Gizmo's Freeware is Recruiting

Gizmos Needs YouWe are looking for people with skills or interest in the following:
- Mobile Platform App Reviews for Android and iOS
- Anonymous Surfing Service
- Rootkit Scanner and Remover
- Streaming Media Recorder
- PDF Writer
                    Interested? Click here

 

Best Free Antivirus Software

Other Language?
  Read this article in Spanish
  Read this article in Chinese
 
In a Hurry?
  Go straight to the Quick Selection Guide
 
Introduction

Antivirus software provides an essential layer of protection from a multitude of virus, trojan, worm, spyware, adware, dialer, keylogger and rootkit infections. Traditionally antivirus programs just detected viruses and spyware removers just detected spyware but nowadays the boundary between antivirus and spyware removers is unclear. Most current antiviruses have at least reasonably good detection rates of all forms of malware.

Malware includes viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, adware, dialers, keyloggers and rootkit threats that perform malicious activities on a computer. With the huge increase in malware, antivirus software cannot keep up with detecting all of it. Despite vendor's claims, no single antivirus solution, or indeed any one security software, can be relied upon for total protection without safe surfing and computing practices. But using more than one real-time antivirus uses much more system resources, can cause conflicts and even reduce protection. So I recommend you only choose one antivirus for real-time protection. Instead, you can increase your protection using other security software; for more information check out our Security Wizard.

I looked at several free antivirus programs which are vital in protecting your computer from virus threats and other types of malware.

 
Discussion

Avast! Free AntivirusAvast! Free Antivirus is my new top pick for the best free antivirus software in light of recent developments. Avast has steadily been improving its detection rates over the past few years and now ranks with the some of the best. Avast has the most features of all the free antivirus with full real-time capabilities including web, e-mail, IM, P2P and network shields, boot-time scanning, and a behavioural blocker. Version 6 brought even more features including an internet site ratings plugin, script malware protection and a limited (non-configurable) sandboxing feature. It's arguable whether their ratings plugin offers comparable levels to WOT, but the script malware protection can prevent certain browser exploits, a feature not available in any of the other free AV's. Although the sandbox is a very useful semi-automated security feature, the default settings involves a pop up to ask whether a software should be sandboxed for not - for the typical average user this can be slightly confusing though it can set to sandbox the software automatically. Avast is also relatively light on resources. Note that Avast requires a free registration to function after 30 days.

Microsoft Security EssentialsMicrosoft Security Essentials is a favorite of mine with great detection rates, particularly for rootkits. Even more impressive is the fact that Microsoft Security Essentials has very few false positives, is light on resources and is good at removal of existing malware. MSE is a great choice for average users because of the minimal user interaction required. It automatically updates and removes threats. No registration is needed, apart from a quick validating of Windows, and there are no nag screens or advertisements.

The main downsides are the slow scan speeds and the lengthy amount of time it takes to quarantine malware, though in my opinion these are rather trivial concerns, as for example a scan just be run overnight. MSE also is not available in certain countries so users there will have to look elsewhere. Note that Microsoft Security Essentials requires a genuine copy of Windows to install.

Panda Cloud AntivirusPanda Cloud Antivirus is Panda's successful attempt to jump on the free antivirus bandwagon. Along with MSE, it is an excellent choice for average users with a simple interface and completely automated features with automatic updating and removal of malware. The detection level is generally very high, but according to the latest test data, detection of zero day threats is slightly lower. PCA uses 'cloud' technology to provide for a much quicker release of updates as all definitions are stored in the cloud and thus the moment Panda updates their blacklist all users of PCA with an internet connection are protected from it. 

Panda Cloud Antivirus has a behavioural blocker and web protection, which will certainly increase your security. However as you can simply use one of the other free AV's with a separate behavioural blocker (for further details see our Security Wizard) to achieve possibly even better protection, this is not necessarily an advantage.

One minor reservation I have is that PCA seems to erroneously detect certain browser/system-related applications, for example VideoCacheView, and because of the automatic quarantine this made it a fraction bothersome.

Avira AntiVir Personal EditionAvira AntiVir Personal Edition is another high quality free antivirus, and formerly the Top Pick. The primary reason I removed it from its status involved the recent controversy of AntiVir including a re-branded Ask toolbar in their installer, and a temporary spate of advertisements promoting a possible 'scareware' company. In spite of the negative press though AntiVir is still a top notch antivirus scanner with outstanding detection rates of malware, higher than almost every other antivirus according to tests. AntiVir is still a good choice for a free antivirus scanner, particularly for high risk users.

However, there are some minor reservations. First, AntiVir does not include web or e-mail scanning capabilities; this is only available in the paid version. The lack of an e-mail scanner is not a disadvantage, it just means that AntiVir won't warn you of infected emails before you open them. But should you open an infected email, AntiVir will still spring into action, so it doesn't mean that you're not protected from email-based infections. Also, AntiVir contains a rather intrusive advertisement every time it updates. Although AntiVir had signature updating problems in the past, this issue seems to be fixed now.

AVG Anti-Virus Free EditionAVG Anti-Virus Free Edition is also a decent choice for a free antivirus. Although this venerable antivirus has had some shaky results in detection in the recent past, it now offers a high level of protection. This is probably due to the inclusion of a fully-fledged behavioural blocker that is the "Identity Protection" protection. This provides a very important additional layer of protection, on the other hand though a similar protection level can be achieved by using one of the free antivirus above alongside a separate behavioural blocker. Unfortunately AVG free has grown considerably in size, has very slow scan speeds and also advertisements (but they can be disabled).

These free antivirus programs are excellent software that provide a real alternative to the major commercial antivirus products.

Please help us by rating this review

 
Related Products and Links
Related Free Antivirus Software Articles

Related Security Articles

Antivirus Reviews and Testing Sites

 
Tags

free antivirus, antivirus software, antivirus download, best antivirus software, anti-virus, anti-virus software, avast antivirus, avira antivirus, microsoft antivirus, free anti virus, anti virus software.

 
Have Your Say

Please visit our freeware forum to share and discuss your views and get advice on free security software, including antivirus software. To post in the forum you need to register first but that's quick and immediate.

 
Quick Selection Guide

Avast! Free Antivirus
9
 
Gizmo's Freeware award as the best product in its class!

Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Top pick for best free antivirus program, full real-time capabilities, behavioural blocking features, script malware protection, low rate of false positives
default settings requires certain user interaction
8.0.1482
105.42 MB
32 bit but 64 bit compatible
Feature limited freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 2000 - Windows 7, Mac OS
Microsoft Security Essentials
9
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Very low rate of false positives, easy to use
Detection rates slightly lower than AntiVir, slow scanning
4.2.223.1
13 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Unrestricted freeware
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows XP - Windows 7
Avira AntiVir Personal Edition
9
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Outstanding detection of malware
Nag screen
13.0.0.3640
97.5 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Free for private use only
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 2000 - Windows 7
Panda Cloud Antivirus
9
 
Combines a web service with a stand-alone program
High detection rate of malware, web protection, some behavioural blocker features
Detection rates of real-world malware is slightly lower
http://www.cloudantivirus.com
2.0
33.08 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Free for private use only
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows XP - Windows 7
AVG Anti-Virus Free
8
 
Runs as a stand-alone program on a user's computer
Behavioural blocker
Slightly lower signature detection rates
2013.0.2899
118.78 MB
32 and 64 bit versions available
Free for private use only
There is no portable version of this product available.
Windows 2000 - Windows 7

Forum for support

 
Editor
This category is maintained by volunteer editor JonathanT.
 
Tags

free antivirus, best free antivirus, free antivirus programs, free antivirus program, antivirus software, free antivirus software,  antivirus program free, anti-virus programs, antivirus scanner, best antiviros, best antvirus

Back to the top of the article

 

Share this
4.338875
Average: 4.3 (1744 votes)
Your rating: None

Comments

by Anonymous on 11. January 2009 - 23:42  (13661)

OK then, how about this for chucking some petrol onto the fire. Some time back I worked out (roughly - I'm not completely sick!) what percentage of my PC usage time was spent mothering my tribal collection of security applications.
Then I added into that the "worry factor" associated with my surfing habbits. Most of you will identify with that "feeling" you get when something doesn't go just right and you wonder what will happen during the next boot! In summary I chucked out Windows and installed Linux. Would have liked OpenSUSE but opted in the end for Ubuntu as being a more friendly transition. Whatever malware does exist for linux will invariably need root priviliges to run and the forums advise that anti-virus's are just not necessary. I run a GUI just to give a graphical interface to the pre-installed IP tables (firewall) and that's it. No worries - and much more time spent surfing! Just a thought.

by Anonymous on 12. January 2009 - 10:13  (13702)

I'm also thinking of throwing Windows away and installing Ubuntu.
The problem is that Linux does NOT offer a user
the variety of programs Windows do.
In terms of security, Linux is, by far, more secure.

by Anonymous on 13. January 2009 - 12:31  (13807)

I need to know if any of the Non-Portable ones have a seperate database update...Cause I update on i-cafe's due to dial-up...

by Anonymous on 13. January 2009 - 12:31  (13808)

Me Again, my email is chadrizard3@gmail.com

I really need to know...

by Anonymous on 13. January 2009 - 12:56  (13810)

I know that Antivir Avira does

by Anonymous on 13. January 2009 - 15:37  (13819)

Potential users of Avast may be comforted to know that there are several very good skins which can replace the (admittedly confusing)default interface. The "MacLover's" interface in particular is an excellent and well laid-out skin that would offer little to confuse the average user. All are available for free download on the Avast home site.

Regards.

by Anonymous on 13. January 2009 - 21:35  (13842)

For an "On Demand" scanner I suggest "online" scans. They are all free. One week scan with Norton, NOD32 the next, Bit Defender and then ? In the course of a month you will have scanned with 5 or 6 of the best. I don't think anyone is good enough to hid from their combined searches.

by Anonymous on 17. January 2009 - 12:41  (14081)

avast! Home Edition 4.8 has the same detection rates as pro, just pro has some more features, is faster at on-demand scanning, and uses less RAM and doesn't use as much processing usage

by compgenius999 on 17. January 2009 - 13:13  (14083)

If you want protection, you should get Avast! Home Edition, it is free and offers protection that even most paid anti-viruses don't give you it, such as a web shield to block the viruses from even reaching your computer, i've only seen something like that in KIS 2009, but avast is better than that, it includes IM and P2P protection, so you don't get infected in the first place, and a boot time scanner, i don't think ANY anti-virus has ever included that, only avast, so if you want free protection, then just get avast, its free and hasn't missed any viruses on my computer yet, and to anybody who hates the interface of avast: you NEVER need to open the interface, only time you need to open it is to activate it, and if the real-time protection was disabled for some reason. avast's real-time protection can already handle most viruses/spyware/adware/malware

by Phobos on 18. January 2009 - 1:20  (14122)

It's a bit funny reading through these posts, but it's actually quite a bit more annoying. Computer security is very important, but all I see here is "I think", "Personally I believe", "I recommend", "It sucks", and every other opinion that may or may not mean anything to anybody. What I don't see is any evidence to back up any of these claims. Today all that ends and you will have something new to argue about.
Here it is, actual independent testing of AV software:
http://www.av-comparatives.org/
Also on that site are links to other independent software testing sites:
http://www.av-comparatives.org/forum/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=6
After reading some of the PDF docs on how testing is conducted, let me say this. "I personally believe that the info doesn't suck and I highly recommend studying the independent testing process. After evaluating the process and forming your own opinion, I personally believe and recommend that we should all meet here tomorrow and argue about how wrong everybody is." But that's just my opinion.

by Anonymous on 18. January 2009 - 9:42  (14136)

I've looked at those, but they just can't compare to real world experience. Everyone seem s to have an option I know, some opinions are better than others.

There are two major things to look for in an Antivirus, First is detection rates, and the other is scanning speed. Now everyone seems very familiar with the first, but not as familiar with the second. Scanning speed, and how your antivirus affects your system performance is very important. Take a system with a clean windows install on it, and no antivirus, and it will fly. You'll be amazed at the difference in the performance and snapyness of the system. Then you put antivirus on it, and the system slows down. Why, because everything you do is getting scanned for viruses. Everything now has to go through that scanner. If that scanner is slow then your system is going to be slow.

Now the problem that I have with the tests that you linked to is that it says that several antivirus that I know have slow scanning speeds have fast scanning speeds. Even the reviews here contradict these tests. The test says that AVG has fast scanning speeds, but here its says AVG "has very slow scan speeds".

I have used avast for years. I use it on all the computers that I work on. All the computers that my family all use avast. Its not perfect, but it the best FREE solution that I know of.

by giantjoebot on 18. January 2009 - 9:48  (14137)

Along with some other people on here I would like to know how Comodo stacks up to the rest.

by Anonymous on 18. January 2009 - 10:30  (14142)

100% Agree!!!

Moreover, AVIRA AntiVir Personal

has NOT protection against Spyware and Adware as shown at:

http://free-av.com/en/products/1/avira_antivir_personal__free_antivirus....

by Anonymous on 18. January 2009 - 10:45  (14144)

av-comparatives.org seems to be independent in the first place.
However,they some obsession with ESET Nod32.

Look at the Summary Report 2008.
Although AVIRA AntiVir PREMIUM Edition
was the Top AV for the Year 2008,
they kept promoting ESET Nod32.

However, ESET Nod32 version 3
proved one of the worst AVs during 2008!

ESET Nod32 version 3 presented a major weakness in
Detecting and Removing Spyware!

Although ESET Nod32 version 2.7 was a legendary AV,
ESET Nod32 version 3 has a failure!

Throughout entire 2008 comparatives, av-comparatives.org
treated ESET Nod32 nicely when the product kept going from
bad to worse!

Anyway, I believe that av-test.com is, by far, a reliable AV Tester!!!
Better than av-comparatives.org!!!

by Anonymous on 18. January 2009 - 11:49  (14150)

top firewall,better than most, but popups will drive you mad.davy

by JonathanT on 18. January 2009 - 12:54  (14154)

Comodo AV was tested by AV-Test in the latest German PC Games Hardware magazine (01/2009) and apparently scored 25-30% in total, it finished last, way behind ClamWin.

However, a new CIS beta is out which includes heuristics, and according to Comodo, they have tested it and it detects 99% of what AntiVir and Kaspersky detects.

by Phobos on 18. January 2009 - 15:02  (14159)

It looks to me like the independent testing pretty much verifies the list recommended here, but it is that 1 virus that gets through that can make your day go bad. The best thing I ever did was to buy Acronis True Image and run a backup everyday. My comp is so old that I just cant run full time AV plus Crapware detection and Acronis has saved me from a few Crapware incidents lately. It's just a home comp, so if I lose a day it's not a big deal. Acronis also has a Try and Decide Service (Virtual Mode) that works excellent at the cost of only 4mb of ram. If this were a work comp, I would go ahead and pay for NOD32 also.

by Anonymous on 19. January 2009 - 3:06  (14175)

Any body knows something about PC TOOLS AV ?

by JonathanT on 19. January 2009 - 4:09  (14181)

It uses the VirusBuster engine with some enhancements. VirusBuster isn't that great in detection though.

by JonathanT on 19. January 2009 - 9:34  (14188)

Thanks for the information, it's appreciated.

by Anonymous on 19. January 2009 - 10:34  (14189)

kept freezing computer,could not even move mouse to log off.pity looks good.davy

by Anonymous on 19. January 2009 - 16:16  (14216)

Phobos:
You're exactly right----evidence is imperative in making informed decisions---I agree with you 100% on this.

However, you have to 'compare apples with apples' here; your weblink to av-camparitives.org is great---but it compares PAID versions of the antivirus programs. I was not able to locate the av-compatives.org link for evidence-based comparison of the FREE versions of antivirus programs. One cannot expect the FREE versions of the programs to measure up to the PAID versions---that's why they are FREE.

Please provide the av-comparitives.org link (or a similar one) that provides legitimate testing of the FREE programs and then your argument will 'hold water.'

by Anonymous on 19. January 2009 - 18:18  (14226)

I used PC Tools AV for over a year with excellent results as far as reliability was concerned. It had only manual updates, but they were incremental so times to download were short. I don't know much about its actual abilities as it never flagged a piece of malware or virus in the whole time I used it (to be fair, SuperAntiSpyware only flagged one or two pieces in that time). I used it (it has an "Intelliguard" to block malware from installing) along with Spyware Terminator and the Avorax Shield, so perhaps there was nothing to find.

There's precious little info in PCTools AV, and I eventually went with Avast because I at least knew its track record from various sites on the web.

Hope it helps!

by Anonymous on 19. January 2009 - 18:27  (14228)

One thing I'll add regarding my post on PCTools AV is that their support forum seems to take forever to register you should you wish to post on an issue. I registered on two different occasions months back and STILL never received permission to post. Since I switched to Avast, it was really no issue, but I thought I'd mention it for potential PCTools users.

by JonathanT on 20. January 2009 - 0:15  (14243)

AV-Comparatives doesn't usually test free products. But the detection rates that AV-Comparatives show for the paid versions is very similar to the free versions anyway, because AV-Comparatives does not test the products against spyware.

by Anonymous on 21. January 2009 - 20:55  (14343)

Avast seems to be fast; but it hinders my system performance.

For example, when I install a program, my system can't access the file, and ask me if I want to retry. Retry, Retry, Retry, ect.

This never happened before I put Avast om my system. It seems to hinder or slow down access to files. Causing my system to act funky.

It is not just my computer. My neighbor has it on his computer and it acts the same way his computer too.

I am seriously looking for a different free anti-virus to put on my system.

I might even go back to Avira AntiVir.

Cole Manager: You have 65 minutes to take the FCC GROL test.
Student: May I have a lifeline please.

by J_L on 25. January 2009 - 8:03  (14653)
by Anonymous on 26. January 2009 - 3:21  (14696)

Does anybody have any idea when comodo will submit its AV for testing.

by Anonymous on 27. January 2009 - 4:19  (14760)

Probably when they are confident that they will do well. They are not yet confident in their AV product. If you look through their forums they even say that you should use other well rated products to compliment their AV as it is not yet up to standards. Hopefully after this 3.8 beta. Hope that helps.

by Anonymous on 27. January 2009 - 22:30  (14826)

thank you and one last question when will 3.8 beta be out