Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

Gizmos Needs YouWe are currently looking for people with skills and/or interest in the following areas:

- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Mobile Apps contributors
- Mac Section contributors
 

If this sounds like you then click here for more details

 

Best Free Disk De-fragmenter

Other Language?
  Read this article in Spanish
In a Hurry?
  Go straight to the Quick Selection Guide
Introduction

Fragmentation: why it happens

Suppose you are browsing the web, downloading your favorite songs and installing an application all at the same time, how does your system write all these files without any interruption to your activity? Well it's simple: it responds to all applications' write requests (I/O operations) by writing all files at a continuous location on your disk.

 

Representation of a disk track:

(Fig. 1)

Yellow: Temporary written internet files
Red: Installation (Game)
Blue: Song cache

 

The purpose of disk defragmenters is to reorganize such files which are supposed to be together. An ideal situation after defragmentation would look like this:

(Fig. 2)

 

But what happens when you uninstall, delete, or simply clean your temporary files? Imagine yourself uninstalling the application (game) you installed. The disk could look like this:

(Fig. 3)

 

The white zone is empty space without fragmentation. A disk looking like this will have just a little or even imperceptible impact on performance. In this case defragmentation is needed but not critical.

The last thing you want to see is a hybrid combination. Files very fragmented fig 1 and empty disk space fig3 but instead of contiguous clean sectors you'll find what we call fragmented empty space. And this is what it looks like:

(Fig. 4)

 

This is the worst case scenario. Overall system performance will be compromised and fragmentation is critical. You should defragment (defrag) or let your defragmenter schedule and execute the defrag process for you.

Standard mechanical HDDs (hard disk drives) will benefit from defragmentation and continuous disk use, because when spinning it keeps remagnetizing the HDD plates. But if you own an SSD (solid state drive) you SHOULD NOT defrag or install any defragmenter application because it will shorten the life of the drive.

So when testing defragmenter software we are going to evaluate it with some parameters:

  • Speed of analysis on fragmented files: Isn't it speed we want from our computer?
  • Speed of defrag
  • Some extras: such as scheduled defrag, shutdown PC when done, etc.
  • Defrag capabilities: why is this placed in last position? Because almost all of today’s defragmenters can perform this task with very similar results.

Well, it's time for action now and let me introduce you to the de-fragmenters.

Discussion

Piriform's Defraggler—The first thing that caught my attention when first opening Defraggler was a green word, GOOD. I quickly realized it was telling me about S.M.A.R.T. Status (information provided by the disk itself, reporting temperature etc). This is a great feature and has its own tab on the program for detailed view.

In terms of defragmentation ability, Defraggler is one of the best choices you could make. It performs a very fast “quick defragmentation” with decent file reorganization but if you perform a complete defrag process, which takes longer, you obtain results that are worthwhile. Your files will be together as they should be as solid as a concrete wall. Defraggler also supports scheduling, low priority and boot defrag. Highly recommended.

 

MyDefrag, JK defrag with a GUI (Graphical User Interface). Bad? No, just awesome!

Unbelievable power user options for everyone without having to configure any script. Just select the option that best suits your needs and it's done. MyDefrag employs an algorithm that places the most used files at the beginning of the disk. This decreases access times because the actuator arm of the hard drive has no need to move to the end of a disk to search a file.

If you don't know what a HDD looks like, please see below:

The trick revealed and a little science.

When you turn off your computer (or Windows shut downs your HDD), the actuator arm has a designated "landing zone" (a specific sector at the beginning of the disk) that remains stationary until the next startup. This is to avoid disk scratch and therefore, data loss (data is read via magnetism, touching surfaces is not required). When turned back on, the closest sector to the actuator arm is already near the "landing zone" (beginning of the disk) so it's faster to read files on that sector than others in outer zones of the disk.

Also, the surface distance travelled is considerably less in the inner sectors of the disk. So, placing files at the beginning of the disk is the best idea.

MyDefrag is not the only defragmenter capable of doing this, as many others includes an option. However, MyDefrag achieves this in a much simpler way. This is combined with a good “fast defrag”; the choice of specific options, many others by scripting, and excellent defragmentation methods and simple scheduler options.

 

This little boy, DiskTune, is not exactly a kid. Despite the use of Windows API to do defragmentation jobs, it's incredibly fast, simple and lightweight. Many useful options just a couple pixels of distance. Direct access to usual options such as Analyze, Defrag (quick), Optimize (rearrange) and Compact (defrag free space). The best thing about DiskTune? The ability to create a shortcut to your desktop and then double-clicking it to run a fully customized defrag. Four words—“one size fits all”.

 

UltraDefrag is simple yet has a lot of customizable options through text files and scripts via two mouse-clicks. Not only is the defragmentation super fast, but also you are not going to notice it's working! You can keep doing your things while UltraDefrag does what was born to do… defrag. It performs so well you gonna want to carry it in your wallet. A lot of varied boot defrag commands. If your goal is to optimize your system startup at maximum, this is what you need.

 

MyDefragmenter, Ultradefrag with a very simple, intuitive GUI plus a full scheduler which has the ability to program defrag while shutting down or starting up computer. Includes a 24/7 support by phone call and online help.

 

Also reviewed but not included:

-Auslogic Disk Defrag

-Puran Defragmenter

-O&O defrag free edition

-Others

 

Including any product in review requires meeting of certain parameters of quality as speed of process, automatization, customizability, GUI design, information provided to users and others.

List regularly updated, not included products could be present in next review. 

Feel free to suggest any software not already mentioned  for review.

Quick Selection Guide

UltraDefrag
9
 
Gizmo's Freeware award as the best product in its class!

Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
System files defragmentation. Incredibly fast in all tasks. Power (scripting) features.
Some settings only accessible by configuration file (txt).
5.0.4
412 KB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Open source freeware
A portable version of this product is available from the developer.
This version will install on PCs running: Windows XP / 2003 / Vista / Windows7 / XP64 / Vista64 / Windows7 64
MyDefrag
9
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
For average and power users
Not regularly updated
4.3.1
2.035 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 2000, 2003, XP, Vista, 2008, Win7, and for X64.
DiskTune
9
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Very Fast. Can create shortcut to double click customized defrag.
Windows API. Needs to improve system resources usage
1.1.31
1.06 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
This version will install on PCs running: Windows XP / 2003 / Vista / Windows7 / XP64 / Vista64 / Windows7 64
Defraggler
8
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Very solid piece of software. Updated regularly. Now with S.M.A.R.T. monitoring.
No optimization feature yet.
http://www.defraggler.com/
2.09
3.4 MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Unrestricted freeware
A portable version of this product is available from the developer.
This version will install on PCs running: Windows XP / 2003 / Vista / Windows7 / XP64 / Vista64 / Windows7 64
MyDefragmenter
8
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Well recognized Ultradefrag engine Excellent scheduler
Not recently updates
http://www.mydefragmenter.com/
1.0
2.0 MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 7, Vista, Windows XP

Running on x64 computer requires download and replace DLL's available at Mydefragmenter website
http://www.mydefragmenter.com/help/

Editor
This software category is maintained by volunteer editor 4goTTen21. Registered members can contact the editor with any comments or suggestions they might have by clicking here.
Tags
defrag disk, defragment hard disk, disk defragmenter, free disk defrag software.

Back to the top of the article

 

Share this
3.986395
Average: 4 (147 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by rudyg on 17. May 2012 - 13:23  (93605)

I would like to know why Auslogics is not mentioned anymore? Is there something wrong with the software we should know about?

by 4goTTen21 on 17. May 2012 - 15:51  (93612)

There's nothing wrong with Auslogic Disk Defrag you should worry about. Only it does not performs so well against other defragmenters. If it's your favourite, keep using it! ut don't stop trying defragmenters qe review here. They're pretty good.

Good luck and have a nice day!

by RushArt (not verified) on 10. May 2012 - 13:01  (93306)

May I know in what system (OS, hardware, etc) did you test the defragmenters and how did you test the defragment capability?

And as you stated that most modern defragmenters will achieve roughly the same result,it will fall to other criteria to determine the top pick?

Oh, and lastly, can you explain how do Windows 7 built-in defragmenter perform in term of defragment capability compared to these?

Thanks for the response and reading this long comment!

by 4goTTen21 on 10. May 2012 - 16:51  (93318)

Hi RushArt thanks for your question.

Defragmenters were tested in two systems, a high a low end with 74% fragmented frozen data.

Low end specifications:

250 GB Caviar green HDD EIDE
Celeron D 2.66 GHz
Geforce 6200 LE
768 MB RAM
XPSP3 / 7SP1 / 8 CP

High End

WD VelociRaptor 6000 BLHX
i7 2600K
Radeon HD 6870
8 GB RAM
XPSP3 / 7SP1 / 8CP x64

In order to determine the best defragmenter, time and defragmentation level were measured. Other factors as priority, smoothness, resources usage, etc were also evaluated.

About your inquiry regardless Windows 7 buit-in defragmenter you should now most of vendors include in their product the same algorithm Windows use. Substantial difference is in aggregated capabilities as defrag in use files, task priority change, persistent defrag, high customizale task scheduler, "in the fly" file placement, and many other features varying from one product to another.

Hope I have helped you with my answer. Have a nice day!

by Radelen (not verified) on 1. May 2012 - 20:50  (92869)

Hi there! :-)

I just want to ask when we can expect a review about O&O Defrag Free? I'm sorry but I'm afraid I can't understand what exactly that means: "Also reviewed but not included" because I couldn't find any info about the program mentioned above. I think it is a very good free product and it deserves to be here in that list, but I'm also interested what is YOUR opinion and impressions from it?... :-)

Best regards!

by 4goTTen21 on 1. May 2012 - 22:09  (92872)

Thank you for your question. As you can see at the bottom of the Article, there's an explanation. Let me quote:

"Including any product in review requires meeting of certain parameters of quality as speed of process, automatization, customizability, GUI design, information provided to users and others."

If you need more simple words, reviewed but, not included means that product performs slower than others or simply its defrag capacity is not as good as all included products. The advice is always to check by yourself. This is only a guide to find the best free product. Results may vary from computer to computer. So a good idea should be to test one by one and decide.

Hope I have cleared your doubts. Have a nice day.

by Kzo (not verified) on 13. April 2012 - 15:53  (92027)

MyDefrag is brilliant! After a recent system re-install, I had files scattered all over the disk. In the process of trying to organize them I tried,at least 10 paid (trial) and free defraggers. NONE would completely consolidate the files. In desperation I tried MyDefrag (after all, its appearance is hardly inspiring- like a diamond hidden in mud...). To my surprise, MyDefrag consolidated the whole disk in one pass. Thanks for the recommendation!

by satrow on 14. April 2012 - 18:24  (92091)

One of the best 'features' of MyDefrag is that it uses the standard defragmentation API by Microsoft - this makes it much less likely to cause problems or conflicts than defraggers that use different methods.

by 4goTTen21 on 14. April 2012 - 19:32  (92098)

Also this is the most used API in defragmenters.
No one knows better how to defrag Windows than the developer itself, hu?

by 4goTTen21 on 13. April 2012 - 16:03  (92032)

:) Thanks to you for giving us feedback.

by HBB (not verified) on 6. April 2012 - 13:45  (91703)

MyDefrag has no portable version but once installed the actual executable is portable. It can be placed - with as many or little scripts - anywhere - including a USB stick - and be run from there on any PC running Windows. But I don't know whether any script is really necessary - haven't tried it - nor which versions of Windows are supported by this "portable" version.

by mmTsuchi (not verified) on 29. March 2012 - 18:22  (91389)

Which defragmenter does NOT write several times at the end of the partition ? Or better does NOT write several times ?
Which could leave gaps between files so as to not fragment files if it become bigger ?
Whi are safe to use, I mean no critical/fatal bugs ?

I have tested Piriform Defraggler : despite of speed and good defragment. The partition becomes fragemented fast. And perhaps boot time of windows becomes slow.

by 4goTTen21 on 29. March 2012 - 19:05  (91394)

True. Good comment.

Remember low I/O activity does not come alone, you gain less defrag effectiveness, despite how good is the defrag algorithm no matter which defragmenter are you using BUT, if you are looking for a slight HDD overload at correct defrag parameters,I think Disk Tune is your option.

Boot files are never moved outside disk. No defragmenter software developer with a little common sense will do that. So don't care about boot, It shall be fast if you let Windows set prefetch (Windows does by default). Also, you can speed up boot, by disabling any programs starting with Windows, such as messengers, and tray resident software.
Hope I have helped you.

by Goh Hinogami (not verified) on 28. March 2012 - 14:39  (91329)

No people, really... you say Piriform Defraggler is better than Auslogics Disk Defrag? How come?....

Please reply with detail. I'll be checking back soon...

P.S. -SMART- monitoring of an HDD health is good.
P.P.S. I've been using Defraggler year ago, or so - it was slooooow. :/

by 4goTTen21 on 28. March 2012 - 16:27  (91334)

It was slow? Give a try again, it has been improved so much, you really gonna like it. Also you can try Ultradefrag, a real fast defragmenter.

Auslogic is no reviewed, so there's no comparative (better or not). It is not recommended due to inefficiency in certain situations as overloaded system. It requires high cpu utilization (which could be good if defragmentation level is according ) There are a couple things to improve in Auslogic, still it's a good Defragmenter.

by George.J on 10. March 2012 - 4:51  (90166)

Which one of these programs, let's me to pause defrag if needed?

by 4goTTen21 on 10. March 2012 - 20:38  (90201)

Generally, you can stop defragmentation task and of course, disk will remain as it's shown so you can continue where you left. Specifically Defraggler and MyDefrag allows you to "stop and go"

by Jessup (not verified) on 20. January 2012 - 23:46  (87512)

What exactly is the "optimization" feature that is with some defragmenters and how vital is it?

by 4goTTen21 on 20. January 2012 - 23:51  (87513)

Here you can find a related comment may answer your question:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best-free-disk-de-fragmenter.htm#comment...

by FrankWhite (not verified) on 20. January 2012 - 20:37  (87501)

Hi 4goTTen21

Just wondering... Why is Puran not in the list?
Is it still due their behaviour in the past on this website?

Greetings

by 4goTTen21 on 20. January 2012 - 22:58  (87509)

Hi FrankWhite! Puran is not in the list simply because it leaks a little of performance. I'll never base a review on whatever happened on the past with Puran, even I'm not sure what was the problem with it but, nothing personal with me you could be sure of that. Thank you!

by FrankWhite (not verified) on 21. January 2012 - 10:51  (87533)

Thanks for your quick response!
Can you explain a bit further why Puran leaks a little performance please? I'm using it and I haven't seen performance issues yet.

Greetings

by 4goTTen21 on 21. January 2012 - 16:17  (87544)

Of course. Most of today's computers has no problems running a defragmenter due to the use of multiple core processors or physically 2 or more. Also a newer single core processor can handle this operation, even a P4 with hyperthreading or AMD with hypertransport. But there's still a lot of old computers which reveals a stuck in performance when using programs like Puran defrag at full processing. Here in Gizmo's we offer the latest and best free software but never forget such old PCs. In the search for a wide service to everybody, our choices lies on balance; balance which leaves Puran out of defrag/performance standard.

by Bill Jarrell (not verified) on 23. January 2012 - 0:47  (87631)

With what you wrote in mind-those with older pcs such as myself with a 6 year old pc with an AMD Athlon 64 single processor and using Windows XP-What would be the best fit in defragmenters for my setup? THank You

by 4goTTen21 on 23. January 2012 - 3:02  (87634)

MyDefragmenter has shown to run smoothly on an Intel Celeron D315 (2.26 GHz) 512 MB of ram and a 80GB Hitachi Deskstar HDD.

by Brisker (not verified) on 20. January 2012 - 19:40  (87495)

Will Puran defrag ever be reviewed?

by 4goTTen21 on 20. January 2012 - 23:04  (87510)

Of course, this review is always open to all products. Also you should know as I say in the bottom of article: the program could not be on the list, but was reviewed and there's always the possibility to include it in future revisions of the review. Thank you.

by StickyW (not verified) on 20. January 2012 - 13:17  (87473)

Same question as Brolly, "What happenened to Auslogics Disk Defrag" which was number one choice???

by 4goTTen21 on 20. January 2012 - 13:28  (87474)

As you can see on previous answers, the category has me as new editor. After a thorough analysis and a selective criteria I made this list which contains the best products in the category, all this supported by an extensive researching.

by n01paranoid on 21. January 2012 - 17:38  (87549)

But you still haven't made it clear whether you actually reviewed Auslogics. Is it not on your list because you didn't think it was as good as some other products, or because you didn't review it

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.