Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager Interested? Click here
Best Free Disk De-fragmenter
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Fragmentation: why it happens Suppose you are browsing the web, downloading your favorite songs and installing an application all at the same time, how does your system write all these files without any interruption to your activity? Well it's simple: it responds to all applications' write requests (I/O operations) by writing all files at a continuous location on your disk. Representation of a disk track:
Yellow: Temporary written internet files The purpose of disk defragmenters is to reorganize such files which are supposed to be together. An ideal situation after defragmentation would look like this:
But what happens when you uninstall, delete, or simply clean your temporary files? Imagine yourself uninstalling the application (game) you installed. The disk could look like this:
The white zone is empty space without fragmentation. A disk looking like this will have just a little or even imperceptible impact on performance. In this case defragmentation is needed but not critical. The last thing you want to see is a hybrid combination. Files very fragmented fig 1 and empty disk space fig3 but instead of contiguous clean sectors you'll find what we call fragmented empty space. And this is what it looks like:
This is the worst case scenario. Overall system performance will be compromised and fragmentation is critical. You should defragment (defrag) or let your defragmenter schedule and execute the defrag process for you. Standard mechanical HDDs (hard disk drives) will benefit from defragmentation and continuous disk use, because when spinning it keeps remagnetizing the HDD plates. But if you own an SSD (solid state drive) you SHOULD NOT defrag or install any defragmenter application because it will shorten the life of the drive. So when testing defragmenter software we are going to evaluate it with some parameters:
Well, it's time for action now and let me introduce you to the de-fragmenters. |
|
Discussion
|
|
Unbelievable power user options for everyone without having to configure any script. Just select the option that best suits your needs and it's done. MyDefrag employs an algorithm that places the most used files at the beginning of the disk. This decreases access times because the actuator arm of the hard drive has no need to move to the end of a disk to search a file. If you don't know what a HDD looks like, please see below:
When you turn off your computer (or Windows shut downs your HDD), the actuator arm has a designated "landing zone" (a specific sector at the beginning of the disk) that remains stationary until the next startup. This is to avoid disk scratch and therefore, data loss (data is read via magnetism, touching surfaces is not required). When turned back on, the closest sector to the actuator arm is already near the "landing zone" (beginning of the disk) so it's faster to read files on that sector than others in outer zones of the disk. Also, the surface distance travelled is considerably less in the inner sectors of the disk. So, placing files at the beginning of the disk is the best idea. MyDefrag is not the only defragmenter capable of doing this, as many others include an option. However, MyDefrag achieves this in a much simpler way. This is combined with a good “fast defrag”; the choice of specific options, many others by scripting, and excellent defragmentation methods and simple scheduler options.
This little boy, DiskTune, is not exactly a kid. Despite the use of Windows API to do defragmentation jobs, it's incredibly fast, simple and lightweight. Many useful options just a couple pixels of distance. Direct access to usual options such as Analyze, Defrag (quick), Optimize (rearrange) and Compact (defrag free space). The best thing about DiskTune? The ability to create a shortcut to your desktop and then double-clicking it to run a fully customized defrag. Four words—“one size fits all”.
In terms of defragmentation ability, Defraggler is one of the best choices you could make. It performs a very fast “quick defragmentation” with decent file reorganization but if you perform a complete defrag process, which takes longer, you obtain results that are worthwhile. Your files will be together as they should be as solid as a concrete wall. Defraggler also supports scheduling, low priority and boot defrag. Highly recommended.
Also reviewed but not included: -Puran Defragmenter -O&O defrag free edition -Others
Feel free to suggest any software not already mentioned for review. |
Running on x64 computer requires download and replace DLLs available at Mydefragmenter website
http://www.mydefragmenter.com/help/
|
Editor
|
|
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor rmitch45. Registered members can contact the editor with any comments or questions they might have by clicking here. |
|
Tags
|
| defrag disk, defragment hard disk, disk defragmenter, free disk defrag software. |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version


(Fig. 1)
(Fig. 2)
(Fig. 3)
(Fig. 4)





Comments
Not recommended 'cause this is a site that points to freeware programs. How can we treat Win defrag that way? I mean.. we can't say "download windows, have a nice defragmenter" You know what? In my opinion, built-in ... is good enough, so go ahead, if you like it, use it, but don't expect I recommend it, for the above mentioned reasons. I could give an advice in review if more users request it.
"we can't say 'download windows, have a nice defragmenter'" It was my understanding that your recommendations were for people who already had Windows downloaded :) Seriously though! it is interesting that there's some site policy of not recommending built in Windows programs, even if they are good. In that regard page views, site traffic and referrals mean more than recommending the best programs for users.
Think again. You have installed XP in your machine (XP defragmenter is not assolid as Vista/ 7) then I recommend to use Vista/7/8 built-in defragmenter. What you XP user gonna do?
"Traffic and referrals" please explain that. This is a free site, containing links ( direct download is rare around here) to free stuff.
It depends on how we look at it 4goTTen21. If you've already had Windows installed and you can use its built-in features to do the tasks effectively at no extra cost, it's worth mentioning in the review if you think that's right, like what we do with the Snipping Tool that comes with certain versions of Windows in this review article Best Free Screen Capture Utility. Just my 2 cents.
I appreciate it jay jay. Gonna thing about a mention in review of b-i defragmenter
Not sure why my previous... take a copy:
Thanks for your constructive critics.
1- Puran was reviewed, but no included by the editor (hi :) )
2- I ask about mentioning built in defragmenters but the answer was no, because we deal with stand alone programs.
3- Forget Puran and let me deal with problems with reviews to me.
4- If you like Puran, use it
5- If you wanna suggest a program please go to hot finds section
6- Thanks :)
IMO several Windows built in programs have shortcomings in that they have few options to configure them how an advanced user wants. For beginner users many are fine though. If a user wants to add some new program they should do so based on either their own knowledge or that of advanced users. If a Windows program falls short of doing its task then a new program should be added. If the Windows program actually does a good job that should be mentioned. Otherwise it kinda misleads the end user into thinking the added program does a better job and the Windows program falls short for some reason. I think it is bad policy to add programs just for the sake of adding them because that can lead to future problems with the computer. Ironically, defrag programs are supposed to fix some of the issues that appear when many programs are installed/removed from a computer.
"My Defragmenter cons: Installation must be made through CNET installer."
Alternate download location: http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-Disk-Utils/My-Defragmenter.shtml
Thank you George.I'm including link on review :)
Will all the products of IObit be banned from Gizmo's? In this article I was referring to IObit Smart Defrag.
Yes. As per our site policy, IObit will not be featured until they have a green WOT rating.
I have just installed Defragler after reading all the above info,as a nvice to using any sought of utilities and most other addons I found it simple to use and not something I could make a mistake with. But after it completed the task a total dfrag there were still fragmented folders and files so I ran it 2 more times still had fragmented foders and files. Is this normal or is there something else I need to do, this was all done after a couple of sweeps with ccleaner.
Remember files and folders "in use" sometimes are skipped in defrag. You did well and it's normal.
Thanks, I am finding interesting programs here to use but my understanding of how deep to go with some applications daunts me as I had a major crash recently after I used a registry cleaner then tried to use a restore point.
We are here to help, buddy. Maybe this is not the right place to ask, but you can surf forums and you'll get a reply
Hi, could someone point me in the right direction for the portable version of Disk Tune, Thanks
My bad. There's no portable version of Disk Tune.
You are right, a portable version is not available on the site. If there is, the editor will reply about it. If not, the article will be corrected :).
Auslogics now downloads through C/Net and installs toolbars and hyjacks homepage.
Sorry,my mistake,was clicking wrong link. lol
No problem. Sifting through sites daily, I sometimes end up with unexpected "treats" myself so I know it's easily done. This is where programs like Sandboxie, BufferZone and Returnil will help.
The link we provide does not go through Cnet. The program in general, as many others, contains an optional toolbar and home page change which can simply be un-ticked. The installer will attempt to connect to the internet but you can block this with your firewall.
If 3rd part. There are some vendors Windows firewall allows as "trusted". Like MC says, use links we provide.
Good point. Third party firewalls can also have long lists of so called "trusted vendors" which are included for a variety of reasons some of us might not agree with. The more responsible vendors like Privacyware (Privatefirewall) now provide a single click selection to delete the whole list. I always recommend to do this and then choose individually who or what you might like to add as "trusted" :)
Yes. Personally I like to set "paranoiac" mode on Comodo Firewall and get unlimited messages but, of course, I think user must have control over its own O.S.
why not recommend Puran ?
Stay connected for future reviews.
Love your site and recommendations. I was looking for a disk defrag program and saw the review for Disk Tune. I never heard of it before, but it is actually quite a robust and thorough program.
No extra bells and whistles, just gets the job done...Thanks for the tip on this great "unknown" defragger.
:) Thanks
Could you state the operating system you use for your evaluations? I have heard that those people using XP def need to use a 3rd party defrag program. But those using Windows 7 should not use a defrag program because the built in one is sufficient. I guess Vista kinda falls somewhere in the middle.
Also, do any of the programs you mention have a boot defrag? That's the only type of defrag I have noticed improves my Windows 7. So I just use the built in one for normal defrag and a different program for boot defrag.