Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are currently looking for people with skills and/or interest in the following areas:
- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Mobile Apps contributors
- Mac Section contributors
If this sounds like you then click here for more details
Best Free Firewall
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Firewalls help monitor your system's communication between your network and the Internet to help stop intrusions and attacks. They are particularly useful for controlling the activities of Internet facing applications. No other freeware product has more of a reputation for causing user angst than a firewall. To find a suitable product may involve a process of trial and error. A firewall should protect while not being too intrusive or too complicated to handle. In this article we give you a selection of what we think is the best free firewall software available today. Our recommendations are made taking into consideration both editors' and site visitors' opinions. Firewalls come in two flavours; software based and hardware based. To avoid potential conflicts only install one (third-party) software firewall. You can improve protection, however, by using a hardware "firewall" (such as a router) and a software firewall in conjunction. Modern routers usually have a built-in firewall; consult your router documentation for more details. Basic firewall protection is critical for securing your PC. Simple firewalls (like the default Windows firewall) limit access to your system and personal information, and silently protect you from inbound threats. We review basic third-party firewalls that have marginally better security than the Windows firewall, such as simpler features for monitoring programs that request outgoing Internet connections (we call this "outbound protection"). The default Windows firewall has only limited outbound protection. Proactive firewalls have the most extended protection, including HIPS or program monitoring (HIPS Explained), and watch for malicious behavior before malware gets a chance to take control of your PC or turn it into a botnet drone. They seek to achieve stronger "2-way" protection, preventing programs from broadcasting your personal information to the Internet. Some kinds of malware are best detected by their behavior, so a proactive firewall (or firewall/HIPS combo) is a solid second layer of protection next to your antivirus program. It's an excellent option for high risk users (check out our Security Wizard to see if this includes you). However, it's plausible to argue that a good resident antivirus will stop some malicious threats before they get a chance to make it to the Internet anyway. Many of the top antivirus programs are starting to provide behavioral blocking and extended scanning of network activity. It's important to use basic or proactive firewall protection, antivirus software for active protection, and safe practices from our "most important advice of all" (Security Wizard) in order to minimize the risk of malware on your PC. You can "upgrade" (for free!) your security by reading the documentation and learning about proactive firewalls or HIPS programs, or using other protection like least-privileged user accounts and/or Sandboxie or GeSWall. Review IndexAdditional Tips
|
|
DiscussionThe built-in Windows firewall is a common choice since it passes all inbound tests (both stealth and open port) and doesn't have many popup alerts. It doesn't require installation, so it's not likely to conflict with your other programs. And many average users may not reliably handle the popup alerts of the best firewalls on the market (especially at their max settings). If you scan clean for malware and you don't want/need the additional features of a third-party firewall, then the Windows firewall is a practical and useful solution. Alternatively, you can replace the Windows firewall with a basic third-party firewall for easier control of outbound protection and additional features. Most simple two-way firewalls ask you to allow or deny Internet access for unknown programs. Many automatically allow trustworthy apps and remember your decisions to become silent over time. First, you can convert a proactive firewall into a basic two-way firewall, making some of the best free firewalls behave with similar silence and protection as ZoneAlarm. Select the following one-click configurations to set them (see the proactive section for more on them):
Second, additional third-party firewalls behave similar to the basic configurations of proactive firewalls above. ZoneAlarm, for example, has made a comeback with fewer popups and lighter resource use.
Basic Firewall Reviews
Users will have to interact with this firewall for a time after installation to make sure programs needing LAN or internet access are granted proper permissions. Popups are very simple in format offering Deny, Accept, and a checkbox a user can check to make ZoneAlarm remember the decision. Novice users should be able to easily identify the name of the program asking for web access so they can make the appropriate decision. The Program Control will allow users to set ZoneAlarm for Low, which is a learning mode and no OS firewall protection and limited popups. Or users can choose Medium, which will make programs ask for permission to access the trusted and internet zones. The high setting is not offered in the Free version of ZoneAlarm. The Smart Defense Advisor will help reduce popups by offering settings for programs asking for access, based on the decisions made by other users worldwide. Users can choose whether or not to participate in ZoneAlarm's community defense program. Users can set programs access manually at anytime by going to ZoneAlarm's Program Control and selecting Programs. Internet Zone controls are divided into the Trusted Zone, used for the local network to share files, printers, etc., and the Internet Zone for communication to/from the web. A simple 3-position format allows users to choose from "No protection" (firewall is off), Medium (Allows file/printer sharing), and High (will allow users to connect to a network but will not allow anyone else to connect to your system). The medium setting is recommended for home networks with more than one system, and for users whose modem requires this setting. The high setting is most recommended for single-system web access (only one computer at home and modem does not require a home network setting), and for public areas such as cafes, restaurants, and hotels (etc.) with wifi. ZoneAlarm Free offers basic two-way defense, stealth mode, and anti-phishing protection. However, it lacks HIPS or program-to-program protection. It is worth noting that there have been many negative comments about the latest version of the software, at least from the visitors on our site. Most notably, many features have been removed, and may be regarded as a step down from previous versions. Perhaps something you may want to take into account when choosing a firewall product.
There are three modes a user can choose from; Normal, DisableAll, or EnableAll. DisableAll disables all applications regardless of program settings, while EnableAll allows all application access (essentially equivalent to switching off the firewall completely). Unless needing to test something specifically, the Normal Mode is the recommended one - applications/programs are allowed or denied access depending on the rules set. Under the Normal Mode, when a program tries to access the internet for the first time (upon installation of W7 Firewall Control) a window pop-ups with information on what the application is, the publisher, etc (assuming default program settings). You can then allow or disallow access, either permanently or as a one-time basis. Selecting the former option will add the settings permanently to the Programs list, while with the latter option you will have to deal with the pop-up window again on the next launch. In addition to the window pop-up for new programs, activities that take place (ie. blocked/allowed traffic, etc) are logged and shows up in the bottom right corner of your screen. Both the pop-up window and log activity notification dialogue can be turned on or off at the user's discretion. That's basically all there is to it. It may get a bit annoying when you first starting using it, since you will have to define the initial rules for all your applications (ie. allow or disallow them); this includes everything from Internet Explorer to your antivirus program. Nevertheless, Windows7FirewallControl allows much greater and easier control over the built-in firewall than what the operating system offers.
|
|
DiscussionThe following personal firewalls provide excellent network and HIPS protection. Each firewall comes with default settings and shouldn't require much adjustment except for the needs of advanced users. Firewall products in this section require more time to learn than basic firewalls, in order to get the most out of them. Since firewalls are often praised for their security effectiveness at their max settings, users will likely have lower protection than mentioned by independent testing sources like Matousec. All of the product vendors seek to provide user friendly features, sometimes incorporating reduced levels of protection in their default settings (by decreasing some HIPS monitoring).
Proactive Firewall ReviewsComodo Firewall is the best choice for users seeking a full featured security suite. This latest release is suitable for both lightly-skilled users (still must have knowledge of installed programs) and technically advanced users. Its robust and active HIPS (or application monitoring feature), called "Defense+", matches or exceeds the security performance of pay products. Comodo allows for much control and customization for the curious or the paranoid. Comodo includes a "memory firewall" (against buffer overflow attacks) and a light sandbox component to limit the way unknown applications and new software installations affect your computer. The use of sandbox protection limits the negative effects of malware. It maintains a lengthy list of known safe applications, but if an unknown application attempts entry through the firewall, Comodo will deny the application and ask the user what to do. The new release contains user friendly features by default while allowing experienced users to maintain control over ports, protocols, and configurations. During installation the user has three firewall installation options to choose from: Firewall Only, and Firewall with Optimum or Maximum Proactive Defense (ie. the Defense+ feature as mentioned earlier). After installation Comodo automatically selects "Safe Mode", which generates numerous popup alerts for applications not in its trusted vendors list (you can browse this list to see if you trust the vendors: go to the Defense+ tab > "Common Tasks" > "View My Trusted Software Vendors"). When you answer "allow" and "remember your answer" to popup alerts for an application, Comodo creates a custom policy for it. Some of its policies are fairly liberal. In the more liberal "Clean PC Mode", Defense+ automatically treats all applications on your drive as safe (but if any malware is currently hidden on your drive, it too would be considered safe). Applications still receive some minimal monitoring for Comodo's two protected lists ("my protected registry keys" and "my protected COM interfaces") and for running as an executable, or more/less monitoring depending on their custom policy. And new files get sent to a list of files "waiting for your review" in the "Summary" page. Files listed for review will be considered possibly unsafe and will provoke popup messages, as if in Safe Mode, until their custom policies are made. Comodo limits the frequency of alerts by automatically treating some programs as safe and allowing some applications to access the Internet. You can additionally automate the behavior of Defense+ by one or more of these methods for treating applications as safe:
The following guides may also contain useful information about Comodo's settings: How to Install Comodo, How to Tame Comodo Defense+ Without Disabling It, and MC's Mini Tutorial.
Run the wizard and have it search your PC for known programs to allow/block/ask. In this case, Online Armor relies on you to respond to alerts for unknown programs. For the curious or paranoid user, it uses excellent popup messages when it automatically allows a program to connect online and, optionally, when it automatically trusts a program/process to run (these alerts don't require user action and they can be enabled/disabled in the interface with "Options" > "Firewall", and "Programs" > "Options"). For example, I noticed a message when it auto trusted a key logger test, but after I set the tester to untrusted, it gave very informative and detailed security alerts (and then it passed the test and logged the tester in the interface under the "Key Logger" tab, but it only logged the key logger after the test was untrusted). You can even close both its tray tools from its right-click context menu. They are not needed for the firewall and HIPS components to continue running and protecting.
The free version lacks many extras of the pay version, however, such as automatic updates and the ability to break active connections. The HIPS component is called "Host Protection" in the interface. It provides four default levels of protection, which can be easily set with a slider and additionally customized item by item by advanced users. The default "optimal" setting only monitors the "most dangerous activities" (such as memory injections, driver loads, and a healthy list of system critical features -- auto starts, shell extensions, and internet settings) instead of all program activities. But these "optimal" settings lack protection from keyloggers, direct disk accessing, DNS API request monitoring, etc. You can check the types of reduced monitoring in "Settings..." > "Host Protection" > "Customize...". The installation asks whether you want to train the firewall for a week (using its Auto-Learn mode and Rules Wizard). In this mode, it sets rules automatically for known safe applications.
While there is a decent help file available, the user interface can be a bit confusing and overwhelming. There are many configurable settings, and sorting through them may require some time. To help out with that there is a information menu on the right of each screen which explains what each section is for. Training mode allows all actions within a 180-second interval, which is ideal for installing or running programs for the first time. On the first run after installing however, Private Firewall still managed to disable Panda Cloud Antivirus, the antivirus software on my test system, even with Training mode activated. Adding Panda Cloud Antivirus to the allow list seemed to solve this minor issue. It is also possible to set different security levels for the Internet and the Network. Various levels of protection (High, Low, and Custom) can be separately specified for Internet Access and Network Security (ie. file and printer sharing). This is useful for, say, when one needs to access the internet via a network they don't quite trust. In addition, there are three profiles you can choose: Home, Office, and Remote. You can set appropriate settings for each one and easily switch between them as needed; this is particulary useful for portable computers which connect to many different networks. Another useful feature is that it is possible to block all outbound email; simply click the 'Block Outbound Email' icon in the main user screen and all outbound email should be blocked. Overall, Private Firewall is a very effective firewall; it ranks among the top products on Matousec. A number of members at our forum speak highly of the developers of Private Firewall, and the software is trusted. However, the graphic interface and usability is slightly tailored for the more advanced users. Beginner computer users may want to consider another firewall instead, but if you are comfortable with the basics of Windows & firewall software, you should definitely consider Private Firewall.
Each section of the program is displayed clearly; navigation is through the menu on the left. Alerts are generally clear and straightforward, as is configuration. The registry defender protects the registry from being modified, with the option of only protecting select categories. The parental control limits the list of websites that can be accessed, but you must manually add each website to be trusted, ie. You cannot block specific websites; you can only allow certain websites. The anti-banner component blocks undesirable web page content including ads, flash banners, pop-ups and the like. All three of these additional modules can be disabled independently as desired. AVS Firewall also comes with a monitoring utility so you can check the size of network traffic which is sent and received by each application. During installation of this firewall, the installer automatically installs the AVS Software Browser; there is no option to opt-out of installing this, but the program can be removed separately after installation with no effect on the actual firewall program. The installer also has a pre-checked option to install AVS Registry Cleaner, and it is recommended that it is unchecked so the installer does not install it. Despite trying to bundle in a few additional programs by the vendor, AVS Firewall itself is a decent firewall program. It has some additional features not found in your everyday firewall program, though most of those features can be found in other third party programs.
|
|
Despite its name, this program works with system Windows XP and higher
To learn more visit its service and support page
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Installation mode/training mode, auto updating, built-in help and tips, parental control with password protection, extra themes and languages, and a stealth ports wizard. Purges old or unused firewall/Defense+ policies or unused files (safe files, files waiting for review, etc.). Displays balloon messages for instant logging events.
To learn more visit its forum, online help, and/or release notes.
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Built-in help and tips. Auto trusts safe vendors. Able to block outbound email automatically. Network options for experts, with three default settings to modify (Home, Public, Work).
To learn more visit its feature list and online support (change log, user guide, & tutorials).
Newer versions and 64-bit version are part of the Outpost Free Security Suite - includes additional software components which may conflict with existing software.
64-bit version (98.81 MB v7.1) available here: http://download.cnet.com/Agnitum-Outpost-Security-Suite-Free-64-bit/3000... *Warning: Downloads from Cnet (Download.com) now require the use of a proprietary installer.
Reduced HIPS monitoring (lacking anti-key logger protection for example)
Additional Features of Interest (as Found in its Interface): Built-in "Help", full screen mode or entertainment mode.
|
Have Your Say
|
|
Your opinion matters! If you've used one of these firewalls before, or know of another outstanding freeware firewall, let us know in the comments section below. For a more comprehensive discussion, please visit our forum. |
|
Editor
|
|
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Tim; registered site visitors can contact Tim by clicking here |
|
Tags
|
| best free firewall software reviews Windows firewalls HIPS |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:









Comments
I don't fully understand why all the stink raised about ZoneAlarm 10.1 free firewall? It works quietly and seamlessly with my Windows pc. Am I missing something? I think I'll stick with it.
I also have used Zone Alarm with confidence for many years.....until recently, that is. In a moment of absentmindedness I clicked on an Update offer and have had nothing but trouble ever since. So, I thought, I'll uninstall Z.A. and re-install an earlier version. Think again, it is impossible for me to get rid of it. I tried Windows 7 Firewall as an interim, but Z.A. kept appearing even though Revo Uninstaller thought it had got rid of it all. Through trial and error I have been able to delete a couple of what must be important dll's so it no longer interferes with Windows 7 Firewall, but many parts are still loaded in my Program files under
"C/Program Files/CheckPoint", and unless I can find a way to get rid of them, it looks like they are there to stay.
Hm, maybe you can try another uninstaller? We have some on the Best Free Program Uninstaller page.
Or you try posting in our forum and someone should be able to help you troubleshoot getting rid of ZoneAlarm.
I was looking for a new firewall, so I had the google to find the best free firewalls and now I am here. Really good reviews, and I am always in need of users' opinion and reviews to choose a good one.
I have used Zonealarm for several years, until now. The verion 9.2 was installed because it was the most stable version of it.
Pros are the easy install, automatic setup for installed programs, showing internet process on tray icon, full screen view of program window, less annoying warnings, nearly good work.
Cons are forgetting of some preferences, sometimes longer boot time of computer, remembering all program files executed and no cleanup option of this list, automatic update mostly not works, in some special cases program cannot start in boot, must be loaded manually.
I have downloaded the latest version but it is a piece of junk.
Pros of v10.1 are not really known for me. Do you know any?
Cons of v10.1 are the chaotic setting options, main program window is small and has no resizing option, automatic setup is not as good as in earlier versions, too much menus and options with no help, no process view in tray icon.
So I am almost in certain of installing COMODO Firewall instead of Zonealarm, maybe it will be a better choice for securing my computer.
The feedback about ZA v10 has been pretty much negative all around..maybe the only pro is that the number 10 is greater than 9.
Anyways, hope Comodo does the job for you. Let us know how it goes
Downloaded Comodo Firewall about 2 weeks ago.
To my ABSOLUTE surprise...IT IS NOW JUST A FIREWALL WITH HIPS!!!
NOT bundled along with AV and that.
What you have to do is get the FIREWALL only (with HIPS of course). NOT Comodo Internet Security which has all that other stuff shoveled in there as well.
GREAT product. I had been using Online Armor Free, BUT, after removing it and installing Comodo, I IMMEDIATELY noticed one thing... My download speeds had risen DRAMATICALLY. Avg. DL speed under OA was about 2.5 mega bits/ sec. Under Comodo, was about 4 megabits. Peaked at almost 6 megabits.
Commodo is certainly the best free firewall at the moment. But all the contenders are taking the same approach to attract the mass market who don't want (or don't know how) to configure a firewall for themselves.
So we now have firewalls that are pre-configured for well known software to allow them to open all the ports and back-doors without asking our permission.
Some of us would prefer to have a firewall that starts with all of the doors in and out of the computer firmly shut, so that we will know when even the operating system wants to phone home or automatically download something to alter the configuration of our computer.
There should be an option so that we can allow only the minimum of communication in, and out through the firewall necessary for the computer to be able to function. We don't want lots of other services to operate in the background without being informed, because every breach of the firewall is a potential security risk.
That's a good point you mentioned. Although some firewalls do have an option where you can set the security level to be the highest. That *should* give one the highest possible protection
My two favorites are PrivateFirewall and Online Armor. Both offer excellent protection (Firewall/HIPS/Anti-Logger) as well as the ability to run apps with limited rights.
PF is a very elegant solution. The download is a tiny 3.6 megs and the installation is a snap. It fully integrates with the Windows Security Center and replaces the Windows firewall automatically. Your personal settings can be exported and imported as needed.
Online Armor is a bit more refined in terms of its user interface and its alerts are somewhat clearer and easier to comprehend, especially for those with limited experience with firewall/HIPS apps. It also integrates with the Windows Security Center and replaces the default Windows firewall.
Though both PF and OA can be run quite simply with default settings, each has a number of options to tighten security to personal requirements.
The only knock I have against OA these days is that it runs quite a bit heavier on my XP Pro SP3 system compared to PF and sometimes consumes quite a bit of CPU for extended periods of time. PF runs much more quietly and unobtrusively on the same system and as a result that is what I use. It has proven to be the perfect complement to my other security apps and has garnered excellent scores when tested on matousec.com's Proactive Security Challenge.
I highly recommend both products and give a very slight edge for the "newbie" to OA which can take a bit more of the decision making out of the installation and setup process. That said, I don't think that anyone should be disappointed by opting for either one. Each is suitable for novices through those users with much more advanced skill sets.
Thanks for the detailed comments! I agree with all your points. PF is great and would arguably edge out OA overall featurewise.
If PF could refine their interface to be more user friendly, it would probably be a one of the best, if not the best, firewall product.
Thanks for the good words, I appreciate it.
I know from having discussed the matter via email with Greg Salvato, that an updated user interface is something they have in the plans but I don't have any information regarding how soon that may be implemented. Still, it's really not all that bad "as is" and if one downloads the user manual (.pdf) from their website, it makes a handy reference when any questions arise.
That said, I've been very impressed with how far the product has come and how quickly the development team has been able to add enhanced features.
Agreed, it's certainly not bad at all (far from it). However in my opinion it just does not seem to be quite as user friendly for those not too familar with computers; veteran computer users would probably have no problems working with PF. That being said, we're probably just being picky about it, as it's a great all-round, no-nonsense firewall solution that works well.
Great to hear that an updated user interface is in the works, thanks for letting us know about that! Perhaps a wizard setup-type interface might be beneficial too, where PF can lead the user step by step through various configurations; then the advanced user can manually configure any further settings.
I've also heard good things about the development team and how quickly they address issues & features; it's definitely a product worth keeping a watch out for.
I finally succumbed to curiosity and after backing up my system with a new image decided to try out the Comodo firewall.
I followed the excellent installation instructions provided by Chiron (linked above in your review) and only made a couple of small modifications to tailor the security a bit more to my liking.
Thus far, I am impressed with how smoothly and quietly Comodo is running alongside my other security apps. In this regard both Comodo and PrivateFirewall are far superior to Online Armor which unfortunately has not played well with my XP Pro SP3 system in its recent incarnations.
The utility and available features included in the Comodo Firewall are impressive but I must say that without the installation guide I don't think I'd have found tweaking and enhancements all that intuitive. Everyone is different and perhaps it simply comes down to familiarity...but for me I think that both OA and PF are a bit more intuitive in this regard. That said, if someone is going to stick with a default installation, it seems to be relatively straightforward.
Long and short of it is that those looking for an excellent firewall/HIPS combination should be able to find one that fits their needs and system requirements with any of these three terrific programs. Those willing to experiment will most likely be rewarded with one that feels just right.
Glad you've found Comodo to be suitable as well. Agreed they're all different and one may want to experiment to find the right one suitable for them.
I guess you're going to stick with Comodo as your firewall now?
Also, a word of caution though to anyone considering trying out multiple firewalls: I have had problems with Comodo products not properly uninstalling - component remains were left behind and some issues were caused there. While there were no problems uninstalling on the test system (using a near-fresh copy of Windows), and everything seems to have been removed properly, anybody considering trying out all three firewalls may want to create a restore point and/or system image (as blues did here) just in case.
I've had it installed for just over a week now. I'll try to give it sufficient time to make a fair evaluation and then decide if a return to PrivateFirewall is warranted or not.
So far, so good...with no issues to report. Fortunately, I was able to get some excellent advice along the way.
What Is Up With comodo DNS Does It Still Use The Same DNS #s Are Could Some One Tell Me If There Is A Better DNS Please. I Am Use WIN Xp SP3 With Avira Free comodo Firewall comodo Dragon Browser. If Someone Could Help Me With A DNS comodoDNS Was Working Fine Then i Dont Know What Happen.
Not sure what the problem exactly is? Is ComodoDNS not working properly?
AVS firewall doesn't seem to be recognised as an installed firewall on my laptop. It reads as windows firewall is turned off.
You can turn off firewall monitoring by Windows: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Use-a-firewall-that-Win...
Does this usually happen with AVS firewall? Mainly I'm concerned if its my laptop alone that has the problem.
Thanks for your help.
On the test system it's not recognized by Windows either so it's just the software itself that doesn't support it, and not a problem with your laptop. Thanks for pointing that out!
Online Armour DOES have automatic updates.
Does Private firewall have any compatibility issues with Avira free or Panda Cloud free? I am thinking of the HIPS functions. Also if the HIPS component of Avira is sufficient and that function not needed in a firewall, then which fw would be a good choice? Thanks for the replies.
It is not possible for the editor to answer this because you have not given your system details.
Do you need details of other installed software or system specs?
The review was done with a Windows 7 system running Panda Cloud Antivirus free, and there were no compatibility issues. If the HIPS function conflicts with another program you could always disable the HIPS in one of them.
If you don't need HIPS, Windows 7 Firewall Control would be a good bet. You could also use PrivateFirewall but without HIPS
It's operating system as a lot of the older but still very good firewalls will only work with XP and some Vista, but not Windows 7.
I just installed the latest ZoneAlarm (ver.10.1). It's very disappointing to me. For,
1. Unlike ver. 7.0, it does not have the red/green traffic indicator on the icon in the tray. Without the visible indicator, I cannot know what's going on.
2. Unlike ver. 7.0, the Show Monitor of ver10.1 does not have a full screen mode. Since it does not allow me to enlarge the monitor size, the View Programs section is not panoptic. The section consists of Programs, SmartDefense, Trust Level, Outbound Trusted, Outbound Internet, Inbound Trusted, and Inbound Internet. But the monitor size is so small I see at a glance only Programs, SmartDefense, Trust Level, and Outbound Trusted.
3. Unlike ver. 7.0, the icon in tray does not have items of Engage Internet Lock and Stop all Internet activity. Without these functions, how can I disconnect from the network when I'd like to disconnect immediately?
I do not understand why they discontinued these things.
Thanks for the detailed review! Very useful! I just wonder what firewall Windows 2000 users use now. I have two PCs and the old one's OS is Windows 2000. I installed ZoneAlarm onto the PC several years ago. Since then I have been using the same version. For, their newer versions are not compatible with W2000.
One of the firewalls listed under 'Other Firewalls for Windows 95-2000' might work for a Windows 2000 machine. However those are all not supported anymore, so any bugs etc won't be fixed by the developer.
I'll do some checking around to see if we can find any Windows 2000 compatible firewalls that are still supported.
Post new comment