Best Free BitTorrent Client

 
In a Hurry?
  Go straight to the Quick Selection Guide
Introduction

It's amazing how quickly Bittorrent has become one of the major download formats. With good reason too: it's fast, equitable and efficient. If you haven't yet installed a Bittorrent client on your PC, you should as there are some great freeware clients available.   In Bittorrent the best clients are free.  (In fact, if a client costs money, it is most likely a scam).

I tested ten bittorrent clients for speed and all ten, after proper setup, ran at essentially the same speeds.  Given their equal performance the decision on which is best was based primarily on support and features.  Other than Miro and Halite, clients had low CPU use.  The amount of RAM use by these clients varies greatly, but with the amount of RAM that the average user has on their system nowadays, that is not much of an issue.   The RAM use on my computer is noted here for your reference.  The use on your computer may vary, but these client's use of RAM relative to each other should be in line with my numbers.  I have linked to screen shots of the Top Picks and Other Suggested Clients as the interface of these clients may be a factor in your decision of which to use.

The features that I considered were first the basic ones that every user would want,

  • Encryption - helps with ISPs that interfere with bittorrent
  • UPnP and NAT-PMP support - automatically configures compatible routers
  • Selective Downloading - allows downloading of specific files inside a torrent
  • DHT and PEX - support trackerless torrents and help to find more peers 

Other features that some users may want are

  • RSS allows automatic finding and downloading of torrents
  • remote control allows control of the bittorrent program from another computer
  • bandwidth allocation - allows more bandwidth to be given to a torrent; helpful for those who use private trackers

  Those who  publish torrents should also look for a (built in) tracker and super seeding.

Discussion

These four clients are well above the average bittorrent client.  I would call it a tie for best between µTorrent and Vuze.  µTorrent is a basic client that is extremely efficient and Vuze is full featured.  Transmission and BitComet come in close behind.  Transmission as a lightweight client for Mac and Linux users and BitComet as a relatively lightweight client that is useful for traversing troublesome networks.

There are links to set up guides for the Top Picks and for articles on search sites in the Related Links section at the end of this review.

Vuze Main Screen ThumbnailMy personal favorite is Vuze (formerly Azureus).   Azureus was always well known for its informative interface and wide variety of plugins due to its being open source.  Now it has added the Vuze patform which provides a large and growing amount of legal content for download.  Most of the content is free and downloads at maximum speed as it is also supported by Vuze servers.  The 3.1 series introduced the Friends plugin, which allows for secure and encrypted sharing.  Vuze has all of the features discussed above and more.  Basically Vuze has all the bells and whistles you could want.  In spite of adding the Vuze platform and other features over the past two years, the Vuze developers have significantly reduced the amount of Vuze's RAM usage.  Still its RAM use (60,000K) is at the high end of these clients.  Vuze is cross platform and has excellent support at its Azureus-WikiVuze forums and Vuze FAQ.  Version 4.2.0.0, released March 22, 2009, has a new "Devices" tab that has the ability to convert and stream videos to devices like iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, Xbox and PS3.

 

uTorrent Main Screen Thumbnail The most popular bittorrent client now is µTorrent.  Quite impressive as a short time ago they were acquired by BitTorrent, Inc. and were tainted by BitTorrent's association with the media industry.  Equally impressive is the list of features that this tiny program has.  Like Vuze it has all the features above, but is also the smallest and easiest on system resources (1,000K RAM) of any bittorrent client.  µTorrent  has gained popularity because it does the basic downloading of torrents as well as any client and does it more efficiently than any other client.  µTorrent is essentially a Windows only application, but can be run on Mac (Intel) and Linux with Wine (guide).  µTorrent's FAQs, guides and forums make for excellent support.
Note
:  Secunia has released a "critical vulnerability" alert for µTorrent 1.7.7 (Build 8179) and earlier builds, which has been patched in version 1.8.  An upgrade to 1.8 is suggested.   This is the second "highly critical" alert that Secunia has issued for µTorrent this year.  µTorrent  responded quickly to the alert, issuing a fix in the 1.8 version.  Although this alert was not enough for me to remove µTorrent from this list, I would point out that none of the other clients suggested here has ever had a "highly critical" security alert issued by Secunia.

 

Transmission Main Screen ThumbnailFor those with Mac or Linux looking for a lightweight client I would suggest Transmission.  I have not used this client myself, but it has uniformly received positive reviews for being full-featured but easy on system resources.  It has also been chosen as the default bittorrent client for Ubuntu. The support is not at the level of Vuze or µTorrent, but their forums appear to be well frequented by Transmission developers.   Transmission is missing a few features, such as DHT, RSS, super seeding and a built in tracker.

 

 

BitComet Main Screen ThumbnailBitComet is a Windows only client that is missing remote control, but has the other features above and uses a small amount of memory (3,000K).  The primary reason for its inclusion as a top pick is that some users have reported that it is able to get through some networks (schools etc.) that other clients cannot.  BitComet also has a "media preview" feature that allows preview of the content before the download is finished (this will slow download speed ) to help avoid wasting bandwidth on fakes or poor quality content.  Their forums are well maintained (there is a nice FAQ at the forums) and their blog provides some guides, making for good support.
Note BitComet does have its issues with the bittorrent community.  It has a reputation as a "bully" client and at one time was banned at most private trackers (more private sites are now allowing BitComet's newer releases).   Robb Topolski (who first verified Comcast's bittorrent interference) debunked most of these issues (at least for newer versions) in this article.  However, there is still an issue with its super seeding, causing the BitTornado developer (John Hoffman, who created super seeding) to ban BitComet users from connecting to BitTornado users.  Topolski also states that BitComet does have issues when it is the original seed for a torrent.

Other Suggested Clients

There are a number of other free bittorrent clients that work well.  The following are clients that work well, but do not rise to the level of the Top Pick clients above.  Still, they download as well as any client and some users may prefer their interfaces.  I have linked to their sites, rather than the more desciptive anchors here for the Top Picks, to keep this review to a reasonable length.

BitTornado is a cross platform client that is mssing some features, PEX, DHT, RSS and remote control and has a high memory use (33,000K, at least on Windows) for a fairly basic client.  Its forums are well maintained, with much input from the developer, but the FAQ is a bit weak. (Screenshot)

Deluge is a cross platform client that is missing the super seeding and built in tracker features, but has the rest of the features above.  Its memory use (40,000K) is high for a basic client.  Its forums are not that active, but are well maintained.  The FAQ also has some support info. (Screenshot)

BitTyrant is an Azureus 2.5 knockoff that is supposed to deliver better speeds by slightly violating the bittorrent protocol.  I did not find it any faster than the others here in my tests.  Its memory use (42,000K) is better than Vuze, but its lack of updates and support (the Azureus-Wiki will help for many issues) kept it from being a top pick.  It is missing the newer features of Vuze, but has all the features discussed above.  It is a cross platform client.  There is no support from the BitTyrant developers.  BitTyrant is banned at most private trackers. (Screenshot)

Clients That Are Not Suggested

I am listing these clients as they were brought up in comments here and are at times mentioned at the various bittorrent forums that I frequent.

Frostwire is a cross platform Gnutella/Bittorrent mix.  Although it ran well in my speed tests, its lack of basic bittorrent features and relatively high memory use (42,000K) make it a non-choice.  For those who primarily use Gnutella and occasionally bittorrent, it is an acceptable choice, but not as a bittorrent client only.

BitTorrent bought  µTorrent some time ago and since then BitTorrent has adopted the µTorrent model for its bittorrent client.  (TorrentFreak) So BitTorrent is the µTorrent client repackaged under the BitTorrent name, except it has the extra baggage of DNA.  DNA does nothing for the average user and is constantly running (even when BitTorrent is closed).  Removing DNA makes BitTorrent as efficient as µTorrent, but it makes more sense to just get µTorrent.  A "highly critical" security alert was issued for BitTorrent on 8/12/2008 (the second this year, just as for µTorrent) by Secunia.   However, for some reason, it took BitTorrent several days longer than µTorrent to issue a patch.  Again, making µTorrent a better  choice.

BitSpirit is hard to figure out.  Its website is listed as red (bad) by McAfee Site Adviser and the latest version there is from 2005.  However, FileForum's download for it shows a release date of August, 2008.  BitSpirit is based upon an old BitComet code and as a result is banned at some private trackers.  It does have the media preview and also will traverse some networks that other clients cannot (as BitComet does).  However, BitComet in its updated state is probably a better choice.

ABC is based upon BitTornado and has better memory use (20,000K), but it has not been updated since 2005 and that means it is missing many of the newer features of bittorrent.  It is banned at some private trackers.

BitLord is also based upon the old, buggy Bitcomet code and is banned at some private trackers.  While it also has the positive of traversing troublesome networks well, it has not been updated since 2005 and BitComet is a better choice for dealing with those networks.

Opera is a browser that supports bittorrent.  It lacks many features and from what I have read adds 5,000K in memory use to the browser.  That makes both µTorrent and Bitcomet better choices as basic bittorrent clients.

These last two clients caused severe CPU issues on my Windows XP SP3 system.  I am not sure why and have not seen this issue mentioned before with these clients.  I cannot fully evaluate them because of this. 

Halite is a Windows only client that is missing a number of features, PEX, RSS, remote control, super seeding and built in tracker.  Its memory use (7,000K) is on the low end, but not as efficient as the lighter Top Picks.  Their forums are well maintained, but other support is lacking.   With no CPU issues, this may not be a bad choice.

Miro is an internet TV and video player that supports bittorrent.  Its high memory use (96,000K) and lack of features make it a non-choice as a bittorrent client even with no CPU issues.

A good listing of bittorrent clients that have some issues and that are banned at private trackers (at least some) is at  Mystery Axiom Forums
There are also some bittorrent clients that contain malware and should be avoided.  They are listed at leechermods.

Related Links

There are guides for getting the best download speed for each of the Top Pick bittorrent clients above, here at Gizmo's Tech Support Alert:

After you have installed your bittorrent client and have set it up, you might want to check my articles

Have Your Say

Please visit our freeware forum to share and discuss your views and get advice on bittorrent clients. There's also a poll on what free bittorrent client you prefer. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate.
 

Quick Selection Guide

Vuze    Rating 9 of 10   Gizmo's Top Pick

Pros   Cross platform, informative interface, wide variety of plugins, excellent support and the Vuze platform of legal content that downloads at high speeds.
Cons   Higher memory use than other picks, toolbar download (optional but initially enabled) on install  and advertisements on Vuze platform
Developer Home Page   http://www.vuze.com/app
Download link   http://azureus.sourceforge.net/download.php
File Size   10.1 MB   Version 4.2.0.2   License Type Open Source Freeware (includes program code)   Installation Requirements Java support

µTorrent    Rating 9 of 10  

Pros   Small, efficient (lowest memory use of all clients), many features and excellent support.
Cons   Essentially Windows only and two "highly critical" security alerts (both patched) were issued in 2008 by Secunia
Developer Home Page   http://www.utorrent.com/
Download link   http://www.utorrent.com/download.php
File Size   281 KB   Version 1.8.3 (build 15772)   License Type Unrestricted Freeware   Installation Requirements Wine, Windows 95 (Winsock2), 98/ME, NT/2000, XP, 2003, Vista
Portable version available   Portable version available

Transmission    Rating 8 of 10  

Pros   Lightweight and efficient with good support.
Cons   Missing some features of the other picks and not Windows compatible
Developer Home Page   http://www.transmissionbt.com/index.php
Download link   http://www.transmissionbt.com/download.php
File Size   4.19 MB   Version 1.72   License Type Open Source Freeware (includes program code)   Installation Requirements Mac OS X 10.4.11 or later, Ubuntu GNU/Linux

BitComet    Rating 8 of 10  

Pros   Small memory use, good support and ability to traverse some networks (schools etc.) that others cannot.
Cons   Issues as initial seed, missing remote control, bad reputation, toolbar download/home page re-set on install (optional-but initially enabled) and some advertisements
Developer Home Page   http://www.bitcomet.com/
Download link   http://www.bitcomet.com/doc/download.htm
File Size   5.56 MB   Version 1.13   License Type Private Freeware (not free for commercial use)   Installation Requirements Windows 2000/XP/2003/Vista
Portable version available  

Portable version available

Tags

freeware bittorrent programs, freeware bittorrent clients, torrent programs, torrent clients, bittorrent software, torrent software, bitorrent, bittorent, free torrents, torrent freeware, utorrent, azureus, bitcomet, transmission, azurus, vuze

4.5
Average: 4.5 (4 votes)
Your rating: None

I want to use µTorrent in Linux but I'm not very familiar with Wine so I'm just asking:-

1. Do you run the µTorrent installer with Wine and install it directly to Linux or do you install it in Windows and boot to Linux then run the µTorrent you install in Windows with Wine in Linux?

2. What happens when µTorrent is installed in Windows and you install it again with Wine in Linux? Does it sort of corrupts the µTorrent in Windows?

Thanks in advance

Sorry, I do not have Linux so I can not answer your questions.

This guide from the uTorrent forums may help
http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=28869

Steve

More information and YouTube video on BitBlinder here:
http://www.how-to-hide-ip.info/2009/05/17/bitblinder/

Free Anonymous BitTorrent! https://www.bitblinder.com/
Just found it from here (The Meta-Ipod is great software too!)- http://www.downloadsquad.com/

I use Modded version of BitComet for my torrent client. No more ISP throttling! More information and download links here-xxx.xxxxxxx.com
Link removed by category editor as this modded client can cause major issues and does not increase speed-see the post of this person below

I get my full internet connection speed, I always download torrents, sort them by number of seeds, so never have slow downloads! Just one thing to mention, it uses and old version of bit comet so it slows down (lags) your computer so don't try doing anything that needs a lot of the computers resources when its running e.g. games because it WILL crash. But if you want spped you can try it!

I use peer guardian with it but I must try bit blinder now! Can't believe FREE anoymous bittorent!

As I installed the latest Win7 (build 7260),decided to try your modded BitComet,opened preferences and got not-responding,could not shut it down with Task Manager.So re-started System,and had to run Trouble-shooter to get Internet back up.As this Win7 is virtually release and very stable,this seems unsuitable for this O/S,and went back to good old faithful UTorrent.

I would advise anyone not to try that modded BitComet.

The thread that the link is in indicates many people had it cause major issues similar to yours on their computer. Also, the original poster here, ran a test between uTorrent and that mod and found no difference in speed.

It is based upon BitComet 0.66, which was released in April, 2006. I am pretty sure that was before the official release of Vista, so it would have real issues with Vista and 7.

I left up the post because he had compared it to uTorrent and it was the same, so he left it for uTorrent. Now that I see your post, I am going to disable the link (sorry, should have done that before).

Steve

I have looked into BitBlinder myself.
It is still in Beta stage and right now people will have to wait for an invite in.
I will be posting more on this when I get it going.
You do have to make your bandwidth available for others in order to download through them. Similar to a ratio at a private tracker, although not related to a specific torrent.

I am not familiar with the BitComet mod and will take a look, though I am always suspicious of mods with claims like that. Anyhow, I frequently get top speed for my connection using Vuze or uTorrent.
I am especially concerned as it uses an old version of BitComet that was acknowledged as a cheating client.

Interestingly, I have found in my recent tests for a new review here that BitComet overstates its download speed. On one of the test torrents, all of the other bittorrent clients download at 770kBps, while BitComet shows 830kBps. But BitComet downloads a smaller amount of data during an equal time period.

Anyhow, two interesting items in your post and thanks for that.

Steve

Thanks for the reply, very helpful information I did not know about. If BitComet is overstating its download speed (and probably is because it's known as a cheating client) then it probably isn't much (if any) faster than uTorrent or Vuze. So I'll settle on uTorrent, it's stable and fast, I'll use the optimizing guide here and that will give me a good speed.

I would be interested what your mod BitComet (assuming you still have it on your system) does against uTorrent on this torrent. It is the Knoppix torrent and I find it always runs at top speed. I let it run for 6 minutes in each and uTorrent had 246MB, while Bitcomet had 231MB. Not that big a difference, but Bitcomet was showing 60kBs faster than uTorrent.
http://torrent.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/torrents/KNOPPIX_V5.1.1CD-2007-01-04-EN...

I am looking forward to checking out BitBlinder and I'll post back at the site when I have more info.

I did a test. It's a good torrent to test on! The results aren't that amazing. I tested BitComet 1.12 (latest stable version) as well just to see how it compares to the older BitComet mod.

1. Average Download Speed Reported

uTorrent 1.83 = 97.5
BitComet Mod 0.66 = 96
BitComet 1.12 = 99

2. Amount downloaded in the 10 mins. (MB)

uTorrent 1.83 = 57.2
BitComet Mod 0.66 = 56.66
BitComet 1.12 = 58.12

I pressed the stop button a second late for BitComet 1.12, so then there is really no difference in speed between the torrent clients, so that shows that it mainly depends on your internet connection speed and the amount of seeders for the download speed you get, so mod versions aren't any faster. It's good we found that out from the test, I think I'll go for uTorrent because it's fast and stable and I can use the guide to optimize it for speed. Interesting test to have done anyways.

Thanks for that info. I like that you did 10 minutes, more accurate than my 6 minutes (but I have 20 or so to test).
Yeah that torrent runs pretty much the same all the time, so it is a good test one.

I wonder why my BitComet 1.12 shows such a difference in down speed from all the others as yours did not. Anyways, your test confirms my basic finding that they all run at about the same speeds when properly set up. Although my tests on torrents with weak health showed some interesting differences.

I always have my suspicions on those mods, and other software that claims to increase bittorrent speed, as there really is nothing more to do than the basic two steps.

I agree that uTorrent is the best choice. Very easy on system resources, great support and they are actively working on enhancements.

Thanks again.
Steve

In Vuze, when type to search for software, he found 0 matches... uTorrent with good torrent sites (nowtorrents, monova) can download any file at same speed like Vuze, maybe faster...

Slobodan Rašic
Zaječar, Serbia

I do agree that uTorrent is an excellent bittorrent client. I am presently testing bittorrent clients for a re-do of this review. It looks like the new review will be making uTorrent the Top Pick.

However, Vuze is still an excellent client also. I would rate Vuze and uTorrent as ahead of the rest of the pack.

As to the searching, templates can be added to Vuze, although it is more involved than with uTorrent. Personally, I prefer searching directly at the torrent sites.

As to speed, I have tested over 20 bittorrent clients and they all run at about the same speeds when properly set up.

Steve

This is an accelerator for P2P programs from IObit so it should work! Everyone likes faster downloads!
http://www.iobit.com/labs.html

Since it is free and apparently spyware free, I will leave the link up.

However, all such programs accomplish nothing as far as increasing speed and may well hurt speed.

There are two basic steps to increasing speed in bittorrent:
1. Clear your network connection. Routers and firewalls will block communications, as they are supposed to do, unless an exception is made.
2. Cap upload in the bittorrent client to 80% of the overall upload capacity of the internet connection. The more upload you give, the more download you will receive back from other peers. However, if upload is set too high, or to unlimited, then it will interfere with needed communications and download speed will suffer.

The Optimizing Speed guides for the suggested clients linked above will help with those steps and will provide better speed increase than any software.

Steve

I'm using Ares. It's by far the fastest!

Downloading this using Ares! http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1947413/775222/

Using Utorrent (which is nothing special and slow) I usually get speeds from 10-30kb/s sometimes a bit higher but never higher than 50kb/s, downloading now using Ares, the speeds are from 60kb/s-105kb/s! I'm getting a stable 82KB/sec now! Much less stressful to download this than Utorrent. Utorrent take 16 hrs to download last leaked one I downloaded, Ares estimates 6hr 511 mins to download getting a 91KB/sec now! I'm so happy! I'm never using "the usual" well known programs again, always looking out for these special ones.

I say to everyone use Ares!

I have not tested Ares, but I have tested many apps, including similar ones to Ares and they all run at about the same speeds.
I suspect that your uTorrent was not properly set up.

BTW where did you get your Ares? There are a lot of scam Ares sites out there. the official site is at sourceforge
http://aresgalaxy.sourceforge.net/

But, I will give Ares a look during my next test run.

Steve

I use Utorrent and sometimes the download speed is unbarebly slow. I found this program which sounds great but want to know if it is? It says "Ares is by far, the best P2P file sharing program out today." http://www[dot]ares.net/

Sorry, I do not use Ares, or similar P2P, so I can not give an opinion.

For your uTorrent speed issue, you could check out Gizmo's Freeware: Optimizing µTorrent for Speed as it should help.

Steve

Edit: I deactivated that link as that is not the official Ares site and it gets a warning from Web of Trust (WOT).
The official site is at Sourceforge
http://aresgalaxy.sourceforge.net/

For me, this is the best, because the download speed is usually faster than any of the others! Try it!

http://images.google.ie/imgres?imgurl=http://www.alvinlife.com/wp-conten...

From what I see at Wikipedia, this looks very sketchy and adware ridden. Also looks like it shares from your computer without your consent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xunlei

I guess it uses a fake header for HTTP to download torrents through port 80 and that is supposed to be the big deal. I am not sure about it myself.

I will take a further look around, but I would advise people to stay away from this for now.

Steve

I think you are right to say "Also looks like it shares from your computer without your consent". And it is really faster than other most other softwares -- because even you finished a download, you file will still be used as other's resources for downloading. This is what flashget is doing right now. You can always manually rename or move the file after downloading. The download speed is much faster than utorrent -- 5 tasks can reach nearly 100kB/s each. There are english packs available and there is an Ad removed version -- maybe in English.

I have not seen here anything relating to music or file sharing, that do not use bit torrent. What about, shareeza, Klite, emule, bearshare, limewire, etc.?
I would love to hear something about them. I personally prefer Klite and emule.

I do not use those P2P programs, so I am not qualified to comment on them.
However, Gizmo's could always use a new category and editor if you are interested in creating one for those.

If you are interested, just click the become a software reviewer link at the top of the page.

Steve

Wish you could look into IP Filters/Block Lists that can be used with some of these bit torrents programs to help protect your system from virus/trojan/worm attacks that your AntiVirus software may not be able to deal with. The only Free Block List source I know is http://blocklistpro.com/download-center/ip-filters/ , but I Gizmo could look into what's available and make recommendations.

Thanks!

That link is the BISS block list and is the most well known and most used. I only know of one other. I cannot really say which is better of if block lists do any good at all. I tend to feel that they do, but there are good arguments on both sides. I use a combo of the two.
I did cover this somewhat in my Additional Vuze Settings page here, under IP Filter.
The better clients here have a built in IP Filter feature, which is probably better than PeerGuardian. If you use one of the other clients suggested here and need info on setting in up, let me know .

Steve

I expect you already know about Peer Guardian:
http://phoenixlabs.org/pg2/
I found it more trouble than it was worth ... but your mileage may vary.

Can I just say first off how much I really appreciate the comments on all parts of this site - although my PC literacy level is above average I still learn things here every day! Comment I would like to make though (and this intrigues me!) is when you guys talk about "speed" and "using more memory" what would you do with the extra memory you had left over or few minutes in time saved between one application or another? Memory to start with to most people is only a figure stuck in their tray. On most modern machines you will never notice a performance degradation between one torrent client and another unless such state can be attributed to something else! There seems to be an obsession with seeing a large memory figure display rather than enjoying the fact that what you've paid for is being used effectively to run your processes! In any case, memory is about the cheapest PC upgrade you can get these days so if you really must see a "big" figure in your "free RAM", buy an extra card and stuff it in your MB. Likewise with speed, you will have to go a long way to pursuade me that you don't have some kind of "problem" if you find a few minutes extra download time for a movie a big issue especially when you would have great difficulty in attribution this to the client itself and not some other external issue.

Trust me, it'll go faster real soon now ...

USING TOR NETWORK IS NOT Good way of downloading
Please read the post here: http://www.chrisbrunner.com/?p=119

Halite is one to watch for the future... Eventualy it will stand besides the other top two bittorrent clients, μTorrent and Azureus (if the developer keeps developing it continously). I believe it deserved a better mention here IMHO.

It may well be OK for those that do not have CPU issues with it as I did.

Much of this is a matter of personal taste for the interface as most of the bittorrent clients will run at about the same speeds, when properly set up.

This being so, I believe that support and documentation make a big difference and Vuze and uTorrent are way ahead of the pack on those.

Its memory use was low (not as low as uTorrent or BitComet), but the version I tried lacked several features that the others have.

Since it caused CPU issues on my computer, I was not able to test it thoroughly.

I do see at their forums that they have released a major revision of Halite and I will probably re-check their client based upon your post.

Thanks

Steve

uTorrent hands down winner

The best thing about Vuze (formerly Azureus) is that it allows for a LOT of security. I use the IP Filter option. I encrypt all data that is being transferred. Plus I use Tor, a free proxy program, which works well with Vuze. I am completely untraceable. Even if I was tracked down, they wouldn't be able to figure out what I was downloading.

Good points. If I ever get around to making the additional guide I have said I would, I will be covering those.

The IP Filter option really sets Vuze apart as it can be set to auto-update, which none of the others (except I think Transmission can) can do.

While other clients have encryption, Vuze has the options for 5 varying levels.

And Vuze does have an easy set up for Tor built in. However, the Tor network should not be used for file transfers as this high bandwidth use puts a strain on the Tor network. The Tor option should be used only for tracker communication or torrent download. Anonymising to the tracker can cause some issues with the swarm not seeing you.
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO/BitTorren...

See also section on Azureus (now Vuze) about being initial seed (which is an exception to the above).
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO/BitTorren...

Fostwire is the best ,it s limewire pro ,but totally free
it doesn t take so much ram,as said in the review...

ive been using utorrent since its early days and up until now ive had no qualms with it. utorrent is fast & efficent but recently ive been disturbed by the rumors that ever since bittorrent inc. acquired utorrent, they've been adding in code that catches our ips enroute to trackers (perhaps it was only when utilizing the DHT feature, i forget).

most forums now acknowledge that there is no such thing according to wireshark logs but i just wanted to hear your opinions here

I also believe that there is no such issue.

I have followed this since BitTorrent acquired uTorrent and, so you know where I am coming from, I never believed those rumors.

It has now been almost 2 years since the acquisition of uTorrent by BitTorrent and there has been no evidence produced of any such tracking. Also, there has been no reporting of an unusual number of uTorrent (or BitTorrent) users having trouble with any authorities.

In those two years, uTorrent has become the most popular bittorrent client with millions of installs. If there was any such tracking or info sent, it would have been discovered by now.

So, I think it is clear now that there is no such issue.

Steve

thanks for clearing things up!

I was downloading a 4.3GB's file (Open Suse-Live Dvd)with Vuse,and the download speed was at times just a few KB's,so decided to try UTorrent,initialy good,then slow down not as bad,then I thought what linked the the two,the set between 50000-60000 the port settings,so set to random,problem solved now averaging 200 KB,s,and my internet experience from poor to good.

I need help. I'm getting this error and I'm not sure what's causing this. I've already tried un-installing my utorrent, re-installed it, and then I installed azureus because I thought I've made some settings changes on uitorrent but both didn't work. So I think this is not client related. What do I need to do? I have vista 64 bit.

Here's the error.

C:\Users\Ariel\AppData\Local\Temp\Iron.Man[2008]DvDrip-aXXo [mininova]-7.torrent could not be opened, because the associated helper application does not exist. Change the association in your preferences.

Thanks,
Ariel

You need to set uTorrent as the associated program for .torrent files.

If you have Firefox, then you have to set it separate from explorer. In Firefox go to Tools>Options>Applications and find .torrent and set uTorrent as the associated program.

For explorer, in uTorrent go to Options>Preferences(Ctrl+P)>General. There is a button to press to associate .torrent files with uTorrent. There is also a box to tick to have uTorrent check this association on its startup.

Thanks a lot! I'm able to download again now.

Allright. Glad that solved it.
Steve

I like ABC the best. It's nice and compact.

I'd get away from ABC. Trackers are starting to ban people for using it.

I've tried eMule, FrostWire, and uTorrent. For easiness of use, and people who prefer using the Gnutella network and having all folders layed out for them, I recommend FrostWire. For speed, footprint and a stronger connection, I recommend uTorrent. I currently run them both together and have no problem.

My favorite feature of uTorrent is the Auto Shutdown. This feature allows you to set uTorrent to either quit, hibernate, standby, restart, or shutdown as soon as all downloads and/or uploads are finished. This is great because I can leave a download going and have the rest of mind that my computer will standby/hibernate and conserve energy when done.

Good points.
For those who want to use the Auto Shutdown, it is located at Options>Auto Shutdown. There is a variety of options for it.

Personally, I do not use that feature as I leave my torrents active 24/7.

The other top picks do not have the Auto Shutdown feature. I know Vuze does not because they feel it encourages leeching (people failing to upload to at least a 100% ratio).

Azureus (I just don't like Vuze as a name) and uTorrent use the same amount of memory. Only, uTorrent pushes the effort of file caching onto the OS, as such, if you don't look at how the file cache of the OS looks with and without the torrent client started, you might believe that uTorrent takes up less mem than Azureus.

I tried uTorrent, and since both uTorrent and Azureus work the same on my PC (with just 512 MB RAM), I prefer to stay with Azureus due to its nicer user interface and its cross platform availability - I can reboot into Linux and go on downloading the same torrents. which is something uTorrent can't do.

You have to be joking about the resource usage between the two,Vuse uses about 70MB's,compared to the 6MB's of UTorrent,and this is stated to be in the revues.