Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

Gizmos Needs YouWe are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager        Interested? Click here

 

Best Free Drive Imaging Program

In a Hurry?
Go to details...  Go straight to the Quick Selection Guide
 
Introduction

Notwithstanding claims of others, I cannot pretend to be entirely unbiased in my reviews; indeed, an “unbiased human” is an oxymoron. While I am in the process of preparing a 2011 update, there are two points that I would like to mention: bells and whistles and the availability of reliable customer service.

Whatever else developers claim their programs are capable of, those programs must be able to accomplish their end; the importance of how they get there is most often a matter of personal preference. My bias dictates that, within the parameters chosen by the user, a disk-imaging program ought to be able to faithfully create and restore the image. To me, factors like resources consumed, GUI, speed of operations, and others are a matter of personal choice or are influenced by the users’ hardware and operating system. Can we agree that, regardless of its features, if a program cannot consistently create and restore accurate images, it is useless? Simplicity and the conjunction of my and others’ experiences vis-à-vis reliability will greatly influence my reviews; comments are welcome.

Disk Imaging has rapidly become a must have tool for most users because of its convenience, speed, and altogether ease of use. With disk imaging software a user can safely recover their computer from a system crash or a bad virus infection without having to worry about reformatting and reinstalling the operating system. With drive imaging there is almost no reason at all to have to reinstall Windows because it offers you the ability to restore an image to your hard drive in a fraction of that time and accomplish the same thing while keeping all of your programs and important data. For many users this has made Windows backup and other file backup solutions redundant.

There are two different types of Disk Imaging programs, online and offline. Most imaging software now days are online programs, meaning that they can run and create images inside of Windows while the operating system is running. The offline type are the programs that run in an alternative operating system such as MSDOS or Linux, to create and restore backup images while windows is not running. Although most Windows users love the normal GUI driven programs, there are advantages to using either type of this software.

Most applications offer different options for creating images. You have the option to back up only the used sectors on the disk, which will create an image of only those sectors on the hard disk that are in use by the file system. This option will make the backup much smaller than if you were to create a clone of the drive. A clone is exactly what it sounds like, an exact sector by sector mirror copy of the entire drive including the unused sectors. These images can be saved to an external hard drive, a USB flash drive, a separate partition on your internal hard drive, burned to a CD/DVD for safe keeping, or saved to a network share. Some applications can use image backups as a file backup and mount images to a drive in explorer so individual files can be restored. There are several other options that can be found within the different free programs available but for most users the default options provided with any of the applications below should suffice.

With the release of Windows 7 this past October Microsoft has provided us with the some new and improved features. One of the more talked about features is the new enhanced Windows Backup and Restore application which now has the ability to create disk images. I myself do not use the built in backup because it does not have all of the features and extras that I require, but I have tested it thoroughly and have gotten to know how it handles for this review. I have to say that it is a very solid backup solution that is reliable and is able to create and restore backups in a reasonable time and faster than some of the other free options around. The program will create an image of any partition on the hard drive if it is formatted to use the NTFS file system but it always includes the system partition and does not let you opt out. The drive that you are saving the backup on must also be formatted to use the NTFS file system. The new Window 7 backup is much improved and while it does not include some of the bells and whistles that other programs may have, it is a solid and simple solution to drive imaging, although not quite as comprehensive as some other choices.

ToolTip: For any of you devoted disk imagers, there are two tools that you must have, and yes, I will be checking up on you! I can't devote the space I would like to here to discuss them, so if you have questions, please comment below, or go to the forums for more involved issues. First is EasyBCD [free for non-commercial use], a GUI editor for the BCD store, the file that controls the overall booting process in Windows Vista and 7 [sorry XPers, this only works with the newer OSes], but it can do so much more. For example, boot CD image files, the '.iso' files, stored on your HD, floppy images, '.img' raw format, it gives a GRUB/GRUB2 choice for multibooters, it can fix many boot errors/problems that plague so many while imaging/partitioning, and on and on, the web site has extensive documentation to help get you going.

The 2nd tool is Super GRUB2 Disk {SGD}, and though it sounds of interest to only linux types, that isn't the case. If you do run into booting problems, and YOU WILL, booting into this CD/floppy/USB [yes all in one image file!], brings up a choice, the first is 'Detect any OS', which can often save you from even serious MBR/boot issues, and this does work for XP!!. The third menu item is to detect any bootable iso files in the folder 'boot-isos', where you can store your EasyBCD boot files too. Booting isos is iffy, so it's good to have two methods to work with. But with EasyBCD you can have an image of the SGD, along with full access to a number of full LiveCD linux distros including a favorite of mine and really 3rd must have tool, PartedMagic, which has SGD built-in, giving an ability to recursively and insanely spend eternity in a boot-loop if you are bored.  Now you can access a wide range of rescue and other  boot environments without needing the CD.

 
Discussion

 

Because Macrium has incrementally been improving their newest 5.0 release since it came out, ironing out a few bugs, making their recovery media adequately install drivers, I have gone back to them for the top spot, especially after finding out you can clone a working, running system with it, I think that is very new, and don’t recall anyone else doing that.

 


 

Macrium Reflect Free Edition is a very solid application that is great at what it does. The free version lacks some key features others have, notably differential/incremental and file/network file support.  With Macrium you can create an XML definition file and save it to your desktop so that all you have to do anytime you want to create a backup is double click the file and the operation will start without anymore user input. You can also start a backup through the context menu when you right click on a partition in Windows Explorer.  The application offers a convenient and easy way to schedule backups with the XML definitions files via the GUI.  The program now has capability,  the possibly unique of free imagers, of cloning your working, running system, very very handy , it's already made my life easier.   Macrium didn’t include the file backup option in the free version but the software can mount any backup image that you have created so you can explore and restore any individual files if the need arises. Now in the new version 5.0, Macrium includes a PE recovery, eliminating  a major objection.  The new PE recovery is quite nice, offering the same functionality as the installed version, most of their driver problems in creating the recovery media appear fixed.  These improvements have lead me to place it just ahead of Paragon, by a small but significant margin.

 

It was very hard to choose a top pick for this category. Any of the top three here should satisfy most,  the new Paragon Backup and Recovery (Advanced) Free edition now falls a bit behind Macrium.. This is a program that is very much improved over some of their older Drive Backup editions. Backup and Recovery 11 has some notable extras over some other free programs such as the ability to carry out some very basic partition editing, as well as full support for ext2, 3, and 4 linux file systems. It was very fast in creating an image of an 8 GB partition, taking just over nine minutes and creating an image that was just over half the size of the partition with the default option for compression. It is the only program that I reviewed with the option to create differential backups which will save a lot of time and space by backing up only the changes that have occurred since a full image was created. It restores seamlessly to smaller partitions, a very welcome, and sometimes desperately needed, ability few other free packages offer.  The application also has a Linux based bootable CD that you can build in case something happens and your computer will not boot. It can schedule predefined backups to run automatically and the program also gives you the option to password protect your backup archives. Of note is the ability to virtualize systems disks to facilitate migration to such an environment, though this only worked with Windows systems, and with Paragon offering the best support for linux file systems, this oversight perplexes.  An untested but interesting feature is its 'Backup Capsule' concept, where the backup is a hidden full system mirror that can take over should the original become damaged.  Overall Paragon Backup and Recovery Free is a reliable program with some great features that is well suited to handle the needs of most users.

Drive Image XML is another great free utility for drive imaging. I had only used this software one time before and it was a few years ago and other than the very long 28:30 minutes that it took to create an image of that same 8 GB partition, I thought the program was very solid. I still do not like the GUI very much but the program is easy enough to use. Runtime didn’t give very many options for creating an image mostly just the essentials, you can create a raw sector by sector image (clone), and you have two options for compression and neither are any good by default but you can tweak them to be better in preferences. The program also has a feature called ‘Drive to Drive’ which will create an image and restore it directly to a second drive without saving the image first. You can also explore backup archives and restore files from the archives in a similar fashion as is available with Macrium Reflect. You can also schedule backups but you have to manually set that up with task scheduler, just the same the program has support for Bart PE/Win PE and has plug-ins available on the web site but building the bootable media and installing the plug-in is left up entirely to the user even if they do include a short tutorial on the site about creating the Bart PE boot CD. Drive Image XML feels is a little different than the other software in this category but it is certainly a reliable imaging program that has a very good feature set capable of covering the needs of most users.

There are a few different options for users that are looking for a good free drive imaging solution and some of the most reliable options are offline programs. The choice that stands out above the rest for me is PING (PartImage Is Not Ghost). Most offline solutions can be kind of intimidating and hard to figure out at first but PING is almost too easy as it leads you through the steps needed to create an image one by one and offers a short explanation of some of the options available. [new editors note:  With all due deference to my very able predecessor, the choices offered as you step through the procedure may easily confuse with nomenclature and concepts not used in typical Windows systems and environments]   The program can create incremental backup images and will save you significant time in doing so. It can also backup and restore the BIOS and it can create a bootable restoration disk to make restoring your backups that much easier. The software was developed to offer a free alternative to the very popular Norton Ghost and over the years it has gained a better set of features than Ghost making it a great choice for anybody.

Clonezilla is the other free offline software that stands out to me. Although it can be complicated upon first use it is a very good program and probably the most popular offline free drive imaging application. It contains a beginners mode with all of the advanced options selected for you and all you have to choose is the partition or disk to backup and the location to save it which can be a USB drive, CD/DVD, or network share. The expert mode can be really confusing if you are not sure of what you are doing and generally the beginners mode should suffice for most users. The program can perform a disk to disk copy or just the regular disk or partition image backup but it is slow in doing this taking almost thirty minutes to create an image of a eight GB partition. However, Clonezilla does come in different packages, you can get it with the G-Parted boot CD or with UBCD (Ultimate Boot CD) which contains several other programs on one CD making the possibilities even greater.

Some hard drive manufacturers offer free software utilities to owners of their products to aid them in such tasks as diagnostics, disk management, and installing new hard drives. Of those tools made available a couple manufacturers are offering free disk imaging software for users of their drives to use as long as they own the drive.

Owners of Seagate hard drives are eligible to download and use the Seagate Disk Wizard tools. Disk Wizard is essentially a slimmed down version of Acronis True Image that is available for free.

Owners of Western Digital hard drives also have a great option for disk imaging. Western Digital offers the Acronis True Image WD Edition which is much the same as what Seagate offers to its users.

 
Related Products and Links
 
Quick Selection Guide

Macrium Reflect Free
9
 
Gizmo's Freeware award as the best product in its class!

Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Very easy to use and fast. can restore individual files, works with linux files systems, ability to clone hard drives--including the working system partition, schedule backups easily, very stable and reliable, great compression of backup images, can convert to vhd virtual format, includes WindowsPE recovery. Best of category in frequency of updates.
No incremental or differential backups, no file/network support-only in non-free edition.
5.1.5870
37.3MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Feature limited freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows XP/Vista/7
Backup & Recovery 2013 Free
8
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Fast backup and restore, differential backups, basic partitioning capabilities, can restore individual files, cyclic backup, good compression options, can clone hard drives.  Recovery media is full-featured, can do most of what the installed application can. Works with Windows 8 including Storage Spaces.
Some compatibility problems with Linux recovery media, no PE environment recovery, program requires registration for download.
2013
102MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Feature limited freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7/8
Clonezilla
6
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Supports a huge array of file systems, very reliable and stable, available on several different boot CD packages with many extra tools, and as a standalone liveCD, a very popular program
Offline only, can be difficult to use or complicated on first use, no incremental or differential backups, can not explore or restore files from images, not very fast
http://clonezilla.org/
2.1.0-26
138.4MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
All Windows and Linux, Intel based Mac OS
Drive Image XML
5
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Drive to Drive image copy, restore individual files from images, ability to restore images to different drives. Provisions for incorporation into WinPE environments via plug-ins. Simple, basic, reliable.
No incremental or differential backup, backup process is very slow compared to others, not many options for creating backups, almost no default compression, has no recovery media included and users have to create their own XP-only based disk, users also have to schedule tasks manually with Windows Task Manager.
2.44
1.78MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Feature limited freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows XP/2003/Vista/7
PING (PartImage Is Not Ghost)
5
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Can create incremental backups, possibility to blank local admin password, can backup and restore the BIOS, can create bootable restoration CD, some basic partition editing available. Many rescue utilities included
Is an offline program, not many options for creating images, rescue utilities not nearly as extensive as PartedMagic.
http://ping.windowsdream.com/
3.02
33.8MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Unrestricted freeware
All Windows and Linux

 
Editor

If you wish to contact me to request a product to be reviewed, or wish to send feedback or suggestions on how to improve this review, please feel free to do so. Registered users can contact me here if you wish to, but everyone is welcome to post a comment.

This software category is maintained by volunteer editor crank.

 
Tags

drive imaging, disk imaging, cloning, clone hard drives, copy hard drive, differential imaging, incremental imaging, hard drive imaging, image backups, drive backup.

Back to the top of the article.

 

Share this
4.133665
Average: 4.1 (202 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by crank on 12. December 2011 - 5:36  (84867)

Well now, two strange ones in a row. First, have you thought of naming your PC Narcissus? I thought I had a tendency to make lots of images, maybe you are doing what I do which is image with a bunch of the available packages so you can determine what works best for you. That is what I recommend anyway, so good going.

The shrinking partition issue is kind of a tough one, did you get sizing info, like start and stop sectors for each situation? Windows Vista and especially 7 do some, er, unique things in partitioning, about how the stating sector of the first partition is decided--how much space is left for the MBR etc. Since even still most of the partition and imaging programs don't really respect this unique setting and basically stomp all over it, I can see such incompatibilities cropping up.

Your vector graphics program may have done a signature check on the disk, which is on in the MBR, and ToDo may not have copied the MBR but recreated it, that might be the cause, I'm guessing.

I'm happy for you that you got it back working properly, that extra imaging work paid off-it wasn't all a vain or an in vain effort. But time consuming indeed, I can readily commiserate with you there. Thanks for the report, we like to hear about our readers experiences with these products we recommend.

by Pugwash (not verified) on 11. December 2011 - 15:23  (84833)

I downloaded EaseUS Todo and installed it without problem to Win7 Home Premium SP1. On first running the program I opted to make a bootable disc. The program greyed out the CD/DVD option with the comment that the drive could not be found. I rebooted the system just in case - error message the same. Confidence blown - if it can't see my CD/DVD drive then what problems might occur should I ever need a recovery? Not prepared to take the chance so uninstalled and now looking to try the Paragon offering.

by crank on 12. December 2011 - 5:09  (84863)

Are you saying ToDo could not find the CD drive to make the recovery disk? That is a strange one. Is there anything unusual about the drive? Is it an internal IDE or SATA drive? I could maybe understand if it was an eSATA or USB3.0 external. Maybe your hard disks are in RAID, I see squirrely behavior with some RAID controllers on other, non-RAIDed disks in the system. I'm grasping at straws, maybe more info I could give you a better idea. Sorry.

by Pugwash (not verified) on 12. December 2011 - 13:19  (84887)

The option to use the DVD/CD drive for the recovery disc was greyed out. It didn't id the drive. As far as I am aware there is nothing strange about my drive as it has worked with quite a number of software programs, both read and write, for some months now. The drive id is TSSTCORP CDDVDW SH-S223C SB06 which I understand to be a Samsung SATA drive with the latest firmware (SB06). Hard disk is not in RAID.

I uninstalled the ToDo software and downloaded and installed the Paragon backup/recovery program instead. Installation was fuss free (even allowing for the need to get a product key and serial number online) and, on opening the software, it recommended that I made a recovery CD. This it allowed me to do without any problems. It could see and use the DVD/CD drive in the same way that my other burning/playback software has been able to.

I like the GUI of the Paragon software and it was easy to spot which drive was which as it displayed the Volume Labels of the hard drive and external drive I was backing up to. I have backed up my main PC and laptop which took quite some time. However, I guess there has to be a trade-off for free software. I'm not in the position of having to try any recovery yet so I am having to trust that the backup is fine. It appeared to work well.

by crank on 12. December 2011 - 16:20  (84897)

Thank you for the follow-up Pugwash. I'm afraid I am at a loss here, maybe some weird incompatibility with that CD drive, but that really is remote. A SATA is a SATA, it should be abstracted enough from the hardware that such isn't supposed to be happening these days.

I'm glad the Paragon worked well for you. Don't worry too much about the speed, I have seen too much wild variation in this to let it be much a determining factor in how I rate the software. You may find later imaging to go far faster. But some are without doubt slower than others, at least it isn't a task we have to pay much attention to, and usually it's best to schedule automatic, off-hours backups anyway. Happy imaging and thanks again.

by ActivatedUser (not verified) on 9. December 2011 - 6:11  (84681)

I am just a simple pc user; not a developer or anything but I do tweak the system into oblivion sometimes. My HP comes with an F11 system recovery to factory image; which is great except with my Vista SP1 baseline I have well over a hundred updates to get back to a properly functional and relativly safe platform. Obviously I want to set the fully updated image as a new baseline; which I can do with Acronis. I've tried it and it works like a dream come true. Here's the but...

If I have activated Vista or Office or Dragon Naturally from Nuance, and If I need to restore the image with the activated software, what are the chances that the activation will still be valid. For example Dragon uses a system fingerprint based on cpu serial, chipset, disk SID, etc, to control activations. Do you think re-laying the image back to the the original hardware/bios will allow activated applications to continue none the wiser, i.e., without using up an activation of which there is a limit of 3?

Best guess...?

by crank on 9. December 2011 - 13:57  (84710)

I don't think you'll have a problem, I haven't with windows, and those guys are pretty fanatical about their copyright protections. If you are restoring to the same disk/partition, I can't see how it could bother anyone, but I have no experience with Nuance, they make take a more nuanced position [sorry, these things can't be helped, but as I have said before, I'm in a program...] So with a few caveats, I wouldn't worry too much, see how it goes, and if there's a problem, call them and complain, maybe they'll stop with the over-kill. There is a question with what is called the disk signature, which can in some cases cause strange behaviour with Windows, but if you are restoring the whole disk with MBR, that shouldn't be a problem with any software, they really shouldn't think anything happened at all.

by Alan H (not verified) on 8. December 2011 - 20:12  (84666)

I downloaded EaseUS to my Dell XPS M1530, running Win 7, fully updated, and clicked on the top Backup button to have a look around. It proceeded to showing the 'loading' graphic for ten minutes, at which point I killed the process. Tried again, same result. Uninstalled it. Will try second choice.

by crank on 9. December 2011 - 13:46  (84709)

I wish I could offer suggestions as to what was going on, some things just weren't meant to be. All facetiousness aside, [leaving me near speechless of course], I've had similar experiences over the years with all kinds of software, a week later it might work, or never work, too many possible interactions to figure out many of these things, good luck with our second choice.

by Paul Vitti (not verified) on 8. December 2011 - 12:26  (84649)

I check this place once in a while to see the news, and I'm really glad EASEUS is the winner as those people really deserved that. They gave a big lesson to all companies involved in the business. TODO backup free beats any paid program out there. I dumped several "famous" applications and switched to EASEUS. I never looked behind. I guess I'm not allowed to mention commercial programs here, but if you put any of those "big" names in Google search along with a term "issue" or similar, you'll be very well informed. At first I had no idea their free version was capable of restoring to dissimilar hardware. Once I tested how it works I was amazed. Further, it never failed on several different machines. I used a lot of drive imaging applications in the past. If you compare EASEUS with the most likely chosen paid alternative - EASEUS could be slower. The only con side. But what counts - it's more reliable, and dealing with Windows AIK is really worth it. I'm writing all this because I know there are people who really need help to make their choice as they need to save their time. I have spent a lot of my time, but, thankfully, it seems I have saved either. Thank you, EASEUS.

by Janice (not verified) on 7. December 2011 - 13:25  (84575)

Hope you don't mind my question here, I read this and the article on free partition programs and it was so helpful to a non-computer person like myself.

I need to restore my computer to out of the box and reload all my software (computer has become unstable) so this time I want to install disc imaging software in the process and save myself the trouble the next time this happens..

Would I use a partition manager like the one from Paragon to create the partitions and then use a disc imaging software (like the one from Paragon) to create the images or do one or both of those softwares do both of those functions and I only need one of them? Is there any harm in using both?(I want to have one partition that holds my system files and the software programs that I use and another partition to hold my data files. And then be able to restore the disc image of my system and software whenever it starts acting weird.)

So then after I use the recovery media that came with the laptop (it's a dual core processor, does that matter?), I would then use the partion software to create partitions? And then add the software to one of the partitions and the data to the other? And then install the disc image software to create an image to my external harddrive? And then would I need some kind of recovery CD on top of that in the event of a crash?

And is it okay to mix softwares like use paragon partition software with Acronis True Image software? (Because I have a seagate external harddrive.)

I keep mentioning Paragon because that's the one I've been reading about before I discovered your site but these articles and the comments say great things about EASEUS so maybe I should do that one.

I'd be grateful if you could answer any of my questions.

Many thank you's.
Janice

by crank on 7. December 2011 - 14:59  (84576)

Hi Janice, thank you for your comments and of course ask all the questions you want, that's what we're here for. I'll try to address your concerns as well as I can, but some will require choices on your part. First off, windows can do the partitioning for you, but there are subtle issues going on with Vista and 7 that make it slightly better for you to partition yourself beforehand. That said, your restore will probably give you little choice, it will make everything as it was new. You can then repartition to your liking.

Paragon Backup includes basic partitioning abilities, but as they are free, having a couple of the partition managers at your disposal never hurts, the flexibility offered with the full programs can be useful. You will most likely have to shrink the system partition the restore left you with, and that will require either windows or a partition manager. You can mix and match all of these programs for the most part, I seldom remember what I used for a given disk/partition, so if I later change anything, I'll use whatever I fancy at the time and this is no problem. The processor type has no effect on the software, as long as you don't try to use 64-bit software on a 32-bit processor, your system of course will be 32-bit if the processor is, though the reverse isn't necessarily true. A large percentage run 32-bit windows on 64-bit processors.

After the recovery, then repartition for a data-disk, D:\ drive, then you can move all your user folders to this drive, this is easy but make sure you tell it to move all files over. [Right click say the My Documents folder, and go to 'location' tab, where you can move the whole directory. You should create an empty folder with the same name on the D drive beforehand, one for every user folder you want to move. It doesn't have to be the same name, but this makes things less confusing/problematic down the road. This works for Vista and 7, for XP I am alas too obtuse to tell you about XP, my brain continually repulses my attempts to learn runes also.]

AND, then you can make use of the stuff on this page, and image your system partition, image it often, schedule weekly incrementals, whatever suits you, and feel safer and know you won't have to do a recovery again. I hope this helps, please get back if I've confused you or you need more info, we're always glad to help.

by Janice (not verified) on 7. December 2011 - 17:49  (84588)

Oh THANK YOU Crank, this is very very clear and helpful. I am getting started on it today.

And I just read the "about" page of your website - you guys do this as volunteers?? Wow, that is heroic.

I'm now a loyal fan, will post about you on a listserv that I'm active in having to do with my industry (I'm in non-profit legal), and happy to donate to the site (it's not much for now as I am underemployed - all the more reason I'm happy to find this site - can't afford to take this problem to a tech person.)

Wish me luck, getting started now -
Janice

by Janice (not verified) on 7. December 2011 - 21:06  (84595)

Hi Crank, I've got my laptop up and running using the recovery process that came with the laptop. So if I understand right, the next step is to download and install partition manager software before installing my various personal user softwares? Any particular order on whether to download partition software first versus my Norton 360?

Thanks,
Jasmine
(and I know, this is on me if something goes wrong, no problem, appreciate the advice)

by crank on 8. December 2011 - 18:26  (84662)

Hi Janice, thank you for your remarks, we try. You are going aout it correctly I would say, use the partition software to split your C drive up into at least 2, giving you a D drive for your data. When to install anti-virus isn't too important but it should go in before you do any significant online activity. And don't forget to image image image. After your set of programs is installed, and you do an image, then if you have to recover again, you can just restore that image and you have a fresh system with all of your programs already installed.

Thanks again and good luck.

by scott8148 (not verified) on 25. November 2011 - 20:07  (83901)

I know I should backup...but right now I am trying to upgrade my pc and all I am looking to do is CLONE the current drive to a new (used actually), larger drive.
I have no experience with any of these programs, but I have built several machines over the years. I'm much more comfortable with hardware that software.
What's the best for CLONING?

by crank on 26. November 2011 - 10:40  (83931)

Remah's advice is spot on, using PartedMagic with the G-Parted program it contains, it is as easy as cut and paste, you can literally cntrl-c cntrl-v and it will copy the partition over to the new drive, you don't have to worry about formatting it or anything, the process will [obviously really] take care of all of that for you. Any spare power and signal cable you can snag out of the harness will do, don't worry about mounting it for this operation if that makes it easier for you. You probably know this being comfortable with hardware, but many probably don't. Just try to get some air flow over a loose disk if the operation might take some time. I actually have an SSD that sorta hangs out the side of one of my cases, flapping around in the breeze as it were, but we won't be getting into any details about that, the doctors might hear :).

by Remah on 26. November 2011 - 13:18  (83936)

crank, I enjoyed reading your review here. I hadn't realized you had BF Partition Manager as wsll so I'll give it a read now.

by Remah on 25. November 2011 - 23:26  (83904)

Another option, if both disks are in the same computer, is to use a partition manager to create a partition on the new disk (I usually match it to the original, ie primary partition to primary partition, etc) and copy the entire partition across.

http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/best-free-partition-manager.htm

I've tended to do this rather than using drive imaging because I can boot a CD with a partition manager on it so I don't have to worry about any issues with open files.

I've only used imaging software where I've had to transfer (a backup, usually) onto different computers.

by Jason Kauffman (not verified) on 14. November 2011 - 21:39  (83305)

Great info, a couple of things that I question. Does anyone know which one of these or another works best for cloning the current state of a drive onto DVD sets, especially regarding minimizing the amount of disc required. Maybe there is no good software to do this. All of the one's I've tried seem to want to use 9-15 DVD's for a pretty simple pc configuration with minimal programs loaded. It would be great if software that is being review list whether or not it can be used for free commercial or not.

Thanks-

by crank on 17. November 2011 - 14:16  (83430)

I have not done much in the area of compression testing, but agree with a number of comments below that ToDo is not that great in the compression department. The online programs will all save to DVD, but which one requires the fewest I can't say. One way to minimize this is to be sure and move your data off the C: drive, but from your question, it looks like you take an image of the your whole system. If you are using incremental or differential backups, that would greatly limit the needed blanks and disk-swapping. One other idea if you insist on optical media is blu-ray, the blanks are insanely expensive still, but hold roughly 6-10 times the data. With flash-drives in the $1/GB zone, it's hard to beat for convenience over DVD, and spare HDs are so so cheap nowadays, you might want to give that some thought.

by golfingdude on 13. November 2011 - 20:16  (83229)

Monk great job, the best comparative review I read on this or any other site, including those from published rags like PC Magazine, etc. I would like to support your choice of Easeus Todo Backup as numero uno. Paragon though feature rich, was often times confusing, when after consulting the fine help features. Macrium is great if you have a smaller amount of data you need to protect, but its lack of incremental or differential backups does make it sort of an outdated choice. Again thanks and great job

by crank on 13. November 2011 - 22:30  (83232)

Much thanks for the compliments, this reviewer, me, crank, is somewhat new, and your remarks should largely go to Monk, who put the overall page together and wrote all the initial reviews, but don't blame him for problems or mistakes as I have the responsibility for this category now and over time more and more of the text will originate with me. The Tooltip is mine, and I hope to incorporate a bit more like that in the future.

Thanks again, and please keep coming back.

by pthubbard on 13. November 2011 - 18:22  (83220)

I've been using Macrium Reflect for about a year so I thought I'd give the other top contenders a try. As stated, they do have a full feature set and a good gui (especially EaseUS) but I'm going to stick with Reflect. Both the other two took a minimum of twice as long to create a backup (full compression)that was twice as big as Reflect's. The EaseUS product bluescreened on my first attempt to use it but I probably should have rebooted prior to using it because it seemed to work ok after that. I like the idea of versioning that the other two have but I've come up with my own solution that is working so I can live without those conveniences. The recent problems that Reflect had with the restore media creation seem to be fixed - mine's working fine. I've never had occasion to need support from Macrium or Paragon but having used other EaseUS products, I can say they provide fast and courteous support. But they need to work on their English language skills.

by crank on 13. November 2011 - 19:49  (83225)

Thanks for the input, it really is a difficult choice between these products, they are quite close and it will boil down to ones own personal preferences. I use all of them, and yes, I have to, but I did before getting this gig.

I have not done any timing or compression tests, for one thing, I try to have a bit of a life now and again, but really, with disks becoming so cheap, the space thing is less important. As for timing, for most folk, even the dedicated imagers, it isn't a task that occupies a great deal of attention once going, works well in the background for our online programs, and doesn't have to be done all that often. For these considerations, I have always thought the timing to be less critical. If you schedule regular backups, it is even of less concern, let the machine do its thing while you snooze.

by pthubbard on 13. November 2011 - 21:15  (83230)

Agreed... personal preferences trumps all. I don't have a big backup drive and like to keep at least a couple of images so size does matter to me. I also don't leave the computer on over night so speed is also more important to me. Besides, I just don't like waste... of any kind. And like you said in the intro, the really important thing is that these do what they're supposed to do reliably. I can't speak for the other two but Reflect has been rock solid for me. Again, thanks for the info. It gave me something to do on my PC which was a plus.

by syntax_error on 14. November 2011 - 6:59  (83245)

I've been using Macrium Reflect for many years now, but became concerned with their ongoing issues with a rescue CD.

I tried EaseUS Todo V2 but didn't like it. I thought the issues raised by Monk seemed to be fixed with V2.5, but waited for a review. I'm still not sure about the "look and feel" of it, but compared to Macrium an image took upwards of twice as long to create and without any compression options the file size was 30% larger than Macrium's (with the recommended compression option).

The rescue CD seemed unresponsive and is limited in it's use, but I did create one that worked first time. There are some other nice features, like being able to create an image of selected files and folders. With Macrium, scheduling and "auto" verifying of the image are reserved for the paid version.

The jury is still out.

by sludgehound (not verified) on 13. November 2011 - 4:14  (83174)

Geez just tonight I used EaseUS rescue DVD to boot up a crashed Win 7 x64. Darn thing just sent a loop of fast scrolling messages about bad formatting or something after crash. Could only get into bios and even its failsafe failed. Then when got to where finally offered choice of 3 things to do by Windows, it saying I had a crash, duh. Well keyboard wouldn't work, just frozen even tho DEL would put me into bios ok.
Set to boot DVD first order bios. EaseUS did its thing and this time the keyboard worked & resume choice loaded Windows to desktop. Crash was on a clean system. no O/C. This is about third time SSD C: drive had done this and I was ready. Back to normal except Windows Essentials virus program has been disabled it says. Leaving it off for awhile.
I've found Windows 7 Ultimate x64 disk image is faster than EaseUS though.
Something (SSD drive or Essentials) is preventing a full backup and system restore point won't complete either if try a restore point. Msg about that when gets back into desktop. Says failed to complete. SSD can turn off Shadow Copy so maybe that causes it.
Like restore point but it can kill some recent programs. Disk Imaging is best route.

by crank on 13. November 2011 - 14:39  (83208)

Good morning sludgehound, assuming the above is a question??? I will throw out a suggestion or 2. BUT, Windows imaging faster than Easeus? There is something clearly wrong because I could image my C drive with all three of the top contenders here in less time than Windows takes, and Windows is supposedly doing incrementals. You mention that you have an SSD for a C drive, have you by any chance off-loaded some of the usual C-drive files to other drives? Windows always insisted on imaging my entire 2 TB D drive because I installed some programs there. For awhile, I had junctions for my 2 program file locations, linked to folders on my D drive, and I can't now recall if that fooled windows or not, too old, too many systems, too oblivious. SP1 and IE refused to update no matter what I tried, and that was one long long long period of troubleshooting with few troubles shot.

Something got creamed early in the boot process, and since you see this on SSDs, 3 of them, I would concentrate my investigation there, but I can't come up with anything specific to recommend you look at. Are there any of those 'SSD enhancements' tweaks in place? Careful who you listen to with those, I have heard so many adamant folk recommending 180 degree out of phase ideas. . . I have 3 PCs wth SSDs and they have been flawless, well, as to the operation of the SSDs, nothing with me involved is ever flawless, after all, I'm there, yes?

Sorry I couldn't come up with more/better ideas, please get back with us if you find out what is going on, many using this software doubtless are making the SSD move and you might help out a few. Thanks for the input.

by Freond on 12. November 2011 - 23:06  (83166)

Hello everyone new (old) boy on the block and wished I had known about this site before now.

Am a regular sevens, Vista, eight, and Whirlpool forums member and this site ranks right up there with them IMVHO!

But back to imaging I am totally sold on EaseUS have used Acronis (far too complicated for an everyday user like me) Macrium (ok but throws pop ups for files it cannot image/ clone etc) but EaseUS well could you fall off a log any easier I mean this is how apps should be so user friendly.

Using my 3.0 USB external for a clone was almost as quick as a system image - I mean why image when you can clone and then if I have got it right update the clone?

Simply no contest in my view:-D