Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform Reviews
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- Email Client
- Archive Manager Interested? Click here
Best Free Disk De-fragmenter
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Fragmentation: why it happens Suppose you are browsing the web, downloading your favorite songs and installing an application all at the same time, how does your system write all these files without any interruption to your activity? Well it's simple: it responds to all applications' write requests (I/O operations) by writing all files at a continuous location on your disk. Representation of a disk track:
Yellow: Temporary written internet files The purpose of disk defragmenters is to reorganize such files which are supposed to be together. An ideal situation after defragmentation would look like this:
But what happens when you uninstall, delete, or simply clean your temporary files? Imagine yourself uninstalling the application (game) you installed. The disk could look like this:
The white zone is empty space without fragmentation. A disk looking like this will have just a little or even imperceptible impact on performance. In this case defragmentation is needed but not critical. The last thing you want to see is a hybrid combination. Files very fragmented fig 1 and empty disk space fig3 but instead of contiguous clean sectors you'll find what we call fragmented empty space. And this is what it looks like:
This is the worst case scenario. Overall system performance will be compromised and fragmentation is critical. You should defragment (defrag) or let your defragmenter schedule and execute the defrag process for you. Standard mechanical HDDs (hard disk drives) will benefit from defragmentation and continuous disk use, because when spinning it keeps remagnetizing the HDD plates. But if you own an SSD (solid state drive) you SHOULD NOT defrag or install any defragmenter application because it will shorten the life of the drive. So when testing defragmenter software we are going to evaluate it with some parameters:
Well, it's time for action now and let me introduce you to the de-fragmenters. |
|
Discussion
|
|
Unbelievable power user options for everyone without having to configure any script. Just select the option that best suits your needs and it's done. MyDefrag employs an algorithm that places the most used files at the beginning of the disk. This decreases access times because the actuator arm of the hard drive has no need to move to the end of a disk to search a file. If you don't know what a HDD looks like, please see below:
When you turn off your computer (or Windows shut downs your HDD), the actuator arm has a designated "landing zone" (a specific sector at the beginning of the disk) that remains stationary until the next startup. This is to avoid disk scratch and therefore, data loss (data is read via magnetism, touching surfaces is not required). When turned back on, the closest sector to the actuator arm is already near the "landing zone" (beginning of the disk) so it's faster to read files on that sector than others in outer zones of the disk. Also, the surface distance travelled is considerably less in the inner sectors of the disk. So, placing files at the beginning of the disk is the best idea. MyDefrag is not the only defragmenter capable of doing this, as many others include an option. However, MyDefrag achieves this in a much simpler way. This is combined with a good “fast defrag”; the choice of specific options, many others by scripting, and excellent defragmentation methods and simple scheduler options.
This little boy, DiskTune, is not exactly a kid. Despite the use of Windows API to do defragmentation jobs, it's incredibly fast, simple and lightweight. Many useful options just a couple pixels of distance. Direct access to usual options such as Analyze, Defrag (quick), Optimize (rearrange) and Compact (defrag free space). The best thing about DiskTune? The ability to create a shortcut to your desktop and then double-clicking it to run a fully customized defrag. Four words—“one size fits all”.
In terms of defragmentation ability, Defraggler is one of the best choices you could make. It performs a very fast “quick defragmentation” with decent file reorganization but if you perform a complete defrag process, which takes longer, you obtain results that are worthwhile. Your files will be together as they should be as solid as a concrete wall. Defraggler also supports scheduling, low priority and boot defrag. Highly recommended.
Also reviewed but not included: -Puran Defragmenter -O&O defrag free edition -Others
Feel free to suggest any software not already mentioned for review. |
Running on x64 computer requires download and replace DLLs available at Mydefragmenter website
http://www.mydefragmenter.com/help/
|
Editor
|
|
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor rmitch45. Registered members can contact the editor with any comments or questions they might have by clicking here. |
|
Tags
|
| defrag disk, defragment hard disk, disk defragmenter, free disk defrag software. |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version


(Fig. 1)
(Fig. 2)
(Fig. 3)
(Fig. 4)





Comments
MyDefragGUI 2.1
offers a better GUI for MyDefrag.
-Home Page:
http://mydefrag.8qm.de/
-Download Page:
http://mydefrag.8qm.de/#1
yes this has already been added.
For anyone trying the Auslogics Defrag 3 Beta, this is a reply from Auslogics concerning my feedback to them:
"We already located and fixed problems with missing buttons (this issue arises on systems with displays which are set to 120 DPI or other non standard display settings). Also we fixed problem with debug mode.
These fixes will be available in our next Disk Defrag 3 Beta build which will be available shortly. Once you get it please let us know if both problems disappeared or not.
Thanks for your feedback."
Thanks for the update. It's always encouraging to see a quick and constructive response when users raise such issues with the vendor.
P.S. If you are using other than 96dpi, you can change to it temporarily, set your exclusions, then change back.
I shall not comment on mydefrag (aka jkdefrag)as I have not tried that software since back in the jkdefrag days. I recall that I was not particularly impressed at the time but exactly why I thought that, I can't remember. But I can state from experience that Auslogics is an excellent defrag piece of software and has been on my system for quite some time. Defraggler is nice in that it gives you the option of selecting the files/folders that you want to defrag but it is slow when working on the entire hard drive. IObit smart defrag remains on my system because I like the disk optimizer that is not available in the Auslogics software (I do not work with betas so if auslogics has included optimizing, I am not aware). Diskeeper Lite, IMHO, should not even be included in this list of defrag software. Anytime it takes 12mb of software to defrag a HD, there is something seriously wrong. Other than the facts that Diskeeper Lite will disable some things, take an excessive amount of time to run and is bloated for openers, I guess that some still like the software. You may have gathered that I am not impressed with it. I want to state that the above is my personal opinion and should not be considered the beliefs of the editors/owners of this site. It is also my opinion that this is a great site.
dazeydog
Your opinions are as valuable as our own. Thank you for sharing your experiences with us.
Coming from you, I consider that a compliment. Being able to state your opinion (without being asinine) is one of the reasons I like this site, ergo,
you are quite welcome and I hope it helps someone. BTW, I see that Auslogics in incorporating "optimizing" in their package.....that ought to be real interesting when looking at the ratings for defrag packages.
dazeydog
Maybe I'm paranoid but I always get a little worried when I see the word "optimize" creeping into feature lists. Iobit tripped up with this when they first moved from Advanced Windows Care to Advanced Systems Care, and it took a while to iron out the bugs.
One of the main strengths of Auslogics has always been it's reliability to "do no harm". I just hope they don't inadvertently upset this by tinkering around with the features.
I agree though that these developments should make Auslogics worthy of another look and I'll be interested to see what drewbee thinks when he comes to review the category.
Auslogics has released DiskDefrag 3beta. Among other things they have added an optimization option and it is very fast. As with most beta software though is has some bugs. When this release goes out of beta I'm sure it will put them at the top of the heap for disk defraggers. You can download it here: www.auslogics.com/en/disk-defrag-3/
Here is a report I sent back to them after I tried the beta:
"I am quite impressed with the 3.0.0.25 Beta especially the optimization option and speed. Good Job!
It took me a minute or two to figure out that I had to maximize the window to see the disk map.
One problem I have is that the 'Add' and 'Delete' buttons are missing from the Settings> Program Settings> Exclusion window, so I am not able to exclude any folders.
Also, once when I clicked on the Settings button, a window popped up referring to the debug mode for Auslogics BoostSpeed and said to shut if off to go to the Help button and select turn off debug mode. I am not using BoostSpeed so I don't know where that came from.
I hope this feedback this helps.
Thanks"
As per my routine Auslogics will be reviewed after it leaves beta.
Thankyou for bringing the program update to my attention.
Keep the comments coming and keep checking back.
Drew
I have tried it and its absolutely delightful. It simply has more than any other single defragger and looks better than any of them.
Having been around the industry for some time I guess it was inevitable that Auslogics would improve their own product in light of new introductions and developments from elsewhere. I used the previous version and found it suited my needs perfectly. I would just maybe advise a little caution with this one whilst it is still in beta format.
he's right for those of u on vista you won't nessarly need 1 of these products like smart defrag
I think MyDefrag is far superior to all the other free defraggers listed here, and just as good as commercial defraggers. Am I correct?
I also notice in Advanced System Care 3 from IObit, they have a new utility called top freeware and guess what, you click it and it brings you to this great site, well this is a great site for top freeware after all..
This is good, everyone who uses ASC will discover this great site and find out the top freeware!
anyone know how to defrag a remote pc?
I think to defragment your drive in the background during system idle time is the worst idea in computer history.
I was using IObit.Com Smart Defrag for a month, and my laptop shows a bluescreen of death quite often. Lenovo service center told me there are many bad track on my disk, and change a new one for me.
First off I would get a second opinion on your disk. You can even scan it yourself for errors with a free program like HD Tune.
http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-Disk-Utils/HD-Tune.shtml
I'm not suggesting that you service centre is deliberately misleading you but I've seen this so many times before. Otherwise, I've never known a defrag tool cause physical damage but I'll stand corrected if anyone knows differently.
For the future, before you install any important software check out their forum first. All of the issues good or bad will be on display there and will help you make a more informed choice. If they don't have a forum then choose something else because if it's not worth supporting then it's not worth having.
I have used My Defrag for years and believe it is the best available. I also have ASC and Glary. I mostly use Glary. It has features that ASC does not. One of the best is the easy access it provides to Windows built in utilities- Disk Check and System File Checker. I would certainly use Disk Check if I suspected anything wrong with my drive and SFC is one of the first checks Microsoft Tech Support suggest if you have program problems. While these are built in Windows programs my guess is most people do not know how to access them. Glary makes it easy. I have never had a problem caused by these programs but there are features in Glary and other similar programs that I would not feel confident using, duplicate file checker for one.
Since several months I have set MyDefrag and Auslogics. Both are fast and accurate. After I defrag my hard disks with MyDefrag and afterwards I check with Auslogics it indicates that all disks are defragmented and upside down I get the same result. Therefore both softwares work well and used together one can check results. Besides MyDefrag optimizes disks and Auslogics can be set to defrag all disks when the PC is idle. Auslogics can also be set to defrag after deleting Temp Files although I prefer to clean my PC with CCleaner before defragmenting. When I don't defragment for 2 or 3 days and after I do, I notice a little improvement in my PC in the sense everything is smoother and a little faster. I quit using Defraggler since results weren't consistent, in fact I never knew if my disks were completely defragmented. Regarding Smart Defrag it slowed down my PC, sometimes it froze it and the process of defragmentation wasn't fast.
I was disappointed with MyDefrag, to put it bluntly it didn't work on my system!
First I tried the slow optimise but it was using up almost 100% CPU and I couldn't use my computer for any other tasks.
I expected it to take a while so I left it overnight (Started about 9pm) but by late afternoon the slow optimise still hadn't finished.
I decided to halt the program and try the fast optimise, but even that after about 5/6 hours wasn't finished and the CPU was also hovering aound the 100% rate.
I stopped the program thinking that I might have a corrupt download or install.
I completely uninstalled the program and did a fresh down load and a fresh install.
I tried the fast optimiser again but once again the CPU was 100%.
I then decided to see if JK defrag fared any better.
I did a fast optimise and the CPU was only about 5%- 10%...... great...I could use my computer again for other tasks!
Whilst the JK defrag wasn't exactly lightning fast at least I could get both the disk map and statistics all on the same page and yep after about 4/5 hours it did actually finish.
The result?
Well the start up screen is definitely quicker to display, however my Speed Touch modem now takes a few more seconds to load than before, so I've gained some time and I have lost some time.
For JK Defrag I'll give it 3/5
For My Defrag I can only award it 1/5 I'm afraid.
Other Defrag programs I have used were Auslogic and Smart Defrag both were quicker than JK Defrag although I'm not sure if JK Defrag was perhaps a little more thorough.
I'll keep JK Defrag,Smart Defrag and Auslogic on my PC and might do some side by side comparisons when time permits, but you can have back My Defrag.....my system doesn't like it!
KL
Oxford
MyDefrag and Auslogics correlate perfectly, they are fast and accurate.
I've tried a lot but these two are lately my definitive choice.
MyDefrag Slow Optimize took 10 hours to defrag my 160GB hardisk and only finish haft it job before I turn it off.
Too slow.
It seems like my hard drive was too full.
I freed up some space and the process finished much faster.
Glad to hear that.
I have never experienced problems with the program but personal experiences are always appreciated!
Here is also an article to check out everyone: http://lifehacker.com/5348638/five-best-disk-defragmenters
1 more for quicksys disk defrag
quiksys review coming up soon...
I hope your review mentions that QuickSys Disk defrag hijacks your IE homepage and installs Ask toolbar despite being told not to during installation. Fortunately I have a backup image.
Another vote for Quicksys Disk Defrag. 5 Stars.
- Free is Enough!
official review will be written when it exits beta.
Just a quirk of mine...