Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager Interested? Click here
Best Free Firewall
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Firewalls help monitor your system's communication between your network and the Internet to help stop intrusions and attacks. They are particularly useful for controlling the activities of Internet facing applications. No other freeware product has more of a reputation for causing user angst than a firewall. To find a suitable product may involve a process of trial and error. A firewall should protect while not being too intrusive or too complicated to handle. In this article we give you a selection of what we think is the best free firewall software available today. Our recommendations are made taking into consideration both editors' and site visitors' opinions. Firewalls come in two flavours; software based and hardware based. To avoid potential conflicts only install one (third-party) software firewall. You can improve protection, however, by using a hardware "firewall" (such as a router) and a software firewall in conjunction. Modern routers usually have a built-in firewall; consult your router documentation for more details. Basic firewall protection is critical for securing your PC. Simple firewalls (like the default Windows firewall) limit access to your system and personal information, and silently protect you from inbound threats. We review basic third-party firewalls that have marginally better security than the Windows firewall, such as simpler features for monitoring programs that request outgoing Internet connections (we call this "outbound protection"). The default Windows firewall has only limited outbound protection. Proactive firewalls have the most extended protection, including HIPS or program monitoring (HIPS Explained), and watch for malicious behavior before malware gets a chance to take control of your PC or turn it into a botnet drone. They seek to achieve stronger "2-way" protection, preventing programs from broadcasting your personal information to the Internet. Some kinds of malware are best detected by their behavior, so a proactive firewall (or firewall/HIPS combo) is a solid second layer of protection next to your antivirus program. It's an excellent option for high risk users (check out our Security Wizard to see if this includes you). However, it's plausible to argue that a good resident antivirus will stop some malicious threats before they get a chance to make it to the Internet anyway. Many of the top antivirus programs are starting to provide behavioral blocking and extended scanning of network activity. It's important to use basic or proactive firewall protection, antivirus software for active protection, and safe practices from our "most important advice of all" (Security Wizard) in order to minimize the risk of malware on your PC. You can "upgrade" (for free!) your security by reading the documentation and learning about proactive firewalls or HIPS programs, or using other protection like least-privileged user accounts and/or Sandboxie or GeSWall. Review IndexAdditional Tips
|
|
DiscussionThe built-in Windows firewall is a common choice since it passes all inbound tests (both stealth and open port) and doesn't have many popup alerts. It doesn't require installation, so it's not likely to conflict with your other programs. And many average users may not reliably handle the popup alerts of the best firewalls on the market (especially at their max settings). If you scan clean for malware and you don't want/need the additional features of a third-party firewall, then the Windows firewall is a practical and useful solution. Alternatively, you can replace the Windows firewall with a basic third-party firewall for easier control of outbound protection and additional features. Most simple two-way firewalls ask you to allow or deny Internet access for unknown programs. Many automatically allow trustworthy apps and remember your decisions to become silent over time. First, you can convert a proactive firewall into a basic two-way firewall, making some of the best free firewalls behave with similar silence and protection as ZoneAlarm. Select the following one-click configurations to set them (see the proactive section for more on them):
Second, additional third-party firewalls behave similar to the basic configurations of proactive firewalls above. ZoneAlarm, for example, has made a comeback with fewer popups and lighter resource use.
Basic Firewall Reviews
Users will have to interact with this firewall for a time after installation to make sure programs needing LAN or internet access are granted proper permissions. Popups are very simple in format offering Deny, Accept, and a checkbox a user can check to make ZoneAlarm remember the decision. Novice users should be able to easily identify the name of the program asking for web access so they can make the appropriate decision. The Program Control will allow users to set ZoneAlarm for Low, which is a learning mode and no OS firewall protection and limited popups. Or users can choose Medium, which will make programs ask for permission to access the trusted and internet zones. The high setting is not offered in the Free version of ZoneAlarm. The Smart Defense Advisor will help reduce popups by offering settings for programs asking for access, based on the decisions made by other users worldwide. Users can choose whether or not to participate in ZoneAlarm's community defense program. Users can set programs access manually at anytime by going to ZoneAlarm's Program Control and selecting Programs. Internet Zone controls are divided into the Trusted Zone, used for the local network to share files, printers, etc., and the Internet Zone for communication to/from the web. A simple 3-position format allows users to choose from "No protection" (firewall is off), Medium (Allows file/printer sharing), and High (will allow users to connect to a network but will not allow anyone else to connect to your system). The medium setting is recommended for home networks with more than one system, and for users whose modem requires this setting. The high setting is most recommended for single-system web access (only one computer at home and modem does not require a home network setting), and for public areas such as cafes, restaurants, and hotels (etc.) with wifi. ZoneAlarm Free offers basic two-way defense, stealth mode, and anti-phishing protection. However, it lacks HIPS or program-to-program protection. It is worth noting that there have been many negative comments about the latest version of the software, at least from the visitors on our site. Most notably, many features have been removed, and may be regarded as a step down from previous versions. Perhaps something you may want to take into account when choosing a firewall product.
There are three modes a user can choose from; Normal, DisableAll, or EnableAll. DisableAll disables all applications regardless of program settings, while EnableAll allows all application access (essentially equivalent to switching off the firewall completely). Unless needing to test something specifically, the Normal Mode is the recommended one - applications/programs are allowed or denied access depending on the rules set. Under the Normal Mode, when a program tries to access the internet for the first time (upon installation of W7 Firewall Control) a window pop-ups with information on what the application is, the publisher, etc (assuming default program settings). You can then allow or disallow access, either permanently or as a one-time basis. Selecting the former option will add the settings permanently to the Programs list, while with the latter option you will have to deal with the pop-up window again on the next launch. In addition to the window pop-up for new programs, activities that take place (ie. blocked/allowed traffic, etc) are logged and shows up in the bottom right corner of your screen. Both the pop-up window and log activity notification dialogue can be turned on or off at the user's discretion. That's basically all there is to it. It may get a bit annoying when you first starting using it, since you will have to define the initial rules for all your applications (ie. allow or disallow them); this includes everything from Internet Explorer to your antivirus program. Nevertheless, Windows7FirewallControl allows much greater and easier control over the built-in firewall than what the operating system offers.
The Firewall Settings dialog is where the user can manage General settings, such as password protecting the application. An application exceptions section also allows the user to specify applications that are allowed to communicate with the network. There is also a 'Detect' feature where the program will try to detect known applications, or the user can elect to manually add applications. Furthermore, TinyWall is able to recognize associated processes with the same application. For example, if you have a program that has more than one process, adding the first process will result in the program also offering to whitelist the second related process as well. Needless to say this is very useful for those applications that have more than one process. It should be noted that when adding an exception to the list, the default settings are 'Unrestricted UDP and TCP traffic'. Depending on the nature of the program it may be necessary to restrict it to 'Outgoing only' to offer maximum security. The special exceptions tab allows the user to specify more advanced settings; specifically, allowing the user to select which system services to allow/block. It is recommended to leave it as is unless there's something you really want to change. The maintenance tab rounds out the Settings dialog, allowing the user to import/export settings, check for updates manually, and a link to visit the vendor's webpage. A small, lightweight firewall, TinyWall is a solid choice for those looking for a reliable, low-resource firewall program that does not interfere with the user's computer usage. |
|
DiscussionThe following personal firewalls provide excellent network and HIPS protection. Each firewall comes with default settings and shouldn't require much adjustment except for the needs of advanced users. Firewall products in this section require more time to learn than basic firewalls, in order to get the most out of them. Since firewalls are often praised for their security effectiveness at their max settings, users will likely have lower protection than mentioned by independent testing sources like Matousec. All of the product vendors seek to provide user friendly features, sometimes incorporating reduced levels of protection in their default settings (by decreasing some HIPS monitoring).
Proactive Firewall ReviewsComodo Firewall is the best choice for users seeking a full featured security suite. This latest release is suitable for both lightly-skilled users (still must have knowledge of installed programs) and technically advanced users. Its robust and active HIPS (or application monitoring feature), called "Defense+", matches or exceeds the security performance of pay products. Comodo allows for much control and customization for the curious or the paranoid. Comodo includes a "memory firewall" (against buffer overflow attacks) and a light sandbox component to limit the way unknown applications and new software installations affect your computer. The use of sandbox protection limits the negative effects of malware. It maintains a lengthy list of known safe applications, but if an unknown application attempts entry through the firewall, Comodo will deny the application and ask the user what to do. The new release contains user friendly features by default while allowing experienced users to maintain control over ports, protocols, and configurations. During installation the user has three firewall installation options to choose from: Firewall Only, and Firewall with Optimum or Maximum Proactive Defense (ie. the Defense+ feature as mentioned earlier). After installation Comodo automatically selects "Safe Mode", which generates numerous popup alerts for applications not in its trusted vendors list (you can browse this list to see if you trust the vendors: go to the Defense+ tab > "Common Tasks" > "View My Trusted Software Vendors"). When you answer "allow" and "remember your answer" to popup alerts for an application, Comodo creates a custom policy for it. Some of its policies are fairly liberal. In the more liberal "Clean PC Mode", Defense+ automatically treats all applications on your drive as safe (but if any malware is currently hidden on your drive, it too would be considered safe). Applications still receive some minimal monitoring for Comodo's two protected lists ("my protected registry keys" and "my protected COM interfaces") and for running as an executable, or more/less monitoring depending on their custom policy. And new files get sent to a list of files "waiting for your review" in the "Summary" page. Files listed for review will be considered possibly unsafe and will provoke popup messages, as if in Safe Mode, until their custom policies are made. Comodo limits the frequency of alerts by automatically treating some programs as safe and allowing some applications to access the Internet. You can additionally automate the behavior of Defense+ by one or more of these methods for treating applications as safe:
The following guides may also contain useful information about Comodo's settings: How to Install Comodo, How to Tame Comodo Defense+ Without Disabling It, and MC's Mini Tutorial.
Run the wizard and have it search your PC for known programs to allow/block/ask. In this case, Online Armor relies on you to respond to alerts for unknown programs. For the curious or paranoid user, it uses excellent popup messages when it automatically allows a program to connect online and, optionally, when it automatically trusts a program/process to run (these alerts don't require user action and they can be enabled/disabled in the interface with "Options" > "Firewall", and "Programs" > "Options"). For example, I noticed a message when it auto trusted a key logger test, but after I set the tester to untrusted, it gave very informative and detailed security alerts (and then it passed the test and logged the tester in the interface under the "Key Logger" tab, but it only logged the key logger after the test was untrusted). You can even close both its tray tools from its right-click context menu. They are not needed for the firewall and HIPS components to continue running and protecting.
The free version lacks many extras of the pay version, however, such as automatic updates and the ability to break active connections. The HIPS component is called "Host Protection" in the interface. It provides four default levels of protection, which can be easily set with a slider and additionally customized item by item by advanced users. The default "optimal" setting only monitors the "most dangerous activities" (such as memory injections, driver loads, and a healthy list of system critical features -- auto starts, shell extensions, and internet settings) instead of all program activities. But these "optimal" settings lack protection from keyloggers, direct disk accessing, DNS API request monitoring, etc. You can check the types of reduced monitoring in "Settings..." > "Host Protection" > "Customize...". The installation asks whether you want to train the firewall for a week (using its Auto-Learn mode and Rules Wizard). In this mode, it sets rules automatically for known safe applications.
While there is a decent help file available, the user interface can be a bit confusing and overwhelming. There are many configurable settings, and sorting through them may require some time. To help out with that there is a information menu on the right of each screen which explains what each section is for. Training mode allows all actions within a 180-second interval, which is ideal for installing or running programs for the first time. On the first run after installing however, Private Firewall still managed to disable Panda Cloud Antivirus, the antivirus software on my test system, even with Training mode activated. Adding Panda Cloud Antivirus to the allow list seemed to solve this minor issue. It is also possible to set different security levels for the Internet and the Network. Various levels of protection (High, Low, and Custom) can be separately specified for Internet Access and Network Security (ie. file and printer sharing). This is useful for, say, when one needs to access the internet via a network they don't quite trust. In addition, there are three profiles you can choose: Home, Office, and Remote. You can set appropriate settings for each one and easily switch between them as needed; this is particulary useful for portable computers which connect to many different networks. Another useful feature is that it is possible to block all outbound email; simply click the 'Block Outbound Email' icon in the main user screen and all outbound email should be blocked. Overall, Private Firewall is a very effective firewall; it ranks among the top products on Matousec. A number of members at our forum speak highly of the developers of Private Firewall, and the software is trusted. However, the graphic interface and usability is slightly tailored for the more advanced users. Beginner computer users may want to consider another firewall instead, but if you are comfortable with the basics of Windows & firewall software, you should definitely consider Private Firewall.
Each section of the program is displayed clearly; navigation is through the menu on the left. Alerts are generally clear and straightforward, as is configuration. The registry defender protects the registry from being modified, with the option of only protecting select categories. The parental control limits the list of websites that can be accessed, but you must manually add each website to be trusted, ie. You cannot block specific websites; you can only allow certain websites. The anti-banner component blocks undesirable web page content including ads, flash banners, pop-ups and the like. All three of these additional modules can be disabled independently as desired. AVS Firewall also comes with a monitoring utility so you can check the size of network traffic which is sent and received by each application. During installation of this firewall, the installer automatically installs the AVS Software Browser; there is no option to opt-out of installing this, but the program can be removed separately after installation with no effect on the actual firewall program. The installer also has a pre-checked option to install AVS Registry Cleaner, and it is recommended that it is unchecked so the installer does not install it. Despite trying to bundle in a few additional programs by the vendor, AVS Firewall itself is a decent firewall program. It has some additional features not found in your everyday firewall program, though most of those features can be found in other third party programs.
|
|
Despite its name, this program works with system Windows XP and higher
To learn more visit its service and support page
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Built-in help and tips. Auto trusts safe vendors. Able to block outbound email automatically. Network options for experts, with three default settings to modify (Home, Public, Work).
To learn more visit its feature list and online support (change log, user guide, & tutorials).
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Installation mode/training mode, auto updating, built-in help and tips, parental control with password protection, extra themes and languages, and a stealth ports wizard. Purges old or unused firewall/Defense+ policies or unused files (safe files, files waiting for review, etc.). Displays balloon messages for instant logging events.
To learn more visit its forum, online help, and/or release notes.
Newer versions and 64-bit version are part of the Outpost Free Security Suite - includes additional software components which may conflict with existing software.
64-bit version (98.81 MB v7.1) available here: http://download.cnet.com/Agnitum-Outpost-Security-Suite-Free-64-bit/3000... *Warning: Downloads from Cnet (Download.com) now require the use of a proprietary installer.
Reduced HIPS monitoring (lacking anti-key logger protection for example)
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Built-in "Help", full screen mode or entertainment mode.
64-bit version only for Windows 7; XP 64bit and Vista 64bit are not supported
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Set passwords, protect programs (right-click > "Advanced options"), key Loggers tab/Hosts tab, and multi desktop support.
|
Have Your Say
|
|
Your opinion matters! If you've used one of these firewalls before, or know of another outstanding freeware firewall, let us know in the comments section below. For a more comprehensive discussion, please visit our forum. |
|
Editor
|
|
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Tim; registered site visitors can contact Tim by clicking here |
|
Tags
|
| best free firewall software reviews Windows firewalls HIPS |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version










Comments
Sphynx Software Windows 7 Firewall Control, newest version is now popping up that you have to buy the commercial version to allow system programs access to the internet.
I can not use DroidExplorer to record Android tests because it blocks simple programs like Java 7.7 from communicating without asking!
As an experiment to verify its stricter use, I uninstalled, reinstalled and there ware many processes with sychost that can not be enabled without purchase!
Last resort, it started blocking Windows Live mail sending out all by itself without prompt!
Are you sure?
By default it blocks system programs access to the internet; after that "enable all" will be activated.
If not you can use their forum to clarify such behaviour.
Sygate the best of the best ever.. they had to buy it and close it as it was no.1
interesting, I've been using Sygate for some time, I ran Microsoft Security Essentials scan which was clean - then I ran MalwareByte scan which removed one PUP which was some kind of recycler - then I did a GSR port security scan and passed 100%.
Shut down Sygate and tried Zone Alarm ... set it all up ... tested the ports again at GSR and Port 1024 failed, so for now I've gone back to Sygate which when I do get computer scan alerts and the source is china (for example), I block the IP addresses which seems to work fine.
Correction ... Port 1025 is the one that failed while using Zone Alert
Sygate is an excellent firewall. It's just a pity it won't work with the latest OS.
I don't know which version of Zone Alarm you are using, but I have the firewall component as part of the free Zone Alarm suite on my Windows 7 and it returns full stealth with GRC.
1025 is a service port, but is also a known malware port. I would run a couple of online scans with say Trend Micro HouseCall and the Kaspersky scanner just to be sure.
Also, when you say "failed", is it returning the port as open or closed? If it's just closed then this is fine. You might find this article about the "Myth of Stealth" interesting.
http://www.hansenonline.net/Networking/stealth.html
Is my security compromised if i have port 80 open?
It depends on what might be using it, and how you are seeing it as recorded "open". If you run a web server or Skype (I believe registers like this) then OK. Generally though port 80 should not be showing as open.
I installed Private Firewall and it locked up my computer (Windows 7 64 bit).
I then tried to install Online Armor and had the same result.
There are several threads on the internetregarding other users having this problem using Avast Free Anti Virus.
It's tto bad about PC Tools Firewall I liked it.
raiderfan
If you have problems with multiple firewall installs, check that all old uninstalled 3rd party firewalls/security suites are completely cleaned out. Most companies have a removal tool, there's a big list here: http://www.carrona.org/avuninst.html
I have Comodo firewall for about 3 weeks and it says it has not blocked any thing is there a way i can turn it on?
Actually this is bad wording in Comodo interface. When it says “Firewall has blocked 0 intrusions so far” it means “there were 0 blocked events with checked Log option”.
Every rule that is configured in Network Security Policy has a “Log as firewall event if this rule is fired” flag. If this flag is unchecked, firewall will block such an event (if it is a blocking rule) but will not write this action into event log. And this is default setting for predefined Global Rules and Application Rules (except Block and Log All Unmatching Requests rule using in predefined policies). It is always possible to manually check this flag for any rule, so it will be more events shown, but most of them will be OS-level communications attempts (like network discover services).
Also it is probably not correct assumption to expect that every host is always a subject for the intrusion attempts. In real life, the real attack is a rare case.
Many acknowledge that the best firewall for the Windows platform since Vista/Windows 7 is Windows own. The only thing it doesn't do is warn users about outgoing connection attempts. Users adopting safe surfing practices don't necessarily need this function anyway, but there are other products reviewed above that add this to the Windows firewall without the need to install additional system drivers. Managing something as complex as Comodo is not an easy task for novices and maybe TinyWall would be a better option. You still need to read the documentation first though in oder to gain an understanding of how it works and how to set it up. If you decide to remain with Comodo however, please see this guide.
http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/how-install-comodo-firewall.htm
I’ve found interesting thing for my own box, quickly testing two configurations:
1. Windows firewall + TinyWall
2. Comodo Firewall (free) (Windows firewall service is disabled, obviously)
And to my surprise found that second one has 10% less memory usage with overall less pressing on the system performance. It could be not so important with modern systems with 3+ Gb amount of memory installed, but as a result of those observations it is not clear what benefit #1 brings to the users, besides a bit simples configuration with less protection. The only thing that comes to my mind is – kernel drivers which become embedded to OS by third-party firewall. However through the years of Comodo usage I did not face any problems with that (which could be not a case for other systems). TinyWall in turn has crashed 3 times during 8 hours of its usage.
So, what I’m trying to say is that Comodo is still a very strong and reasonable alternative to Windows firewall, not only from the protection point of view, but from the performance point of view as well. And it is still worth to try it even it is more complex in the initial configuration setup.
As you rightly point out, different systems will react in different ways. I've had several problems with Comodo for instance including network recognition issues and the failure of the program to always run at startup, and yet none with TinyWall. The only guaranteed thing is not installing third party drivers is always a better option. Products also change with updates and new releases. I had endless problems with the recent releases of ZoneAlarm free firewall for instance and yet I'm in the middle of a long term run with the ZoneAlarm free antivirus + firewall suite and have not encountered a single issue.
As far as I understand, Tiny Wall and Windows 7 Firewall Control are very similar in function, the difference being mainly that Tiny Wall is better designed and generally speaking seems to be more handy. So I installed TW - only to find out shortly that for some unknown reason it blocks altogether Security KISS. I had to change TW for W7FC which does not look very nice yet poses no problems for my VPN agent.
Needs setting into learning mode as per the comment from here:
http://www.davescomputertips.com/2012/06/tinywall-the-best-thing-since-s...
"I opened multiple browsers, ftp, vpn, online games, and even did a pathping from the command prompt for good measure".
I tried the learning mode, but it didn't help. But maybe I had to be more patient. Anyway, I will give Tiny Wall one more try, as I am not a fan of 'half-baked' apps which Windows Firewall Control seems to look)
P.S. W7FC free version has one more flaw: it won't process some system transactions.
I have tried Tinywall for two weeks and I have given up on it. Sure, it stops movement, but it is too aggressive for my liking. I ran it in learning mode but even that doesn't fully learn. For example, even in learning mode it blocked File Hippo Updater, and although it let windows Update scan it would not allow the updates to install. Another issue that I had with it was that I could not get it to stop asking me if I wanted to allow hpnetworkcommunicator.exe which is the annoying software that my wifi enabled HP computer uses. Added to this is the 200+ svchost.exe that it blogs at a typical start up and in the end I just had to give up on it.
Incidentally, if we look under the hood of Windows firewall there is an option to set a block for outgoing connections as well as inbound. Id we just apply that, will we not get some sort of outbound protection, similar to Tinywall?
I have Comodo firewall for about 3 weeks and it says it has not blocked any thing is there a way i can turn it on?
I have installed the latest Comodo Firewall (without the AV component).
Youtube videos do not play now.
I had Zone Alarm v 10 (ZAIS -paid) and had no problems with youtube. Yep, it sure guzzled cpu cycles!
Have tried disbaling some of Comodo but nothing works.
Had a very under-whelming chat with Comodo "support"(pause for ironic laughter). Absolutely no help at all. Zero out of ten.
Can anybody help with settings under Comodo to get youtube videos to play again?
I followed Gizmo's setup guide (How to install Comodo).
Thanks.
PCTools Firewall is great too, and very similar to Comodo but somewhat more customizable in my opinion. PCTools is owned by Symantec which also owns Norton though ironically while I love and preach for PCTools, I dislike Norton and am not a big fan of Symantec products that aren't labeled as by any of their child companies, and just as by Symantec, though I haven't fully investigated the effectiveness - mostly just a matter of "I know what I like, but might not know if I would like another thing until I try it, but I'm can't say I'll probably like it because I probably won't" type case as usual with my bias.
I too like PC Tools Firewall, but sadly, it's not being developed anymore.
ARGH! The complications make hair on the head rise straight up.
I just ran the Security Wizard and am using XP. It recommends that I use Avira Antivir, first, but says I could also use MSE. I will surely continue using Antivir even if it takes a few hours to scan my two hard drives. The only problem I've been having with Antivir is that when it starts a scheduled execution, it seems to badly hog the system. It's nearly impossible to do anything else and I have a RAM meter application that shows that not much RAM is being consumed. Still, it's nearly impossible to do anything else when Antivir runs a scheduled full scan. I always stop it when it starts and I'm using the PC.
For firewall, either Comodo or Online Armor is recommended by your Wizard. I've always been using the firewall that comes with Windows XP and in the page for Best Free Antivirus Software, MidnightCowboy posted on July 28th about "A recent very good test result for ZoneAlarm Free AV + Firewall". He provided a link.
https://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-anti-virus-software.htm
The link he provided is for a test using 64-bit Win7, so do you think the test results would differ with XP?
And are there reasons for why Comodo or Online Armor would be better for me than ZA, or Win7 Firewall?
Some people told me last year that the Windows Firewall and MSE with Win7 and Vista are very good. Some also said that MSE with XP is not very good. What's your view about this?
Are Comodo, Online Armor or ZA better than Win7 Firewall, and if any of these are, then can you briefly explain the differences? It seems like they're all good choices and since the Win7 Firewall can be installed with XP, doesn't add third-party software, and is better than XP Firewall, it seems like a very good choice for these reasons.
If an XP user installs Win7 Firewall, then what happens with the XP firewall? Does the XP one get removed or only disabled during installation of Win7 Firewall? If only disabled, then is there a way to remove it, and would it be recommendable to remove it?
I never transmit anything that could be infected, only making use of e-mail for ordinary e-mails, sometimes attaching a job search resumé file created with LibreOffice, and creating or registering for accounts at websites and posting comments. If I attach a PDF, then it's a file downloaded from an authoring and safe website, nothing of porn, etc. My Internet usage is very safe. This is why I've felt safe using XP Firewall and an AV. But maybe increasing security would be good even if there haven't been any problems with what I've transmitted.
It might be a lot to ask, but you people could make videos and upload them to YouTube. I discovered languy and majorgeeks videos there, and there're other tech. channels. But I've never made a video, so don't know what is required for time with recording and editing. Your website would surely be a serious "Hit" there though.
Let's see if I can help make it slightly less complicated :) I'll address the points in the order it was mentioned:
If AntiVir significantly slows down your computer while scanning, perhaps you could schedule it to scan at a time when you probably won't be using it, say at night. You would then be able to let AntiVir do its scanning at a time that's more convenient for you, and I believe AntiVir has an option to automatically shut down the computer after it finishes scanning, if you don't want to leave the computer running.
Regarding the test results, there shouldn't be any differences between different versions of Windows; as long as they are compatible with the version you're running, it should still be able to do its job properly regardless.
The built-in firewall on Windows XP is not as good because there is no outbound protection; it can block incoming attacks, but it does not filter outgoing traffic. So any programs, malicious or not, on your computer is free to send data out to wherever they want. Because of that, it is recommended to use another firewall with outgoing protection.
Comodo and Online Armour provide HIPS protection (HIPS Explained), while ZoneAlarm is a basic two-way firewall only. Many of our readers here at Gizmo's Freeware have stated that the latest version of ZoneAlarm (v10) is a step down from recent versions, with causing the system to be sluggish being a key point.
However ,the added protection that Comodo and Online Armour offers over ZoneAlarm means there are more features you may have to learn and adjust to.
Regarding MSE, I can't really comment on it because I have not used it before (but I have heard good things about it). I personally use Avast on my computers, and have found it to work quite well. You might want to direct that question over on the Best Free Antivirus section :)
The different between Comodo, Online Armour, ZoneAlarm, and Win7 Firewall is that Comodo and Online Armour have HIPS protection; ZoneAlarm and Win7 Firewall are just basic firewalls with no HIPS protection. Win7 Firewall is a lot smaller and lighter than ZoneAlarm and works in conjunction with the built-in firewall, while ZoneAlarm is a separate independent software with its own firewall components.
Windows7 Firewall is definitely one of the lightest of the bunch and relatively easy to use, so I would agree that it is definitely a good choice. I am in the process of writing up a review for TinyWall, which is another lightweight firewall software, so be sure to look for that review to be posted soon.
Win7 Firewall works in conjunction with the built-in XP Firewall, so you should not need to disable the built-in firewall (contrary to other software).
If you use another firewall (eg. Comodo) in which you need to disable the built-in XP Firewall, you can do so by going to Start -> Run -> type in Firewall.cpl -> click OK -> General Tab -> Off. Disabling it is enough and there is no need to have to uninstall it from the system.
Since your internet usage is very safe I don't think there is much you need to worry about. After upgrading your firewall to one of these listed software, you should be good to go.
The videos are definitely a great idea - I'll certainly pass it on to the relevant person. Thanks for the suggestion!
I tried ZoneAlarm it had an easy installation and protects pretty good against incoming and outgoing ip requests.
After 3 days of using it I encountered a setting change on the internet tab --to protect sneaky browser attacks that turned to disabled somehow.
After several attempts to turn ON it kept turning OFF, I looked everywhere in the product but could not find a suppport tab to immediately report to.
Can't help but wonder if the review for the free Online Armor firewall was cut and pasted from the old review that was here or it wasn't thoroughly looked at, because this isn't an accurate review at all...this firewall definitely has automatic updates! I get them all the time and I've had it for over a year. So why does it say it doesn't have automatic updates?
The Online Armor firewall review is definitely due for an update, thanks for pointing that out. Will try to get to it soon.
When You Install Comodo FireWall And You Restart It Has 3 too Pick From Home NetWork Public Network I Think Public Is The Safest Too Pick Right?
So I SHOULD Pick Public?