Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are currently looking for people with skills and/or interest in the following areas:
- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Mobile Apps contributors
- Mac Section contributors
If this sounds like you then click here for more details
Best Free Disk De-fragmenter
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Fragmentation: why it happens Suppose you are browsing the web, downloading your favorite songs and installing an application all at the same time, how does your system write all these files without any interruption to your activity? Well it's simple: it responds to all applications' write requests (I/O operations) by writing all files at a continuous location on your disk.
Representation of a disk track:
Yellow: Temporary written internet files
The purpose of disk defragmenters is to reorganize such files which are supposed to be together. An ideal situation after defragmentation would look like this:
But what happens when you uninstall, delete, or simply clean your temporary files? Imagine yourself uninstalling the application (game) you installed. The disk could look like this:
The white zone is empty space without fragmentation. A disk looking like this will have just a little or even imperceptible impact on performance. In this case defragmentation is needed but not critical. The last thing you want to see is a hybrid combination. Files very fragmented fig 1 and empty disk space fig3 but instead of contiguous clean sectors you'll find what we call fragmented empty space. And this is what it looks like:
This is the worst case scenario. Overall system performance will be compromised and fragmentation is critical. You should defragment (defrag) or let your defragmenter schedule and execute the defrag process for you. Standard mechanical HDDs (hard disk drives) will benefit from defragmentation and continuous disk use, because when spinning it keeps remagnetizing the HDD plates. But if you own an SSD (solid state drive) you SHOULD NOT defrag or install any defragmenter application because it will shorten the life of the drive. So when testing defragmenter software we are going to evaluate it with some parameters:
Well, it's time for action now and let me introduce you to the de-fragmenters. |
|
Discussion
|
|
In terms of defragmentation ability, Defraggler is one of the best choices you could make. It performs a very fast “quick defragmentation” with decent file reorganization but if you perform a complete defrag process, which takes longer, you obtain results that are worthwhile. Your files will be together as they should be as solid as a concrete wall. Defraggler also supports scheduling, low priority and boot defrag. Highly recommended.
Unbelievable power user options for everyone without having to configure any script. Just select the option that best suits your needs and it's done. MyDefrag employs an algorithm that places the most used files at the beginning of the disk. This decreases access times because the actuator arm of the hard drive has no need to move to the end of a disk to search a file. If you don't know what a HDD looks like, please see below: The trick revealed and a little science. When you turn off your computer (or Windows shut downs your HDD), the actuator arm has a designated "landing zone" (a specific sector at the beginning of the disk) that remains stationary until the next startup. This is to avoid disk scratch and therefore, data loss (data is read via magnetism, touching surfaces is not required). When turned back on, the closest sector to the actuator arm is already near the "landing zone" (beginning of the disk) so it's faster to read files on that sector than others in outer zones of the disk. Also, the surface distance travelled is considerably less in the inner sectors of the disk. So, placing files at the beginning of the disk is the best idea. MyDefrag is not the only defragmenter capable of doing this, as many others includes an option. However, MyDefrag achieves this in a much simpler way. This is combined with a good “fast defrag”; the choice of specific options, many others by scripting, and excellent defragmentation methods and simple scheduler options.
This little boy, DiskTune, is not exactly a kid. Despite the use of Windows API to do defragmentation jobs, it's incredibly fast, simple and lightweight. Many useful options just a couple pixels of distance. Direct access to usual options such as Analyze, Defrag (quick), Optimize (rearrange) and Compact (defrag free space). The best thing about DiskTune? The ability to create a shortcut to your desktop and then double-clicking it to run a fully customized defrag. Four words—“one size fits all”.
Also reviewed but not included: -Auslogic Disk Defrag -Puran Defragmenter -O&O defrag free edition -Others
Including any product in review requires meeting of certain parameters of quality as speed of process, automatization, customizability, GUI design, information provided to users and others. List regularly updated, not included products could be present in next review. Feel free to suggest any software not already mentioned for review. |
Running on x64 computer requires download and replace DLL's available at Mydefragmenter website
http://www.mydefragmenter.com/help/
|
Editor
|
| This software category is maintained by volunteer editor 4goTTen21. Registered members can contact the editor with any comments or suggestions they might have by clicking here. |
|
Tags
|
| defrag disk, defragment hard disk, disk defragmenter, free disk defrag software. |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:


(Fig. 1)
(Fig. 2)
(Fig. 3)
(Fig. 4)





Comments
Hello,
My constructive criticism: This reviewer seems very incompetent and damages
the good reputation of this site. When you exclude a product that used be
number one on this list for a long time you OUGHT to be justifying this
descision to your audience. I am sorry to day that but also your English
is very poor.
I've been using Auslogic Disk defrag since it was number 1 some time ago, and still like because it’s quick and does the job.
Some of the others programs seem to take a lot longer to complete the task. I'm not sure if there's a big difference on performance when loading programs. Also Auslogic has had a few patches recently, which adds to the value of the program as its still being developed. I stick with this program for the time being.
You do well! If you like it, use it. Always remember this is only a guide and you have the last word, the final decision in your hand.
Remember other programs, also got updated, so don't stop trying 'em.
Nice day.
I would like to know why Auslogics is not mentioned anymore? Is there something wrong with the software we should know about?
There's nothing wrong with Auslogic Disk Defrag you should worry about. Only it does not performs so well against other defragmenters. If it's your favourite, keep using it! ut don't stop trying defragmenters qe review here. They're pretty good.
Good luck and have a nice day!
May I know in what system (OS, hardware, etc) did you test the defragmenters and how did you test the defragment capability?
And as you stated that most modern defragmenters will achieve roughly the same result,it will fall to other criteria to determine the top pick?
Oh, and lastly, can you explain how do Windows 7 built-in defragmenter perform in term of defragment capability compared to these?
Thanks for the response and reading this long comment!
Hi RushArt thanks for your question.
Defragmenters were tested in two systems, a high a low end with 74% fragmented frozen data.
Low end specifications:
250 GB Caviar green HDD EIDE
Celeron D 2.66 GHz
Geforce 6200 LE
768 MB RAM
XPSP3 / 7SP1 / 8 CP
High End
WD VelociRaptor 6000 BLHX
i7 2600K
Radeon HD 6870
8 GB RAM
XPSP3 / 7SP1 / 8CP x64
In order to determine the best defragmenter, time and defragmentation level were measured. Other factors as priority, smoothness, resources usage, etc were also evaluated.
About your inquiry regardless Windows 7 buit-in defragmenter you should now most of vendors include in their product the same algorithm Windows use. Substantial difference is in aggregated capabilities as defrag in use files, task priority change, persistent defrag, high customizale task scheduler, "in the fly" file placement, and many other features varying from one product to another.
Hope I have helped you with my answer. Have a nice day!
Hi there! :-)
I just want to ask when we can expect a review about O&O Defrag Free? I'm sorry but I'm afraid I can't understand what exactly that means: "Also reviewed but not included" because I couldn't find any info about the program mentioned above. I think it is a very good free product and it deserves to be here in that list, but I'm also interested what is YOUR opinion and impressions from it?... :-)
Best regards!
Thank you for your question. As you can see at the bottom of the Article, there's an explanation. Let me quote:
"Including any product in review requires meeting of certain parameters of quality as speed of process, automatization, customizability, GUI design, information provided to users and others."
If you need more simple words, reviewed but, not included means that product performs slower than others or simply its defrag capacity is not as good as all included products. The advice is always to check by yourself. This is only a guide to find the best free product. Results may vary from computer to computer. So a good idea should be to test one by one and decide.
Hope I have cleared your doubts. Have a nice day.
MyDefrag is brilliant! After a recent system re-install, I had files scattered all over the disk. In the process of trying to organize them I tried,at least 10 paid (trial) and free defraggers. NONE would completely consolidate the files. In desperation I tried MyDefrag (after all, its appearance is hardly inspiring- like a diamond hidden in mud...). To my surprise, MyDefrag consolidated the whole disk in one pass. Thanks for the recommendation!
One of the best 'features' of MyDefrag is that it uses the standard defragmentation API by Microsoft - this makes it much less likely to cause problems or conflicts than defraggers that use different methods.
Also this is the most used API in defragmenters.
No one knows better how to defrag Windows than the developer itself, hu?
:) Thanks to you for giving us feedback.
MyDefrag has no portable version but once installed the actual executable is portable. It can be placed - with as many or little scripts - anywhere - including a USB stick - and be run from there on any PC running Windows. But I don't know whether any script is really necessary - haven't tried it - nor which versions of Windows are supported by this "portable" version.
Which defragmenter does NOT write several times at the end of the partition ? Or better does NOT write several times ?
Which could leave gaps between files so as to not fragment files if it become bigger ?
Whi are safe to use, I mean no critical/fatal bugs ?
I have tested Piriform Defraggler : despite of speed and good defragment. The partition becomes fragemented fast. And perhaps boot time of windows becomes slow.
True. Good comment.
Remember low I/O activity does not come alone, you gain less defrag effectiveness, despite how good is the defrag algorithm no matter which defragmenter are you using BUT, if you are looking for a slight HDD overload at correct defrag parameters,I think Disk Tune is your option.
Boot files are never moved outside disk. No defragmenter software developer with a little common sense will do that. So don't care about boot, It shall be fast if you let Windows set prefetch (Windows does by default). Also, you can speed up boot, by disabling any programs starting with Windows, such as messengers, and tray resident software.
Hope I have helped you.
No people, really... you say Piriform Defraggler is better than Auslogics Disk Defrag? How come?....
Please reply with detail. I'll be checking back soon...
P.S. -SMART- monitoring of an HDD health is good.
P.P.S. I've been using Defraggler year ago, or so - it was slooooow. :/
It was slow? Give a try again, it has been improved so much, you really gonna like it. Also you can try Ultradefrag, a real fast defragmenter.
Auslogic is no reviewed, so there's no comparative (better or not). It is not recommended due to inefficiency in certain situations as overloaded system. It requires high cpu utilization (which could be good if defragmentation level is according ) There are a couple things to improve in Auslogic, still it's a good Defragmenter.
Which one of these programs, let's me to pause defrag if needed?
Generally, you can stop defragmentation task and of course, disk will remain as it's shown so you can continue where you left. Specifically Defraggler and MyDefrag allows you to "stop and go"
What exactly is the "optimization" feature that is with some defragmenters and how vital is it?
Here you can find a related comment may answer your question:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-disk-de-fragmenter.htm#comment...
Hi 4goTTen21
Just wondering... Why is Puran not in the list?
Is it still due their behaviour in the past on this website?
Greetings
Hi FrankWhite! Puran is not in the list simply because it leaks a little of performance. I'll never base a review on whatever happened on the past with Puran, even I'm not sure what was the problem with it but, nothing personal with me you could be sure of that. Thank you!
Thanks for your quick response!
Can you explain a bit further why Puran leaks a little performance please? I'm using it and I haven't seen performance issues yet.
Greetings
Of course. Most of today's computers has no problems running a defragmenter due to the use of multiple core processors or physically 2 or more. Also a newer single core processor can handle this operation, even a P4 with hyperthreading or AMD with hypertransport. But there's still a lot of old computers which reveals a stuck in performance when using programs like Puran defrag at full processing. Here in Gizmo's we offer the latest and best free software but never forget such old PCs. In the search for a wide service to everybody, our choices lies on balance; balance which leaves Puran out of defrag/performance standard.
With what you wrote in mind-those with older pcs such as myself with a 6 year old pc with an AMD Athlon 64 single processor and using Windows XP-What would be the best fit in defragmenters for my setup? THank You
MyDefragmenter has shown to run smoothly on an Intel Celeron D315 (2.26 GHz) 512 MB of ram and a 80GB Hitachi Deskstar HDD.
Will Puran defrag ever be reviewed?
Of course, this review is always open to all products. Also you should know as I say in the bottom of article: the program could not be on the list, but was reviewed and there's always the possibility to include it in future revisions of the review. Thank you.
Post new comment