Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

Gizmos Needs YouWe are currently looking for people with skills and/or interest in the following areas:

- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Web Browser for Android

If this sounds like you then click here for more details

 

Best Free Desktop Search Utility

In a Hurry?
Pros  Go straight to the Quick Selection Guide
 
Introduction

A couple of years back there were no contenders for this title. Today we have a wealth of choices.

NOTE:  I have made a decision to mainly highlight programs that meet 2 specific needs that I have:  1) the ability to search within files (find words within files) and 2) programs that will work across network shares (index files on my work network where all my documents are stored).  There are literally tons of software programs that will search for files and folders, but that do not search within files.  There are also several alternatives that might search network shares, but do not search within files. 

Again, my focus has been on programs that meet the primary needs I've identified above.  It is beyond my scope to review all types of desktop search tools.

NOTE #2:  I recently upgraded to Windows 7 (64-bit).  To be honest, after upgrading and using Windows 7 built-in search tool, I see no reason to use a third-party desktop search tool.  It takes a little tweaking, but the new search tool within Windows 7 is quite good.  It even searches within files and will search my home network for files.  My recommendation is that if you are using Windows 7, you really don't need a third-party tool.

For an excellent resource on how to maximize your use of the Windows 7 search tool, please check out this article:  

http://windowssecrets.com/top-story/getting-the-most-from-windows-search-part-2/

 
Discussion

CopernicIn a close race I would have to say Copernic Desktop Search. It's a very competent and balanced product.  It used to support network shares, however, from version 3.0 forward, the network searching is only available with the pro or corporate versions. My only beef is the presentation of email search results is not as effective as other search engines such as X1, a product that is unfortunately no longer available in a free version (although it is integrated into free email client Eudora's find function).  Copernic was recently updated to version 3.4.

 

Locate32Locate32 is a little known but highly impressive desktop search program. It works like updatedb and locate commands in Unix based systems. In other words, it uses databases to store information about directory structures and uses these databases in searches. The use of these databases provides very fast searching speed. The software includes a dialog based application as well as console programs which can be used to both update and access databases. Supported operation systems are Windows 98/ME/NT4/2000/XP/Vista/7 (32 & 64-bit versions available).  Locate32 does NOT have to be running at all times like both Copernic and Google desktop.  In my tests, it wasn't quite as fast as either of the above, but it is still quite fast.  Plus, I really like not having to have it run all the time.  Just remember to update the databases fairly regularly.  Please note that finding words within files is somewhat difficult to find.  At first, I didn't believe that it included this feature, but it is included.  You just have to look to find the feature. Available in many languages.

Please note that the download page is a little confusing.  I recommend that you use the Release Candidate (RC) downloads (not the Daily Version unless you want to be a beta tester).  I actually do NOT recommend that you use one of the "official versions".  The RC downloads are the newest, non-beta versions.  The section you probably want to download from is the one that says "Release candidates (RC) and beta versions".

 

Google Desktop SearchAnother option is Google desktop search. It not only will search your hard drive files but also your web history. It offers an Outlook toolbar, integrated Gmail search and a novel desktop sidebar that allows personalized search, news, weather, photos and more. The Sidebar also includes a quite effective application launcher.  Some folks love the Sidebar but others, me included, find it intrusive. My main problem with Google Desktop search is again the presentation of email seach results which is even poorer then Copernic. This is not an academic point. For many users searching email is the number one application for desktop search programs so you need a product that performs well in this area.  There is both a MAC version and a version for Linux.

Google recently released Google Desktop version 5.9;, which is lighter and faster.  Google Desktop now supports 64 bit Windows. In addition to supporting 64 bit Windows systems, Google Desktop now supports the latest browsers as well (Google Chrome, Firefox 3, & Internet Explorer 8). Please be advised that Google Desktop does not appear to index pst files in conjunction with Outlook 2010.

Please be advised, according to http://googledesktop.blogspot.com/, "As of September 14, 2011 Google Desktop will no longer be available for download, and existing installations will not be updated to include new features or fixes."  I do not know if you can still find the installation file elsewhere on the internet.

 
Related Products and Links

Everything (http://www.voidtools.com/) indexes your entire hard disk and then you can search for a file by typing in part or all of the filename and it will display results as you type. Then just double click to run the file or right-click for the menu to open the path. The beauty of Everything is that it can be completely portable!  Everything was recently updated and now supports Windows 2000, XP, Vista, and Windows 7.  (There is no mention of 32 bit or 64 bit on their website.)

Cons:  It does not have a right click preview of common file types (txt, doc, pdf, etc.).  It works only on NTFS drives.  And, Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names.

Exalead (http://www.exalead.com/software/products/desktop-search/)  For home users, this is a serious contender for my top pick.  It's been around for a while, but only recently has become totally freeware.  It's fast and the options are quite handy.  It opens up in a browser window with preview options and other search options.  Recently updated to version 4.6.  Supports Windows 2000 (SP4), XP (SP2 and SP3), Vista/Vista SP1, Windows 7.

Cons:  I don't recommend Exalead Free version in a networked environment unless you have a ton of storage capacity.  On my work laptop, the index file took up a HUGE 46 GB of storage space!  In addition, Exalead does not allow users any option about where the index files will be kept on computer.

DocFetcher (http://docfetcher.sourceforge.net/en/index.html)  DocFetcher is an Open Source desktop search application: It allows you to quickly access documents on your computer by typing keywords. - You can think of it as Google for your local document repository. The application is currently available for Windows and GTK-based Linux distributions.  It does offer the ability to search within files (actually only certain document types).

A Java Runtime Environment (JRE), version 1.6.0 or higher, is required.  Note: If you have a 64-bit OS, you might have to replace an installed 64-bit Java Runtime with its 32-bit counterpart in order to make DocFetcher work. 64-bit Java is currently not supported.

The Windows version runs on Windows XP or later. Windows 98 is not supported.  There is also a Linux version and a portable version.

Cons:  (though some might see this as a pro)  It indexes documents only - pictures, music, videos, etc. are omitted.

Agent Ransack (http://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/) Agent Ransack is one of my favorites when I'm in a hurry.  It is very similar to Locate32.  It does not index your hard drive, but is still relatively quick.  It also has the ability to search within files.  When searching the contents of files Agent Ransack displays the text found so you can quickly browse the results without having to separately open each file!

Requires: Win 9x/ME/NT/2000/XP/SP2/2003/Vista/2008/7.

 
Quick Selection Guide

Copernic Desktop Search Home
10
 
Gizmo's Freeware award as the best product in its class!

Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Find your files instantly: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, HTML, Word Perfect, text, ZIP files, Emails or attachments from Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora and Mozilla Thunderbird and over 150 other types of files like MP3, JPG, WAV, MPEG
The presentation of email search results is not as effective as other search engines. Takes up a fair amount of RAM.
3.4
8.5MB
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Microsoft Windows 7/Vista/XP SP2 required.
Locate32
8
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Available for Windows 98/ME/NT4/2000/XP/Vista. Much faster than Windows Search. You can choose to include or not include folder names in the search, and can search for text strings within files. Both 32 bit and 64 bit versions available.
Not really a con to me but it is to others--it uses databases to store information about directory structures and uses these databases in searches. Not as full-featured as Copernic or Google.
http://www.locate32.net/
3.1 RC3 (build 8.9210)
1.1MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 98/ME/NT4/2000/XP/Vista/7
Google Desktop Search
7
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Google sidebar and gadgets. Just type a few letters or words into the search box and your top results pop up instantly. Indexes and searches multiple email programs.
Google sidebar and gadgets. Large resource utilization. Difficult to remove once installed. Does not appear to work with Outlook 2010. No longer being developed.
http://desktop.google.com/
5.9.906.4286
1.7MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Intel Pentium 400MHz processor. 128MB RAM. 500MB HDD space. Must have administrator privileges. Windows XP/Vista/7 (64-bit supported)

 
Have Your Say

You are invited to share and discuss your views in our freeware forum. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate. Alternatively, anyone can leave a comment at the bottom of this page.

 
Editor

This software category is maintained by volunteer editor Kendall Alexander.

 
Tags

Search desktop, search files, best free desktop search tools, best free desktop search utility, top free search desktop tools.

Back to the top of the article.

 

Share this
3.944445
Average: 3.9 (36 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by imvm on 4. February 2012 - 1:01  (88258)

For me Copernic Desktop Search Home is useless ,i tried it for one week ,when i write something in its search bar to search, It unable search file each and every time.
' EveryThing ' is far-far better than Copernic Desktop Search Home.

by googull (not verified) on 5. February 2012 - 20:36  (88361)

I second that! - I tried CDS Pro for 2 weeks. I had trouble getting it to finish indexing. It goes idle for 12 hours even with permission to use all resources and files are clearly not indexed. Further, it refuses to index or even recognize raw camera image files. It won't index the metadata nor the filename as a photo or a simple file! Email results sometimes preview and sometimes they don't. I can't tell why or confirm which folders it believes its indexed. IMO, it is a lightweight tool that tanks on large disk assets and fails to recognize metadata in modern file types.

Windows Search is so incomplete and they make it harder to do non-indexed searches. They dropped support for network indexing unless the server is a Windows server. Unless you live in an all MS world, Windows Search is useless.

I would value a indexing product that not only indexes file contents, but helps you parse down the search after returning 64,000 results. The tool should look for groups of similarities that allow the results to be filtered dynamically with a few clicks.

We need trust worthy search tools that take care of us. I don't want to have to second guess and test my search engine.

by kendall on 5. February 2012 - 21:02  (88365)

Have you tried Locate32? It indexes files and folders and is very quick.

by kendall on 4. February 2012 - 4:38  (88269)

2 different products for 2 different uses.

As I stated above, "Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names." There are 10's or 100's of programs like Everything. There are only a select few, free programs that will search within files. Copernic is one such program.

by George Worley (not verified) on 28. January 2012 - 8:18  (87925)

In your second note about Upgrading to Windows 7 64bit you stated that you would "see no reason for to use a third party desktop search tool." I disagree. I typically save stuff to either a mapped network drive or my local drive and sometimes both depending on what I am saving. Windows 7 search utility still only searches local drives and by default Windows Search will not index the contents of a file. I need a search utility that does both transparently without much configuration at all.

by kendall on 28. January 2012 - 17:07  (87939)

You can get Windows 7 to search mapped network drives and index file contents. From a post below as a reminder:

http://www.windows7news.com/2009/10/21/making-windows-7-search-work-better/

I also suggest that you check out the following article to make Windows 7 search work for you:

http://windowssecrets.com/top-story/getting-the-most-from-windows-search...

by ms vt (not verified) on 24. January 2012 - 12:51  (87693)

very good article. thank you kendall.
I use both 'Everything' and 'Locate32' simultaneously.
'Everything' is light and very fast and no more features.
'Locate32' is powerful and full featured.

by Tons of emails and PDF (not verified) on 19. January 2012 - 10:44  (87404)

Google desktop = not in the race
Copernic Desktop = I have used this for 1-2 years and just installed it in favour of windows 7 search.

1) Copernic forces you to log in to the email server. When offline the this is a pain.
2) Main problem it doesn't index closed pst files.

3) Win 7 is heaps faster than copernic and seems to use less resourses.

I have only been using Win 7 for 3 months but it seems it wins hands down'

by Kai (not verified) on 25. November 2011 - 11:27  (83865)

how to use Ultra File Search in better way?

I think... first, search all files or search in computer. Second,after get search result,press ctrl+F to search in search result. So,you don't have search in long time again, just use ctrl+F then search what do you want. But cannot search new file which not in search result. So,you must search all files which take a long time.
in fact,search all files with ultra file search is faster than agent ransack if without file indexing. And ultra file search has better search option.
Thanks

by Rod Lockwood (not verified) on 24. November 2011 - 23:52  (83849)

Saying that the Windows 7 search works perfect is nonsense. I cannot get it to find files that I know are on my system. There is no way to set the search filters the way you did with XP. For that matter, there is no way to set W7 to use most of the filters that were available in XP. So there is no way to tell W7 what it is that you want and what it is doing wrong.

There is definitely a need for either a third party search tool or for Microsoft to admit they screwed up and fix the W7 search tool.

by kendall on 25. November 2011 - 0:44  (83851)

I never said that the Windows 7 search tool worked perfectly! I never even alluded to that.

I said that, for my purposes, on my home system, I don't see a need for a 3rd party tool. It appears from your post, that you have not found how to make Windows 7 work for you. I strongly suggest that you read the following article; or do a Google search for "making Windows 7 work for you" or something similar.

http://www.windows7news.com/2009/10/21/making-windows-7-search-work-better/

Above, I also suggested that you check out the following article to make Windows 7 search work for you:

http://windowssecrets.com/top-story/getting-the-most-from-windows-search...

by Zoltano (not verified) on 19. November 2011 - 17:39  (83552)

Great topic; fabulous discussion.

I have a first gen Solid State Hard Drive in my PC; indexing must be disabled for those drives. As a result, my Windows 7 search tool is seriously handicapped... :(

So which software do you Gents advise me to use instead?

by kendall on 19. November 2011 - 18:26  (83559)

I find myself using Locate32 more and more at work. It's fast and you can choose to build databases or not.

by jim_800 (not verified) on 14. November 2011 - 8:42  (83251)

Copernic 3.5.0 doesn't close when shutting down computer
See the last posts on http://forum.copernic.com/topic.php?id=315 to check whether the shutdown trouble has been resolved since. For the moment however, no solution seems to exist.

by dal987 (not verified) on 3. November 2011 - 9:09  (82639)

OCR's document indexing is the only reason I keep Google Desktop Search now, given its serious indexing limitations noted elsewhere in this discussion- which increase as the index size increases- is the Omnipage plugin. That allows on-the-fly indexing of imaged documents.. yes, OCR indexing.

Any other freeware options for that?

Oh, and GDS's sidebar doesn't autohide if IE9 is installed... (Vista 32bit).

Agent Ransack finds vs Locate32
I recently did a quick 'test' of Agent Ransack vs Locate32, searching the same folder for the same text within a file. Agent Ransack found 4 more (about 4%) more files. (And yes, Locate's database was up to date).

by wpgesser (brazil) (not verified) on 2. November 2011 - 3:25  (82550)

very good job so far kendal.
been using everything for a couple of years it is very good in its limited scope (searching for file name).

I'm looking for an app that could index and allow me to organize (and search) in my growning library of books and articles, mainly medical, mainly .pdf (some .CHM's). Last I checked this amounted to over 4000 books (average 3-5mb) and 6000 articles (avg 1-2mb). I would like: index name and content, search boolean, see preview, etc. I would love: automatation, specially in assigning file name, extracting isbn number from withing file, etc.

any recomendation?
(please point me correct forum if this is not the case.
thanks.

by kendall on 2. November 2011 - 4:36  (82551)

Locate 32 might be your best bet. However, you'll probably get many more suggestions if you ask your question in our forums: http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/.

More specifically, you might want to post in this specific forum: http://www.techsupportalert.com/freeware-forum/i-want-freeware-program-t....

Based upon what you are asking, you might actually need 2 separate programs; one to do searches and one for the automation.

by rob winter (not verified) on 26. October 2011 - 9:29  (82148)

Very good thanks. Just what I wanted Caernic was too much,this is simple and effective

Silly website saying this to me Your submission has triggered the spam filter and will not be accepted.!!!

by rob winter (not verified) on 26. October 2011 - 9:30  (82149)

regarding glarysoft Quick Search

by J_L on 20. October 2011 - 2:11  (81759)

Now I'm using UltraSearch. It's like Everything, but without indexing and a bit better 64-bit support. Still not native 64-bit, but I like how it lets me opt-in drives instead of opt-out, as well as it's active development.

by KAI (not verified) on 19. October 2011 - 11:10  (81695)

How about Quick Search? (http://www.glarysoft.com/products/utilities/quick-search/)

Thanks.

by kendall on 20. October 2011 - 2:05  (81757)

I've never heard of it. It scans clean via Jotti. It appears to be freeware. Unfortunately, I do not have time right now to test it out.

Feel free to try it out and let me know how you like it.

by Choppercharles (not verified) on 10. October 2011 - 19:38  (81202)

none of these are adequate to my needs.

I want a search that does NOT index my drive. I want it to find in files with a regex, the option to exclude certain file types (binaries), the option to ignore everything in a .svn directory, the ability to find and replace across files on disk, and I want the path of the file and the line where the found text occurs in a list. I want to be able to double-click that list and have it open to that exact line.

by kendall on 10. October 2011 - 19:53  (81203)

You don't want much do you?! ;)

I'm sorry that these options do not meet your needs. Please see what I was looking for above when I completed this review. Obviously, my needs are different than yours.

Here is a link to some other options that might meet your needs:

http://www.tipsotricks.com/2011/09/best-5-desktop-search-engines-to-sear...

by Patrick Kirby (not verified) on 10. September 2011 - 13:46  (79371)

I notice that Google have annouced that Desktop is going to be discontinued from 14 September 2011.

http://googledesktop.blogspot.com/2011/09/google-desktop-update.html

Leaves this category wide open once again

;(

by erbos (not verified) on 25. July 2011 - 0:00  (76188)

I loved the old W98 (still the best Windows of all time) search (which I believe is continued on the XP version). (I don't have the machine with 98 and XP and NT on it up at this time, may have the os details reversed.)

In W98, you had a popup box. Inside was a box for a Filename and a box for Contents. You could use the Filename plus Contents to search for filenames with those contents. (I think there were some other features like date and size, too)

So, if I were looking for a file called "my apples", I would type that into the file box - without the quotes, of course. If I wanted to find what files contained the word "apples", if I just typed in apples, then files like "food", "purchases", "meals", and of course "my apples" would show up.

Also the search from the W7 menu collapses after clicking on a found item. The search from the Computer icon on the right of the program menu, which pulls up a Windows Explorer type window, usually returns to the original search - though often it will do it over. But the biggest payoff from going to the trouble of using the W explorer search is that you can open a found Folder IN A NEW WINDOW!

And what idiot gave the file display function and the Internet browser the same name?

However, I know the the Windows Explorer window can be made nearly as good as the W98 one - if you are willing to go the trouble for typing in the UNDOCUMENTED keywords like "name:my apples", just like the filter does the date search. However, as I say, (1) it is undocumented and (2) it is a big pain to use.

So please bring back the functionality and simplicity of the W98 search.

Also, I would like to have some SQL ability, like AND, OR, and NOT.

(Oh, and a word about XP. I "upgraded" from W98 because because W98 won't read flash drives - despite the usb ports. I dual partitioned my drive for XP. Actually, I already had NT as well. Fortunately, I had a second disk drive, but I had to install more ram. Well, one of the XP upgrades that I downloaded over the internet, overflowed the partition I had set up for it and so mangled my machine that it took me months to get it working right again. Despite working again, XP is still like a donkey in a pony show.

I have W7 because I needed a machine that worked and so I bought a new one, an HP Compaq at $300 (sans monitor) I still can't get anything out of the plug for the speaker though - good thing I don't want to listen to music. I also used my W7 machine to connect me with MS service and I brought my other machine back to life after about 4 months.)

Best,
erbos

by Bastian (not verified) on 11. July 2011 - 12:39  (75199)

Is there a way to search on networkfolders without making them offline available?

I use w NAS to store my music and I want to search with the microsoft search on the NAS.

There is a patch for 32 bit to add networkfolders to the search but I didn't find this patch for 64bit.

by BE Bob (not verified) on 17. September 2011 - 13:19  (79790)

In Windows XP, you can point Windows Search 4.0 to a network folder and it will index it by crawling through the files over the network.

In Windows 7, Windows Search will not index network shares unless they supply a Windows Search 4.0 client (to do the indexing locally, not available on most linux-based NAS) or you make the network share available offline (which means copying it to your local drive, this capability is only available with Win7 Premium or above [I think]).

I actually tried Win7 and replaced it with XP because of this issue. Unfortunately, I have had problems with WS4 corrupting the index and losing all of my indexed network shares. That is the reason I'm looking at this forum!

by kendall on 11. July 2011 - 13:40  (75213)

I'm sorry, but I don't know the answer to your question. You could try posting over at our forums. In fact, it is a much better place to ask these types of questions. Hopefully, you'll get a quick response once you post there.

by lacipuma (not verified) on 4. July 2011 - 15:07  (74735)

Another free and open source desktop search utility:

http://www.miner-mole.com

It has a portable version too.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.