Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting
We are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform App Reviews for Android and iOS
- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- PDF Writer
Interested? Click here
Best Free Antivirus Software
|
Other Language?
|
Read this article in Spanish |
Read this article in Chinese |
|
In a Hurry?
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
Antivirus software provides an essential layer of protection from a multitude of virus, trojan, worm, spyware, adware, dialer, keylogger and rootkit infections. Traditionally antivirus programs just detected viruses and spyware removers just detected spyware but nowadays the boundary between antivirus and spyware removers is unclear. Most current antiviruses have at least reasonably good detection rates of all forms of malware. Malware includes viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, adware, dialers, keyloggers and rootkit threats that perform malicious activities on a computer. With the huge increase in malware, antivirus software cannot keep up with detecting all of it. Despite vendor's claims, no single antivirus solution, or indeed any one security software, can be relied upon for total protection without safe surfing and computing practices. But using more than one real-time antivirus uses much more system resources, can cause conflicts and even reduce protection. So I recommend you only choose one antivirus for real-time protection. Instead, you can increase your protection using other security software; for more information check out our Security Wizard. I looked at several free antivirus programs which are vital in protecting your computer from virus threats and other types of malware. |
|
Discussion
|
|
The main downsides are the slow scan speeds and the lengthy amount of time it takes to quarantine malware, though in my opinion these are rather trivial concerns, as for example a scan just be run overnight. MSE also is not available in certain countries so users there will have to look elsewhere. Note that Microsoft Security Essentials requires a genuine copy of Windows to install.
Panda Cloud Antivirus has a behavioural blocker and web protection, which will certainly increase your security. However as you can simply use one of the other free AV's with a separate behavioural blocker (for further details see our Security Wizard) to achieve possibly even better protection, this is not necessarily an advantage. One minor reservation I have is that PCA seems to erroneously detect certain browser/system-related applications, for example VideoCacheView, and because of the automatic quarantine this made it a fraction bothersome.
However, there are some minor reservations. First, AntiVir does not include web or e-mail scanning capabilities; this is only available in the paid version. The lack of an e-mail scanner is not a disadvantage, it just means that AntiVir won't warn you of infected emails before you open them. But should you open an infected email, AntiVir will still spring into action, so it doesn't mean that you're not protected from email-based infections. Also, AntiVir contains a rather intrusive advertisement every time it updates. Although AntiVir had signature updating problems in the past, this issue seems to be fixed now.
These free antivirus programs are excellent software that provide a real alternative to the major commercial antivirus products. Please help us by rating this review |
|
Tags
|
|
free antivirus, antivirus software, antivirus download, best antivirus software, anti-virus, anti-virus software, avast antivirus, avira antivirus, microsoft antivirus, free anti virus, anti virus software. |
|
Have Your Say
|
|
Please visit our freeware forum to share and discuss your views and get advice on free security software, including antivirus software. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate. |
Quick Start Guide: http://www.avast.com/download-documentation
Forum: http://forum.avast.com/
Forum for support
|
Editor
|
| This category is maintained by volunteer editor JonathanT. |
|
Tags
|
|
free antivirus, best free antivirus, free antivirus programs, free antivirus program, antivirus software, free antivirus software, antivirus program free, anti-virus programs, antivirus scanner, best antiviros, best antvirus |
Back to the top of the article
- Article type:
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version


Comments
OK then, how about this for chucking some petrol onto the fire. Some time back I worked out (roughly - I'm not completely sick!) what percentage of my PC usage time was spent mothering my tribal collection of security applications.
Then I added into that the "worry factor" associated with my surfing habbits. Most of you will identify with that "feeling" you get when something doesn't go just right and you wonder what will happen during the next boot! In summary I chucked out Windows and installed Linux. Would have liked OpenSUSE but opted in the end for Ubuntu as being a more friendly transition. Whatever malware does exist for linux will invariably need root priviliges to run and the forums advise that anti-virus's are just not necessary. I run a GUI just to give a graphical interface to the pre-installed IP tables (firewall) and that's it. No worries - and much more time spent surfing! Just a thought.
I'm also thinking of throwing Windows away and installing Ubuntu.
The problem is that Linux does NOT offer a user
the variety of programs Windows do.
In terms of security, Linux is, by far, more secure.
I need to know if any of the Non-Portable ones have a seperate database update...Cause I update on i-cafe's due to dial-up...
Me Again, my email is chadrizard3@gmail.com
I really need to know...
I know that Antivir Avira does
Potential users of Avast may be comforted to know that there are several very good skins which can replace the (admittedly confusing)default interface. The "MacLover's" interface in particular is an excellent and well laid-out skin that would offer little to confuse the average user. All are available for free download on the Avast home site.
Regards.
For an "On Demand" scanner I suggest "online" scans. They are all free. One week scan with Norton, NOD32 the next, Bit Defender and then ? In the course of a month you will have scanned with 5 or 6 of the best. I don't think anyone is good enough to hid from their combined searches.
avast! Home Edition 4.8 has the same detection rates as pro, just pro has some more features, is faster at on-demand scanning, and uses less RAM and doesn't use as much processing usage
If you want protection, you should get Avast! Home Edition, it is free and offers protection that even most paid anti-viruses don't give you it, such as a web shield to block the viruses from even reaching your computer, i've only seen something like that in KIS 2009, but avast is better than that, it includes IM and P2P protection, so you don't get infected in the first place, and a boot time scanner, i don't think ANY anti-virus has ever included that, only avast, so if you want free protection, then just get avast, its free and hasn't missed any viruses on my computer yet, and to anybody who hates the interface of avast: you NEVER need to open the interface, only time you need to open it is to activate it, and if the real-time protection was disabled for some reason. avast's real-time protection can already handle most viruses/spyware/adware/malware
It's a bit funny reading through these posts, but it's actually quite a bit more annoying. Computer security is very important, but all I see here is "I think", "Personally I believe", "I recommend", "It sucks", and every other opinion that may or may not mean anything to anybody. What I don't see is any evidence to back up any of these claims. Today all that ends and you will have something new to argue about.
Here it is, actual independent testing of AV software:
http://www.av-comparatives.org/
Also on that site are links to other independent software testing sites:
http://www.av-comparatives.org/forum/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=6
After reading some of the PDF docs on how testing is conducted, let me say this. "I personally believe that the info doesn't suck and I highly recommend studying the independent testing process. After evaluating the process and forming your own opinion, I personally believe and recommend that we should all meet here tomorrow and argue about how wrong everybody is." But that's just my opinion.
I've looked at those, but they just can't compare to real world experience. Everyone seem s to have an option I know, some opinions are better than others.
There are two major things to look for in an Antivirus, First is detection rates, and the other is scanning speed. Now everyone seems very familiar with the first, but not as familiar with the second. Scanning speed, and how your antivirus affects your system performance is very important. Take a system with a clean windows install on it, and no antivirus, and it will fly. You'll be amazed at the difference in the performance and snapyness of the system. Then you put antivirus on it, and the system slows down. Why, because everything you do is getting scanned for viruses. Everything now has to go through that scanner. If that scanner is slow then your system is going to be slow.
Now the problem that I have with the tests that you linked to is that it says that several antivirus that I know have slow scanning speeds have fast scanning speeds. Even the reviews here contradict these tests. The test says that AVG has fast scanning speeds, but here its says AVG "has very slow scan speeds".
I have used avast for years. I use it on all the computers that I work on. All the computers that my family all use avast. Its not perfect, but it the best FREE solution that I know of.
Along with some other people on here I would like to know how Comodo stacks up to the rest.
100% Agree!!!
Moreover, AVIRA AntiVir Personal
has NOT protection against Spyware and Adware as shown at:
http://free-av.com/en/products/1/avira_antivir_personal__free_antivirus....
av-comparatives.org seems to be independent in the first place.
However,they some obsession with ESET Nod32.
Look at the Summary Report 2008.
Although AVIRA AntiVir PREMIUM Edition
was the Top AV for the Year 2008,
they kept promoting ESET Nod32.
However, ESET Nod32 version 3
proved one of the worst AVs during 2008!
ESET Nod32 version 3 presented a major weakness in
Detecting and Removing Spyware!
Although ESET Nod32 version 2.7 was a legendary AV,
ESET Nod32 version 3 has a failure!
Throughout entire 2008 comparatives, av-comparatives.org
treated ESET Nod32 nicely when the product kept going from
bad to worse!
Anyway, I believe that av-test.com is, by far, a reliable AV Tester!!!
Better than av-comparatives.org!!!
top firewall,better than most, but popups will drive you mad.davy
Comodo AV was tested by AV-Test in the latest German PC Games Hardware magazine (01/2009) and apparently scored 25-30% in total, it finished last, way behind ClamWin.
However, a new CIS beta is out which includes heuristics, and according to Comodo, they have tested it and it detects 99% of what AntiVir and Kaspersky detects.
It looks to me like the independent testing pretty much verifies the list recommended here, but it is that 1 virus that gets through that can make your day go bad. The best thing I ever did was to buy Acronis True Image and run a backup everyday. My comp is so old that I just cant run full time AV plus Crapware detection and Acronis has saved me from a few Crapware incidents lately. It's just a home comp, so if I lose a day it's not a big deal. Acronis also has a Try and Decide Service (Virtual Mode) that works excellent at the cost of only 4mb of ram. If this were a work comp, I would go ahead and pay for NOD32 also.
Any body knows something about PC TOOLS AV ?
It uses the VirusBuster engine with some enhancements. VirusBuster isn't that great in detection though.
Thanks for the information, it's appreciated.
kept freezing computer,could not even move mouse to log off.pity looks good.davy
Phobos:
You're exactly right----evidence is imperative in making informed decisions---I agree with you 100% on this.
However, you have to 'compare apples with apples' here; your weblink to av-camparitives.org is great---but it compares PAID versions of the antivirus programs. I was not able to locate the av-compatives.org link for evidence-based comparison of the FREE versions of antivirus programs. One cannot expect the FREE versions of the programs to measure up to the PAID versions---that's why they are FREE.
Please provide the av-comparitives.org link (or a similar one) that provides legitimate testing of the FREE programs and then your argument will 'hold water.'
I used PC Tools AV for over a year with excellent results as far as reliability was concerned. It had only manual updates, but they were incremental so times to download were short. I don't know much about its actual abilities as it never flagged a piece of malware or virus in the whole time I used it (to be fair, SuperAntiSpyware only flagged one or two pieces in that time). I used it (it has an "Intelliguard" to block malware from installing) along with Spyware Terminator and the Avorax Shield, so perhaps there was nothing to find.
There's precious little info in PCTools AV, and I eventually went with Avast because I at least knew its track record from various sites on the web.
Hope it helps!
One thing I'll add regarding my post on PCTools AV is that their support forum seems to take forever to register you should you wish to post on an issue. I registered on two different occasions months back and STILL never received permission to post. Since I switched to Avast, it was really no issue, but I thought I'd mention it for potential PCTools users.
AV-Comparatives doesn't usually test free products. But the detection rates that AV-Comparatives show for the paid versions is very similar to the free versions anyway, because AV-Comparatives does not test the products against spyware.
Avast seems to be fast; but it hinders my system performance.
For example, when I install a program, my system can't access the file, and ask me if I want to retry. Retry, Retry, Retry, ect.
This never happened before I put Avast om my system. It seems to hinder or slow down access to files. Causing my system to act funky.
It is not just my computer. My neighbor has it on his computer and it acts the same way his computer too.
I am seriously looking for a different free anti-virus to put on my system.
I might even go back to Avira AntiVir.
Cole Manager: You have 65 minutes to take the FCC GROL test.
Student: May I have a lifeline please.
I recommend you to take a look here: http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/six-months-free-avira-antivir-pr...
Does anybody have any idea when comodo will submit its AV for testing.
Probably when they are confident that they will do well. They are not yet confident in their AV product. If you look through their forums they even say that you should use other well rated products to compliment their AV as it is not yet up to standards. Hopefully after this 3.8 beta. Hope that helps.
thank you and one last question when will 3.8 beta be out