| New: | Help keep this site independent with few ads by buying a Gizmo Cap or T-shirt or by Donating |
| Hot: | Get free personalized security suggestions from Gizmo's Security Wizard |
| Help: | Know your freeware? Then suggest a hot product or become a reviewer or moderator for Gizmos |
Best Free Firewall
In a Hurry? |
|
|
Introduction |
|
A firewall protects your system from unwanted intruders. It also protects your system from programs that will send out or broadcast your personal information. You could think of a firewall as being a security system like the entry door on your residence. If you have no door, intruders could freely enter or leave your residence and have full access to everything in it. When you have a firewall on your system, it's like installing and then locking the door to your residence. No one can get in except you and those who are allowed access by you, whether you give them a key, "buzz them in," or you open the door for them when asked. Firewalls that are doing their job will often tell you there's someone at the door (trying to communicate with or gain access to your system) and ask if you want to let them in. A popup appears telling you someone/something is trying to connect to you, or that a program wants access to the internet. The alert may show a name of a network, a program, a website, or even an ip address. The firewall will ask you what you want to do and it's up to you if you want to open the door (to your system) or not. Many people misunderstand alerts (often popup alerts) from their firewalls. It is very important to be able to have control over your system and to be aware of who or what is trying to gain access to it, and to know what communication is originating from your system. Firewall alert messages should never be seen as a nuisance. There are some malicious programs that get into your system and "prop the back door open" or they "make a key to your door" for themselves. This is done by masquerading as a harmless program and at a predetermined time or action, this program you thought was harmless will unleash its destructive power as the virus it truly is. A virus in your system may modify your hosts file and even turn your system into a cyber-soldier in a huge botnet army. Your personal information can be broadcast across the web to criminals who will destroy your good name. These are a type of trojan which is a very dangerous type of malware. A common symptom of a compromised hosts file is whenever you turn on your computer or open your browser, you are automatically directed to one or multiple nasty websites. You will feel as though you've lost all control of your system. It is extremely important to have a good firewall installed to control access to your system and protect your personal information. It is also equally important to install antivirus software and maybe additional security protection for your system. An effective firewall monitors your system's communication with your local network (if any) and the internet to help stop intrusions and attacks. Some firewalls offer additional protective features such as host file lock, internet lock, custom IP address filtering, and more. If you want to learn more about firewalls, visit these excellent sites: How Firewalls Work, How Firewalls Protect Your PC and Microsoft Security Firewalls FAQ. If you decide not to use one of the firewall products in the article, please be sure your Windows Firewall is active. NEVER use more than one software firewall on one system at the same time. You may, however, use a hardware and a software firewall in conjunction to improve protection. Before installing your new firewall:First and foremost, you should back up your system and partitions. While installing new security software, you may encounter unforeseen difficulties which may result in system instability or system failure. Everyone's system is different and very unique. You may have an old, latent driver in your system that is incompatible with whatever you are installing. To avoid frustration, loss of data, and possibly therapy, you should always back up your data to a separate partition on your hard drive (the same size or larger than the partition you are backing up), or you should back up your information to an external hard drive. It is far easier to restore a system from a backup archive or image than it is to resurrect a damaged operating system that no longer boots. Now that I have made my point perfectly clear to readers, the backup software I recommend is Paragon Backup & Recovery free edition. Install, backup your system and move on to the next step. Before installing a new firewall (or other security/suite), you must completely uninstall any previous firewall (or security suite). [This only applies to third party firewall products. If you are using the Windows firewall included with your operating system, you can simply install the new firewall according to the product instructions.] After uninstalling, the system must be rebooted as most uninstallers have a built-in cleaner to finish removing remaining components of the software. At this time it's a good idea to run a drive cleaner to remove all remaining temporary files. I recommend CCleaner. Experienced users may even want to run a registry cleaner included in this software. I recommend using caution when cleaning your registry. This is only an optional step. If you are in doubt, and you really don't know what you are doing, then perhaps you should leave your registry alone. If you are going to clean your registry, I ONLY recommend CCleaner to novices and those with moderate experience. I have used CCleaner's registry cleaner thousands of times on numerous systems and have never had a problem with it, unlike other registry tools. If you do decide to clean your registry with CCleaner, make sure you backup your registry entries when prompted to do so with CCleaner. Once you have uninstalled the old firewall, cleaned the file system and the registry (if you chose to do so), reboot the computer and you are ready for a fresh installation on your new firewall (or other security/suite). I hope users will choose one of the great free firewalls we tested and reviewed in this article! Today the use of reliable firewalls is IMPERATIVE as we face a new age of cybercrimes like identity and data theft! A good firewall will not only thwart attacks by hackers but is your first line of defense in keeping your personal information in your hands alone. No firewall or any security software can certainly guarantee 100% protection certainty. As technology changes, criminals change and attacks on systems, and even malware becomes more sophisticated everyday. I want to be clear that though I have information posted in this article for very old, unsupported firewalls, I will only recommend current, actively supported firewalls and security solutions. - Cyberlightning The following Free Firewall article is presently undergoing a major revision. I thank you for your patience. |
Discussion |
|
I. Best Software Firewalls for Maximum Protection and Greater User Involvement The following personal firewalls provide excellent network protection. Each firewall comes with default settings and shouldn't require much adjustment except for the needs of advanced users. Some information for configuration is provided whenever possible to help you learn about your firewall and to better suit it to your needs. Firewall products in this section may require a fair amount of time to learn their features. Some products rely of lists of known safe applications, safe vendors, or valid digital signatures. Some products can optionally give safe or trusted status to all your current files, some have training or installation modes, and some have lesser configurations to reduce monitoring. Since firewalls are often praised for their level of protection at their maximum security settings, users may not have the degree of protection mentioned in the reviews below if they reduce security levels using the firewall interface, or if users employ methods to increase automation in order to reduce alerts.
Comodo Firewall is the best choice for users seeking a full featured security suite. It has a robust and a very active HIPS or application monitoring feature called "Defense+", which matches or exceeds the security performance of pay products. Comodo also provides a "memory firewall" which in their words, “Cutting-edge protection against sophisticated buffer overflow attacks.” Comodo allows for much control and customization, with a plethora of additional settings to adjust for the curious or for the paranoid. This latest release of Comodo is suitable for both lightly-skilled users (still must have knowledge of installed programs) and technically advanced users. Comodo includes a very effective Sandbox component to limit how many applications and new software installations affect your computer. The use of sandbox protection helps to limit the negative effects of malware if some terrible infection manages to enter your system. Comodo Firewall boasts a “Default Deny Protection” for applications. Though they maintain a lengthy list of known safe applications in their database, if an unknown application attempts entry through the Firewall, Comodo will deny the During installation, it gives you a choice between two levels of security. The "Firewall Only" mode (discussed in the next section) and the Comodo Internet Security (includes antivirus, antimalware, and additional features). After installation Comodo automatically selects "Safe Mode" which maximizes proactive protection to a high level, and is the best mode for most users. It will generate numerous popup alerts for applications not in its trusted vendors list (you can browse this list to see if you trust the vendors: go to the Defense+ tab > "Common Tasks" > "View My Trusted Software Vendors"). When you answer "allow" and "remember your answer" to popup alerts for an application, Comodo creates a custom policy for it. Some of its policies are fairly liberal.
Comodo limits the frequency of alerts by automatically treating some programs as safe and allowing some applications to access the Internet. You can additionally automate the behavior of Defense+ by one or more of these methods for treating applications as safe:
Take a look at this guide on How to Install Comodo (version 4.1)The following guides are far outdated and being reviewed for update so they are relevant to the current release of Comodo, but you are welcome to look at them anyway for any useful information that might help you: How to Tame Comodo Defense+ Without Disabling It and Comodo Forum Help. Alternatively, see this mini guide (currently reviewing for update relevant to current version of Comodo) for an example of how to maximize some of its basic settings. Comodo nicely allows you to quickly increase or decrease protection with its different modes, configurations, and settings. This review is currently undergoing revision.
Run the wizard and have it search your PC for known programs to allow/block/ask. In this case, Online Armor relies on you to respond to alerts for unknown programs. For the curious or paranoid user, it uses excellent popup messages when it automatically allows a program to connect online and, optionally, when it automatically trusts a program/process to run (these alerts don't require user action and they can be enabled/disabled in the interface with "Options" > "Firewall", and "Programs" > "Options"). For example, I noticed a message when it auto trusted a key logger test (Zemana, which it failed initially), but after I set the tester to untrusted, it gave very informative and detailed security alerts (and then it passed the test and logged the tester in the interface under the "Key Logger" tab, but it only logged the key logger after the test was untrusted). You can even close both its tray tools from its right-click context menu. They are not needed for the firewall and HIPS components to continue running and protecting.
Internet Zone controls are divided into the Trusted Zone, used for the local network to share files, printers, etc., and the Internet Zone for communication to/from the web. A simple 3-position format allows users to choose from "No protection" (firewall is off), Medium (Allows file/printer sharing), and High (will allow users to connect to a network but will not allow anyone else to connect to your system). The medium setting is recommended for home networks with more than one system, and for users whose modem requires this setting. The high setting is most recommended for single-system web access (only one computer at home and modem does not require a home network setting), and for public areas such as cafes, restaurants, and hotels (etc.) with wifi. Users will have to interact with this firewall for a time after installation to make sure programs needing LAN or internet access are granted proper permissions. The popups are very easily understood most of the time, listing the program name or the name of the executable file asking for access. Most often programs executable files contain the name of the program followed by ".exe" so even novice users should be able to easily identify the name of the program asking for web access so they can make the appropriate decision. Popups are very simple in format offering Deny, Accept, and a checkbox a user can check to make Zone Alarm remember the decision. The Program Control will allow users to set Zone Alarm for Low, which is a learning mode and no OS firewall protection and limited popups. Or users can choose Medium, which will make programs ask for permission to access the trusted and internet zones. The high setting is not offered in the Free version of Zone Alarm. The Smart Defense Advisor will help reduce popups by offering settings for programs asking for access, based on the decisions made by other users worldwide. Users can choose whether or not to participate in Zone Alarm's community defense program. Users can set programs access manually at anytime by going to Zone Alarm's Program Control and selecting Programs. Zone Alarm Free offers very good HIPS protection, Inbound/Outbound defense, Stealth mode, Anti-phishing protection, identity theft protection, and now even offers 2 GB free online backup. Zone Alarm Free 2010 passed all leak and hack testing with flying colors. The only negatives I can name is lack of program-to-program protection offered by the free version, which includes programs reaching out to the web through a web browser. Note to those using or planning to install Immunet Protect: Zone Alarm products are not compatible with Immunet Protect and at this time there is no work-around for this incompatibility. Immunet Protect and Zone Alarm products (any Zone Alarm product - free or commercial) will cancel each other out and neither one will function in your system. Development is continuing and Immunet hopes to release a version someday that will be compatible with Zone Alarm. This review is currently undergoing revision.
The free version lacks many extras of the pay version, however, such as automatic updates and the ability to break active connections. The HIPS component is called "Host Protection" in the interface. It provides four default levels of protection, which can be easily set with a slider and additionally customized item by item by advanced users. The default "optimal" setting only monitors the "most dangerous activities" (such as memory injections, driver loads, and a healthy list of system critical features -- auto starts, shell extensions, and internet settings) instead of all program activities. But these "optimal" settings lack protection from keyloggers, direct disk accessing, DNS API request monitoring, etc. You can check the types of reduced monitoring in "Settings..." > "Host Protection" > "Customize...". The installation asks whether you want to train the firewall for a week (using its Auto-Learn mode and Rules Wizard). In this mode, it sets rules automatically for known safe applications. II. Best Software Firewalls for Basic Protection and Less User Involvement (This section is currently undergoing revision)
Some users (of many degrees of experience) prefer to avoid advanced firewalls that employ a constant "security guard" that question them daily. The following alternatives accommodate the use of your favorite active security programs, such as other HIPS software, active anti-malware, or browser protection (virtualization, isolation, rights reduction). Firewall Only ("Set it and Forget it Options") The built-in Windows firewall is a common choice since it passes all inbound tests and it doesn't have popup alerts. It lacks proactive security against outbound malware intrusions, but some users are simply unprepared to reliably handle the numerous popup alerts of the best firewalls on the market. And users who click "allow" to each and every popup alert will not have the level of protection they think they have. If you're fairly sure malware isn't on your computer and you don't want the other features of a third party firewall, then the Windows firewall is actually a practical and useful solution. You could marginally increase security with the alternate configurations below or with the default "no popup" settings of Sunbelt-Kerio. But Windows firewall doesn't require installation, so it's the least likely to crash your PC or conflict with your other programs. Nearly "Silent" Firewall Configurations If you disable or reduce program monitoring in the following firewalls, they still provide limited inbound/outbound protection/filtering, but still offer more features than the built-in Windows firewall. Select the appropriate installation options or settings to reduce the proactive monitoring components in these firewalls:
Cautions Though these less proactive choices will greatly reduce important protection from malware running on your PC, such as root-kits, keyloggers, Trojans, viruses, adware, or spyware. As editor I warn you that I DO NOT recommend reducing security settings just to reduce popup alerts. The alerts are serious and are designed to protect you and your personal information. Most firewalls will remember decisions you make regarding program access if you instruct the firewall to do so. I highly recommend using secure DNS providers (OpenDNS or Comodo SecureDNS), site safety advisers (WOT), software update monitors (Secunia PSI), and, especially, browser protection (Sandboxie, GeSWall) to avoid malware problems in the first place. And our site has related articles that cover other security essentials: anti-virus software, anti-spyware software, HIPS software, etc. |
Other Firewalls |
|
Several other free firewalls were brought up in comments here or noted from other sources. As they are not rated in this review, they are listed here with brief descriptions and links to their sites for ease of reference. Additional Options for Simplicity and Basic Protection: I recommend the firewalls in section II, but if they don't work for you one of these might. No complete test results exist for the proactive components of these firewalls, but in general they aren't as good as the max security modes of the firewalls in section I. Loosely ordered from best to worst all around:
|
Firewalls no longer supported |
|
This section is for firewalls whose support is considered to be "end-of-life." These firewalls are no longer being developed and therefore may pose a risk to your system's security and possibly stability. PC Tools Firewall PlusSupport Ended September, 2010. Because support for this product ended so recently, it will remain a viable firewall solution for a period of time. However, users should beware that support has ended for this product so it will eventually become more and more vulnerable to breech, attack, and stability. This firewall provides a HIPS-like component through its "enhanced security verification," which alerts the user about possibly malicious behavior. It relies on a list of known programs and a check for digital signatures to significantly reduce the frequency of popup alert messages, so it will mainly ask you about unknown programs, programs connecting online, and programs requiring more access. It seems more liberal and user friendly in its default settings than previous versions, giving fewer popup alerts for common tasks. Easy installation. fails the Zemana key logger test when it's set to automatically allow programs with valid digital signatures. Users can still download this firewall by clicking here.
Firewalls Compatible with Older Versions of Windows:
|
|
Have Your Say
|
|
You are invited to share and discuss your views in our freeware forum. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate. Alternatively, anyone can leave a comment at the bottom of this page. You can also help us by rating this review at the end of the article.
|
Quick Selection Guide |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editor |
|
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Cyberlightning All free firewalls featured in this article have been tested extensively using a wide range of tools to measure the quality of the product, its effectiveness at every security level, reliability, overall performance, resource consumption, bandwidth usage during operation, real-time protection versus passive protection, leak testing, stealth testing, HIPS (if available), hack defense, user-friendliness, and even installation/uninstallation.
What else would you like to see in this article and/or category? I have received suggestions for a Novice section, a Linux Firewall section, some helpful videos, more screenshots, more links, more voting/contests, and even a request for a sort of "complete idiot's guide" for firewalls. Help me answer more questions and improve this category and article by making suggestions! Make suggestions in the Comments section below or if you are a registered user on this site, feel free to send me a PM. And for those of you finding press releases for products, or offering tips & tricks: Keep them coming. Your knowledge and experience may go a very long way to help another user. For readers who are novices with firewalls or computers in general, please continue to read and learn! The only dumb question is one that is not asked. |
|
Tags
|
| best free firewall, software firewall, firewall for XP/vista/Windows 7, firewall reviews, windows firewall, Comodo Firewall/Comodo Internet Security, Online Armor Free, PC Tools Firewall Plus, Outpost Firewall Free, Privatefirewall, Sunbelt-Kerio Personal Firewall, ZoneAlarm Free Firewall |
- Article type:



Subscribe to our 
application and ask the user what to do. The new release contains many new features while allowing experienced users to maintain absolute control over their system by controlling ports, protocols, and complete configuration command.
In the more liberal "Clean PC Mode", Defense+ automatically treats all applications on your drive as safe (but if any malware is currently hidden on your drive, it too would be considered safe). Applications still receive some minimal monitoring for Comodo's two protected lists ("my protected registry keys" and "my protected COM interfaces") and for running as an executable, or more/less monitoring depending on their custom policy. And new files get sent to a list of files "waiting for your review" in the "Summary" page. Files listed for review will be considered possibly unsafe and will provoke popup messages, as if in Safe Mode, until their custom policies are made.



Comments
I just tried the windows 7 control - and it stopped gibsons leaktest - so perhaps they have upgraded something after you wrote this?
To readers:
If you have a Gmail account beware a fake message telling you to update your account information. Do not open that email. Delete it without opening. It is an attempt to steal your personal information and hijack your account.
Read more here:
http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=9842
I have been using Outpost, and was very happy with it, but I got a notice that my support would end on October 1, 2010, and that I would need to get version 7, which is only available in the Pro version as far as I can see. I'm very disappointed, as I did not like Comodo. If, in fact, I will not be getting updates anymore after October 1, I will have to switch.
Outpost free has already outlived its life cycle. It is now nearly end-of-life and will soon be located in the unsupported firewalls section. Outpost Firewall Free was launched in May of 2009, which is 16 months without an update. Agnitum does not have plans that I am aware of at this time to release a new free firewall product. I'll still try to get an answer. You may just want to take a look at Comodo Firewall, Zone Alarm Free, or Online Armor Free.
For novice readers:
Old and unsupported firewalls can still be effective for day-to-day use in your system. The problem with them is evildoers and super-bugs able to manipulate the code, control, and exploit a known weakness which would grant entry to your system. Supported firewalls not only often add new features, but their developers are busy working to increase the defensive abilities of the supported firewall. When a vulnerability in a firewall becomes known to developers, they fix the vulnerability as soon as possible. With a firewall that is no longer supported, the security vulnerability will remain since there is no one to update the product to include a fix for such an issue, should a weakness be found.
online armor temporarily disqualified?
http://www.matousec.com/
Maybe what they're saying is that there were outstanding fees for tests not paid by Tall Emu before they sold out to Emsisoft who no doubt won't pay up either :D Only a guess, but others welcome :)
http://www.pctools.com/forum/showpost.php?p=234075&postcount=55
If it's made official, I will look at changing its position in the article. For now, PC Tools has some real ethical issues.
Can you elaborate on the "issues" please?
I have a question that may or may not have been asked before, that is :Who owns Comodo and where do they originate from ?.The firewall program they have is regarded as the best in free firewalls, having been tested by such excellent individuals as everyone working here as well as Matousec and others. I want all to know that with out any doubt, I always recommend Gizmo as THE site for all things in free software information and results- A++ for MidnightCowboy,Anupam,Cyberlightning, and everyone else that contributes valuable information and opinions that keep our internet as safe as possible.
Excellent question! Comodo is a privately owned corporation (self-existing entity). The Comodo Group of companies has two offices in the United States, as well as offices in the UK, India, China, Romania, and Ukraine. Melih Abdulhayoglu, CEO of Comodo Companies founded Comodo in 1998 in the UK. You can find out quite a bit of that information from Comodo itself here: http://www.comodo.com/about/comodo-company-profile.php
Midnight Cowboy, Anupam, and Rizar (and many others) are amazing and are certainly tops in my book! Many readers have also contributed very useful tips and information. All the editors here have projects they are working on and we all try to contribute where/when we can. Admittedly, this article is still quite a work in progress. I am re-testing firewalls and revising content, and the size of this article is about to increase. You can help too by giving me some feedback on what you'd like to see here. Look on the page just above where the comments start to get an idea of feedback I am looking for.
I'm very indifferent when it comes to products I test. Comodo is the Top Pick because that firewall earned that position. If Zone Alarm, Outpost, or Online Armor was the best, you'd certainly see it there. I'm sure many readers share my frustration in the fact that out of all the commercial security products available today, there really are very few FREE firewalls available today that are currently maintained and developed. Instead what we see are excellent free firewalls going commercial, or development is ceased and the product fades into history.
Reader participation is always welcome. It's one of the things that makes this such an outstanding site. I hope you'll visit often and share tips, tricks, experiences, ideas, questions, and answers. That goes for all readers. There's no such thing as a stupid question. If a day goes by in which we learn nothing, it is because we were not paying attention.
Zone Alarm free is a big download.Is this likely to create problems on a laptop with half of the hard drive free and with 2GB SDRAM and 160 GB HD?
Not too long ago I tested Zone Alarm Free on a very old laptop with an 850 MHz processor, 512 MB SDRAM, and only a 10 GB HDD. I wanted to see what would happen. The drain was not too bad at all. By comparison, Comodo would not install because of lack of resources available. I know several others who had a similar configuration to you, except they were using desktop PCs. Zone Alarm has been a real trooper for me as I used it in a load test system with some 400 installed applications to see how Windows handles that number of software titles. Having so much traffic in and out of the system, I noticed, didn't increase any resource consumption from Zone Alarm which handled all the traffic very well. I think you'll find it to be a good, reliable, and even hearty firewall solution for your laptop having the resources you listed. Good choice!
Thanks Cyberlightning! I will try it soon.
Am I overlooking the notice or does Outpost no longer offer a free firewall? I mean the 2010 version. It is not on their website. Thank you
Only the 2009 version is free, not the 2010.
A note about PC Tools:
PC Tools support for their free firewall product has come to an end. They will be missed. Users who wish to use a currently-supported firewall product may want to consider switching to another freeware firewall product in the near future as support and development has ended. All firewalls in the article above have recently made very significant improvements to their free firewalls, with the exception of Outpost Firewall Free which is never supported by updates. My highest recommendation remains Comodo's (Top Pick) top level protection.
Symantec acquired PC Tools in 2008 and I believe everyone of us working in this industry knew the writing was on the wall for the eventual end of the freeware PC Tools. As category editor for Best Free Firewall, I now bid farewell to an old friend: PC Tools Firewall Plus (Free).
Personally, I believe for them to abandon such an amazing product is a serious mistake, and judging from posts all across the web, thousands of other would agree. In a time of such great economic turmoil all over the world, we tend to enjoy and appreciate the generosity of software companies making some of their products available to us for free. Since PC Tools is owned by Symantec, we can be sure this move is not driven by lack of revenue, and that is a problem for many people.
WE can also hope Symantec and PC Tools see the light and realize they are causing a PR disaster for themselves, and resume support and development on the free firewall. Either way I am awaiting an answer from Symantec and PC Tools corporate regarding the final disposition of this product and will post the information in this article for readers to see.
I heard the PC Tools 6 page is back up, v7 is set for release, and they're basically reversing the decision to retire the standalone firewall due to bad press.
That's possible. I am more than willing to return the firewall to the main article if they reverse their decision. Even if development is stops, PC Tools Firewall Plus Free will still be a recommended firewall solution, and I will make it the first entry in my soon-coming revision for old and unsupported firewalls. I would very much like to see Symantec reverse their decision and continue development and support for the FREE PC Tools Firewall Plus.
At this time I am still navigating the press and corporate channels, having placed several inquiries. Hopefully when we have a response, it will answer all of our questions. I will post any press release on this site regarding the decision and disposition of PC Tools Firewall Plus, as well as any of their other freeware products if they include such information in their response.
I appreciate comments posted in their forums, especially by administrators in those forums, but with all due respect to those individuals, I prefer to speak to someone on the telephone or in person regarding this matter followed up with any official documented press releases so readers here can have the full story. It is my intention to make/keep this Best Free Firewall article as complete as possible, and hopefully make this the most reliable source on the web for information regarding freeware firewalls and in this case, the company & decisions behind the product.
One way or the other, PC Tools Firewall Plus will be placed in the article again. The question is will it return as a supported product, continuing along its path of excellence? Or will I have to place it under the heading of Old and No Longer Supported Firewalls? Its absence from the article is temporary. I hope I will have to return it to its rightful place in the main article and delete comments I made earlier about its removal! Several members of my own immediate family use PC Tools Firewall Plus Free so this event is personal to me, not just a matter to deal with as category editor.
PC tools still has their firewall 6 on their website for free. Are you referring to the beta version 7? So do you feel the free version 6 is now outdated?
No. The issue isn't with the age of the product, or even the fact that the stand alone firewall is now abandoned and no longer supported as of the final release of version 7 available now. The issue is this product has now been turned into a commercial product. This website is all about freeware.
Symantec has a rather distasteful track record of buying out their competition. The over-charge for their own products (my opinion) and of course reliable freeware certainly threatens their market. Not so long ago Symantec bought out Sygate and quickly abandoned it, leaving Sygate free firewall to slowly rot to death in a market in which it once flourished. We now see Symantec acquired PC Tools in 2008 and they are making their move now to turn all PC Tools products into commercial products with the exception of Threatfire (for now).
Sygate is still mentioned in the article above, in the "no longer supported" list because it never became a commercial product. I don't recommend using Sygate because it is no longer supported, and with technology changing so quickly, an unsupported product is much more vulnerable than an actively supported product.
Symantec is ignoring inquiries from myself and scores of others including editors for many other popular websites and magazines as to the final disposition of the former freeware. My decision to remove PC Tools Firewall Plus from this category is based entirely on the fact that Symantec, in their greed, has decided to make this a commercial product, incorporating it forever into the security suite. There are not only issues with their ethics, but with the licensing of the product itself. I will not recommend a commercial product on this freeware site. If in the future Symantec decides to leave the free firewall as stand alone product, and if it remains available for download as freeware, even if development has stopped, I will add PC Tools again under the list of firewalls no longer supported.
So while PC Tools Firewall Plus may not be considered outdated at present, it is now no longer supported and, for all intents and purposes, will be considered a commercial product.
do you think the same thing will/could happen to online armor(free)?
It's possible since EMSISoft already offers several free products with Anti-malware Free among them. They really wouldn't need to continue offering a free firewall, now that they have acquired Online Armor. Unfortunately for us, it is a real possibility. I guess we'll have to cross that bridge if we come to it.
When Emsisoft acquired OA, Mike made a final post on his blog, addressing users of the free and paid OA firewall (www.onlinearmorpersonalfirewall.blogspot.com/).
Among other statements he said "What I can tell you on Christian's behalf is this: Product editions will stay untouched. Freeware edition will not end of course."
The post is still up there, for everyone to read.
The same info/ message was also in TallEmu's email-Newsletter.
On the other hand, Christian Mairoll made no mention of this on the (short) anouncement he made on Emsisoft's site (http://www.emsisoft.com/en/kb/articles/news100701/) and I can't remember what they said in their email-Newsletter.
The argument "...already offers several free products..." could could work the other way around as well. I think there're good chances they'll keep their word.
I certainly do hope it always remains free. At this time there's absolutely nothing to indicate that Online Armor Free will ever cease its status as freeware. In the case of PC Tools, it was a simple matter money of Symantec buying out the competition. Seeing the prices consumers must pay for Symantec's "other" commercial products, who I will not name here, one can see how any successful, reliable freeware product would be a threat to their revenue, especially in today's global economic climate.
I have the utmost faith in EMSISoft that they will continue to offer the outstanding product line currently available, both freeware and commercial products. I have tested all their software and I am impressed not only with the quality and effectiveness of their products, but with their continued dedication to development and service. I believe Online Armor Firewall Free will remain in this article as a highly recommended firewall.
Note: I am revising Online Armor's section here, as well as the other firewalls.
Anyone have any ideas on Avast and Online Armor free as a pair. I wanted to run them together I have in the past but I'm not sure if the added free web shield will be useful or not in the free version. I just don't want to turn off features you know.
I know five associates who use that combination without issue. I have not tried the pair together. The free web shield is useful. I think Avast Free Antivirus and Online Armor Free Firewall would be a good combination.
PC Tools Firewall Plus is retiring!
http://www.pctools.com/firewall/
See above. No free firewall available for download anymore. Since the product is now commercial, we now say goodbye to it.
I had seen the retiring page on the PC Tools Firewall page. But, now, I just visited the page again, and it no longer shows that notice. The firewall is still available for free. Whats going on? Do they still plan to retire the firewall, or have they taken it back?
OK... I got this from their forum, posted by the administrator :
Just be to clear, we are still releasing the final version 7 of the FW. However, there will be no further developments in regards to the standalone Firewall. You can still continue to use the Firewall for as long as you like and post on this forum. However, should you wish to upgrade in future, you will need to install PC Tools Internet Security.
So, from the above post, the firewall is indeed retiring, but they will release the final version 7 before that. The version 7 will be available for free, and users can use it as long as they like.
The key here is the firewall is no longer supported. I am awaiting final clarification for licensing from Symantec regarding the question of whether or not the product can continue to be considered "freeware," and if it will still be available for download as freeware for the foreseeable future.
If the resolution allows for continued downloading and the product can still legally be considered freeware under Symantec's licensing, PC Tools will again be added to the article under the non-supported firewalls section with a brief overview. The days of that firewall appearing in the main body of the article with a full write-up and rating are in the past now.
Thanks Cyberlightning and I agree with your view here :).
Is it necessary to totally uninstall Vista firewall, if that is possible, before installing either PC Tools firewall or Privatefirewall? In the past I have simply turned it off when attempting to do so... However up to this point I have been unable to actually fully install a new firewall as the installation always gets frozen after reboot in the "initializing" phase. Any ideas?
No, the firewall service is part of Windows and should only be switched off to accommodate a third party replacement. If what you describe is happening with several firewall products and you are certain that your computer is not infected then this suggests a system error or conflict with another installed program.
Thanks MC-Yes I am certain there is no infection with malware...How do I determine if there is a system error? Also, which type program is more likely to create a conflict? Finally could the Vista firewall still be causing the problem even if it is switched off when attempting to install the new firewall? Thanks
Well, a scan with Malwarebytes followed by HitmanPro would confirm that your system is clean (or not) System errors are usually evident by the Windows messages which accompany them such as "Windows cannot this..." or "program x needs to close..." etc. If however some shared files have been deleted in error by the use of an aggressive cleaner or uninstall program, or if a registry cleaner has been used, sometimes things just don't work and there is no notification. Other security software can cause such conflicts even if you no longer have it but it was not completely removed during the uninstall process. Programs with HIPS or behavioural monitoring components are the most likely culprits.
Privatefirewall is known to be a tad sensitive sometimes at install and as PC Tools firewall will soon be joining Sygate on the Symantec "let's scrap the best freeware we can buy up" scrap heap I would try ZoneAlarm Free and see if this installs for you.
Thanks again MC-I have scanned with both and more...I think the issue may lie with damage caused by a registry cleaner as you mentioned or perhaps even Revo.
Too bad about PC Tools firewall. I know it was popular. I will try Zone Alarm and see what happens.
Yes, Revo set to advanced is capable of causing this type of issue and registry cleaners set to anything will certainly do so if what they flag as "surplus" is not checked out thoroughly before removal.
Have you tried a system restore?
Yes I tried System Restore but it provided no success.
Sergi I recognize this problem and it's not a damaged registry (if I'm correct), but a left-over registry entry confounding the rest of the system. MC is right about the system errors. If something is just not initializing upon reboot, it's often due to a bad registry entry somewhere, often leftover from obsolete or formerly uninstalled software. I've run into this problem often.
Also in light of this, I revised my article above to only recommend the least-invasive registry cleaner I've ever used. CCleaner has both a junk file cleaner and a registry cleaner. I've tested it thousands of times on numerous systems and have yet to have a problem with it. Just make sure you always back up your registry entries when prompted to do so.
Thanks for the reply-Is there any method to determine specifically the left over registry entry causing the problem and delete it? Or any other solution? Thanks for your help
Yes. It depends on the product you used before, or the uninstall. For example: If you uninstalled Zone Alarm, you would look for an entry in the registry under HKLM>Software>Zone Labs. Even a failed installation will leave traces behind. But use extreme caution. Judging by your comments I am left with the impression that the registry is undiscovered country to you. If you delete the wrong key or entry, you could do serious damage to your operating system.
This conversation could probably go on for a while. I ask that you click on my username and send me a PM (personal message) so I can guide you through this. (register as a user on this site before attempting to send pm) When we are done I will post the highlights of this problem for other readers if appropriate so the less experienced readers can also learn from your dilemma.
Your first pm should contain information on the most recent product(s) installed and uninstalled and exact descriptions of the problems and error messages (if any) your system is experiencing.
Anyone got any views on: Windows firewall control?
I am sitting here with a nice new build and was going for zonealarm 93.014 - however having read here it does not appear to stable.
Having read this site and others and companies own support forums, it appears to me Online Armour is the best option should you want to replace win firewall (i do i want outgoing protection).
However i note Windows Firewall Control is increasingly mentioned on the net, and has the advantage of replacing nothing with a minimum performance impact. Any views on it? Why is it not tested like others on the test sites!
Windows firewall control can be a very helpful user interface if you want to use the Windows firewall for your protection. It is very limited in function, but I think it would be a helpful tool for users wanting to keep their Windows firewall for its simplicity.
Zone Alarm is a good stable product and I recommend its use. The problem you will have for outgoing protection is products that use your browser(s) to communicate on the web (phone home) instead of directly communicating. Zone Alarm will stop and ask your permission for any product wanting to communicate directly to the web, but any program can open a browser. Zone Alarm Free does not include the program protection element which would prevent programs from reaching the web even by using a browser.
For the most part Zone Alarm is a very good, reliable firewall. Comodo still remains our Top Pick for protection. I am still in the process of trying to get everything updated and will soon be including Zone Alarm in the list.
for online armor users:
the free version now has web shield.
Which free firewall, this being between Comodo and OnLine Armor uses the least memory , the application in question is XP/SP3, Intel 2.4GHZ and GB of RAM along with 80GB and 40Gb HD,s.
The answer to that question has more to do with your system's activity and your installed programs. I have found both firewalls to be very similar (reasonably light on resources) for power and memory consumption. My tests showed both firewalls to seldom exceed 2%-6% CPU under regular computing with the occasional spike during web surfing. RAM and Virtual Memory remained nominal at only a few megabytes for RAM. Comodo generally uses slightly more virtual memory in my tests, though this should not affect your system performance under regular use.
quick question I have zonealarm free firewall newest version I do enjoy it very good for what I need since I do have a hardware firewall on my router. My question is I recently switched back to OpenDNS for my dns and did some looking around online should I allow outgoing DNS/DHCP in trusted or Internet zone with high security or should I add the dns server ips in internet or trusted zone?. I know it sets it up automatically but I'd rather use opendns then my isp's. Thanks for the help and I do like your review of comodo's new version keep up the great work TSA.
It is not necessary to allow outgoing DNS/DHCP on high security settings. For your home network configuration, leaving those boxes unchecked will be just fine. Allowing outgoing DNS/DHCP on high security settings will create a port vulnerability. Unless you are on a network which is configured in such a way to make this communication necessary with high security, I'd advise you to leave those boxes unchecked.
As far as DNS options go, Comodo, OpenDNS, and others offer some good choices in secure, safer DNS servers. Many users who are less experienced with DNS may have trouble changing settings so here are a few free applications which can be used to change DNS settings on a system. The DNS settings may have to be adjusted manually for many routers and modems (not possible on many modems, depending on ISP). Check out these free DNS changing utilities:
DNS Jumper
http://www.freewarefiles.com/DNS-Jumper_program_58450.html
Public DNS Server Tool
http://www.freewarefiles.com/Public-DNS-Server-Tool_program_58288.html
and OpenDNS
http://download.cnet.com/OpenDNS/3000-8022_4-10608274.html
Thank you very much very good tools I like the dns jumper has a nice feature there to test the fastest dns server for you in your area and has more then public DNS server addresses. So there isn't any need to add dns server to either internet or trusted zone in the firewall zones on Zonealarm free edition. I don't need to adjust anything?
No further adjustment should be necessary. Zone Alarm will use your IPconfig settings which are adjusted by the tools from links provided in my answer above. The Zone Alarm firewall will generally only point to the DHCP server which is most likely your router (hardware firewall) or modem in this case. If you want you can set your router's DNS to look at OpenDNS servers. Depending on your ISP, you may not be able to adjust your modem's DNS settings.
Just a note to let readers know I am in the process of updating this entire article. I apologize for the delay. I hope readers like the revision work. Keep posting those firewall and other security comments & questions!
Good timing with the release of PC Tool's Firewall v7 Beta.
I've just started a thread for this here:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/security/4825-pc-tools-fi...
So far running without issues on two machines although you may not see it featured in Cyberlightning's review until it comes out of beta. In general terms we do not recommend the use of beta status security software, especially when there are already plenty of other options. That said you can easily make an alternative argument that some of the so called established products are not exactly stable either :D
PC Tools is a good balance between something which offers very little over the Windows firewall and those which seek to do everything. The latter are mostly way too complicated for ordinary folks to manage effectively and their complex nature is what causes most of the system issues we can all do without.
As with all security related products, I would urge potential users to browse the support forums and Wilders first before making a decision. If any of the issues you see there are things you can do without then choose something else or for Vista and Windows 7, stick to the built in firewall.
Thanks MC, browsing their own forum I see they have high hopes for the next beta release due tomorrow.
That said, I take your gentle hint about not discussing beta software here.
Please don't misunderstand my drift here. By all means discuss the beta version. The feedback will no doubt help me as well as others :) It's just that as a site we won't be recommending this for general everyday use until it goes final. Lots of folks have a spare machine though so stick it in there and tell us what happens! Yesterday for instance I swapped AV's in this machine and was getting continuous popups for Userinit Logon Application changed binaries. Deleting the entry in the firewall application settings solved this and now it appears to be "remembering" changed binaries for this service again.
This issue is now recorded in the PC Tools forum:
http://www.pctools.com/forum/showthread.php?s=1688f8f3b0d2429889b9e261c7...
I hope that Online Armor Free gets 64 Bit support soon.
Online Armor Free 4.0.0.45 is out
Is sygate firewalls good
what about zonealarm
Given the choice I recommend Zone Alarm. Sygate is no longer supported.
Zone Alarm 9.1.007.002 IMHO gives too many Security Alerts,
although have no problem with any other features. it was easy to block off a particular program which was never heard from again.. However
it can question the same Progs. time and again (e.g. AVGcmgr.exe) the pop up saying "This program has previously asked for internet access" .Choose "Allow", and ticking "remember this setting" has no effect.
If you respond to link "Want to have fewer alerts?" you are taken to a ZA 'buy an upgrade' web page.
Found Comodo far too complicated for a home user.
About to try On Line Armour instead.
AVG and Zone Alarm are a very effective combination for free protection. AVG sometimes updates components within its program and Zone Alarm sometimes sees these as "new" programs needing approval. I highly recommend going through the Zone Alarm interface and navigate to the programs list, then manually "add new." Navigate to the AVG folder and allow full access for all AVG components (one-by-one). This will solve the problem of questions from Zone Alarm unless AVG upgrades the program or component version during an update.
I can tell you where the link for Zone Alarm takes you for fewer notifications. The paid versions offer a nearly useless component that makes an educated "guess" as to whether or not to allow a program, based on community-established usage statistics. To be honest, during my testing of the commercial (paid) product, that component was ineffective, and I saw just as many notifications as the free version. In addition, some of the choices it made automatically were wrong for my system. If ever a person wants to upgrade from a free product to a paid product, "fewer notifications" should not be the reason.
The following is intended for readers who are less-experienced users:
The average user might expect to get a warning from their firewall about a program one time, and they expect to make a choice to allow or not allow, and the day goes on. Many programs often contain numerous components. For example, AVG Free antivirus is one program, yet it contains many components. In the graphical user interface (when you open AVG) one can count seven components. HOWEVER, the program itself actually contains 17 components, not including the toolbar and setup files. ALL 17 of these components will at some point need to be approved by a reliable firewall at some point.
Pop-ups might be irritating to many users but it shows in a very interactive way that your firewall is (hopefully) doing its job and protecting your system and your personal information.
Cyberlighting, I may be asking an off-topic question, sorry, but how do you rate the present AVG antivirus, if you have tested it too along with firewalls. If you haven't you may ignore the question. But, I am just curious. Haven't seen much good reviews about AVG lately, so I wanted to know.
As for ZoneAlarm firewall, I have been reading good about it, since the version 9 came out. So, can we say ZoneAlarm is back?
I give AVG free Antivirus 5 stars out of 5. They have an excellent program, a resident shield with real-time protection for on-access file actions, a reliable real-time email scanner, link scanner, scheduled updates and scans, and they are presently offering one year free ID Protection service for users. I use AVG free on one of my systems and I highly recommend it to users looking for a free, reliable antivirus solution with dependable detection rates.
Thanks a lot for your reply Cyberlighting :).
Tend to agree. Splitting hairs between a couple percent detection rate differential has little or no affect on how well you might be protected in the real world. For most people the answer to the question "how good is this?" will be "good enough" for any of the top programs featured in independent tests, AVG being one of them. It's only if you fail to set up your other security layers properly or take unnecessary risks while surfing that you need to wring every ounce of performance out of your installed software.
Very well said!
You may want to update this article.
At the very least your description of Comodo Firewall is outdated. Ever since V4 and the incorporation of the automatic sandbox it has changed drastically. The description here is still for V3.
Post new comment