced w/ random characters & file content, if any, is random data?

Or - at least w/ some erasing tools - is there no trace that the files ever existed?

Erasing some test files, using single pass, pseudo random data in Eraser (recent 6.2.x / 6.1.x nightly builds), and Shredder 2.5, the free recovery tools I've tested show nothing for the erased files. That's good... if it's an accurate result. What one will / won't see or be able to detect, after running erasing tools, then using recovery tools, is rarely discussed in the erasing tools' documentation.

If nothing's detected / shown by recovery tools, it may be there's nothing TO detect, or it may mean the recovery tools aren't doing a thorough job.

by Misty27 on 30. January 2013 - 0:46  (104949)

I've never been able to get File Shredder to install it's entry to the context menu in Vista. I've read of others w/ same problem. Don't know if it's Vista or another conflicting prgm. It works, just doesn't have the context entry.

EDIT: Finally got File Shredder to add a context menu entry. There is some text associated w/ this option in Shredder's options, that is jumbled (for me). Part says "Elevation Required." So, after reinstalling Shredder 2.5, started it 1x in admin mode. I also turned off my AV / FW during installation. Then, it installed the context entry. But once it is there, you don't have to BE in an admin acct to use the context entry.

by Misty27 on 29. January 2013 - 22:51  (104946)

I suggest that the editor of this section re evaluate the "best" secure erasing program.
I've used Eraser a long time & currently, I have no replacement for it that has all of its ADVERTISED features. So I'm not suggesting that users drop it for XYZ prgm. I've been a beta tester for it for several yrs & communicated w/ the dev on a regular basis. Claiming to have the most features and being consistently reliable are * two * different * things.

I wrote about Eraser's decline in development, bug fixes & support some time ago. This hasn't changed - in fact, it may be a bit worse. Yes, it has lots of features. No, they don't always work. There are often months when the (apparently) one part time developer is gone. OK - fine. Lots of freeware doesn't have a 24 / 7 / 365 dev team.

But this isn't a desktop sticky prgm. It's one w/ potential to screw up your OS or other partitions where reinstall / restore will be necessary, even if used per directions (don't count on System Restore working after using Eraser, or others, to wipe unused disk space).

Given that there appears to be only 1 part time dev working on Eraser (when there is one at all), for such a complicated prgm, many bugs go unfixed for long periods of time. I'm not aware of issues right now that are trashing users' HDDs / OS. But there ARE plenty of times when it simply won't do what it's suppose to do, because the part time dev is often absent for months.

When it works (which is most of the time by %), it probably has as good or better erasing than most others, in terms of removing all traces of files. But, it is FAR from trouble / error free. That is what should be considered.

It crashes a lot. Probably as much or more than any respected, highly rated freeware I've used. It often can't erase files / folders that is supposed to handle, that * Some * secure erasers have no problem erasing. This is due to unfixed bugs. How good a job those other erasers do, is another matter.

I'm not sure the owner, Heidi Computers Limited, pays anyone to work as developer. Regardless, IMO, Eraser is no longer (for several yrs) maintained as well as other freeware offerings from companies w/ other commercial software. It was at one time. When the current part time dev took over a few yrs ago, he was VERY young & may not have had necessary experience.

There may / may not be anything better, in terms of features & "claimed" thoroughness of erasing. Most others don't have scheduling or saved erasing jobs (tasks) ability, which is handy. If there are others w/ ability to define / save erasing jobs, I'd like to hear of them.

by Kyle_Katarn on 6. October 2012 - 16:42  (100380)

Maybe Zero0 (file shredder) and KCleaner (System cleaner with secured deletion) would be worth being mentionned ?

http://www.kcsoftwares.com/?zero
http://www.kcsoftwares.com/?kcleaner

by admrich on 7. October 2012 - 8:07  (100415)

I'm on holidays at present with a MacBook Air & unable to test/try these.
The Downloads have them in the grouping Sponsored Freeware. Are they free of Ads - the screenshots given are free of Ads.

by Kyle_Katarn on 20. October 2012 - 20:45  (101116)

Lite version is free of ads.

by MidnightCowboy on 7. October 2012 - 9:33  (100419)

Contains Relevant Knowledge.

http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/18/about-relevant-knowledge/

Unless they offer "lite" versions of these programs without the spyware, if ever we feature them this needs to be made very clear.

by Kyle_Katarn on 20. October 2012 - 20:44  (101115)

Of couse, Lite version is available with No Ads at all.
It deserves a try for sure !

May it be listed here ?

by MidnightCowboy on 21. October 2012 - 3:27  (101127)

This is entirely up to the category editor.

by Kyle_Katarn on 23. October 2012 - 21:23  (101245)

Admrich, what's your opinion ?
http://www.kcsoftwares.com/?zero

by admrich on 23. October 2012 - 22:02  (101247)

I haven't done much with it yet, so far only installed & run it quickly.
Still some more playing & in particular footprint/overhead (ram, cpu, etc) comparisons with existing/other products.
It certainly does the basics from what I've seen so far.
FYI I'm always a tiny bit cautious & hesitant of 'Lite' versions + anything that isn't considerant in how it offers optional add-ins or optional supplemental applications.

by Kyle_Katarn on 30. October 2012 - 23:06  (101627)

Hi

"Lite" version has NO add-ins at all.

Zero ( http://www.kcsoftwares.com/?zero ) is a very simple file shredder.
KCleaner ( http://www.kcsoftwares.com/?kcleaner ) finds junk files that CCleaner can't find and has an "automatic background" mode that no other cleaner has.

May be worth being listed here :)

Kyle

by admrich on 31. October 2012 - 3:00  (101635)

I still haven't had much of a play with it yet but now have a query or two for you

a) direct query up front 1st - what's your interest in it, there's quite a push from you for it?
b) "finds junk files that CCleaner can't find" - any evidence to support this at all, in my brief testing that wouldn't appear to be the case -yet? What sort of junk files? ie are they actually junk files?
c) "has an "automatic background" mode that no other cleaner has" - in the free version? Other cleaners have this in their pro/paid-for versions. This of course assume you want such a feature & any associated overhead that it may have?

by Kyle_Katarn on 4. November 2012 - 21:50  (101890)

Hi, sorry, i should have made thing clearer at first post.

a) I'm the developper of these products and i've a Gizmo daily visitor. My other software have been listed in various section here for years (SUMo : 3y+)

b) Clean your PC with CCleaner, then run KCleaner and you'll see :)
Some dup files in windows installers can waste Gb

c) Built-in the free version (no paid version for this software). Automatic mode is an option, disabled by default (of you do not want the overhead of having it process running periodically in the background)

Does it deserve a try ? :)

[Moderator's note : Direct link to file not allowed. Edited out]

by admrich on 4. November 2012 - 22:43  (101892)

Hi Kyle,

Many thanks for your reply , yepp, as indicated already, I'm still to play properly with it, only having played briefly with it so far but on a new machine only.

You say "Some dup files in Windows Installers can waste Gb" - do you know at all which types of installers do this?

regards,

M

by Kyle_Katarn on 24. February 2013 - 20:45  (105722)

Have you had time to play a little bit more with KCleaner ?
Most Windows Installers file are "duplicated" every time Windows Update try to run. On my system i've found that it wasted about 3 Gb. Then i decided to code KCleaner because no other software was able to find these.

Would it be worth to be recommended (Lite version) here ?

by SGB (not verified) on 26. September 2012 - 17:57  (99790)

INTERNET CONNECTION REQUIRED DANGEROUS?

Recently I discovered I could not use Eraser.exe if I did not have an Internet connection. On their Website they say this is because the program needs to verify certificate(s) to ensure malware isn't being run.

Call me paranoid, but would it be possible that with a freeware program if some of the contents of the document to be shred could possibly be shot out to a remote server? Just makes me a tad bit nervous.

I'm not a programmer or Windows expert so thanks for your replies in layman's terms.

by admrich on 6. October 2012 - 12:47  (100368)

Do you know how recently this is & also which version (or versions) of Eraser this occurs for.

by MidnightCowboy on 2. August 2012 - 2:38  (97076)

Moderators note: Comments about ASC deleted. Iobit products will not be featured or discussed here because of their reputation/site WOT rating.

http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/iobit.com/comment

by admrich on 2. August 2012 - 3:18  (97080)

I was about to mention this but hadn't had any chance to find/reference previous comments to this effect :)

many thanks.

by MidnightCowboy on 2. August 2012 - 3:48  (97083)

No problem - we are here to help. :)

by SportMan (not verified) on 15. July 2012 - 17:35  (96203)

I just installed File Shredder and it seems to work very well for deleting/shreding single files at a time. The issue I have is this.

I run the program to shred ALL free disc space with the 7 pass. Takes a while. After it's done I run this small utility called [commercial software] (really old) but paid for. Even after ALL free disc space has been shsreaded it will find 90% of the files AND recover them.

Same thing for the usb thumb drives with fat32. Now on the thumb drives all I have to do in simply add more files until the thumb drive is full. Next I have to move ALL the files I added to the file shreder. Run FS and let it do its thing. Then and Only then is all free space is wiped clean.

This can be done on the hard drive but would take forever.

Any ideas people?

Thanks

by admrich on 15. July 2012 - 22:56  (96221)

Hi Sportman,

Is there any reason you've used File Shredder over Eraser or DBAN or others?
Do any of the others display the same problem at all?

In reality there's no difference between 1-pass & 7-pass.

Are there any issues with your drives at all, because if they're not erasing/writing random data properly over the old data, they more than likely shouldn't be writing all data properly.

I'd suggest trying one or more of the 1st 2-3 recommendations & with less passes (1-pass Pseudo Random data).

One of the only logical explanations for what is happening to you if your drives are working properly is that FileShredder is buggy after the 1st file may be?

regards,

MhR

by dhry on 8. June 2012 - 20:52  (94582)

Eraser is bloated and slow. I would recommend Moo0 Anti-Recovery. http://www.moo0.com/software/AntiRecovery/

by Wooloomooloo (not verified) on 22. April 2012 - 12:33  (92419)

I've used Eraser for a while, but lately it had enormous startup times (it was obviously waiting for something), and after I installed the newest version it wouldn't start up at all (kept crashing). Now I do understand not everybody has this problem, but then again no other software (and there are quite a few) on my PC has such problems either, and frankly a program entrusted to securely wipe the data you want (and only the data you want!) saying "I might have done something fishy your system doesn't seem to like" is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. If you don't believe me, take a look at the almost a million Google hits for "eraser crashes" (and has been for a long time)...

I'm using Hardwipe now, and I no longer have a problem erasing files. Simple.

by luke141992512 (not verified) on 5. April 2012 - 2:17  (91653)

If the file/files that you are talking about walker are on a USB or External Hard drive simply just pull it out! But if they are on the C; drive just restart the PC and attempt to delete them. If they still will not delete contact a PC technician.

by PEG (not verified) on 6. March 2012 - 0:08  (89971)

I've never been able to get File Shredder to install an entry in Explorer context, after several attempts - Vista x64 SP2. Read a few others w/ same complaint.

Anyone gotten it to install the link in the context menu in Vista? Was there any trick to it? Thanks.

Gizmos Needs You

Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

 We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following areas:
 -  Mobile Platform App Reviews for Android and iOS
 -  Windows, Mac and Linux software reviews       Interested? Click here