Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are currently looking for people with skills and/or interest in the following areas:
- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Antivirus for Android
If this sounds like you then click here for more details
Best Free Drive Imaging Program
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Notwithstanding claims of others, I cannot pretend to be entirely unbiased in my reviews; indeed, an “unbiased human” is an oxymoron. While I am in the process of preparing a 2011 update, there are two points that I would like to mention: bells and whistles and the availability of reliable customer service. Whatever else developers claim their programs are capable of, those programs must be able to accomplish their end; the importance of how they get there is most often a matter of personal preference. My bias dictates that, within the parameters chosen by the user, a disk-imaging program ought to be able to faithfully create and restore the image. To me, factors like resources consumed, GUI, speed of operations, and others are a matter of personal choice or are influenced by the users’ hardware and operating system. Can we agree that, regardless of its features, if a program cannot consistently create and restore accurate images, it is useless? Simplicity and the conjunction of my and others’ experiences vis-à-vis reliability will greatly influence my reviews; comments are welcome. Within the realm of customer service, I include making available reliable downloads to ALL users. I believe that Gizmo’s banner which announces “The Best Freeware,” must surely apply to everyone who seeks the best freeware. With that in mind, I am wont to alert readers to the fact that some of the programs listed here are housed on servers (e.g., CNET, Majorgeeks) that DO NOT support resumable downloads and, therefore, preclude the use of download managers; broken downloads will have to be restarted. More importantly however, the significant number of users who are limited to dialup cannot avail themselves to restricted downloads because of imposed, 4-hour disconnects. Depending on one’s connection, programs >30-40MBs will not be accessible. Nonetheless mindful of the rationale that imposes restricted downloads, both my human and unbiased natures urge the conclusion that programs that are restricted to broadband users (or those who do not otherwise suffer interrupted connections) do not deserve the “Best” designation regardless of their merits. In keeping therefore, I would note that the following offer their programs from servers that permit resumable downloads, i.e., download managers are able to be employed by dialup users or those anticipating interrupted downloads. I am especially grateful to 1-Click Restore Free who added a “local server” link at my suggestion, to accommodate all users.
The following offer their programs from restricted servers, i.e., download managers/resumable downloads are not permitted:
Act accordingly Monk Disk Imaging has rapidly become a must have tool for most users because of its convenience, speed, and altogether ease of use. With disk imaging software a user can safely recover their computer from a system crash or a bad virus infection without having to worry about reformatting and reinstalling the operating system. With drive imaging there is almost no reason at all to have to reinstall Windows because it offers you the ability to restore an image to your hard drive in a fraction of that time and accomplish the same thing while keeping all of your programs and important data. For many users this has made Windows backup and other file backup solutions redundant. There are two different types of Disk Imaging programs, online and offline. Most imaging software now days are online programs, meaning that they can run and create images inside of Windows while the operating system is running. The offline type are the programs that run in an alternative operating system such as MSDOS or Linux, to create and restore backup images while windows is not running. Although most Windows users love the normal GUI driven programs, there are advantages to using either type of this software. Most applications offer different options for creating images. You have the option to back up only the used sectors on the disk, which will create an image of only those sectors on the hard disk that are in use by the file system. This option will make the backup much smaller than if you were to create a clone of the drive. A clone is exactly what it sounds like, an exact sector by sector mirror copy of the entire drive including the unused sectors. These images can be saved to an external hard drive, a USB flash drive, a separate partition on your internal hard drive, burned to a CD/DVD for safe keeping, or saved to a network share. Some applications can use image backups as a file backup and mount images to a drive in explorer so individual files can be restored. There are several other options that can be found within the different free programs available but for most users the default options provided with any of the applications below should suffice. With the release of Windows 7 this past October Microsoft has provided us with the some new and improved features. One of the more talked about features is the new enhanced Windows Backup and Restore application which now has the ability to create disk images. I myself do not use the built in backup because it does not have all of the features and extras that I require, but I have tested it thoroughly and have gotten to know how it handles for this review. I have to say that it is a very solid backup solution that is reliable and is able to create and restore backups in a reasonable time and faster than some of the other free options around. The program will create an image of any partition on the hard drive if it is formatted to use the NTFS file system but it always includes the system partition and does not let you opt out. The drive that you are saving the backup on must also be formatted to use the NTFS file system. The new Window 7 backup is much improved and while it does not include some of the bells and whistles that other programs may have, it is a solid and simple solution to drive imaging, although not quite as comprehensive as some other choices. ToolTip: For any of you devoted disk imagers, there are two tools that you must have, and yes, I will be checking up on you! I can't devote the space I would like to here to discuss them, so if you have questions, please comment below, or go to the forums for more involved issues. First is EasyBCD [free for non-commercial use], a GUI editor for the BCD store, the file that controls the overall booting process in Windows Vista and 7 [sorry XPers, this only works with the newer OSes], but it can do so much more. For example, boot CD image files, the '.iso' files, stored on your HD, floppy images, '.img' raw format, it gives a GRUB/GRUB2 choice for multibooters, it can fix many boot errors/problems that plague so many while imaging/partitioning, and on and on, the web site has extensive documentation to help get you going. The 2nd tool is Super GRUB2 Disk {SGD}, and though it sounds of interest to only linux types, that isn't the case. If you do run into booting problems, and YOU WILL, booting into this CD/floppy/USB [yes all in one image file!], brings up a choice, the first is 'Detect any OS', which can often save you from even serious MBR/boot issues, and this does work for XP!!. The third menu item is to detect any bootable iso files in the folder 'boot-isos', where you can store your EasyBCD boot files too. Booting isos is iffy, so it's good to have two methods to work with. But with EasyBCD you can have an image of the SGD, along with full access to a number of full LiveCD linux distros including a favorite of mine and really 3rd must have tool, PartedMagic, which has SGD built-in, giving an ability to recursively and insanely spend eternity in a boot-loop if you are bored. Now you can access a wide range of rescue and other boot environments without needing the CD. |
|
Discussion
|
|
Note: With the latest updates from Macrium and Easeus, it has become even more difficult to choose a top pick, but I now favor Easeus, the new recovery media with a near-complete feature set, along with it's improved help, and to really take it to the top spot, its support of backing up individual files, including networked files. None of the others offers this array of features and ease of use. Also, please note the ongoing issues with Reflect getting a patch to fix recovery media problems, if you grabbed a copy of the 5.0 update early, and are having problems, be sure to get the patch. I think they still have much work to do here. There is a rewirte of the two reviews in process, and I still have a few tests to get to, please stay tuned. |
|
|
|
Easeus ToDo will very simply build you a linux-based recovery media which supports only cloning and recovery, but with slightly more effort, namely downloading and installing Windows AIK [Automated Installation Kit, free from Microsoft], it will build a WinPE-based environment, on CD/DVD or USB drive! With this, you can do almost everything the full windows program can, plus you access to the windows command line with many of windows capabilities-like DISKPART!, AND you'll be able to run many of your portable/standalone applications. OK, no more gushing, but I am very taken with these PE-environment disks, this is how all of them should be, soon my son, but not yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few different options for users that are looking for a good free drive imaging solution and some of the most reliable options are offline programs. The choice that stands out above the rest for me is PING (PartImage Is Not Ghost). Most offline solutions can be kind of intimidating and hard to figure out at first but PING is almost too easy as it leads you through the steps needed to create an image one by one and offers a short explanation of some of the options available. [new editirs note: With all due deference to my very able predecessor, the choices offered as you step through the prodedure may easily confuse with nomenclature and concepts not used in typical Windows systems and environments] The program can create incremental backup images and will save you significant time in doing so. It can also backup and restore the BIOS and it can create a bootable restoration disk to make restoring your backups that much easier. The software was developed to offer a free alternative to the very popular Norton Ghost and over the years it has gained a better set of features than Ghost making it a great choice for anybody. |
|
Clonezilla is the other free offline software that stands out to me. Although it can be complicated upon first use it is a very good program and probably the most popular offline free drive imaging application. It contains a beginners mode with all of the advanced options selected for you and all you have to choose is the partition or disk to backup and the location to save it which can be a USB drive, CD/DVD, or network share. The expert mode can be really confusing if you are not sure of what you are doing and generally the beginners mode should suffice for most users. The program can perform a disk to disk copy or just the regular disk or partition image backup but it is slow in doing this taking almost thirty minutes to create an image of a eight GB partition. However, Clonezilla does come in different packages, you can get it with the G-Parted boot CD or with UBCD (Ultimate Boot CD) which contains several other programs on one CD making the possibilities even greater. |
|
Some hard drive manufacturers offer free software utilities to owners of their products to aid them in such tasks as diagnostics, disk management, and installing new hard drives. Of those tools made available a couple manufacturers are offering free disk imaging software for users of their drives to use as long as they own the drive. Owners of Seagate hard drives are eligible to download and use the Seagate Disk Wizard tools. Disk Wizard is essentially a slimmed down version of Acronis True Image that is available for free. Owners of Western Digital hard drives also have a great option for disk imaging. Western Digital offers the Acronis True Image WD Edition which is much the same as what Seagate offers to its users. |
|
Related Products and Links
|
|
Editor
|
|
If you wish to contact me to request a product to be reviewed, or wish to send feedback or suggestions on how to improve this review, please feel free to do so. Registered users can contact me here if you wish to, but everyone is welcome to post a comment. This software category is maintained by volunteer editor crank. |
|
Tags
|
|
drive imaging, disk imaging, cloning, clone hard drives, copy hard drive, differential imaging, incremental imaging, hard drive imaging, image backups, drive backup. |
Back to the top of the article.
- Article type:




Comments
When I tried to download Paragon Backup & Recovery 2012 (Advanced) Free, I was redirected to CNET's download area for the program. But when I tried to download from there, I was redirected to areas of CNET that I am not familiar with. I never did get the progam to download, but ended up being redirected to areas of CNET that I am very uncomfortable with. I then tried to download the program from Softpedia and went through a smiliar series of redirects and never did get the program to download.
I am very satisfied with Paragon Backup & Recovery 2011 (Advanced) Free and refuse to get caught up in the redirects when trying to upgrade to the 2012 version. Because of this experience, it is my opinion the the 2012 Version be rerated to the bottom of the pack. If a product can not be downloaded from the vendor's site, then Gizmo's should not recommend that product at all.
I edited the link above, which had already been done before, bit it's back to Softpedia now. I want to give these guys a little more time to see if they will change this situation, either CNET or Paragon, but I may decide to consider that a negative factor in the reviews. Paragon can choose to have its downloads free of the parasitic attachment, as Easeus does. I can't give it quite the drubbing you want, the software is easily found elsewhere.
Replied in your forum thread :).
So far, I have tried EaseUS and it totally blew chunks. It claims on site it can backup to CD/DVD, wanted to backup to CD media as test...WOULD NOT even see the 2 CD burners in machine. Also size of DL is a little large. So, uninstalled it. DL'd both Macrium and Paragon. Paragon is also huge DL. Macrium was nice at around 30meg.
ALSO NOTE TO EDITOR: When downloading Paragons software which is now called Paragon Backup & Recovery Free 2012 it did not ask for reg at download, as it uses a link to CNET for the actual download. AT THIS TIME since I have yet to test it, I do NOT know if it asks for registration during install.
Will post again, if possible after trying these 2 (Paragon & Macrium).
Yes, they will ask for it. It is annoying and a hassle, but still not to steep a price to pay for a good piece of sw, and I haven't noticed SPAM due to registering. I don't know why you a having trouble with DVDs and ToDo, but you are the second person to mention this. It works on mine, is there anything unusual about your setup?
nope. It's a Dell Dimension 2350/ 2.2GHz Pentium4. 30Gb HD, 2 CD burners. 768MB RAM. Just a basic PC system.
So, I don't see a thing in my system that would cause
EaseUS to not see either of the burners.
Oh well. I installed Macrium Reflect, and it worked PERFECTLY. So I ignored Paragon, and definitely won't ever bother with EaseUS AGAIN.
I'm happy Macrium is getting the job done for you. I would like to add, for you and anyone else, software, especially utilities such as these that get so close to the hardware, can be touchy, and their next version may work fine on your machine. I wouldn't write them off completely, that Macrium has no support for incremental/differential backups, and can't see GPT disks, or linux file systems is a stumbling block for me, I need those capabilities, and you might too at some point.
I keep all three of the top contenders on all my systems, and would even without being the editor here, too many times I have needed to do something that one or another piece of software failed at for reasons unknown, having multiple tools for the job is a major plus. ToDo can handle GPT, but not linux, Paragon handles both but has no file backup or PE recovery environment. Having all three available usually assures I'll not have problems regardless of what comes up. We really appreciate your reporting in with us about your experiences, and good luck.
Is it possible with Paragon to "mount any backup image that you have created so you can explore and restore any individual files if the need arises" in Windows Explorer like it is with Macrium?
Funny you should ask ... I was trying to do this only two days ago, and nowhere is there an option for mounting your archived image. It still lists this as a feature, so I dropped them a message asking about if it is gone, or if I am somehow missing something. It isn't a capability I use a lot, but it can sure come in handy at times.
Thanks for calling it to my attention, I overlooked this feature missing from the latest version, I try but is is difficult to keep up with all the features in all the products and versions. Clearly I'm in need of a systems upgrade in the wetware but they tell me they just don't do that, not yet at least. So again, thanks for the heads-up, we welcome suggestions and corrections from our visitors, we want to keep our information as accurate and up-to-date as possible, and appreciate the valuable input we get from all of you.
Cheers crank.
Would be interested to know what they tell you if and when they get back to you.
I finally heard back from Paragon on the 26th, and it was not exactly a satisfactory answer by a long shot, I'm disappointed. First, excuses for the delay, holidays, etc, and then I was asked to provide a link to where, ON THEIR SITE, I saw the verbiage about being able to mount images. No answer to the question of whether I had missed it somehow, or that no, they did not offer that capability in the free version. I would hazard the answer is no. And so I sent that to them, copied the whole page and enlarged the print for that item, to about an inch and made it red, won't miss THAT. I hoped they might have responded in some fashion after that but I have heard nothing. Thought I'd give you notice.
I just cloned a failing 80gig drive with 20 gig of data to a 40 gig drive with the free version of XXCLONE and it worked perfectly. The new drive booted on the first try. For cloning one drive to another I can recommend XXCLONE.
Tried PAYFOR Norton Ghost in the beginning. Tried others including Windows backup program. Macrium Reflect is free and I've tested and restored from it several times. Athough it takes a little learning and trial and error. And as stated elsewhere does not do incremental backups. ALSO, after installing several Linux varieties my multiboot capability (MBR) was destroyed. And this computer OWES ITS LIFE to Super Grud disk 1 or 2. Either version will start it everytime. Gave up on installing Linux on this machine. Only running Windows XP and 7.
Tried Paragon also once, maybe twice. No luck for me there. Macrium =success.
Also Macrium Reflect creates a self running image. Open it and it'll do an auto restore. Did anyone mention that elsewhere?
Hope you don't mind me butting into the conversation, thanks for your information, multibooting windows and linux can be uh, irritating at times that is without a doubt, and SGD can fix, or at least get around, many of these irritations. Plus, it isn't only on installations with linux, there is a wide array of windows booting issues, very common ones, that SGD laughs at, merrily getting you booted while thumbing its nose at the lame limitations of the windows boot process. I am not quite sure exactly what an 'auto restore' means, but you're the first to mention it, I will check this out. thanks again for your comments.
I almost never comment, but
having tried ToDo4 disk image to dvd on 2 computers with complete failure to restore. I used image verification with each disk on both computers. To do log files indicated no failure and 100%success. But when attempting restore with dvd both dvd and the stored backup plan indicated imcomplete files. Copying the data to a usb drive made no difference-still bad data reported.
I must conclude that backup image to dvd is COMPLETELY BROKEN on todo.
Luckily I didn't lose anything important before I found this out.
hammy, I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. Embarrassingly, I haven't tried this option on any of the programs, my smallest system would require 7 to 10 disks and I haven't the patience for that. All of my virtual system are, uh, not feeling very well, but I have been needing to set them aright, and also I had an idea about a minimal system build I might try on this disemboweled spare that I have lying around, reproachfully watching me and wanting to be put back together so I can abuse it some more. I will try to do this and test the DVD backup, maybe I'll see something.
Now, as you have a USB drive, did you by any chance test whether ToDo could make a good image directly to it? You might want to try that if in a troubleshooting mood. It might be best to go ahead and try another of the imaging programs, please forgive that I don't know if one or another is any better for your needs. Some of these problems are just incompatibility issues when rare combinations of hardware and software can't make nice. Can't we all just get along? NOT in the PC world, too many diverse products and picky systems. Good luck.
I've had a chance to look at Macrium Reflect and run it through a number of tests. It has some quirks but generally it is reliable. It writes the image at least 2x faster than ToDo, both disk and usb, and compresses better to use less DVD. You have to do verification yourself after backup, but I don't care about that. I do like it's option to verify backup before restore so if something is damaged you know before really screwing the HD (if it still has functionality)- especially for the DVDs. The WinPE boot disks are good and found all my devices: dvd and usb disks(flash and HD) - trick is to plug them in AFTER the WinPE environment is loaded. Restores went well.
Practically you could get a 64 gb flash drive and port this around with you as a complete restore solution, boot disk included (you'd need to install the boot environment on the flash drive). Even though images are not incremental, a disk image backup takes 15 minutes for 100gb data (IIRC takes about 25gb of flash space), and a little longer to restore.
As far as ToDo: I won't give it a second look. Even a novice app builder will post notice when a feature is broken like that. I wouldn't even think about putting money in a professional version!
Hi just a quick question about Macrium free
Have an older version and several backup images....should i update to the new version and make new images or stick with what I've got?
If I update to new version I guess I'll have to create more restore disks. How will this effect older backups?
Also I have installed ubuntu alongside xp. How will future backups effect this?
Thanks
skip
First off, you should make new images, what are you doing with only old ones? They are good for reinstallation of a relatively clean system, but not much good as a backup. I just restored a 2.5 year old image and everything seemed to go well, and I'd be really upset if it didn't. It bluescreened on me, but I am trying to boot a 10 year old laptop OS, so it isn't surprising it wasn't happy, but it verified fine, and was written to disk without any hiccups.
You can image your XP without any problems with Reflect, but if you have to restore, it might overwrite your bootloader,, I'm not sure of your setup and XP I don't know very well. If you want to image the ubuntu system, you will need to go with Paragon if you don't want a sector by sector image, it is the only one of the online programs that deals with ext# filesystems. Good luck and please fill us in on how everything went.
Thank you for sharing your experience with imaging and Macrium Reflect, they had a recent patch that appears to smooth out some or all of the earlier problems recognizing hardware. I've tried it on two machines and was able to access my disks after that second step of telling it where to look for drivers. But, it still couldn't deal with my NICs, I need to try to work with it more and see if I can get that to work, but my experience is NIC functioning in the recovery environment is problematic, and that makes no sense, but at least for me I can rarely get it to work with most of these systems. Any users who have a different experience I would appreciate your comments. Thanks again for reporting your testing results.
Hi CRANK and "well done" as to the topics found on your website.
I noticed that you have not talked about the differences between "drive imaging programs" and "drive backup programs".
There are some of us that do not need constant automatic (or incremental)backup of our drives for the simple fact that programs that do this are usually resource hungry and will slow down the computer because they continuously work in the background. Evidently, that's not too good when you are running a not-so-recent computer or a newer computer, but with "limited" hardware.
What would you suggest is the best imaging program that will allow you to, whenever you wish to do so, manually take an IMAGE of your drive and store it either on another drive (external, portable, etc.) or on recorded media (CD or DVD)?
In the eventuality that your drive crashes, the program would provide you with a bootable media along with an IMAGE of your drive so that you could reload your OS and whatever software you had installed originally and wished to preserve.
I presume the Seagate Disk Wizard which you describe as "a slimmed down version of Acronis True Image" as well as the Acronis True Image WD Edition offered by Western Digital would do this if, of course, you owned one of their respecting drives.
Maybe other programs in your list could probably do this also, but this is where your expertise comes in.
So, if possible, please elaborate more specifically on IMAGING PROGRAM(s) which will take an image of your drive on demand and allow you to transfer the data to another drive in the eventuality of a crash.
Thank you!
Hello Ghistrem, and thank you for the comments. A drive imaging program is what we have here, they are designed to image the entire drive, allowing you to restore it to it's identical condition in case of crash, or to migrate to a new disk if that is what is needed or wanted. The term 'drive backup' is pretty loose and you would need to glean what was meant from the context.
So any of these will do what you are asking, the Acronis derivatives are fine products and I've used them extensively in the past. I can't recommend them here because of their limitation to systems with a respective brand HD, even though a large percentage of people will have one of these, I believe that percentage is falling, possibly quickly falling. I am still quite partial to ToDo from Easeus, and with the recent release of yet another version, 4.0, it is even better with GPT support claimed, though I haven't looked how well they do this. Plus, it will do file baclups, and off the network. All around, it is a quite capable offering for the price, though I'm not a big fan of the interface, many will probably like it.
Hope this info helps out, good luck.
As an afterthought, I noticed BIGdrive's December 29 "heads up" regarding the size of drives when imaging.
I would "image" a 640 gig drive onto a 480 gig (500-20 for embedded software) portable drive.
Would this influence the backup option I should choose when using EaseUS?
Thanks again!
Thank you CRANK for your quick response.
It is always a pleasure to "pick the brain" of an expert.
I had been tempted by Paragon's offering in your list of programs but, further to your comments, I did an in depth search into ToDo from EaseUs. I agree with you that it is overall a better program with its ability to backup files and folders, to make a PE rescue bootable media, etc. (http://www.todo-backup.com/products/home/comparison.htm).
However, I need a bit of your guidance. I will mainly use it as an imaging tool but I have been unable to understand the difference between the two options offered under BACKUP, i.e. "Data backup (File,Disk/Partition)" and "System backup".
This is where I need your help since I can't seem to find the info on the EaseUs website. If I want to take a complete image of a drive, which of the two options should I use? Is there an advantage to use one option over the other?
Thank you again and have a great weekend.
Thanks for your reply. As for picking my brain, you know the guy who rode the A-bomb down in 'Dr. Strangelove' ... Anywho, he was played by Slim Pickens, just a thought.
The 'System Backup' is meant as a near 1-click option for easy backup of your system disk, few options are available, it for the 'launch and forget' type operations. For more flexible options, you go with the disk backup, where you can backup multiple partitions/disks, set up scheduling, choose incremental or differential, change compression ratios,etc. I sounds like this is what you would want to do. As to your second post, not really, the 'system' choice is the same, it just makes a number of assumptions as to what you want, it's quicker, easier, but lacks flexibility. If you wanted to schedule daily incrementals of your system, it can't do this, but you can schedule full system backups with it, but with the size of your drive, you would need a lot of room. Good luck.
Thanks for your insight CRANK.
"Good one" re Slim Pickens. :-) I'll have to remember that one!
I'll probably try both options offered as backup by EaseUS. I'll image to my portable drive as well as to burnt media. I'll compare the results as to size used and/or required and then decide which option I want to use permanently or more often.
It's been nice getting your input.
Have a nice weekend!
Hi and congrats for your nice website ;-))
I have a question regarding the Software EaseUS® Todo Backup.
There has been released version 4 and I want to know if it#s
possible with this software to do an incremental backup
by only updating the changed sectors and not the whole file.
Example :
I have a 100 MB Word file and only change a single word.
Normally the whole 100MB file will be saved to the disk which
obviously takes some time.
By only changing the affected sectors this will be done in
a second.
[edit] Commercial software reference removed
Hello, thanks for your comments. ToDo will backup the whole file if it has changed. While it is true you could write a sector faster than the whole file,you should realize that the time difference writing 512 KB and 100 MB is going to be minimal. Also, there are programs out there that do a bit by bit incremental backup, and while I've never used one, I think that the time differences with these will be minimal, they have a lot of work to do to find the changed bits in the first place. There is so much preparation in beginning an image job, that the actual writing for such minimal changes won't matter much. If these files are on the system disk, there will always be other files to be written anyway even by the bitxbit programs. If this isn't a system disk, you would probably be better off using a standard backup than imaging, it is far more efficient and will be much faster, swamping the small difference discussed above.
Post new comment